scrobble.life
#steemit

Announcing Steemit's New Delegation Application Process

del app process thumb.jpg

Hello Steemians, our #1 goal at Steemit is to onboard the masses to blockchain technology. One of the tools we have in our toolbox that has gone underutilized is Steemit, Inc.’s stake. In the beginning, there were only a small number of great applications. This made the task of determining who deserved a delegation relatively straightforward. But as the ecosystem has grown, the number of potential delegation recipients has increased dramatically, and the lack of a formal delegation process has led to confusion, uncertainty, and distrust around delegations.

A Formal Process

That’s why today we are excited to be releasing a formal delegation application process that is intended to add more transparency and decentralization to the process by providing a standardized format for delegation applications which will be applied by an independent committee tasked with determining which projects satisfy the criteria. The full process is included in this post below.

The Goal

Our goal with this process is to add a higher degree of rigor to the process through which delegations are distributed with an eye toward maximizing value creation on Steem. To that end there is a strong emphasis on projects that have a coherent business plan and revenue generation model. Ultimately whether organizations that are not designed to generate a profit should be given delegations will be determined by the committee and the process outlined below is intended to be a living document that is iterated upon in collaboration with the committee. If you have any feedback on this process, please share it in the comments sections below.

The Steemit Team

Steemit, Inc. Delegation Process

In the coming months we will restructure all Steemit delegations in an effort to move the ecosystem in a more fair and sustainable direction without harming existing delegations that add value to the ecosystem.

The Goal

This document outlines a new delegation process that is more transparent and decentralized, ensuring that recipients of delegations act in the best interest of Steem stakeholders and the overall health of the Steem ecosystem. This is intended to be a living document that can be updated and improved over time.

Delegation Tiers

Three tiers of delegations: Top–Tier: 1,000,000 SP Mid–Tier: 500,000 SP Test–Tier: 100,000 SP

The STEEM amounts associated with the Tiers are set at Steemit, Inc.’s discretion and are subject to change based on the number of applications and the STEEM price.

The delegations will be treated as “at-will” meaning that they can be withdrawn at any time for any reason, whether stated or not.

All delegations will be re-evaluated on a quarterly basis and redistributions made if necessary.

In order to receive a delegation a project must complete a Delegation Application and post it to the Steem blockchain with the tag: delegationapp.

To continue receiving a delegation, a project must complete a Delegation Renewal Form and post it to the Steem blockchain on the first day of every quarter. The delegations will be reviewed every quarter and projects will be judged as if they were applying anew. At that time delegations will be removed or adjusted based on an evaluation of the renewal application.

General Advocacy Agreement (GAA)

As part of the application process every project that applies for a delegation must indicate their willingness to sign a contract agreeing that their business will continue to leverage the Steem blockchain as long as they are receiving a delegation and 1 year following the removal of the delegation. During this time they agree to advocate for the Steem blockchain as a valuable technological protocol that delivers unique value to application developers, regardless of whether or not any contract is signed.

What is the Goal of a Delegation?

Delegations should be like adding “jet fuel” to an existing Steem-powered business. No business should receive a delegation if it isn’t already seeing some kind of success which can be accelerated through a temporary delegation. The most attractive delegation recipients are those who do not require a delegation in order to survive and thrive. If a business requires a delegation to function, it is not a business, and does not warrant a delegation. A delegation should only be awarded if it will result in specific and MATERIAL (not ambiguous or theoretical) economic benefits to both Steem users, and Steemit, Inc. (the entity sacrificing the opportunity costs that result from delegating Steem Power).

We acknowledge that there are circumstances under which non-business organizations should be awarded delegations. Some of these are addressed in this document, but further consideration can be given to such organizations in future processes.

These applications will be reviewed by an independent board of Steem stakeholders and Steemit, Inc. will have final approval.

