scrobble.life
#committee

Announcing the Delegation Committee

Hello Steemians, last week we announced our new Delegation Application Process. As we disclosed in that announcement, one of the exciting changes included with this new process is that it will be overseen by an independent committee. We are now excited to announce the members of this committee.

The Goal

Before we get to the committee members we want to go into a little more detail about the thought process behind their appointment. Our goal with these changes is to make the process of delegating our stake more decentralized, transparent, and fair. But we also want to make sure that the process is fast and efficient. That’s why we’ve decided to appoint committee members that we believe already have the trust of the community because they have demonstrated long-term commitment to the Steem blockchain.

These are community members who have not been afraid to speak truth to power, while always remaining a force for progress by facilitating consensus. We also did our best to select a Committee with a diverse set of skills, including (but not limited to) real-world business experience, marketing talent, and development expertise.

Independence

The Committee will be tasked with delivering a list of account names and delegation tiers to Steemit, Inc., which will then distribute the delegations according to the determination of the Committee. Steemit will, ideally, not exert any influence over the Committee. But this is our Steem Power, and as such, we do reserve the right to reject a recommendation made by the Committee that represents a danger to the Steem blockchain, or to Steemit, Inc.

Just because we intend to defer to the judgment of the Committee members, that does not mean that more people can’t be involved in their decision-making process. The Committee is free to involve anyone they like in this process as long as the goal remains to distribute delegations in a way that both stimulates economic growth while maintaining the confidence of the community.

With that being said, we would like to introduce you to the members of the Committee.

delcommittee.jpg

@aggroed

aggroed modded.jpg

Dr. Blair “aggroed” Reich is a PhD chemist out of Texas A&M University who spent 10 years working for startups and giant conglomerates leading sales initiatives to committees of chemistry academics who were making software curriculum choices for their courses.

He co-founded and organizes the Peace, Abundance, and Liberty Network discord group, MSP-Waves, Steem Monsters (a blockchain based digital trading card game) and leads the sales and marketing efforts of the game. With ~2200 daily active players it’s one of the most popular crypto games on the market with the most active NFT marketplace in the world. The game accounts for just under 20% of total on-chain activity for the Steem blockchain, and has grown to nearly $2.5 million in market capitalization after 1 year in business.

He co-founded and leads steem-engine.com, a platform for creating communities and trading assets on the Steem blockchain. It has lead to millions of Steem being powered up, 20 different “tribes” forming, and ranges from thousands to over a hundred thousand dollars in volume in any given day. The base trading pair is STEEM, which brings additional utility to it, and the exchange currently has over 600,000 liquid STEEM held by traders.

Aggroed is a consensus witness on the Steem blockchain and focuses on community development, spreading STEEM into new hands, and keeping people engaged on the blockchain.

@starkerz

Screen Shot 2019-07-22 at 11.01.11 AM.png

Matt Starkey is a chartered mechanical engineer (CEng) and project manager, he has lived and worked all over the world managing multi-billion dollar industrial projects. Matt became a blockchain and cryptocurrency investor and enthusiast in April 2013. Having made successful investments in blockchain and the cryptocurrency markets, Matt has a multitude of positive and cautionary experiences that will help inform his decision-making process as a Committee member.

Matt has applied blockchain technology with his partners to set up several start up platforms:

  • Andre Gray’s Football Academy – a transparent charitable giving model for young aspiring footballers in disadvantaged countries backed by the Premiership football player Andre Gray of Watford Football Club
  • Oracle-D a blockchain backed content creation platform with over 300 professional authors and content creators
  • DCORE a community investment platform working in partnership with hedge fund KMG Capital which hosts 100’s of analysts to review financial assets with starting capital of $10M
  • 3Speak a video and content platform that advocates free speech and uses a mechanism which combines several blockchains to store and monetise marginalised content creator's content.
  • Promo-Steem: the world's first decentralized promotional network

@eonwarped

Screen Shot 2019-07-22 at 10.23.49 AM.png

@eonwarped is a full-stack developer with five years of experience, working full-time for a large tech company. There he does mostly backend software development, spanning many components in a large, latency-sensitive system. Prior to that, he completed a mathematics PhD at New York University.

