scrobble.life
#steem

Our Plan for Onboarding the Masses

onboarding the masses.jpg

In today’s post we will explore our plan to onboard the masses, how it informs the product decisions we have made in the past, and the decisions we continue to make. As many have observed, the Steem user base is not growing as fast as it used to grow, and traffic to steemit.com has been decreasing in lock-step. If our goal is to onboard the masses, that’s not a good sign.

The Root Problems

We want to solve this problem and, as the team that released the base protocol and maintains the most used Steem-powered interface, we have the most to gain by doing so. When looking at these problems it can be tempting to look at the problems that appear on the surface. But we are always trying to look deeper. Steem and steemit.com grew rapidly because we offered people an experience that they couldn’t get anywhere else. Is there more we can do to make the process of getting an account and understanding the platform easier? Absolutely.

But the people who joined steemit.com early on were doing so in spite of the difficulty because we were giving them the opportunity to take ownership over their content. The real question is; what else can we offer users that will encourage them to take that leap once again and join an experimental platform?

Communities

The beta release of steemit.com proved that the proposition of leveraging blockchain technology to guarantee ownership over your content was extremely compelling. The question we asked ourselves was how we could take that value proposition to the next level. “Communities” are our answer to that question.

Communities will leverage Steem to deliver, *for the first time in history*, the ability for Community leaders to *own* the communities that they build.

If we want to onboard “the masses” we first have to appreciate that they are not a single, monolithic abstraction and instead acknowledge “the masses” as being made up of individual people with diverse interests, personalities, and group identities. Once we do that, it becomes obvious that if we want to onboard these diverse people onto Steem, then they need to be able to leverage this blockchain to discover information, and people, that match their interests.

As always, we want to do this in a decentralized way, by releasing open source software that expands people’s ability to own and control their online activities. When we talk about “Communities” what we really mean is “the software that solves those problems." The development of this software, while progressing rapidly is still ongoing and we’d love your input or suggestions.

To learn more about Communities check out our recent post in which we announced our high-level design document. We’d love to hear your feedback.

Smart Media Tokens

While Communities will make history when they launch by giving people total ownership over the online communities that they build, we still believe that there is more we can do to set up Community leaders for success.

Thanks to our experience with STEEM, we can also give community leaders (whether they are app developers, businesses, or non-technical users) the financial tools they need to ensure that they, their community managers, and their community members are all incentivized to grow a community and build its value. That’s why we are working on Smart Media Tokens (a/k/a Steem Meta Tokens) in parallel with Communities. These two pieces of software are our top priorities, which is why they are being developed in parallel by separate teams, one led by @roadscape (Communities/Hivemind) and the other by @vandeberg (along with @gerbino).

We believe that these improvements will usher in an entirely new era of growth by transitioning Steem from onboarding individuals one at a time, to onboarding entire communities. This will lead to another explosion in growth, at which point we plan to shift focus to the sign up bottleneck. Though that will be a decision made at the time based on all relevant factors.

Light Accounts

While we are thinking a lot about how we can dramatically improve the sign up process, 3rd party Steem developers have informed us of one feature that they believe could dramatically improve their ability to onboard new users to Steem, while dramatically decreasing the cost of doing so. That solution is “light accounts” and it is our hope that the community, and the Witnesses they elect, will consider this feature for inclusion in the SMT hardfork.

Light accounts would essentially be the types of accounts that are typically created on blockchains. These accounts would be simple wallet addresses (not usernames) that would not have any of the valuable rights that the current Steem accounts have and which contribute so much to their cost. Light accounts could enable developers to onboard their users to Steem for free, give them access to their Steem app, unify their backend databases, and then selectively “upgrade” the users who add the most value to their app to full Steem accounts. This would effectively transform the Steem accounts we all now have to “premium” accounts.

Feedback

But what do you think? Do you think this is the right approach? We realize that a lot of people have lost faith in our ability to ship code, but the reality is that we have never stopped shipping code. The “crypto winter” has certainly forced us to shift focus at times, but even the software that was shipped in response to our financial circumstances were critical to ensuring that the impact of Communities and SMTs is maximized.

Hivemind & MIRA

Our first major cost-cutting measure was Hivemind which not only dramatically reduced the cost of running Steem nodes, but is also the very software that will be powering Communities! Our next major cost-cutting measure was MIRA which moved the blockchain from RAM to commodity hardware thereby dramatically improving the scalability and sustainability of the Steem blockchain. In addition, when developing these solutions, our estimated ship dates were largely on target.

We know that a lot of people have been waiting patiently for Communities and SMTs. We agree with those people that these are the most important pieces of the puzzle and we wish they were already out. That being said, we are still confident that we are far ahead of our competitors. We are already making a lot of progress on these projects and are now confident that we will deliver them.

We will be delivering Communities features gradually over time, so you should start seeing improvements to Steem front ends before the release of SMTs which will require a hardfork. If you want to help influence the direction that these projects take, please leave your feedback in the comment section below.

Steem on!

The Steemit Team

Comments · 107

  • @arifullah(43)· 2580d

  • @dwarrilow2002(57)· 2581d

    A little over a year ago, I started "steemhost" in order to create a mechanism that would reward people for reading the steem content. It entailed selling advertising and converting that to steem. Steemhost, the content producer and the reader were rewarded in steem power delegation. As it was a delegation, it couldn't be sold but it would be reflected when the participant posted their own content.

    • The coding could be applied to any website so it would open the possibility of creating a competitor to Adwords.
    • Everyone could sell ads
    • Both the advertisers and the content providers had the ability to control the ads:
    1. It could specify what geographic area it would be available for;
    2. It could specify the content tag it could appear on (eg photography, art, travel etc.);
    3. It could limit the ads to appear only on specific content providers' pages.

    I think there is also another aspect to this. Since this buying ad space, people could purchase advertising via credit card. It is just that steem/delegation is the underlying method of accounting for it. For instance a person could buy 1000 ads and pay for it using credit card. The internal mechanism would buy the steem at the current price and allocate it for delegation.