Delegation Tiers

Top–Tier: Reserved for projects that bring value to the Steem ecosystem beyond the potential of their own business. Due to the external benefits of their work to the community, additional support is given. This may include being complementary to other Steem business growth or addressing critical bottlenecks like user onboarding. Obtaining and maintaining this delegation should require both business validation (proof that the business logic is sound, that growth is happening, and that there’s a sustainable business model), as well as community validation which supports the idea that the business does add additional value to the Steem community.

Growth–Tier: Used to help grow a validated idea that has gained community support. For businesses that have figured out their Business Model and proved that they deliver value to the community and are ready to grow their business.

Test–Tier: Used to help validate an idea for a product. The emphasis is not on growing, but instead on testing and obtaining feedback from the community. Delegation is short-term, and the expected reporting is less about numbers and statistics and more about development and testing ideas with the community (see LEAN StartUp). Test Tier delegations expire automatically after a 3 month period and should be re-applied for at that time.

Illegitimate Use of Delegations

Delegations must not be used to enrich the recipient of a delegation through upvotes (aka “self voting” or purely by means of beneficiaries gained through the use of a project’s platform).

Projects shall not use the delegation in any exploitative way that is detrimental to the Steem community, such as to grow a community, product, or application and then cease to leverage the Steem blockchain.

Legitimate Use of Delegations

  1. Account creations
  2. Incentivizing users for the purpose of growing the Steem user base
  3. Incentivizing users for the purpose of increasing revenue which is then powered up

Delegation Recipient Obligations

Projects receiving delegations shall operate with the Steem blockchain as a core mechanism to their business concepts. They shall build and operate on the Steem blockchain with a long–term view toward growth that benefits the Steem community.

Projects that receive the highest tier of delegation from this process are obligated to develop and operate their projects on the Steem blockchain for the duration of the delegation and 1 year after the removal of the delegation.

Projects that receive delegations shall conduct themselves with the highest regard for the Steem blockchain and its community. They shall not in any way abuse their position or their delegated stake in a way that causes net harm to the blockchain.

Should it be brought to the attention of Steemit, Inc. that a project is abusing its Steem Power delegation, or using it for means outside of the scope of the delegation as originally granted, the delegation may be removed immediately without reason.

Key Performance Indicators (KPI’s)

In some cases, KPI’s may be placed on projects in order to have an agreed upon means of measuring its progress, to hold it accountable for appropriate and adequate use of the delegation, and for the approval of delegation extensions.

Existing Delegation Re-Balancing

Projects with existing delegations will be re-balanced in order to fall in line with the new Tier system. In order to accommodate projects with existing delegations that exceed the new Top or Mid-Tier amounts and have on-going obligations to clients that are based on their current delegation, there will be a quarterly step-down in delegation sizes for these projects until their delegations align with the new Tier system.

In order to qualify for the re-balancing program, projects MUST agree that they will continue to leverage the Steem blockchain at the end of the process and agree to the General Advocacy Agreement.

For example, if the Top-Tier is a 1,000,000 Steem Power delegation and the project in question currently has 2,000,000 Steem Power delegated, then the delegation will be reduced based on the following calculation:

2,000,000 – 1,000,000 = 1,000,000

1,000,000 / 3 = 333,333

Quarterly reduction of Steem Power for 3 quarters = 333,333 SP (until the project has reached the top tier of 1,000,000 SP delegated, assuming that it has been approved for that tier. A project’s current delegation should have no bearing whatsoever on the committee’s determination as to which tier it should belong in the future.

Delegation Application

Project Information

Please limit your responses in this section to 140 characters.

Company name:

Place of Incorporation:

Token name (if applicable):

Token Type (ERC20, Steem-Engine, etc.):

Market

Please limit responses to 300 characters.

What problem is the product / project solving?

Core Team Details

Please limit responses to 500 characters for each team member.

Write short summaries about each core team member including their achievements to show they have a strong track record. Add links to their LinkedIn profiles to this section.

Minimum Viable Product

Please limit responses to 500 characters for each team member.

Provide links to your minimum viable product and describe it. If it is not available, please describe it and include how you plan to build it and when it will be built

Business Strategy

Please limit responses in this section to 250 characters.

