scrobble.life
#writing

What Would YOU Do With 100,000 Steem Power?

whattodo.png

steemlinedivider.png

What Would You Do?

People often talk about what they would have done if things were different, or if they hade been given the opportunity and things like that. People talk about change and how things should be or could've been. Personal opinions, behaviour, goals and lifestyles varies, just as people's stake. However, if you had 100,000 Steem Power, what would you do?


In case a user close to or at 100K+ SP happens to read this, feel free to tell me what you are doing, and/or what you would've done if you had 500K or 1 million Steem Power instead.


100k.png


I am not looking for any type of fantasy stories or things you believe I (or someone wealthy) would like to hear. I want to hear genuine ideas and thoughts. Things you honestly believe that you would do if you had 100,000 Steem Power.

  • What would you do?

I love to daydream and I often think about things that never or probably never will happen, 100K Steem Power is one of those things. I'm not saying that it's impossible, because it's not. But I don't think that I will ever reach that amount. And honestly, 100K isn't that exaggerated and it would make a huge difference.

The first thing I would do, or the first thing I think I would do, is to stop voting on my own content. I am not against self-votes in general, even though I wouldn't appreciate the biggest whales to vote for themselves multiple times per day. I find that sort of behaviour greedy and selfish, but I vote on my own content now, and I will probably do it in the future as well. You see, I vote for my own content because it becomes sort of a guarantee for myself to earn something. It's different for wealthier accounts.

They get tons of exposure due to the size of their wallets, so I would not vote on my own content if I had 100K Steem Power. Anything I wrote or did would attract tons of people and I would receive hundreds of upvotes from others, so it wouldn't be necessary to self-vote.

If I stopped to self-vote, I would also have "extra" votes to reward other users with. I can totally see how this might sound like some sort of hypocrisy or whatever, as I self-vote today. The only answer I have is that I need a guarantee to earn something when I share content. If I had 100,000 Steem Power, the actual size of my account would be the only guarantee I needed. I would be rewarded more than I am today and the only difference is the actual size of my account. People often support and interact with wealthier accounts automatically because its an attempt to taste the crumbs they might spread on their audience.

Anyhow, the increased support I would get, based on what I wrote above, would also be the reason for me to stop self-voting.

steemlinedivider.png

This leads to the second thing I would do, or the second thing I think I would do, if I had 100,000 Steem Power. I would most likely curate differently. First of all, I would put all my focus on users close to 500 SP. I would probably not upvote any content from any other users, except for the people I have on my autolist and/or users I have frequently upvoted for a long period of time.

However, this would most likely be time limited, in the sense that I would focus on users close to 500 SP for 2 weeks and "ignore" them for the next 2 weeks after that to focus on whoever I wanted to support.

I can see why this might be a bad approach, and I can totally understand that some people, especially those who would automatically be ignored, would dislike that sort of discrimination. However, I would have to "find my own way", and as I currently believe that a strong middle class is a must have for STEEM to ever flourish, I would prioritize users close to 500 Steem Power before anything else.

I would probably change the Minnow-ASAP project a bit, and take on 10 or perhaps 20 users in total and push them into Minnowhood. Once they had reached that goal, I would take on new users again.

Even though we have projects and initiatives out there who already focus on minnow-making, I would definitely focus on building a middle class. My entire stake would be going straight towards "soon-to-be-minnow" users. And I would get a new title on STEEM. - Mmm... Minnow-Making Machine.

steemlinedivider.png

The third thing I would do, is to donate more to charity and to those in need. I'm not talking about giving away money to any of the beggars I get DMs from on Discord. But real charity projects. Donate to help kids get new stuff for School etc. Help someone to get food for the week or pay a bill. Things like that. I would basically just try to do more than what I have done.

So... My question is:

What Would You Do?

Comments · 8

  • @juxtapozed(49)· 2708d

    I would dance in happiness because Now I have power and staring at that SP for a days just to make sure it is really 100.000.000 SP .. LOL.

    First.. I will delegate 30k to @steemcommunity, the 30K to @steem-indo and use the rest of it to empower the any minnow wanna be through upvote and easy contest like "what's your next challenge?".