    As far as steemhost goes, it was a success as far as it went. I had a number of people who earned enough to trigger delegation (ie needed 1 steem worth at the time). Unfortunately, three things put a stop to my promotion of the site.

    1. Jump in the price of connection to DB
    2. Majority of hosts stopped creating content
    3. Pneumonia
  • @improv(73)· 2582d

    My first thought is, light accounts seem like a good idea! I'll let you know as my opinion develops.

  • @sammosk(71)· 2584d

    Good joke.

  • @por500bolos(68)· 2585d

    @steemitblog...

    I reckon and I have the hunch, you may well want take an in depth glance to this post to get a stronger grip about your Plan for Onboarding the Masses!! };)

  • @vantocan(52)· 2585d

    We don't believe you're genuinely listening to the users and content-creators here. We think these posts are just here to convince a few of the more gullitble members that you're still on our side, still working on improving the infrastructure here... but you're just sucking out everything of value and running for the hills. We like to note that everything here is recorded. Nobody will get away with anything. Eventually, we'll sort out exactly who profiteered, who didn't follow through on promises, who lied, who cheated.

  • @greatesteem(59)· 2585d

    I hope you're reading these comments, Stinc! People are telling you the hard truth you need to hear. Will you listen yet?

  • @knircky(73)· 2585d

    I believe you are completely missing the point in your “root problem”.

    The root problem are incentives. Yes, creating accounts matters as well, but still that is not the hardest thing to do.

    The hardest thing is to do what the original mission of steemit was: incentivize content and content creators.

    Today steem has no mission and no leadership, but just a little better marketing.

    Without a reason of existence this is not enough. If we do not address how to give value to users, especially new users steem will becomes even more worthless than it has become already.

  • @orionmisfit(11)· 2585d

    Why does my rank keep going lower?

  • @madalchemist(50)· 2585d

    I get the feeling these posts are just a way for stink to keep the whole thing going and milk it longer. Remember @Ned not saying a word for a month and only coming out when people threatened to fork? They want to suck as much Steem as they can before the whole thing dies. Its all they care about.

  • @pirateofthedtube(53)· 2585d

    How about making the website itself more useful, usable, and understandable for new users? Right now it is so confusing, and generally not very rewarding, that there is little reason for people to put in the effort to get involved. Check out what Publish0x is doing. Their site makes way more sense.

  • @bigdeej(64)· 2585d

    More like waterboarding the users who still are here... I do recall saying 11 months ago HF20 and RC was going to KILL steem ;) seems many steemians now agree with me despite COUGH COUGH ned flagging me and trying to silence anyone who disagreed with the INSANE idea of forcing DAPP devs to PAY for their users to get accounts while the early adopters (ned and steemit staff) have millions of steem for free and earn insane amounts compared to the rest of us while having basically full control of the witnesses who then adopt their insane new policies and hard forks...

    Just to be clear I said this 10 months ago ;) https://steemit.com/steem/@bigdeej/is-steem-dead-i-think-it-may-be-getting-ready-to-power-down-if-this-continues

    So you can't say I didn't warn you all!

  • @jonbit(66)· 2585d

    I had a friend that pointed out how to achieve this goal.

    1. Accounts should be free to make and fast to get.
    2. Get rid of RC
    3. Free to post and comment
    4. If you want to earn you have to power up.

    People want easy and fast UI, sign ups, posting, monitoring reactions to the post they made. FB and other places did this right, why is steem/steemit doing it any other way?

    What you purpose doesn't fix the sign up problem and to be honest wallets should of been one of the first things that came out as did BTC and other crypto.

  • @trayan(71)· 2586d

    @steemitblog, plans usually do not work itself out..! ;)

  • @victorholyo(60)· 2586d

    I am a big fan of Steem and would really want to be part of a community involving writers. Please update me with the latest news. Thanks.

    Posted using Partiko iOS

  • @jacobtothe(77)· 2586d

    Address the bid bot problem. Until you take serious measures there, I can't take anything about "onboarding the masses" seriously. Committment to community require dealing with bad actors who make this experiment problematic.

  • @greatesteem(59)· 2586d

    Images were hidden due to low ratings.

  • @joshh71390(46)· 2586d

    Raise the fee to do trivial tasks... if it COSTS 8 dollars to downvote 7$ of rewards then... thats goona out an end to that.

    If a comment costs .01 steem then thats gonna stop crap spam

  • @hotsauceislethal(66)· 2586d

    What we really need is a new user and content discover mechanism. New users get zero traction because they have to be manually followed and there is no "suggested" authors for your feed.

    Without anyone actually going out and self-promoting the user retention rates have plummeted because they have gotten no engagement or feedback for their work. This is very discouraging or all users and is one of the biggest setback for the platform.

    We need to restructure the entire UI and make it way more user friendly and fool proof.

  • @mejustandrew(59)· 2587d

    I am sorry to see that this post is downvoted so much. You should try to reach a common goal maybe with the biggest stakeholders from the community before taking different measures...

  • @theopinion(63)· 2587d

    Who sells off all that Steem the authors lol. no the whales right they crash the system at will or it sure seems so.How does it go again divide and conquer. Really shrink the pool rewards which go 98% to the Steemit and whales anyways then give 50% of the vote again who will profit the whales again, what four quarters for a dollar nows you get 85cents??? Cmon you guys think everybody's that dumb and cant count right? Your not improving user stuff at all looks more like a smoke screen to get everyone arguing while you secretly silently clean out the coins every day really!! you want to make money and users it`s so simple dial it all back to when you were making money and users what are you waiting for?

  • @offgridlife(74)· 2587d

    Steemit is still the best. I let everyone know that I earned $40,000 here in 6 months. Best place on the Internet to make a living as a blogger, artist. Photographer. I tweet about Steem daily to my 12,000 followers.