He has contributed to projects such as TokenBB, Steemit Condenser UI, and Steem Keychain. He also develops and runs the Steem Engine Nitrous Custom UI for 20 different tokens/tribes. He has written various technical posts concerning the inner workings of the Steem blockchain including posts about SBD mechanics and the voting system. He is also actively helping to test Hardfork 21 by offering a testnet condenser/wallet pair that is running on-demand which makes it easier for anyone to test the hardfork.

Only the Beginning

This is still only the beginning of the process of developing a better system for allocating Steemit, Inc.’s delegated Steem Power. Now that we have selected a Committee, we want to empower these people to develop their own system for determining what projects deserve delegations and how big those delegations should be.

We believe that the top priorities should be speed (coming to a consensus on how delegations should be redistributed as soon as possible) and transparency (ensuring that Steem stakeholders feel informed about the process). But again, we will not influence the Committee, so the decision-making process will ultimately be up to them.

The Steemit Team

Comments · 54

  • @arifullah(43)· 2578d

    I agree that no one acting as a representative for this program should be allowed to have ownership in projects receiving benefits from the program. That is just a logical rule.

  • @brianturner(68)· 2584d

    Big support for Aggroed, he's the best

  • @felixxx(73)· 2584d

    Den Bock zum Gärtner machen.

    To let the dog watch the sausage.

  • @offgridlife(74)· 2585d

    Awesome. Great choices. I hope this will help Steem go back to $8 soon. Maybe I will start buying some cheap steem.... ready for the MOON..... . Go steem Go.

  • @whyaskwhy(56)· 2585d

    Great guys, the trio , the moderate the delegation process!! But my little misgivings is why hamstring them , by vetting their recommendations as intended??

    To avaoid human errors of judgement and undue favouritism as some has suspected in @sterkerz, the number of the committee could be extended to neutralize errors of judgement!!

    In all, the results shall bring about a new watershed in the journey of steemit block chain !!

    Bravo to the committee!!

  • @pandamama(69)· 2585d

    Personally, I'm happy with the choices made . I have met @aggroed over the radio and found him very upright as with @starkers whom I have met personally in Cyprus and having followed him in the early days and seeing the work that he did travelling the country and promoting Steemit - he worked exceptionally hard for Steemit and deserves a lot more recognition

  • @elmarnis(59)· 2585d

    THANK YOU

  • @isnochys(67)· 2585d

    The best corruption capitalism can buy. Lol :)

  • @honusurf(62)· 2585d

    Every time I try and use steemd.com to look up my comments and stuff, they never seem to appear anymore, & I get this message below instead:

    7E405D1C-DA63-4647-9AAF-35608DA84FD7.jpeg

    And then I always get this message too!

    I also always run into this message below! 0DE2C0A9-1503-4BBB-8383-A2C386435979.jpeg #Time for me to stop voting for them for witness, I think they are corrupt! Must be the global blacklist or something else going on! CADE110B-13A3-43D4-8A6E-D27D5BBBC83C.jpeg

    I only vote for 2 witnesses, now this new removal will take me down to one! Un-Voting @steemd in the morning if my stuff is still broken! I will add @parriko for witness to replace @steemd! This is getting ridiculous, there is not going to be any way for me to access my account any more if everybody keeps blocking me like this! #onmyown! Seriously this is all @themarkymark’s fault! He’s the one doing all this to me, slandering me calling me the troll. Truth is he’s way worse than me, and he is the real troll! Just go look at the vote history and see how irresponsible he is flagging all my posts for months. Pretty soon I’m just going to concentrate on downvoting everybody who votes for @themarkymark for witness, no excuses! I’m going to start making my list!

    Also anybody I see voting for him will be eligible for my downvote too! I don’t know what else to do but try to get rid of him as a witness! So if anybody out there wants to help, just make sure you don’t vote for @themarkymark for witness! That would help me a lot! Here is an example below from today. 9404650E-CC50-4E71-A2A2-A62BADF22A37.png

    Someone send me a list of everyone voting for markymark! I’m going to have to go after them one by one! Heres another:

    E2CE5126-E250-4FC9-A5A4-6E7EE19ED6DA.png And another: 3645547A-9032-41DF-A4F8-85E94DB5A042.png I downvote people, but not like this, this is different. Here’s another: F229D5BC-8EBD-47C0-9A17-4225B25A265A.png This is why I downvote anyone talking to him! Here’s another one: 3AE7E91E-09CF-4C17-8825-3D33CB2C89EC.png He’s the problem troll here, not me! I’m just defending myself! Get rid if him whatever it takes! Somebody do something about that maniac! I’m not giving in. I could go on all night with these screenshots, but I’m tired and have to fo to bed now! Good night! Ok I guess I got time for one more, he even downvotes my sunset photography: 1FC711B8-DA1C-498A-9605-96A38A17BFDB.png In the morning I’m just going to add more and just keep posting this over and over every single day as the list grows until somebody helps me out and listens! Goodnight!

