scrobble.life
← All reviews
Movie20

Pet Semetary 2: Wow! What a piece of crap

Review by @gooddream · 2265d · of Pet Sematary

I was unaware this film even existed and after suffering through it I think there are some very good reasons for this. I don't know if I have ever seen a movie with a decent budget be so horrible and can't believe that Stephen King allowed this (if he even had any say in it.

51vzzzOALL.AC.jpg source

Directly after the immense success of Terminator 2: Judgement Day, Edward Furlong would exhibit, quite profoundly actually, that he didn't really have much chance of a future in acting because of his wooden performances that are only accented by being in films with far greater actors than he is.

This isn't necessarily the case in Pet Semetary 2 because everyone in the film other than Clancy Brown is just awful. Outside of Brown's performance this looks like something so amateurish that I am relatively convinced that some of the home movies that myself and my friends painstakingly made with a camcorder are far more entertaining.

MV5BM2QyMzViMTUtZDYwZi00YzVkLTgyYTYtNmE4N2YwNzlhM2MyL2ltYWdlXkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyMTEzNzczMA.V1.jpg source The only highlight of this abysmal film

The story, as you would expect is completely absurd because all the really needs to happen in a Pet Semetary film is for people to somehow need to put pets, and then later people, into the burial ground that raises them from the dead.

Logic would dictate that after the events that transpired in this city that people would have wizened up to the fact that the Indian burial ground is actually very dangerous and should be shut far away from any sort of possibility for human interactions but nah... everyone can just kind of wander in and out of there - which although stupid i will admit is pretty critical to this horrible story happening in the first place.

So how did Jeff (Furlong) and his father end up in this community? Well, in a completely unnecessary and stupid establishing shot Jeff's mother is a famous movie star who is tragically killed on a movie set. After her death Jeff and his father Chase (portrayed in an incredibly weak manner by Anthony Edwards - who surprisingly would win multiple Emmys after learning how to act) move to a remote town in Maine because... why not! We don't need Los Angeles and Maine is practically next door, right?

Jeff becomes friends with school fatty named Drew who is not only abused at school but also by his stepfather Gus who was played by the aforementioned only good actor in this turd of a film. Gus maliciously shoots Drew's dog one night and well he needs to go bury the dog right? What better place to do that than the reanimation studio!

petsematarytwo1.jpg source

At this point the movie drags and we are simply waiting for the moment to arrive where they are going to bury a person and since Jeff's mother was killed at the start of the film we already know that eventually she is going to be one of them. What we didn't expect is for several other people to end up getting turned into the undead as well.

A series of nonsensical events combined with terrible acting and worse CGI as far as the dog is concerned is what follows.

[src](https://dailydead.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/Pet-Sematary-2-shot.jpg)

Nobody seems to realize that there is something wrong with the dog whose eyes just happen to be glowing red all the time and is very prone to intense violence and has seeping wounds that never heal. No cause for alarm at all.

At times it is almost amusing because when they do eventually raise Jeff's mother from the dead, she has been dead for quite some time but her reanimated corpse doesn't have any signs of being anyone who was ever dead - the other two zombie folk have maintained all of their wounds though and well, this is just the sort of lack of consistency that you can go ahead and add to the long line of things that are wrong with this film. The fact that it is essentially the first film with new actors doesn't add much to the likability.

This film should only be watched by people who want to revel in just how horribly bad it is, perhaps with your finger very close to the fast-forward button because I can assure you, the story is completely irrelevant and ridiculous. I would imagine that the studio was attempting to capitalize on both the generally favorable memories people had of the original film and also Edward Furlong's quickly unraveling fame.

Stephen King, presumably upon seeing the film before it was released, had his name removed from the film and refused to be associated with it in any fashion.

My overall rating! 2 / 10

and the 2 is just for the laughs I got from reveling in how awesomely terrible almost everything about this film is.

URGHmeme31004.jpg

Voted by
  • @xeldal
  • @enki
  • @jphamer1
  • @nuthman
  • @slobberchops
  • @adol
  • @life-timer
  • @jkramer
  • @cryptoandcoffee
  • @enlil
  • @drax
  • @scholaris
  • @carilinger
  • @theouterlight
  • @borran
  • @created
  • @onetin84
  • @dera123
  • @onealfa
  • @bdmillergallery
  • @livingfree
  • @bozz
  • @amico
  • @star.lord
and 182 others

Comments · 9

  • @whoisjohn(79)· 2260d

    I've not seen it, and now i definitely wont do so. The trailer looks low budget as hell.

  • @netflixr⭐ 🏆#186 🎵9 🎬300 📺171(79)· 2261d

    I saw this featured in the horror section recently and gave it a miss. Looks like I made the correct choice!

  • @artemislives(74)· 2262d

    Damn - just saw the news online about DaNang and 80,000 people being moved out and quarantine AGAIN. You doing OK???

  • @bdmillergallery(77)· 2264d

    I was laughing right from the beginning after reading your title! 😆 😂

    I also had the great pleasure of viewing this one. Your right on target with the 2 out of 10 vote. I don't think I watched it to the very end though.. Sorry for your suffering 😕😁

  • @slobberchops(82)· 2264d

    You should know by now anything suffixed with '2' or greater is at best quite pants, or at worst fucking terrible. There are a couple of exceptions but for the most part it is a holy proverb.

  • @gudnius.comics(67)· 2264d

    This kind of movies exist because when studios acquire the rights to those stories they want to squeeze them out, without caring much about the quality of subsequently entries. Unfortunately the original creators can't do much after selling the rights.

  • @cryptoandcoffee(85)· 2265d

    You will not get me to watch this one. I think you have to be brain dead to even consider putting this on. Over the last month I have so many films that have only got as far as around the 20 minute mark. That normally tells you if it is good or bad. I am finding tons of crap as though no one has any standards anymore. Who writes this shit and who signs it off must be rather worrying as they are the reason we see this.

  • @inalittlewhile(68)· 2265d

    I've passed this movie up so many times. Thanks for affirming my supposition. I was pretty sure it sucks. 🤣

    Yesterday it was a binge session of 'Cursed' on Netflix. An adaption of the story that leads up to King Arthur, The Sword In The Stone, etc. Camelot.

  • @trincowski(72)· 2265d

    Ahahahah. That really seems like a dreadful experience. I'll take your advice and keep away from it.

    Horror movies are not really my thing, anyway. I only watch a few, if they happen to have an 8 or higher score in IMDB. Horror movies with low scores are usually rated like that for a reason. 🤣