  • @offgridlife(74)· 2587d

    Why not offer some referral rewards similar to Publish0x.... it is bringing in a ton of new accounts. I am getting about 20 per month.... and earning extra DAI stable coins every day. https://www.publish0x.com/?a=BDbDqjxdl2

  • @mjhomb(58)· 2587d

    One thing that you could do to bring on the masses is improve scrolling in chrome on android :) So frustrating that

  • @mrosenquist(72)· 2587d

    If you are looking to strike a chord like you did when Steemit came out, you are missing the point. Back then Steemit was unique, for the reasons you mentioned. But now, there is COMPETITION! You must be better, faster, easier, and more in tune with the audience you want to attract.

    So, here are the short points to success. I will keep it brief, if something doesn't make sense, then ask why.

    1. Kill the bots. No more auto-voting or auto anything! This is a social site people!!! The very strength is having people contribute, either by posting content, curating, or simply adding to the conversations. So KILL the bots. They are caustic, drive people away, and make it so even the invested don't have to participate.
    2. Reward the authors of good content. Upvoters/curators should also get a reward, but much less. Without good content, Steemit fills up with crap posts that only the bots care about.
    3. Make posting EASY. Enough of this markup language crap. Every other site I use makes it easy for content to be posted. Steemit is one of the MOST DIFFICULT to post anything. I rarely use it anymore because of this. Allow for short posts, links to external articles with user commentary, and a simple interface that does not require HTML knowledge. Go out to Twitter, Medium, LinkedIn, Uptrennd, Minds, etc. to see much better interfaces.
    4. Market across traditional venues and with word of mouth, when the reputation improves. Here is the thing, yes it is painful to say, but many (perhaps most?) of the good writers have left. Bots rule and the whales grab most of the rewards. So what do you expect word-of-mouth marketing to promote? Right now, nothing. So, if you are going to get people to try Steemit, it will be with more traditional marketing maneuvers.
    5. Don't waste time on 'Communities'. It is premature to focus on 'Communities', as most of the activity are by bots anyways! First get competitive, then lure people in with a great experience, and once you have real content, real interaction, and real excitement, then worry about things like 'Communities'. If you spend you energy on them now, you will end up with a bunch of dead/nearly-dead communities that are only being used as another tool by bots. This will distract you from the real opportunities you must go after.

    We need to fix issues, be competitive, and reach out to the vast social media audience who want a functional 'Steemit' experience (in that order). If Steemit does not deliver, they will go to Uptrennd, Minds, Hyperspace, Publish0x, BitTubers, or a list of other contenders. I already see a lot of Steemians on these sites who are more active there than they are on Steemit. That SAYS SOMETHING! (and it is not because Steemit is missing 'Communities'). Fix the reward system, remove the auto-bots, make it easy to post, and then use real marketing practices to showcase the improved Steemit.

    Otherwise, I doubt any of us will be here next year.

  • @socrate01(34)· 2587d

    OKAY

  • @schwarz(45)· 2587d

    I like the communties angle but I think you need to identify some areas to target and incentivise some community leaders. Certain groups like car forums or official sports clubs forums where they currently have fairly poor infrastructure for example and an incentive could be given to establish.

    The UI needs to be simplified and improved massively though. A decent app is essential and some changes to the power ups etc. Despite being around for a while I've still got no idea what steem power is and who would want to power up or down. It needs to be the simple up / down vote and some engagement / retention mechanism so people get something extra for sticking with the platform. People just want to use something, not have to learn how to use it...

  • @isnochys(67)· 2588d

    Hmm. Wasn't hf20, rc introduction, the big onboarding feature? At least it praised like that. Newsteem I guess..

  • @melip(61)· 2588d

    Get rid off the bots and problem solved 😊

  • @jbgarrison72(50)· 2588d

    I feel like onboarding new users into the waiting jaws of a whale with a bot army which exists for the sole purpose of destroying accounts of people with different opinions is.... problematic.

    Imagine a self-proclaimed whale crusader against "bad actors" with the initials BS who single handedly gives this entire platform more bad PR (through his posting and voting/flagging) than all OTHER bad actors combined... how ironic. It doesn't take new users long to get exposed to this toxicity.

    EVERYONE who's been using Steemit for a while knows who this is. THIS is what needs to be addressed to improve the "environment" for new users to arrive... ...and stay (which will in turn attract actual investors and increased stake).

  • @honusurf(62)· 2588d

    Get rid of @themarkymark!

  • @freebornangel(72)· 2588d

    Steem is not going to stop being a commons just because we all hide in our rooms.

    I'm in on paper wallets, and leaning on light wallets. Maybe some of the stake will find a home offline.

  • @alexvanaken(68)· 2588d

    So to be clear, you are NOT going to advertise to the masses...? How the fuck will they find out about Steem? Word of mouth? That got us to #70 on coinmarketcap. WTF... Why do you refuse to advertise??

  • @blake.letras(55)· 2588d

    How do communities reduce unwarranted flagging? As long as upvotes involve STEEM inflation I would imagine that the flagging continues. Sure, SMTs might make it less obvious, but nothing prevents someone else from using a general block explorer to identify content they dislike and flag it, regardless what community it is.

    The only way for flagging to be reduced would be if people could not see posts from certain communities. Is that happening, and if so how? If everything is openly on the blockchain I can't see how it actually gets reduced or eliminated.

  • @arcange(79)· 2589d

    Congratulations @steemitblog! Your post was mentioned in the Steem Hit Parade in the following category:

    • Comments - Ranked 1 with 216 comments
  • @ssekulji(80)· 2589d

    it seems that owners let the time to do whatever will do with this. they have EOS now which is what Steem was at early stages.

