scrobble.life
#softfork222

What is property? Is it defined by consensus?

My thoughts as a consensus witness on the current status of the Steem blockchain.

First, please read this soft fork 22.2 joint announcement by the current consensus witnesses.

Edit: Justin Sun has responded to the community and will host a town hall event for top witnesses.

Many say property is defined by the legal jurisdiction you live in controlled by a nation state. Others, myself included, derive property rights from the philosophy of liberty as described here:

I own myself. I own my actions in the present moment which creates property, a representation of myself in the past. Blockchains, to me, provide an opportunity to create a new paradigm for understanding property. It's global, not defined by a monopoly on violence in a geographic region (i.e. nation state).

But how is blockchain property defined? Via consensus. In most PoW consensus blockchains, that means 51% of the hashing power. In DPoS on Steem, that means 2/3 + 1 of the top 20+1 elected witnesses.

There has been a long-standing social contract for how the Steemit stake will be decentralized over time and used to grow the Steem ecosystem. Some examples include:

  • It would be decentralized via methods such as: "funding the continued research and development of steemit.com, the Steem Blockchain’s first and premier application, promoting and publicizing the Steem Blockchain and its features, hosting high availability services for platform users, sponsoring conferences and community gatherings, and sponsoring undertakings to build applications and increase user adoption across the entire ecosystem" as per Roadmap2017

  • Ned Scott Interview published December 20th, 2016. Some of the statements made were inaccurate (Steemit mined closer to 80% of the tokens, not 50%, and there was never a publicly available “testnet”) At time 33:29: "It's all dedicated to the advancement of the ecosystem" At time 43:45: “Steemit holding used to...sort of reserved and earmarked for improving the ecosystem”

  • Hard Fork 14: decline_voting_rights_operation introduced to “formalize a smart contract between certain accounts and the community that currently only exists as a social contract”

I have heard from many in the community who feel Ned sold this property without making these points clear. Given the announcements by Tron to move the STEEM token over to Tron, many fear this stake would be used to force this action against the will of consensus and against the original intent of the Steemit stake.

This is a key moment for DPoS. It's easy to step away and let others figure it out, but I was recently a backup witness and put back into consensus when this all started. I posted about Steem not being Steemit and Justin replied to it as his first on-chain post. I've been right in the middle of this, whether I like it or not.

Last year, when the Steemit stake was powered down, I made this clear statement:

I will not implement, support, or condone any hard fork that effects the balances, keys, or security of any accounts on the current chain.

I still stand by that, but I have participated in this temporary soft fork in order to maintain the status quo for now. The witnesses (as of this post) have not had a direct conversation with Justin or the Tron team to better understand how they intend to use their newly acquired property, but we have reached out to start a conversation.

I use that word "property" deliberately. I do see the purchased Steemit stake as property belonging to the person or entity that purchased it. There's a social contract lean of sorts on that property, but it's still property. I've argued against certain aspects of this soft fork (specifically preventing liquid transfer), but I saw the reason why many in the community and among the witnesses wanted to take decisive action to prevent witness voting and further power downs (which, once started, would most likely require a hard fork to change).

So where does that leave us now? I hope the consensus witnesses, whoever they may be, will have a conversation with Justin and the Tron Foundation about how they intend to use their property. The ideal outcome, in my mind, is to replace this temporary code with something more specific to our shared goals as a Steem community now connected with the resources of the Tron community.

As always, as your elected witness, I openly welcome all questions and will do what I can to answer them.


Luke Stokes is the Managing Director for the Foundation for Interwallet Operability as well as the Interim Executive Director for the EOS Foundation. He's passionate about voluntary systems of governance and has been involved in bitcoin since early 2013. He's been a witness for the Steem blockchain since early 2018 and a custodian for eosDAC, a community-owned EOSIO Block Producer and DAC Enabler, since its inception. With a computer science degree from UPENN, he built, bootstrapped and co-founded the shopping cart software company FoxyCart over a ten year period and is now focused on blockchain technology as a means to create a world we all want to live in. He currently lives in Puerto Rico with his wife and three children and enjoys discussing everything from philosophy, to consciousness, to voluntaryism, to love and awakening. lukestokes.info UnderstandingBlockchainFreedom.com fio.foundation eosdac.io

I'm a Witness! Please vote for @lukestokes.mhth

Comments · 16

  • @vikisecrets(80)· 2359d

    Thanks for standing up for our blockchain and fighting for decentralization :) I am very proud of our community and witnesses and it must be a very hard and stressful week for everyone involved.