Fiat Revenue Strategy: [E.g. We plan to sell NFTs which represent in-game items for US Dollars]

Fiat Revenue Projections in $/user every month: [E.g. $10]

How will this increase the amount of STEEM being powered up?

What financial incentives are you willing to provide to Steemit, Inc.? [E.g. project tokens, revenue-share, etc.]

How will you become financially sustainable once the delegation is removed?

KPI Progress Measurement

Please limit each KPI description in this section to 100 characters.

Suggest at least 3 KPI’s with which to measure the progress of your project in its current phase. KPI’s must be measurable and objective (a percentage or numerical value), or binary (yes / no or completed / not completed).

KPI1 description: KPI1 target:

KPI2 description: KPI2 target:

KPI3 description: KPI3 target:

Token Offering

**Please limit responses in this section to 10 characters.**

Token Launch date:

Total Token Supply at launch:

Fundraising target (in order to fund expansion into the operational / project growth phase / mass market adoption):

Yearly inflation:

Percentage of total token supply that will be airdropped to ALL Steem stakeholders (a/k/a SP holders) in proportion to their SP:

How many tokens will you offer Steemit Inc. in exchange for the delegation?

Do you plan to launch an IEO, ICO, or other public token offering?

Do you plan to raise money from other investors?

What is the vesting period for the following: Team members: Early investors: ICO investors:

% token distribution to: Team: Marketing:

Delegation Request

**Please limit responses in this section to 10 characters.**

How much of a delegation are you requesting? Limit your requests to one of the three tiers: Top-Tier, Mid-Tier or Test-Tier.

Specify the desired time frame for the delegation in 6 month increments: [E.g. 6 months, 1 year, etc.]

Which one of the following answers best describes how the delegation will be used to add direct value to Steem: A. It will be used to create new accounts B. It will be used to give new accounts 15 SP to give them the resources needed to use Steem and purchase goods and/or services through our platform C. It will be used to incentivize the creation of content that promotes Steem on external platforms D. It will be used to provide limited trial or discount services to clients to encourage them to hold Steem and delegate in the future

We agree that our business will continue to leverage the Steem blockchain as long as we are receiving a delegation and 1 year following the removal of the delegation. During this time we also agree to promote the Steem blockchain as a valuable technological protocol that delivers unique value. We are willing to sign a legally binding contract with Steemit, Inc. to this effect.

Delegation Renewal Form

  1. How many new users have you onboarded this month?

  2. What is your monthly growth rate? [Answer to #1 divided by total users]

  3. How much revenue have you generated in $/user per month:

  4. How much revenue have you brought to Steem as measured by total STEEM powered up whether through the company account, the aggregate of your users’ accounts, or a combination of the two?

  5. How much Steem is delegated to your project to manage on behalf of your clients?

  6. Report progress on each of your KPIs. Was the KPI met, exceeded, or failed to be met? By how much and why? Present your answer in contrast to the target KPI and calculate the % it either exceeded or missed the goal by.

  7. Describe the business validation behind why your project continues to add value to the Steem community

  8. Describe what value the project continues to bring to the Steem community and why the community should continue to support your project

Immediate Grounds for Withdrawal

If at any time the recipients of a delegation misrepresent data, metrics, or any other piece of information that is intended to justify their receipt of a delegation, this will constitute bad faith and be grounds for an immediate withdrawal of the delegation.

Comments · 92

  • @steemitboard(66)· 2595d

    Congratulations @steemitblog! You have completed the following achievement on the Steem blockchain and have been rewarded with new badge(s) :

    Your post was the most commented on one week

    You can view your badges on your Steem Board and compare to others on the Steem Ranking If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word STOP

    Vote for @Steemitboard as a witness to get one more award and increased upvotes!
  • @coininstant(69)· 2595d

    @elipowell How come the STEEM facebook scam is coming from the official STEEM FB account? Also since all the sock puppet accounts are fake, and also verified by me to be fake without any matching tx's why would this scam be posted by steemit in the first place? Surely if it were real someone would be using it and sending some steem back here?? So who owns the steemit FB account and why is this post still being posted on FB? Is this a scam YES or NO? ! I know you will never answer me, I better start flagging again soon!

    https://steemit.com/beware/@kawaiicrush/scammy-sounding-commments-coming-from-the-steem-facebook-page

  • @qaysriq(25)· 2595d

    Good look

  • @coininstant(69)· 2596d

    I want an application for a delegation for my flag bot to counter the burninman’ please?