  • @fishyculture(61)· 2589d

    "The Root Problem" IMO is that steemit has this "We are not FACEBOOK!!!" mentality when what the masses are seeking is an alternative to facebook. I do not mean steemit should try to be facebook, but ignoring t he reality that facebook is what WORKS is kinda stupid. I know, I am just a BLOGGER - ick! I post actual things from my actual world, have been doing so for almost 2 years (steemiversary next week!) I keep coming back and trying to keep my account active because I see such potential here. I hate discord, I am not looking for a "community" I want a blogging platform that pays me in crypto. Steemit is that. Unfortunately, it is also full of bots and blog-haters, so I have about three actual humans who ever read anything I post. THAT is the root problem. I am not here to please the BOTS, but this platform has become almost the sole domain of BOTS. The root problem is BOTS. And I am aware that everyone has resigned, surrendered to the bots, thrown up their hands and said "There is nothing we can do about bots!" In other words, no one even wants to fix the root problem.

  • @fabien(63)· 2589d

    Great news! Really excited to see such improvements going on, i'm a big fan of the "light account" proposal, this will have huge impact for making onboarding easier, hope we will see this implemented soon!

  • @reggaemuffin(66)· 2589d

    I love the new communication from you. It really gives me hope for the platform to see you recognize the problems and having solutions.

    If we want to onboard “the masses” we first have to appreciate that they are not a single, monolithic abstraction and instead acknowledge “the masses” as being made up of individual people with diverse interests, personalities, and group identities.

    This. Exactly this. I like the communities + SMT approach in this context, even if the community proposal still needs work. The goals behind it are spot on.

    Light accounts are a game changer! We are doing a hacky guest account thing in TokenBB and having real Blockchain light accounts would be epic. I am 200% in favor of that as soon as possible.

    While it will take time to regain the communities trust, I personally believe that you are on the right path!

  • @prameshtyagi(71)· 2589d

    Light steem account and sdk that helps build ios/android dapps on steem blockchain. These two features are essential to get more users. Account creation and login process should be easy in first and as user interacts more and start having value>100 steem in his/her wallet - he/she should be reminded to move to next level to protect his/her wallet.

  • @greatesteem(59)· 2589d

    Onboard the masses? We can't even onboard our own users.

  • @steevc(80)· 2589d

    I think communities could be a big plus for Steem, but it's been a long time coming. Not sure about the value of light accounts. I can create accounts with RCs, but I don't see a way to do it through the Steemit site. I've used SteemWorld. There ought to get a method that lets you create an account and get the keys to the new user without you seeing them. I thought that some sort of 'sponsored' account creation was going to be added. I will delegate to people I bring on board who can add value. Just make it easier.

  • @felixxx(73)· 2589d

    I wish I had a job as easy as yours.

  • @hungryharish(67)· 2589d

    That's a lot of promising plans which people here are waiting and saying about them when I joined here. I really like the idea of

    Light accounts

    That's what needed. Simple and instant account creation for the new people to onboard without any hassle.

    As you are mentioned SMT again. Its really become interested to see how the both steem-engine token communities and hivemind compete and their advantages. And I believe the Dev team behind SMT will now have more advantages as they can learn from the drawbacks or more features required to be added to SMT from steem-engine.

    I loved how much you guys progressing from last 2 months. Definitely it's worth wait to experience new hardfork and this updates.

    Posted using Partiko Android

  • @aaronhawk(57)· 2589d

    I think the free accounts and the premium accounts is a good idea. I like that being implemented for sure.

    But how do you onboard the masses? You didn't talk about that. Can we gather a large amount of liquidity and roll out a big PR Event? Just talking about it doesn't help onboarding the masses.

    What do you guys think of SE and the tribes? I would like to hear your opinion.

  • @furion(71)· 2589d

    Steemit is a platform that pays people to spam. This economic model is not sustainable in the long term.

    Perhaps the creator reward inflation should be reduced towards 0, and the rewards themselves be paid from the ad revenue generated by the author's posts?

    The assumption here is that the content creators incentives would now be on writing content that people want to see, as well as investing in the discoverability of the posts (sharing, backlinking, etc) - a big shift from current incentives of finding the most efficient way to siphon the reward pool.

  • @nomad-magus(70)· 2589d

    Communities are a great idea. I'm making some steps to solidify one and, naturally, check only Facebook. But now I will patiently wait for your updates about that (what's the ETA?). Only, make sure there will be options, in the UI, to share media (video, audio, photos), with the members of my future community. STM will also be a good supplement. Need to wait and see what it actually will give to the end user and how. Steem communities will also create a new job title. A blockchain community manager. Again, need to wait and see.

    Keep up the good work!

  • @cryptogee(76)· 2589d

    No company, website, team, product, service in history ever onboarded masses without ##ADVERTISING!!!##

    Cg

  • @rajan3854(55)· 2589d

    Wonderful

    Posted using Partiko iOS

  • @rudyardcatling(65)· 2589d

    1 billion masses < 1 1% er ...

  • @drutter(73)· 2589d

    I think the concept of "communities" and "light accounts" sound good, and make people happy, but this post didn't actually explain what those things are. Doesn't anyone mind that it's all just public relations fluff and shiny promises?

    This post is supposedly about "onboarding the masses" but you have no plan for how to do that other than to write code? That hasn't been working.

    As for "leaders", is that decentralization, or centralization? I don't want to be led, and I don't want to lead, and I don't want to be around people that need to be led. I didn't think Steem was that kind of place, but maybe it's changing.

    You call this an "experimental platform" and remind readers to be lenient and patient. Why was there a big fanfare about "no longer being in beta", just a couple months ago?

    People's finances and lives are being ruined here, I see it all around me. This is a massive disaster, and it looks like it's about to get even worse. Frightening lack of direction and honesty.

  • @freebornangel(72)· 2589d

    because we were giving them the opportunity to take ownership over their content.

    What ownership? Posts are public, follows are public, comments and votes are public. We are very much still giving our data away.

    the ability for Community leaders to own the communities that they build.the ability for Community leaders to own the communities that they build.