    Follow @coininstant for more!

  • @lordbutterfly(80)· 2587d

    Id say this is a good move. Each one of these guys deserves to be in this position. A conflict of interest? Sure. Maybe. But i dont really care.

    I care about right people doing right things.

    Posted using Partiko Android

  • @smooth(74)· 2588d

    I think anyone with an interest in a project (or any directly competing project) under consideration for delegation should step away from any decisions. This likely calls for a somewhat larger committee, or perhaps reserve/backup members to substitute in these cases.

  • @abitcoinskeptic(75)· 2588d

    Congratualtions to all on your ascendency! You are all capable and accomplished individuals obviously connected to Steem and love it.

    Individually the choices make sense, however collectively, it seems to be all coming from similar backgrounds with similar interests.

    I think at least one member should have community or marketing experience so we can get better insights on how to community or market will react to any proposals.

  • @sacra97(77)· 2588d

    Congrats @aggroed @starkerz @eonwarped

    @steemitblog

  • @jondoe(76)· 2588d

    Considering that delegations are going to further dilute everyone else's vote, we need to be very judicious about any and all delegations. Plus, could we get some people in here with no conflicts of interest please? Nothing personal, they seem like decent candidates, but a conflict of interest should make them ineligible.

  • @ammonite(73)· 2588d

    These all seem to be smart business minds. I'm sure there will be a lot of scrutiny of their decisions to keep them in the chains best interest. For me any change in the status quo is a good thing. Wishing them luck with this task.

  • @stoodkev(72)· 2588d

    Great team! We ve got a business guy, a community guy and a tech guy, who all did a lot for this blockchain. Regarding the conflict of interest:

    • It's hard to put users that are invested in this blockchain enough to deserve this position, without having a possibility of conflict of interest.
    • Who in his right mind would have refused the SM delegation anyways?
    • At the end of the day, it's Steemit's stake and their choice, I just happen to think it was a good one.

    The vote for each proposal should be transparent, with comments as of why a given proposal has been accepted / rejected.

  • @zaxan(67)· 2588d

    This is really good news! Happy to see good people working for the future of steem delegations ♥

  • @hitmeasap(75)· 2588d

    Hmm... Nope, still doesn't sound good to me. Probably a really solid committee, but this is probably another thing that will make things worse for everyone.

  • @chrisrice(68)· 2588d

    I am interested in someone creating a Steem-based Twitter that uses a feature similar to @algo.coder's @share2steem DAPP where the tweets of verified accounts from people like @theycallmedan, @therealwolf, mine and anyone who has verified their account will be automatically posted to SteemSays.com @steemsays.com, a name for a Steem-based DAPP similar to Twitter.

    I imagine that the "Tweets" will be posted as Comments & Replies, NOT posts, and a good marketing message might be something like:

    "Got something to say?"

    • Say it on SteemSays 😀

    I want this as an end-user since I am starting to post on Twitter. One idea is to only let people who leave a link to SteemSays im their Twitter Bio to post with a free account and to charge people to have a Premium account without having to link to SteemSays in their account (or make non-Steem users pay but let Steem users who link their account, post for free). That would be one idea for generating revenue but even without that, traditional advertising can probably generate revenue, especially if @steemit Inc. makes a system for Steem-based Dapps to share in some of the revenue from Steemit Inc.'s custom advertising system.

    I personally do not have the will-power, capacity or even desire to lead this my self but the name and the tagline was @emafe's idea so I want her to get a 15% stake and then I can transfer the domain names I registered (different spellings of SteemSays in .com) and all the usernames I registered for SteemSays.

    It was our idea and we also fronted the money to reserve the digital assets including through @starkerz's @steem.ninja (I am an active user of Steem.Ninja as I have paid for a lot of accounts through them and also delegated to them with @chrisrice, @emaferice, @zaclucasrice & @abello). The only developer I would not surrender the domains and usernames to is @algo.coder but its not because I dont like him but because he changed the deal his had witg the co-Founder of @share2steem once they were underway (I am not judging though).