    Uhmm.. maybe I will cash it out about 500 steem to buy starter deck and give it away😁

  • @glenalbrethsen(71)· 2710d

    Hey, @hitmeasap.

    I'm happy with the way I'm doing things now, and 100,000 SP wouldn't change things for me that much. A 100% upvote of $2.75-ish is definitely more than I am able to give out now, but I don't give out a lot of those as it is. That could be one of the changes I make, maybe more 100% upvotes, but I would still end up spreading my upvotes around as much as I can as a manual curator.

    I don't think I would change who I'm upvoting, either, as I end up upvoting mostly plankton and minnows, with a few dolphins here and there. I don't think I would concentrate on anyone in particular, but would do it based on who I judged should get one on their posts and comments.

    I know it's being commonly put out there that the minnows are the middle class, and we need more of them, but I'm more inclined to say the middle class is actually higher up. A minnow of 500 SP really isn't middle class in my mind. Someone in the 3000 SP range and up is definitely closer, though.

    So, anyway, since you were asking, I thought I would share my thoughts. I wouldn't delegate out (I'd rather support those I want to support directly and earn curation rewards since I wouldn't want to charge), and I wouldn't start self-upvoting since I don't do it now.

    What else? I think that's it. Spread my upvote out but maintain some decent upvote amounts, drop at least 100% upvote every day, and keep curating what I think to be content that adds value to the STEEM platform.

  • @newageinv(74)· 2712d

    I have to admit I have the same thoughts as I have grown my account and taken similar approaches. I don’t feel that we need to be at 100k to do some of these either. I just completed my first month with no self votes and have found that I got more support and thus did not lose out for making that choice. The only thing I would add is that I would use any extra SP above 100k to delegate to value creating projects.

    Posted using Partiko iOS

  • @bashadow(70)· 2712d

    I honestly do not think I would change. I would still vote primarily at the 50% level, and still for 15-20 post a day. I have a few people I give 100% votes to, and everyone else gets 50%. I am always happy with any vote I get, but not all votes are the same. I may not be "happier" with a big vote, and then again I may be. If it is a vote from someone I follow and like, or from someone that is known for being nice, yes I would be very much more happier with a big vote from them. (I once got a $10.00 vote from @grumpycat, I kind of miss his views and view points on steemit).

    So being able to give out a $1.20/$2.40 vote to the people I follow, the tags I follow, I think that would be fantastic. Yes I could lower the percentage and spread the net wider, but I like the tags I follow, and the post under those tags. I do save some votes for new post or people I have not voted on before, but spreading the vote to thin is not me.

    Lets say a small town needed a new water treatment plant, it was a town of 30,000 people. Building this treatment plant would cost 30,000,000 dollars. Someone with big pockets give every resident 1,000 dollars to build the water treatment plant, but they do not need to use the money for that purpose, it is just suggested. Do you think that $1,000 in hand now to fix the bathtub, or the car or the what ever, would not out weigh the water treatment plant?

    I know the tags would end up being flooded, but I would be careful about the votes I gave out. When I run real short on Vote Power I have dropped to 25%, ant that is what it was asked for the #tenkminnows boosting post. Featuring 20 people at a time that would be 5 full power votes, a pretty good guide to help build and still leave votes for my regular accounts.

    So I guess, no real change in how I do things, I just do not think I would have time to find more that the 15-20 post a day.

  • @cryptogee(76)· 2712d

    What I did last time I had a lot of SP, run competitions that hopefully enhance the platform.

    Cg

  • @abitcoinskeptic(75)· 2712d

    Same thing I do now. Hodl and Preach the Steem gospel. I would probably slow down my accumulation, too. Settle for 25% growth and do more events to help with distribution. I may also stop powering up unless I can pay people steem to do my bidding.

    Posted using Partiko Android

  • @wolfhart(63)· 2712d

    1/3 Delegated to different community projects

    1/3 delegated to grow my account

    1/3 for me to self curate just like I do now 😊

  • @foxkoit(76)· 2712d

    I would finance it so I can go see the world and do a big photo book after that.