    The old paradigm was worried about ownership because of the scarcity model. If you haven't noticed that paradigm is quickly becoming obsolete.

    we want to do this in a decentralized way,

    Lol, is anybody still drinking that koolaid?

    You literally just put out a post about how proud you were to announce the names of the gatekeepers to being rewarded with steem. Yet, you are sooo clueless as to attempt to claim that decentralization is your core value? Seriously? Anybody buying that at this point?

    and it is our hope that the community, and the Witnesses they elect,

    Lol, hold your watches high, the bs is getting deep in here.

    You guys have done a good job with rc's, mira, and hivemind, but you are deaf to the feedback that doesn't echo your own feelings on matters. That might fly among the small group of people that depend on your goodwill to eat, but it won't be getting picked up for renewal by most folks. 1m dead accounts should confirm that.

    Stop using the ninjamine to force us to pay your favored accounts. Step out of any perceived 'leadership' roles, let the community decide. The masses have already demonstrated their rejection of what y'all think is best.

    Seriously.

  • @oldtimer(76)· 2589d

    I have a feeling I'm reading the same post over and over again. Month after month after month. Tell us something new for a change.

  • @pnc(65)· 2589d

    Steem blockchain is ahead of many blockchains out there. It's hard to build stuff. People think rome was build in one day. Having millions at your hard does not mean you will be successfull. I's takes dedication, hard work and stewardship. For having bee here since the begining, I applaude what the team have build in 3 years. Remember 3 years. The Steem community is very very strong, no matter the challenges, no matter the competition (which is good), Steem blockchain will strive. "Communities" & "SMT" will take us to another level. Many blockchain social network will launch, but Steem is here to stay. The NEW STEEM is Different. Thks for communicating this to the community.

  • @abitcoinskeptic(75)· 2589d

    Sounds good to us. BTW like that you tagged #themasses, lol

  • @retrocommodore(65)· 2589d

    These sound like good things to work on, however I think simplifying the sign-up process should come first. That way when the other upgraded elements are put in place it will make it very easy for any new users they attract to sign up.

  • @boboxer(46)· 2589d

    Games are the only reason I came back to steemit and stayed. If not for steem monsters I wouldn't bother with the social media aspect. Develop games and have communities built around them and you will see the numbers grow. If you focus solely on social media then you already lost the war. That battleship sailed 16 months ago.

  • @jarvie(75)· 2589d

    That solution is “light accounts” and it is our hope that the community, and the Witnesses they elect, will consider this feature for inclusion in the SMT hardfork.

    Could you be specific please.

    Does this mean HF21?

    If you are serious and have or will have the code ready for testing and approveal by witnesses in the next couple of weeks-ish (maybe less) please let us know or we will likely have to just consider this something for 2020 or 2021... because the next hardfork after this one is likely not gonna arrive until 2020 and that's not a good enough solution for @steempeak in my opinion.
    We were about to start down another road but we like this decentralized option better.

    WHAT EXACTLY WILL A LIGHT ACCOUNT DO?

    You were pretty vague on what a light account can do. Even a short list would be nice.

    • Comment?
    • Send receive money?
    • Create JSONS (thus handle many types of apps)
    • I assume probably not stake steem for Steem Power and vote.
    • I also assume probably not create posts but seems like Comments would be important... but technically the two things are pretty similar.
  • @thoughts-in-time(68)· 2589d

    The cloudflare browser check is definitely not helping traffic to steemit.com, and I can see how it may discourage new users if your going to plug the original condenser.

  • @luckystrikes(73)· 2589d

    Please improve your homepage(UI) first. Steemit.com has an unattractive design to visit.

  • @silvertop(76)· 2589d

    We really do have a serious on -boarding problem. We need to make this much simpler to signup. I just spent three hours today trying to figure out what a friend of mine did wrong trying to set up her keys. If I can backtrack to the original password I might be able to salvage this account, but I am helping through text's and one phone call. She said she was OK without help....

    If you try to sign up someone that might have had exposure to only Facebook, many including my friend are lost.

    Please understand not every user will be at the same computer skill level!

    I would fully understand if my friend gives up before she even starts, and her account will be lost forever!! One less Steemit account!

  • @itstime(61)· 2589d

    This sounds good ...but timelines please...

  • @briggsy(65)· 2589d

    Thanks for the update, although I doubt you will get much useful feedback considering the people you're trying to attract to the steem ecosystem are not here and present (yet).

  • @raj808(77)· 2589d

    Your plan to onboard the masses is ignoring a few crucial factors.

    There is so much that needs to happen beyond what this post expresses. It's a good bit of PR writing though 👍

    Here's what I'd do if I had steem's stake:

    • You can offer new users the chance to not join and become disappointed within a month of joining that quality of content isn't any indication of how they will be rewarded. Believe me, the only reason why any quality content creators I've seen on steem don't leave within the first three months was because of @curie, I worked for curie for a while and I'm sure of this as fact!

    How can this be achieved?