    I think this would be a great idea and as @exyle pointed out, we need to offer a financial incentive for Steemians to post on Twitter.

    The branding for this would be good IMO and can easily become a multi-blockchain DAPP like @steemmonsters. If anyone can help me make this a reality, please contact me: chris@steem.ph

    Help me help Steem & reward the people that help Steem @whatsup @nonameslefttouse @galenkp @tarazkp @ned @andrarchy @kenmelendez @steem.cafe @eonwarped @cryptodrive @reggaemuffin @themarkymark @nathanmars

    ~ @chrisrice

  • @arcange(79)· 2588d

    Congratulations @steemitblog! Your post was mentioned in the Steem Hit Parade in the following category:

    • Comments - Ranked 1 with 162 comments
  • @bluefinstudios(72)· 2588d

    interesting.

    Certainly explains the actions or inactions of some within the Foundation.

  • @darlenys01(70)· 2588d

    Everything to improve is well received, we are at a time where only the union of members and teamwork will make a difference, this committee has done an excellent job, I know that Matt @starkerz is a competent, professional person, and with a lot of talent and wonderful ideas that add value to this blockchain, we hope to see good results and that the true purpose of this platform is evaluated, if what we do does not bless the life of a community and leaves a legacy in the world, It's no use. We have organized communities that are doing social impact work that must be valued now.

    DARLENYS

    @steemchurch representative

  • @d0zer(61)· 2588d

    Even though it is a bit weird that someone applying for a delegation is in the delegation committee as well, I think we’re moving forward.

  • @blockchainstudio(72)· 2588d

    .

  • @dmilliz(73)· 2588d

    Very interesting choice. I have high regard for them all. Did not see this one coming.

  • @ivan-perez-anies(67)· 2588d

    Traducción rápida al Spanish... Estos son los individuos que tenéis que agasajar para intentar rascar algo xD

  • @nildighonto(42)· 2588d

    would just like to take this moment to say that if @eonwarped can’t improve a situation, then it just isn’t possible. He helps me so much, pretty much DAILY! Excellent little list of wizards here. Cheers all around!

    ❤️❤️❤️ -Serena

  • @revo(62)· 2588d

    STEM people, FTW!

  • @hungryharish(67)· 2588d

    I am following these two people @aggroed and @starkerz from some months. As mentioned above they have done a lot of contributions on the block chain and involved many other projects. Hope they continue as they are and help the people who are making awesome things and in need for delegation. Wishing all the best to the team.

  • @prameshtyagi(71)· 2588d

    Good to see you started moving fast on your promises. Hope committee would also make quick assessments and announce their decisions.

  • @gank(60)· 2589d

    Awesome news, a step in the right direction!

  • @midlet(74)· 2589d

    This is really awesome to see. All three of these people ABSOLUTELY deserve to be there and it was a great move for Steemit to pic people from the community that have proven track records of adding value to this chain.

    Please feel free to ignore all the haters. You guys are renewing my faith in Steemit.

  • @vishnur(25)· 2589d

    Congratulations guys.. Looking forward to your work

  • @geekgirl(80)· 2589d

    Nice move. Is there a total cap for delegations?

  • @matt-a(66)· 2589d

    I like this. That's all I got.

  • @theguruasia(69)· 2589d

    @steemitblog, Won't be a part of below discussion, I hope this committee might work accurately and effectively! After all it's your Stake and your intention to motivate developers and upcoming projects by assigning SP is a positive thinking for all of us! $trdo

    Cheers~

  • @richardcrill(68)· 2589d

    Cool, but I just wish I knew why y'all let bid bots destroy the content discovering mechanism of Steemit. It's awesome that some tribes are fixing this on their end, but it's counter productive that this vote buying still dominates Steem. As pleased as I am about these recent developments, I still don't know why y'all would kill off one of the main features and making the trending page into something different entirely. It doesn't instill confidence, especially seeing how doable it is after starting my own tribe.

  • @drakos(70)· 2589d

    Congrats to the committee members.

  • @drutter(73)· 2589d

    It feels like consolidation of power and control. It feels like centralization.

  • @dr-frankenstein(66)· 2589d

    Same faces everywhere.

  • @anthonyadavisii(73)· 2589d

    I am slightly concerned about potential conflicts of interest with applicants also being committee members.

    What assurance, if any, can Steemit Inc. provide that the committee will remain impartial in such instances?