    Posted using Partiko iOS

  • @synrg(66)· 2596d

    Whats up with these scammy sounding commments coming from your facebook page?

    Screen Shot 2019-07-20 at 4.19.15 PM.pngScreen Shot 2019-07-20 at 4.21.02 PM.png

  • @bitcoinflood(80)· 2596d

    Is Steemit still selling 800k steem each month ?

  • @nezer(50)· 2597d

    I wonder why people keep mentioning "this should have been done two years ago. " This is two years after guys and we should be very concerned with things being done right right now.

  • @onecoinpk(25)· 2597d

    Wow! That's great news! We are really excited!

  • @stevescoins(70)· 2597d

    how about delegations to INDIVIDUAL Steemers?

    The purpose would be to decentralize voting power to people who have added content to Steemit, who have worked to create communities, who have proselytized for this platform, and who have spent years here.

    This type of decentralization would be better able to protect new Steemers from involvement in the flag wars, at the very least.

    Proposed Requirements for Consideration

    • Currently hold less than 20,000 SP
    • Minimum of two years on the Steem blockchain
    • Minimum of 500 original posts ( i.e. 250/year) Open for discussion as to what "original" means
    • Minimum of comments of others' posts of 1000 This indicates community involvement
    • Minimum rep of 65
    • One of the following indicators of community involvement -has sponsored creation contests -has taken part in forming a tag-based community -has delegated SP to support a community or project (either a minimum of 1000 SP OR 25% of total SP)

    Businesses are fine and dandy, and Steem Inc. should attempt to onboard them for the purposes stated here.

    More importantly, Steem Inc. needs to consider that INDIVIDUALS are going to be the the factor that makes or breaks STEEM value.

    • It is INDIVIDUALS that decide whether using the platform is a waste of time or not, which directly affects the regard the blockchain itself is held in
    • It is INDIVIDUALS that make the decision for any enterprise whether or not to use our blockchain
  • @tensor(69)· 2598d

    This entire post is filled with contradictions and it further moves the platform in the wrong direction. I thought the goal was to onboard more users, yet you are making it less appealing to actually use the platform. This move effectively turns the social media part of the platform into an app platform instead and that just screws over all of the content creators who are not creating applications. Why should I invest time writing a post or putting up my content if it doesn't fit into a specific topic that some app is curating? And if the app that I chose to contribute to doesn't get a large amount of delegation than there is no purpose either.

    You talk about how this move will make the platform more decentralized and yet thats obviously not true. One of the largest mistakes that was made early in the development of steem was to allow the chain to be mined. This made it so that there was a drastic income inequality when the steemit platform was established. That income disparity is huge and this move just gives those few people more power.

    Steem remains a shining example of what not to do with a social media blockchain platform.

  • @mmunited(67)· 2598d

    I like this and I can do this.

    I will not get the delegation because I can not fulfill the requirement. Anyway it is good for the people who need a lot of steem power for their project to give incentive to the user. But I will be thinking how can I get your delegation.

  • @pagandance(56)· 2598d

    Chill guys, when SMT arrives, STEEM will go to the MOOON!

  • @viraldrome(67)· 2598d

    I'm conflicted. On one hand I survive on Busy's delegation. But OTH I consider steemit's massive stake to be pretty much the opposite of decentralization. It should be users rewarding great content not steemit inc. Dtube votes seem to be almost entirely from dtube rather than the community so its basically one person handing out rewards. That's worse than even youtube for fairness.

  • @endless.drugs(66)· 2598d

    .