    • You can stop ignoring the massive abuse of power that early adopters continue to take for granted. Use your stake to downvote the obvious massive reward pool rapists and mega trolls that make this platform a shity thing to look at, and for some, be involved with. Censorship by consensus only works with a group of reasonable, intelligent people with power to find consensus. Not by a massive minority of ego maniacs with a kim jong il complex, this isn't north Korea... I hope! These peopke provide one simple message to anyone looking at steem and considering joining; that it is just a 'who stakes the most' wins platform. The overwhelming discrepancy in stake (the wealth gap) on steem negates any reasonable consensus of censorship, as the massively stake wealthy have far too much power to manipulate through either fear or incentive.
    • You can leverage your ninja mined stake (steemit.inc) to make sure that vote sellers are not endorsed as legitimate members of the community. It's time to shit or get off the pot steemit.inc. Do you care about the success of steem as it was originally envisioned? Vote bidbot owners out of consensus witness positions with stinc's stake, while providing some incentive to other large stake holders to support the position of continued downvote control on bidbot owners, and users, which would curb the influence of such detrimental mechanisms and help realise steem's original value proposition.
    • You can stop trying to fool the community by joining in with the smoke and mirror politics that the value steem has been bled by content creators only. The top 10% (sp wealthy) are some of the worst leechers of value, particularly bidbot owners, hold them to account; you have the stake to do it. The depreciation of steem's value is not all down to comment spammers and plagiarism scammers with small accounts. That is a political narrative that had been perpetuated by some of the wealthiest (stakeholders) on steem. An equal (or larger) amount of price depreciation has come from the highest SP holders and vote sellers taking value out of the system by promoting content that provides no value for anyone, but profits them. If I had more SQL knowledge I might be able to query the blockchain for stats on this, but one thing I'm certain of is that at least 6-7 of the top 20 witnesses run vote selling services according to my research. Apparently HF21 and the EIP is meant to mitigate against vote selling and encourage manual curation? I'm going to say outright that a group of consensus witnesses with even one bidbot owner in the group isn't impartial. Witnesses have private telegram groups.
    • You can stop pandering to witnesses. Realise that this platform as a glorified excuse for various business interests to incentivise advertising holds less than a fraction of the value proposition of people being rewarded for quality content based on talent, interest and creativity. The masses will on-board with the chance at realising a dream of rewards for expressing their passions a million times quicker than they do with the offer of 'the same, old same old' product hunt, or write for my agenda incentives. It baffles me how anyone can't see that we had the winning formula. If someone/s with stake had the guts to step up and regulate those who want exploit this USP then even the selfish people who want to only take, might see their investment appreciate through the coin price above and beyond how much they can leech out over 2-3 years.
    • You can continue to market steem as the real paradigme shifting and unique idea it started off as; a content creation platform, while ensuring that it remains so. This can be achieved, not by giving the power of your stake into a centralised authority (the committee of three people you recently announced do not represent a community of 10000 people, they represent the business interests of 3 people), but by using your stake to negate the massive reward pool rape perpetuated by whales who hypocritically state people should live up to values they never stick to themselves. Anyone with an ounce of intelligence who joins the steem blockchain can see that it's one rule for the proles on steem, and another for the whales, vote selling barons and witnesses. Apparently, we're all in it together... I know many people on steem who've never powered down (including myself)... but they're not making tens of thousands of dollars/year by making this platform look like a lie and a Ponzi scheme to anyone who joins up.

    Finally, you use 'the root problem' as one of your titles. I read thorough the whole post, and I agree that communities and SMT's may allow the onboarding of large community groups with varied interests (especially as it will be decentralised at the blockchain level). But if we've learnt one thing from Scot and tribes, it's that creating a community and a token does not equal value. A community's value is only as strong as the people 'hodling' the token, and the leaders moderating the content. Steem needs a strong foundation value on the token, we have a strong community, but without fixing the 'root problems' I've stated above steem as a blockchain is just going to perpetuate the same corruption and avarice across a thousand SMT communities. That's the nature of the beast, and human behaviour. The root problem that you've brushed over is that the corruption at the core of the governance of steem needs to be addressed, or steem will founder and die.

    I really don't want to see that happen. Cheers.

  • @howo(76)· 2589d

    Light accounts would be a game changer, and I honestly believe that communities will be the most impactful feature. If everything gets delivered hf22 will be amazing !

  • @jondoe(76)· 2589d

    It seems simple to me. Increase the ability of people to earn on here and the masses will flood in. Unfortunately all the changes that we are doing recently are likely going to further decrease people's ability to earn on here.

    Though admittedly, I am not sure how you help people earn more while also making things sustainable. Above my pay grade.

  • @everittdmickey(73)· 2589d

    ban bots ban flaggin problem solved.

  • @nokodemion(59)· 2589d

    LOWER INFLATION and onboarding is no issue.

  • @geekgirl(80)· 2589d

    I don’t think “light” accounts is the solution. If new people want to use Steem they need full features, and right away. Problem has always been delayed sign up system and lack of marketing.

    If account creation costs are the problem, I would suggest cost credit system. Let’s say Steemit Inc creates an account at the cost of 2 Steem. When account reaches 50 Steem Power, user will lose 2 sp which is credited back to the account creator, in this case Steemit Inc.

    Additionally if account never goes active within first month, creator is credited with RC equal to one account creation.

    But most importantly I think Steemit Inc should take the lead on marketing Steem and community would follow/help.

  • @theghost1980(70)· 2589d

    Well, I believe this could be something. Light accounts may open new use cases to people. In the meantime if anyone could answer me the followings I will appreciate it:

    • Just to get this right. Are the Sub-Communities(tribes) of STEEM going to be released with SMT? What would be the cost comparing that to Steem-Engine?
    • If they will be released with SMT's, what would happen with the actual tribes?
    • Also, what would happen with the Actual tokens in Steem-Engine after the SMT's?
    • Any date for SMT's?
  • @carloserp-2000(69)· 2589d

    Free accounts is one of the main things you should do, that would attract the masses and help strengthen steem and help regain its true value.

  • @steemalbania(50)· 2589d

    as i am finding out first hand it is really hard trying to explain steem to non crypto people.. the users that steem so badly needs .

    thats a good aproach with light account i would also suggest that you give out a couple of demo accounts that can interact freely on one specific tag "demotag" and transfer small amounts in and out to give that first hand experience ... maybe if there is time add it to the HF21 ...

  • @petanque(44)· 2589d

    Sounds exciting !

  • @jphamer1(62)· 2589d

    One thing about the adoption curve is getting people to understand it. That part is out of anyones control in the main but the masses themselves. Thats not to say that Steemit could not focus on making it as easy to use and understand as possible though.

  • @phoenixwren(73)· 2589d

    So wait, stupid question - are SMTs going to be part of HF 21, or is HF 21 its own thing and SMTs will require a HF 22?

