scrobble.life
#steem

Curators? Hello? Where the Hell Are You?

I voted twice for music in one week.

That was enough to make me a top 200 curator of music here.

NoNamesLeftToUse - Success.jpeg

About Sixty Fucking Cents

I dished out about sixty cents and that makes me one of the best?

Normally, I'd be proud to be 'one of the best'.

My bedtime story last night was a podcast about the Alcubierre warp drive; and you damn right I fell asleep fast.

The last thing I remember from dreamland was lobbing incendiary grenades into a black Ford F-150 that wasn't supposed to be there. I'm sure I took him out but then his wife comes running at me from out of nowhere. One of those weird looking redneck wives you'd see on an episode of Cops. I picked up a small metal plate and whipped it at her like a ninja star. Damn thing bounced off her tits; she just kept coming at me...

A notification bell sound effect saved my life.

Someone on the Steem blockchain was talking about me.

Just in time, too.

Instead of diving straight into my device first thing in the morning, I thanked the higher powers for what looks to be another beautiful day, then headed outside for a stroll.

All I could think about was that woman's tits flapping around everywhere and how angry she was with me. I still think a moose charging at me would have been less intimidating.

After much fresh air and peacefulness outdoors in the middle of nowhere, the most frightening of experiences finally morphed into something I could laugh about. My head was clear; I was ready for my morning coffee.

Time to hit the books.

Who's talking about me?

Of course it was only a post written by a robot. Sigh.

A list of the most effective curators. I've been on these lists plenty of times and I think there's a list for nearly every category of content. This time around, it's the music tag being analyzed.

There I was, sitting in slot 132 out of thousands of accounts on this platform. I shelled out two votes that week. Think about that.

And here I thought my nightmare was bad...

Screenshot (573).png

Music

Where there's music, there's money.

Until you come here?

The other day I was browsing what's "trending" on Steemit.com. In one of the top slots was a post written by a bonehead. Probably the worst example of the written word in the history of literature, pointed towards one of the smallest audiences on the entire planet. Inside, the guy basically said STEEM might hit 30 cents before it hits 40 cents again and, because he's just some random dipshit who knows nothing, just your typical monkey behind a typewriter smashing keys for an eternity, hoping for the banana he'll receive if he manages to accidentally string the correct letter combination together to form a word; he was wrong!

Placing that garbage on the front page is WRONG!

Say thanks to your local vote seller for being the worst promoter in the history of promotion.

Who here isn't annoyed when the shit rises to the top?

Go to flush it and it just spins around and around around and around around and around around and around around and around around and around around and around and it never goes away!

What actually goes down the toilet here are those potential billions the arts and entertainment industry generates every fucking year.

Factor in everything I said within this post:

Screenshot (574).png

You'll then see why I've become so passionate about this. You'll see why I'm so disappointed that I made slot #132 on a list of effective curators.

Maybe I'm an effective curator but with two votes in one week, that speaks volumes. Where the hell is everyone else? How can we expect this place and STEEM to thrive when so many are willing to turn their backs on billions of dollars here, billions of dollars there, and billions of dollars everywhere! You turn you backs on billions, for a few thousand dollars worth of paid votes? You pay people to look away, in an attention economy?

Derp!

If you feel something sliding up your ass, don't worry. That's just your Darwin Award looking for a new place to hibernate.

If you factor in everything I said in the post linked above, you might be able to see how this concept of paying content producers and curators could literally give the entire music industry a run for its money. Even if we offered content producers who create music 50% of the rewards generated from their work, that's still far more than the 12% they receive today.

Even Pooh could do it!

Rome wasn't built in a day.

And here it seems too many are waiting for the first paving stone to place itself.

"Duh I only vote for myself because the system allows it duh profits profits profits!" That's just a fancy way of saying you shoot yourself in the foot because the gun has a trigger.

"Duh content producers earn too much that money should be mine I'm a smart investor duh." That's just a fancy way of saying you truly can't see the difference between billions of dollars and thousands of dollars. You shouldn't be anywhere near a dollar because you're just going to end up wiping your ass with it. You also think Snoop Dogg is a homeless man.

Allow the content to thrive.

Allow the best of the best to be the best of the best.

As a content producer here on this platform, is it selfish of me to want to attract thousands upon thousands of votes worth a penny?

Ten thousand votes worth a penny is something like 2.5 million STEEM. The entertainment industry proves people are willing to spend money on entertainment. Everywhere else, a wealthy content producer is a sign of a thriving business model. There's nothing wrong with thousands of people purchasing millions of STEEM.