  • @rudyardcatling(65)· 2598d

    If i didn't know better i'd think someone's been listening to me :p ... i had kinda hoped for a chunk for creative content, not just money, though i understand at this time - > incoming is priority. But every improvement is improvement. Spreading the resources to access more and give more access. Comes right out of my mouth three or four times ...

    But ... still ... a few 100k for artistic and creative content and a few 100k for humanitarian or environmental / animal initiatives ... gotta think about your rep, man

    euh, woman ...ehm ... TEAM ! think about ... how much advertising budget greenpeace and wwf have for instance if they came to like you ... that's money too, AND good rep ... but this is good, well it's better, thanks for keeping on it !!!

    now ...

    @steemitblog

    no time for sittin' on the fence i guess ...

  • @brianturner(68)· 2598d

    I nominate @dtube to get mid-tier or any delegation. Solid project that will interest my youtube friends if there is more value in it

  • @clixmoney(78)· 2598d

    @steemitblog , @andrarchy , tell me please where to apply ? Should we write a post with all those details or to communicate with you somewhere ? I'm the founder of @dcooperation , it's a community to collaborate and I'm planning to collaborate with other crypto communities.

  • @old-guy-photos(77)· 2598d

    Just dont screw over Dtube. Its the best thing going here.

  • @sniper555(54)· 2598d

    perfect

  • @ajayyy(65)· 2598d

    Oh no, utopian is going to be losing ANOTHER 1 million SP? :(

  • @in2itiveart(73)· 2599d

    so sad... the new STEEMIT GOVERNMENT designed to kill steemit - beat it to death with your administration. This is what always happens when people start something new without first raising their consciousness above the hierarchical way - and here we are again. Too bad. Now we need your "committees" to centralize the decentralized. Gag.

  • @littlescribe(67)· 2599d

    If I might be so permitted, I have a revision to strengthen the following paragraph:

    As part of the application process every project that applies for a delegation must indicate their willingness to sign a contract agreeing that their business will continue to leverage the Steem blockchain as long as they are receiving a delegation and 1 year following the removal of the delegation. During this time they agree to advocate for the Steem blockchain as a valuable technological protocol that delivers unique value to application developers, regardless of whether or not any contract is signed.

    Could read as follows:

    Projects that qualify for delegation may be required to sign a business contract honoring their commitment to strengthen the steem blockchain. Therefore, as part of the application process, every project that applies for a delegation must indicate their willingness to sign a contract agreeing that their business will continue to leverage the Steem blockchain as long as they are receiving a delegation, and for 1 full year following the removal of said delegation. During the time of delegation, they will agree to advocate for the Steem blockchain as a valuable technological protocol that delivers unique value to application developers. Any revenue generation during delegation, and for a full 12 months after delegation, will be considered the property of the project or applicant only insofar as they have contributed a net positive revenue to the steem blockchain first.

    The purpose of the delegation is to build up the platform by giving worthy projects an opportunity to help do so, while mutually benefiting from an increase in influence themselves.

    Point being, applicants should consider delegation as a stewardship, rather than a personal business investment. And treat it as such. So I think there needs to be an actual contract, and I think the language of the contract needs to have adverse effects if the person takes advantage. And the definition of "taking advantage" needs to be clearly defined and understood.

    It is another thing entirely, if they do not deliver, despite best efforts. Which is where a quarterly evaluation comes into play.

    In essence, I hate to be a hard nose, but the contract should benefit steemit or the welfare of the blockchain first. Then, if appropriate, and as a byproduct, the project holder. But the purpose of delegation should not be to boost one's self. It should be primarily to boost the blockchain. Period.

    This should not be approached as a request for a business loan or investment, to strengthen oneself, as much as it is a request to use one's own project to boost the blockchain. And strengthen onself in the process, if need be. But only if it has a net positive effect on the blockchain.

  • @blok(37)· 2599d

    Nice. Here is link to my blog https://steemit.com/@blok

  • @dana-edwards(75)· 2599d

    Good move. Hopefully it's not too late to save Steem.