  • @galleryworld(56)· 2589d

    Wowww really nice plan i like that

  • @ats-david(75)· 2589d

    I made this original image back in April 2017. Not much progress has been made, it seems...neither with messaging nor implementation.

    steem_same-old_same-old.jpg

    https://steemit.com/special-report/@ats-david/special-report-another-marketing-post-released-by-steemit-inc


    We want to solve this problem and, as the team that released the base protocol and maintains the most used Steem-powered interface, we have the most to gain by doing so.

    You want to solve this problem, but you not only refuse to improve your actual interface - which is what most "normies" (the masses) care about - you also make investment into the platform far too risky and essentially useless. You dilute stakeholder influence over the reward pool by delegating massive amounts of your "ninja-mine" while simultaneously continuing your programmatic selling of STEEM tokens at market prices. Not to mention the fact that you delivered a plethora of poorly rationalized code changes that destroyed both the economic incentives and the social elements of this platform.

    You're not going to onboard users while making your main selling point "Get paid to blog!" when the "payments" are most frequently on the decline.

    Social media is primarily about the social experience of users. They don't need money to interact. The money is the big bonus. It's what gives you an advantage over other sites if the rest of the playing field was somewhat equal.

    It is not.

    Steemit.com (and the other Steem interfaces) offers very little to the masses. Communities won't matter much if the rest of the site is difficult and/or unpleasant to use and look at. Tokenization (SMTs!!!) won't matter much if nobody likes the site and the "popular" content.

    So, how are you going to onboard masses with the main enticement being communities and scary crypto tokens? Facebook has groups. They work pretty well for most FB users. Same with Reddit. Same with most other popular sites. People use those and are happy...and they make no money at all.

    How do you plan to compete with those interfaces when you have an aesthetically and socially inferior product? How can you entice people to come for the money when you're doing your best to make the token worthless and investment pointless?

    How can you expect people to believe you about delivering on your promises when you have continually broken promises and missed delivery dates for three years? Communities have been talked about since the winter of 2016/2017 with a delivery date in 2017. SMTs have been talked about since at least September 2017 with a delivery date "sometime in 2018." We're now over half-way through 2019 and we still have neither.

    You ask for feedback and suggestions...but you mostly ignore actual feedback and suggestions unless it's something you already planned on doing or unless it's blowing smoke up your asses about how wonderful you are.

    Maybe start by actually addressing criticism so that the criticism doesn't go unanswered or even uncorrected for years on end. Unless, of course, the criticism is spot-on and you have no adequate response to it.

  • @freddio(60)· 2589d

    I would love to see if you can stack Steem in a SMT. The SMT thus has access to RC. This would make the need for Steem higher and the SMT more usefull.

    For Light Wallets, if they only own a SMT in a community, there would have access to RC too.

    The group leader had a reason to buy or stack Steem.

    Only a Idea :)

  • @vikisecrets(80)· 2589d

    Sounds very similar to tribes ;) light accounts and easy onboarding is super important, excited about the upcoming hf and updates 👍

  • @reasedulmac(26)· 2589d
  • @donkeypong(76)· 2589d

    This looks like your plan for completing the work that has been ongoing and promised for eons now. This post could have been written a year ago; I don't see that it includes any plans for onboarding anyone.

  • @ssjsasha(74)· 2589d

    Even with the massive price decrease there are still plenty of steemians ready to build and share

    Amazing

  • @sisygoboom(65)· 2589d

    I've never been more excited for steem 😍 look at us kicking ass and taking names again

  • @florian-glechner(78)· 2589d

    I think the most important thing would bei to bring more real world use cases to Steem. We have this beautiful fast 3 Seconds transactions that could really be used to pay at a Supermarket, Restaurant or whatever. Other blockchains have a much slower Block confirmation time making them not acceptable for real time payments. Nobody will wait several minutes just to see the transaction has gone through. With Steem in the other hand transactions only take seconds, making it perfect for a real time scenario like this. I think this is one of the biggest plus when comparing to other much slower chains. My dream a debit card that uses Steem for payments. Fast easy and secure. We have another plus with the SBD that should act AS a stable coin more or less, so users dont have to worry about big price fluctuation.

    Posted using Partiko Android

  • @bashadow(70)· 2589d

    I hope the SMT hardfork will be just that, only about the SMT's. Piling on of more and more "aside, nice to have", things would not be a good idea. Keep it simple, keep it about the SMT's when it is time.

    Take note of how long the witnesses have had HF21, (over a month now), and note how much progress has been made on an adopt or not choice. To many divergent things to test, so for SMT hardfork Keep it simple and only about SMT's

  • @videosteemit(62)· 2589d

    Light accounts. Yes yes yez yesssss. Make it happen, captain!

    Posted using Partiko Android

  • @hitmeasap(75)· 2589d

    "But the people who joined steemit.com early on were doing so in spite of the difficulty because we were giving them the opportunity to take ownership over their content. "

    Uhm. No? People signed up early because they had an amazing chance to earn a shit ton of money for posting the same stuff they posted elsewhere.

    The majority of the people on STEEM are here for the money. When we fail to reward new users they leave. Simple as that.

    It has never been about being a part of a decentralised, non-censorship platform for the majority of the people. Bob wants money. We need to give him that or he will leave. The lack of rewards are the main reason for people to leave. It has always been about the rewards.

    People can talk about community and whatever, that's not the main reason for people to join. It might be why some people decides to stay, but it's definitely not the main reason for people to join.

    "Steem and steemit.com grew rapidly because we offered people an experience that they couldn’t get anywhere else."

    Yeah. You offered people money. When people realized they won't earn, they decided to leave. That's also the reason for people to not sign up today. They don't earn and the value of STEEM is low.

    On top of that, STEEM is difficult for people to understand and we allowed people to promote STEEM like a personal ATM. Like a cash cow. They did that for years and everyone was okay with that...

    bidbots destroyed the trending pages, vote selling in general destroyed manual curation. The users who scored a lot in the early days are the same people who earns today. (with the exception of some investor here and there perhaps).

