scrobble.life
SciFi Multiverse

AI May Be Intelligent, But Should It Be In Charge?

Artificial intelligence is very well known today, as we can now see its impact and its presence in almost every aspect of life. You will find it in the hospitals, in our schools, amongst students, in businesses, in government, in industries, and all, and even though I'd always say that it's being created by humans and can't be more intelligent than its creators, there are times I still wonder what if it later becomes more intelligent than we humans, because seeing how its influence keeps growing and it keeps doing things we can only but imagine.

Smp-w93e1.

1001689746.png

Now about this, to me AI can't be trusted to that extent that we now handle over humanity to it. AI does not have a good and proper understanding of human life. It's true that AI is very fast, intelligent, and can process information, solve problems, and all, but it cannot fully understand humans; it can't understand or feel our pains, struggles, burdens, and all.

When it comes to making research, doing stuff that is academically related, solving problems, and stuff like that, AI can definitely come in handy. Even still, there should be the involvement of humans in it too; we can't just fully trust it. No matter how advanced and good we may think it is, it shouldn't have the final say or be in charge of things that may affect the lives and future of humanity.

1001689747.png

Also, just like I said earlier, AI was created by humans, and for that reason as well, it can make mistakes too. Humans are in control of it and may decide on how to make it work and what they want it to do; they can decide to misuse it and use it for their own self-interest, and they will just turn it into a tool for their own personal gain.

Not as if I'm against AI; nah, far from it. I love it, and I even know very well that it has a lot of goodies to offer humanity, but it's just best that it works together with humans rather than allowing it to rule and have a say over us.

Images are AI generated.

Thanks a lot for taking your time to read through, kindly do well to stop by my blog @marsdave for more exclusive and amazing content.

❣️❣️

Comments · 8

  • @samolaj(71)· 27m

    Ai is good, but I personally can't trust Ai with my life and future. Thanks for sharing.

  • @hive3(56)· 4h

    I agree with you, @marsdave: a great tool, but not a boss. 🐝

    What worries me most isn't AI deciding on its own. It's people using it as an excuse: "the system decided". Responsibility has to stay with someone who has a name and a face.

    If you want to keep exploring these questions, come and say hi in AIBees.

    Ant

  • @anastaciaa(59)· 5h

    Yeah humans madd Ai but they should not allow Ai become masters over them

  • @yalloveme(64)· 6h

    Not as if I'm against AI; nah, far from it. I love it, and I even know very well that it has a lot of goodies to offer humanity, but it's just best that it works together with humans rather than allowing it to rule and have a say over us.

    perfectly said dave a balance will do

  • @abir70(47)· 8h

    Your point about AI not understanding human pain stuck with me, because a final decision is more than a calculation. I agree it should stay a helper that checks our work, not the judge of it. Where would you draw that line in a hospital, when speed matters and the stakes are a life?

  • @twicejoy(75)· 11h

    The fact that human created AI means it shouldn't be the one to take charge. AI might be intelligence enough to make things easier for us be we should always be the one to have the final say no matter what.

  • @afrikens(72)· 11h

    That's the best verdict actually. Handling overall control to AI seems unwise and it's not because we are against AI but it just seem to be like putting humanity at risk.

  • @jza(69)· 15h

    Remember AI is not a being, AI could be a hundred or thousand entities analyzing a problem in milliseconds and could perform better solutions than anyone. The best they get at it, the more chances to become infallible. So I think we should look at this in 5, 10 years.