I also realize there are at least 100 million people on this planet who could do a better job than me, some of them are musicians, music generates billions yearly, one musician means thousands of listeners; I can't bloody well support them all with my whopping two votes worth sixty cents. I'm not saying any of this so I can earn more, I'm saying it so we all can earn more, including the dipshit vote sellers and self voters who make it nearly impossible to earn more, today.

So, whatever.

That's how I feel about it.

And I want to wake up from this nightmare, really bad.

I know the STEEM blockchain has a lot of good things going for it. A lot of progress. Good things on the horizon. Other markets and other potential billions to tap into. All I'm talking about is one pile of potential billions.

If I see a twenty dollar bill on the ground, I'm going to pick it up, so pardon me for being so passionate when I see millions of twenty dollar bills on the ground with a goddamn electric fence around it and a note that says, You can't see me!

Fuck you, John Cena.

Have a nice day.

linebreak1

Credits:

Youtube video linked to source.

All images seen here were produced digitally, by me.

NoNamesLeftToUse Outro.png

"Seriously though. That redneck lady was freaky."

© 2019 @NoNamesLeftToUse.

Comments · 17

  • @ddaily(63)· 2636d

    Hey @nonameslefttouse There is much truth in this post. Thank you! Not sure if you are familiar with @ddaily ... we are mostly video content creators who are dedicated to ‘daily’ activity. Our slogan is For Creators by Creators. In the nearly 2 years we have been around we too have noticed that we have plenty of creators but not many watchers/readers.
    So rather than continue bitching about it we have taken steps to do something about it. One of our members created DIYtube and built a curation team around it. We started a Ddaily curation trail to highlight quality content and created a team of curators around it. And we recently made a contest called “THE 5 REEL GOOD” that serves to motivate both content and curation. We will not muddy your post with shill links... but encourage you to click on our profile and peek at this weeks contest that was dropped monday. The theme coincidentally is MUSIC this week. We think that many doers and groups are working on solutions to various steem issues all in there little corners and that we need to start becoming aware of each other and what we are doing. We are not begging for support. We are hoping that the Orca’s and Whales see and recognize the effort actually happening by us at @ddaily and by so many others.
    It seems groups like @curie @helpie @c-squared @onelovedtube @powerhousecreatives @steemitbloggers @steemsavy and initiatives like the curation league by @abh12345 .....can often go unnoticed in there curation efforts. Our hope is that all of us that are seeking and creating solutions can find each other and stick together. So this comment is in no way denying any of your points but more highlighting and drawing focus toward some of the many groups working to bring more eyes, retention, and value to the steem blockchain! Cheers

  • @heymattsokol(69)· 2638d

    There's a pretty good music scene here on steem, but small. It is hard to attract people who aren't amateurs because the pay is so low, and the audience isn't as large as on places on Instagram or Spotify.

    I'm trying to show an example of how a musician can use steem with my own blog, it's fun to share life updates and music stories here. I find it rewarding even if it doesn't pay very well, and I suspect that it has been driving new listeners to my music on Spotify lately which is cool.

    But the curation thing is a big problem. I agree with you.

    The question is, how else to determine value of content. Is there any hope of finding a perfect metric, or series of metrics, to "fairly" distribute money? Is distribution of money and resources ultimately an unfair game no matter how we slice it?

    I feel like we are still extremely early in addressing concepts of fair compensation with blockchain, and we need a lot of patience and goodwill towards each other as we try to figure it out.

  • @arcange(79)· 2638d

    Congratulations @nonameslefttouse! Your post was mentioned in the Steem Hit Parade in the following category:

    • Comments - Ranked 10 with 51 comments
  • @schattenjaeger(71)· 2638d

    Dude, this place is dead. It's over.

  • @murathe(61)· 2638d

    Need for profits has indeed driven the whole system to a new level of greed-like mentality where we all after some sort of huge returns as compared to our dear input. In my recent post, I did call up on African curators to at least come up with a customized curation system and will be covering more on the same coming days.

  • @buttcoins(75)· 2639d

    Modern people are lazy by nature. Vote buying is the epitome of laziness. So fitting for this modern social media experiment. The boomerang ‘derp’ hole 🕳 round and round on the circles we jerk.