    Greed, poor leadership, ignorant behaviour and lack of self-control ruined STEEM. And that's the reason for STEEM to be stagnant no matter what happens. Give people a fair chance of earning rewards, like they had in the early days, and the masses will come without any major marketing.

  • @resiliencia(75)· 2589d

    I believe the focus should be in all of the stated in this post. I hope you guys can make this vision happen. I am sure that the results will be mindblowing!

  • @donald.porter(67)· 2589d

    We really need a safe merchant ready native mobile Light Wallet. Will light accounts spur that development?

    Mass on-boarding without merchant adoption efforts is not exactly efficient, but what-do-I-know right 🤷🏽‍♂️

    Not much, but I have learned that not everyone and every society is open to having their wallet always visible on their blog. That creates a huge learning curve in the Caribbean, which we are actively on-boarding with ReggaeSteem.com

  • @nateaguila(69)· 2589d

    Light Accounts would be great. Just like tacos are great.

    I guess I’m hungry.

    Exciting times!

    Posted using Partiko iOS

  • @theycallmedan(80)· 2590d

    Nail on the head. Tight concise read and vision. Very impressed with the communication and vision from Steemit INC. The light accounts are a godsend for 3Speak and all of Steem.

  • @darlenys01(70)· 2590d

    It is here where the secret is in the masses, to strengthen the communities.

  • @ammonite(73)· 2590d

    I am probably not the first one to be thinking this but what exactly will be the difference between SMTs and Steem Engine and the new communities popping up like Leo, geek and creativecoin with these new communities? Will these all complement each other or all come together as one?

  • @theguruasia(69)· 2590d

    @steemitblog, Seems you guys are addressing a lot of most common issues and drawbacks of the chain by using those update! Excellent and carry on! $trdo

    Cheers~

  • @borislavzlatanov(65)· 2590d

    I have been really, really wanting to get more people to Steemit and form a community for over two years now. The single reason I have not been able to do so is because the Communities feature hasn't been available. If I bring someone here, they have no reason to stay. Whereas if they could hop on a Community section where there are other people gathered around the same interest, that would give them a reason to participate and keep them coming here. There is no reason for them to be here otherwise.

    Communities is the one single most important feature. I think much more important than everything else that was done over the last 2+ years.

    You don't need to do marketing. Every single one of your users will be your marketer. They will advertise the platform, form their communities, bring over their friends and existing communities. In fact, they can't wait to do that. But right now they can't do it because there is no point bringing in more people if there is nothing for them to do here.

    There are a lot of fundamental mistakes being made in regards to the sequence in which things are developed. New technologies go through an adoption curve, where at the start of the curve you have early adopters. We are still there. This means things like easy onboarding are not a priority at all at this time. Early adopters like products that require more skill to figure out, they like it when the product is not polished, when it is still not ready for the masses. That gives them a chance to adopt it before the masses. But without Communities, there is only one big ocean of people and posts, so the "social media" part cannot really happen. So my suggestion to all entrepreneurs on this blockchain is: read the book The Four Steps to the Epiphany in order to understand more about developing your product from an idea to a massive business.

  • @martie7(62)· 2590d

    While we are thinking a lot about how we can dramatically improve the sign up process

    Check how easy create account on bearshares https://bearshares.com/register

    Same I can say about other steem based platforms where no need to wait many weeks.

  • @moon32walker(72)· 2590d

    If Steem wants to be a global player for the masses, right now it can't be without something like light accounts. Certainly an interesting idea that needs more exploration.

  • @ew-and-patterns(71)· 2590d

    Once SMTs and Communities are out, you should use big parts of your future ad revenue to pay for influencer marketing on Twitter/ Instagram. Get some big names on here and big parts of their following will also create an account. They can then easily form their LeBron James community or Neymar da Silva Santos Júnior community here on the steem blockchain...

  • @steemitqa(64)· 2590d

    Light Accounts

    I can't tell you how important this is. Thank you for bringing this to the fore front and let's get the masses on this beautiful chain!

  • @whatsup(76)· 2590d

    Nice! Thank you for communicating this. It's a great start and set some expectations.

    Also good job on showing how you view current steps as part of the over all picture.

    I will quit trolling you on this one. :) (just said in fun)

    Thanks for the post.

  • @jondoe(76)· 2590d

    Also as long as we are taking input here, my other suggestion would be to limit witness votes to something around "5-10" per account instead of the current "30". The reason being that several of the largest accounts are basically deciding all of the top 20 witnesses, something that isn't good for decentralization going forward.

  • @sameernawab(67)· 2590d

    i am with you steem team

  • @marki99(62)· 2590d

    Great update, communication is always getting better. I think that light accounts are a great idea, and should be added in the hardfork.

    I would also like to see a feature proposed by @theycallmedan that enables to instantly power down for a 5% burn of the stake. Even though this directs attention away from SMTs and communities, STEEM desperately needs a better sink, instead of just counting on growth of the network.

    Posted using Partiko iOS

  • @bluengel(71)· 2590d

    GodSpeed ! :) 💙

    May the Steem ♨ Force B ...............

    Posted using Partiko Android

  • @jondoe(76)· 2590d

    My input would be to get these done yesterday. Communities, SMTs, and light accounts (fixing the sign up bottleneck) should be 'mission critical'. Everything else should come after, specifically EIP and SPS. Put all your resources into delivering those first couple ASAP. They are significantly more important to steem and steemit's survival.

  • @richardcrill(68)· 2590d

    Cool, but I don't think any of it matters if y'all continue to let bid bots destroy the content discovering mechanism of Steemit. It's awesome that some communities are fixing this on their end, but it's counter productive that this vote buying still dominates Steem. As pleased as I am about these recent developments, I still don't know why y'all would kill off one of the main features and making the trending page into something different entirely. It doesn't instill confidence, especially seeing how doable it is after starting my own tribe.