[Source](https://www.filmaffinity.com/ve/filmimages.php?movie_id=501691)
"Furiosa: From the Mad Max Saga" may not live up to "Mad Max: Road Rage", but that doesn't mean it's not an enjoyable film.
This time around, we have a fuller-bodied story and a more discontinuous narrative, which gives it a different pace and an intensity that is felt throughout its two-hour-plus running time.
I can't help but compare it to other sequels, such as "The Dark Knight: The Legend Reborn" in relation to "The Dark Knight", or the "Matrix" sequels in comparison to the 1999 original.
[Source](https://www.filmaffinity.com/ve/filmimages.php?movie_id=501691)
In all of them, something of the essence of the original films is missing: those dirty, sweaty, blood-soaked frames, reflecting the desperate struggle for survival.
George Miller is a little more comfortable this time around, especially with the use of more overt CGI effects than in Mad Max: Road Rage.
Junkie XL's soundtrack doesn't stand out as much either. While it remains an important part of the film, it doesn't have the same punch and authenticity as its predecessor.
A slight disappointment is inevitable: "Furiosa: From the Mad Max Saga" is a prequel that fails to surpass the original. 
[Source](https://www.filmaffinity.com/ve/filmimages.php?movie_id=501691)
[Source](https://www.filmaffinity.com/ve/filmimages.php?movie_id=501691)
It lacks that magical spark and sense of surprise that Mad Max: Road Rage had. Even so, it's still an impressive film, full of intense and furious moments that few films can achieve.
While it may not be the new miracle we were hoping for, in time, "Furious: From the Mad Max Saga" may come to be appreciated as such.
Despite its digital finish, which is more noticeable compared to the craftsmanship of its predecessor, had it been released in 2015, it could have been considered another cinematic miracle.