  • @outtheshellvlog(62)· 2599d

    I have a feeling this comes in part due to dlive deciding to screw over Steemit after having so much in delegation being utilized to keep themselves afloat and pay their developers via upvotes before moving on to another blockchain as soon as they were able to.

  • @atomcollector(70)· 2599d

    I would like to provide some constructive criticism regarding your goal of onboarding the masses.

    I signed my son up yesterday and the process was not smooth at all.

    There needs to be some kind of tutorial system that guides you through one step at a time and explains what a wallet is and why it is separate and all about the keys.

    My son felt pretty deflated by the end of the process and if I wasn't there to help him he would have given up.

    At the moment only people who understand about the blockchain will sign up imo.

    First impressions are extremely important as you know so the sign up process needs to be a joy.

  • @coininstant(69)· 2599d

    How are you going to onboard the masses when the masses won’t be allowed to say what they want to say? Maybe you can onboard some of the masses, but if everybody you onboard has to conform to the same old STEEM, who’s going to want to cone here for new ideas, and the truth! They block everything I say, and it is just the truth! I’m not like the masses, so I can deal with it, however the I don’t see how this schema is going to really work out! STEEM works out fine on Partiko, just be more like Partiko!

    OK sounds a little bit better this delegation decentralization you speak of! Hope it works!

  • @cryptogee(76)· 2599d

    This post has everything apart from the type of "company" you want to have a delegation.

    So are you saying that individuals can no longer get delegations? (Even if you're sleeping with the CEO? (lolz))

    Cg

  • @ash(74)· 2599d

    mh thinking about this, you could basically do a decent referral program.

    here's how I'd imagine it:

    • New User sign-up
    • steemit delegate 10 SP to the affiliate for 30 days
    • User is actively posting > prolong delegation based on activity

    does this make sense?

  • @marian0(66)· 2599d

    Good move.

    Posted using Partiko Android

  • @swapsteem(66)· 2599d

    That is a a good news after a long time from steemit inc. It's great to see that you have decided to use your stake to help and encourage community projects. I hope you have got enough lessons from your previous mistakes like dlive and utopian and would love if you ask the community to vote for a delegation application before deciding whom to delegate.

    Finally, At @swapsteem, we have been working on multiple projects that help the steem community grow and would surely post a delegation application for us.

    Posted using Partiko Android

  • @alexvanaken(68)· 2599d

    One of the tools we have in our toolbox that has gone underutilized is Steemit, Inc.’s stake.

    You are really just now realizing this?

    If you don't get your asses in gear and start ADVERTISING FOR THIS BLOCKCHAIN OUTSIDE THE ECOSYSTEM, your stake will be worth nothing, just like all of ours! How are you not scrambling to bring the market valuation up??? How are you not worried that we are now #80 on coinmarketcap smashing through alltime lows? You literally focus on everything except what actually matters... Soon you will be firing everybody again because the coins you sell for your business have no value anymore.

  • @ew-and-patterns(71)· 2599d

    This process is way too complicated and demanding for small projects. This is nuts. The number of applications will be very small.

  • @mermaidvampire(73)· 2599d

    Oh, gosh. This should have been done a long time before people left but I guess better late than never. We have a community, the Plankton Token, and we are doing our best to onboard and nest new Steem people. Thank goodness for Actifit for helping us with instant account creation with 10 SP. So far, they are the only community who helped us and of course the little plankton people all over the place. We have a token in Steem Engine, it is slowly growing and everyone HODLs their coins because we aim fot better things in the future. It's basically has the power from the community going back to the community mechanism. Right now, we have upvotes and profit shares for everyone holding the token, regardless if small or huge accounts. We are pro-powerup and growing together while helping each other. We definitely know how it is to be Plankton here, that is why.

    Good initiative, we will try our best to apply for delegations. We need all help we can get to give more hope to Plankton and hope to Steemit. Kudos!

  • @magicmonk(80)· 2599d

    It's a good idea.