    Posted using Partiko iOS

  • @coininstant(69)· 2639d

    The curators all self vote with bidbots now! This is more like an investment scheme than a curation blog environment these days! Before the bidbots people would have extra steem power to vote with, and we would vote for each other. Times changed, everybody got greedy. Even me, I got mixed up in Bid Bots for a long time. Now I'm not greedy, but for the amount of steem and followers I have I only maker 15 cents a post on my own! It is not anything more than a hobby. No big dreams of striking it rich on a post anymore! Still I stay positive about STEEM that one day maybe something will change??

  • @kansuze(69)· 2639d

    I enjoy the music community here.

  • @ammonite(73)· 2639d

    I feel your pain. Unfortunately Steem seems to have moved on for where its founding fathers left it. Content is not king, not even a court jester. The Blockchain has unfortunately become a mining rig in a race for the bottom. There I said it! Sometimes I wish I could lower my standards and ethics and go buy some votes but the most I've convinced myself to do is give myself a sneaky self-vote on my posts every now and again. I really thought that if I was the change I wanted to see in Steem then things would start moving in that direction but, No. Content is nowhere within the castle walls. Maybe things will change or maybe a new castle needs to be built. Vent over. I Still love Steem.

  • @raj808(77)· 2639d

    What actually goes down the toilet here are those potential billions the arts and entertainment industry generates every fucking year.

    I've been saying this since Dec 2017 when I stopped using bidbots and started shouting about it.

    Went to steemfest in Krakow last year... saying something similar to what you're expressing in this post -

    by allowing vote sellers carte blanche, we're literally losing billions in the long term for smaller short term gains for 12-15 people ....

    And guess what? No one cared or gave a shit to listen to me, or any of the other people who were saying the same.

    Here's what I think the problem is:

    We have most of the bidbot owners, vote selling barons and other psudo-criminals in among the top 100 witnesses. If no one has got together to vote the crooks out, it means too many fucktards are making there small time fucktard-ary $20000-$30000/year by keeping their allegiances and saying/doing/changing nothing.

    The status quo here has left me in a state of perpetual nearly giving up if I'm honest. Until I see a post like this, and realise that others see the same truth and would like to see all our investments bloom massively, rather than what will happen if things are allowed to continue as they are.

    Anyway, 🤣 your rant inspired this rant... Cheers for the rant inspiration 😉🔥👊

    Oh yeah, and the image in my head of an angry woman charging at me with her tits flapping 🤣

  • @vander(64)· 2639d

    I am top 200 curator for photography, one of the most popular topics. I have only 3000sp... Yeah, it is all pretty depressing, or let's be positive: there is a lot of room for growth and improvement...

    Posted using Partiko Android

  • @enjoywithtroy(71)· 2639d

    Bouncing tits are wonderful just not on an angry woman. Let's hope those mamas don't turn into torpedo tits.

  • @marcusantoniu26(68)· 2639d

    You are right. Human people are willing to spend their bucks in entertainment. Just human nature. No science, no good healthcare. We aliens still do not get it.

  • @c0ff33a(76)· 2639d

    I keep getting mentioned in various top curators posts, it surprises me more because I have such a tiny stake in Steem - I don’t feel like my vote value could ever give that much back.

    But I suppose in a way it’s more DPOS actually working because when I have the time I do read posts and actively upvote them at a percentage based on the content I read.

    The potential is there, it’s getting people to read and appreciate posts more that is needed - honestly I’m sure some of Steem’s biggest stakeholders would be amazed at the content on here.

    I also think my friend @novacadian would have a good comment to say one the subject, he’s very eloquent when it comes to this sort of thing.

    Posted using Partiko iOS

  • @shadowmask(56)· 2639d

    Let's hope the investors or those that set the author/curation don't split see this and decide that 50/50 is to much and want a 25/75 split. After all if the music industry is at a 12/88 split why steem chain should be also.

  • @blueeyes8960(71)· 2639d

    Great rant that hits the nail on the head. Trending on Steemit is such a pile of garbage. I hope palnet will be able to flourish and do things differently that the current thievery going on. I do have a question though, you mention voting for yourself a couple of times, like it's a bad thing. I agree if you're a whale and producing garbage just to vote on yourself with a thousand duplicate accounts. Yes, that's a very bad thing for the rest of us trying to create content and survive. But I vote for myself all the time. Sometimes I wouldn't have much else, lol. I believe in my own content and know the effort I put into it. And it's only worth a couple of cents anyway. So I hope you were talking about those aforementioned assholes sucking up the rewards. Is there a harmful reason why I shouldn't vote for myself, that you know of?

  • @tarazkp(86)· 2639d

    I think there is an algorithm for the calculation of effective too. Still.

    Of course, part of the problem is that no one enjoys music.kinda like that Footloose town.