    Posted using Partiko Android

  • @freebornangel(72)· 2589d

    This is still only the beginning of the process of developing a better system for allocating Steemit, Inc.’s delegated Steem Power.

    Do we have to keep doing this the hard way? Let's go back to 'its a dao'. And 'we aren't responsible to anybody'.

    Stop picking winners and making losers of everybody else, please. You may get away with this in the short term, but the backlash is coming.

  • @littlescribe(67)· 2589d

    Well well well. Aren't we a lovely bunch of coconuts!

    Congrats, guys. Couldn't have picked a better bunch.

  • @hobo.media(64)· 2589d

    Nothing wrong with those people, but I do kind of get tired of seeing the same people given responsibilities or roles of authority all the time. If this is a large community with diversity of responsibilities we should see a larger variety of characters taking the lead for new projects.

    I keep seeing the same people, often top witnesses, getting additional authorities. That's just not ideal for decentralization and democratic systems. Don't get me wrong, its Steemit's SP, so by all means do what you want with what is yours. But I'm just saying...

  • @sammosk(71)· 2589d

    Independent? Aggroed is not as impartial as you would think. His delegation applications for the DAP will surely be leaning towards MSP/PAL orientated services and servants.

    Eonwarped is a legend who I would back. With the skill-set and critical mind I believe will lend an edge of caution and strategy when deliberating over a project to determine its worthiness of garnering a delegation. Can't think of any reasons to reject that member of the committee.

    But who is starkerz? The name makes me think of getting nude, is this because of the honesty and transparency offered by this particular user? or more of a alignment with blockchain tech in general, as the ledger is open (most of the time). But I digress, this particular individual will surely be a valuable member of the committee as they are obviously already an established professional user of multiple platforms, and in my opinion a keystone in establishing a presence in the real world from this platform.

    My 2 cents, take it with a grain of salt. Keep steeming on. Love you guise. <3

  • @jackmiller(68)· 2589d

    Steemit Inc.'s money, they can do with it as they wish.

    Simple as that.

    I am now wondering what the purpose of The Foundation shall be since from what I recall, this was in fact going to be one of the core (fundamental) responsibilities of The Steem Foundation.

    Just interested in hearing it direct from the source.

    Would love to hear what our Community organized Steem Foundation thinks too.

    @bluefinstudios , @shadowspub and all the others voted in to do the job for fellow Steemians.

  • @fredrikaa(74)· 2589d

    Good starting point and certainly an improvement from how it has been done previously.

    Still think it is vital that while the committee should be flexible and efficient in how they appprove new projects for a delegation, the community should have a mechanism to opt the receivers of the largest delegations out should it fail to live up to the requirements stated in the first document of delivering sustainable value to the community at large.

  • @smokingfit(59)· 2589d

    Not too concerned with who or what apart from obviously you are gonna get shit for some well obvious thing :). I would very much like to just see the memes and I feel like Matt is the main boss with the two henchmen, somehow shredder comes to mind or maybe biker mice... mmm thinking caps on.

  • @niallon11(77)· 2589d

    Pretty solid team you have chosen there. Some of the best people on the blockchain with proven track records of helping out the system. Good call.

  • @klarou12(57)· 2589d

    need someone can bring steem back to $8 dollars again because now steem is boring

    Posted using Partiko Android

  • @uyobong(78)· 2589d

    me choices. I respect these men on Steem blockchain. They have proven capacity and integrity for this. Congratulations @Aggroed @eonwarped and @Starkerz. We all look up to you three for developing Steem projects and communities.

  • @enforcer48(75)· 2589d

    @aggroed

    So, being part of @steemalliance, driving force behind Steem Engine, and part of STINC's delegation committee?

    I think we lost the decentralized part somewhere. Not that it was to begin with, but dang this seems like a step backwards.

  • @paintingangels(66)· 2589d

    I would just like to take this moment to say that if @eonwarped can’t improve a situation, then it just isn’t possible. He helps me so much, pretty much DAILY! Excellent little list of wizards here. Cheers all around!

    ❤️❤️❤️ -Serena

  • @ats-david(75)· 2589d

    So two techies and a college chemist are deciding on business/finances and social media influence?

    Makes perfect sense to me. What a diverse and knowledgable “committee.”

    And since this wasn’t answered from the last post...

    How much total STEEM will be available from Steemit, Inc. accounts for this delegation program?