  • @cryptoxicate(69)· 2364d

    From all the previous STEEM WITNESS I vote for you because I believe in your actions and what you represent and done so far, please be the grown man and dont hate or try to destroy what you dont know, always look up for the understanding between both parts before taking any defensive or aggressive actions, thanks for your great great support to the steem community

  • @jankasparec(69)· 2372d

    Thank you for still making time to help the Steemit community with your busy FIO schedule bro!! resteemed

  • @arcange(79)· 2373d

    Congratulations @lukestokes! Your post was mentioned in the Steem Hit Parade in the following category:

    • Pending payout - Ranked 6 with $ 59,11
  • @svamiva(61)· 2373d

    I think you are overcomplicating the issue. As far as we know, JS never bought any Steem blockchain tokens. He bought the Steemit inc from Ned Scott and nothing prevents him from selling Steemit inc back to Ned or selling it to you, or selling it to anybody willing to buy it. It's his property, yes.

  • @forykw(71)· 2373d

    Let's keep the momentum and work towards the positive side of the path. The technology that is exploring decentralization I mean... this will be probably worth many Nobel prizes... but because society does not award prizes to communities... it will be kind of lame to think it would be worth such thing.

    Instead, think it as a new technology breakthrough... something like landing for the first time on the moon... but this time, we just skipped that and landed on Mars instead. I hope to be able to make people around me understand what under the hood is happening to technology in the blockchain.

    This is history to me.

  • @freebornangel(72)· 2374d

    The original What is Property post.

  • @whatsup(76)· 2374d

    Our witnesses have proven that a small group of people can and will change the code without a single public conversation.

    That is more important than the whys and hows in this circumstance.

  • @epic-fail(70)· 2374d

    If said "property" was acquired by ill-gotten means and unethical behavior ("Ninja Mine" ) then they are simply trying to find a way to "launder" STEEM into Tron. History will not be kind to Ned.

  • @iamstan(63)· 2374d

    You know from my beginning with steem coins I listened and trusted you. I am just wondering why that stake was ok in the hands of the irresponsible folks so long and now new owners come and now its time to care? We were all lied to constantly by the steemit inc team and owners! Why so late? If it was truly ninja /cheated /stake then that stake steals from every legitimate investor. I guess it still the status quo and the powers that be will "Do as they wilt"?

    I sold my investment when the price came back to 52 cents. I dont think its time for me to come back!

    BTW I wanted to let you know I checked up on you after the earthquakes and I was not able to post? Glad your family is doing well!

  • @diazrock(58)· 2374d

    Does even the TRON team or Justin Sun say any word about a meeting with the witness?

  • @dizzyjay(56)· 2374d

    Sounds to me like witnesses intentionally damaged the property belonging to steemit inc without permission. Isnt destruction of private property illigal, would that make all the witnesses who pushed this softfork criminally liable for damages?

  • @d-pend(76)· 2374d

    Good to read your extended thoughts on this development here. I have a lot of trust in the benevolence of the community at large as represented by top witnesses. I see this as a somewhat drastic measure taken, however, after quite a bit of consideration. I can tell this is not done lightly, even though it is "only" a soft fork.

    From a more emotional/visceral perspective, it does make me feel more confident as a stakeholder and active participant in the vision I believe Steem to have been founded upon.

  • @kaminchan(76)· 2374d

    Very interesting! Thanks for sharing!

  • @anaclark(64)· 2374d

    That said, my post is not blockcahin focused.

    Just the same, you bring up good points.

    Posted using Partiko Android

  • @anaclark(64)· 2374d

    Ha! I'm in the middle of writing a poverty piece as well.

    Thank you for this. 🌼

    Posted using Partiko Android