  • @roundbeargames(73)· 2599d

    so you're "restructuring" everything done by ned the dictator? i hope he never returns :)

  • @stackin(78)· 2599d

    Just give me the delegation 😂😂😂

    Posted using Partiko iOS

  • @darrenclaxton(71)· 2599d

    @spotlight.artist is a fantastic music community initiative that deserves some decent delegation. They help support so many musicians, producers and songwriters on Steemit.

    @d-vine @onemedia

  • @arcange(79)· 2600d

    Congratulations @steemitblog! Your post was mentioned in the Steem Hit Parade in the following category:

    • Comments - Ranked 2 with 88 comments
  • @cjsdns(75)· 2600d

    The sale of the foundation and the leasing business of the foundation are wrong.

    I think that the users who do not want to lease the property and take away the profits of the investors and are ruined will not be able to operate SteamIt anymore.

    What is Steam It Foundation doing right for investors and users? Even with the best system, it is always the absence of management skills. Get your mind up.

    Think about whose interests should be protected first!

  • @yasu24(70)· 2600d

    Resteemed this article. Thank you for supporting Steem community.

    Posted using Partiko iOS

  • @cwow2(73)· 2600d

    This is amazing! I see this as such a good sign of things going well at steemit inc!

  • @firepower(80)· 2600d

    As much as I like the idea I’m worried about huge delegations leading to further erosion of voter influence given what has been observed already in the past year or so. What is the real incentive for powering up if influence and vote value reduces for majority users looking to capitalise on powering up stake, due to delegations + constant sell pressure reducing token value and influence as we’ve seen off late?

    Cheap as steem may be currently there’s no stopping the sell pressure right now. There’s no saying when prices will get back to a $1 or higher to sort of even out the impact from any large delegations further reducing existing user influence.

    Wouldn’t it be great if people/businesses were first encouraged to buy their own stake and have skin in the game? Rest I concur with some other concerns on this thread.

  • @actnearn(70)· 2600d

    We have submitted our application as per your format. Looking forward for the decision by the committee. Below is the link for the same

    https://www.actnearn.com/delegationapp/@actnearn/delegation-application-by-actnearn-to-steemit-inc

  • @cryptopie(78)· 2600d

    At least you will delegate your stake to some of the best steem groups/dapps which will then boost the onboarding and retaining users in this platform.

  • @celestal(73)· 2600d

    This is great news!

    Posted using Partiko Android

  • @abdt(66)· 2600d

    It is most grand plan , i am waiting for next update

  • @steemmatt(71)· 2600d

    This is awesome. I'm happy to see this, especially the rebalancing of existing outlays. Thank you for addressing this huge topic.

  • @travelersmemoire(58)· 2600d

    This is huge! If the Steem is used correctly we could be seeing at least an extra hundred thousand users within a year!

    Posted using Partiko iOS

  • @ats-david(75)· 2600d

    How much total STEEM will be available from Steemit, Inc. accounts for this delegation program?

    If you're talking about delegating even more than is currently being delegated from @misterdelegation, then I have absolutely zero confidence in the ability of your company to assess actual problems plaguing this platform and coming up with any actual solutions. You appear to be completely tone deaf to economic incentives, market conditions, and user feedback. Instead of creating a new delegation program with a laundry list of rules and procedures, you ought to be pulling back all of your current delegations and giving that influence back to the rest of the user base.

    A delegation should only be awarded if it will result in specific and MATERIAL (not ambiguous or theoretical) economic benefits to both Steem users, and Steemit, Inc. (the entity sacrificing the opportunity costs that result from delegating Steem Power).

    There are two major problems with this statement.

    First of all, the best economic benefit for STEEM would be to entice businesses to purchase STEEM. By freely giving away delegation, you undermine the entire concept of staking. You're telling businesses that, if they meet your requirements, then they don't have to actually purchase STEEM - to invest in the very platform they want to build on. This is the exact opposite of how bad businesses are weeded out and how legitimate businesses are able to thrive. It ultimately results in less pressure for business operators to succeed by essentially giving them a free "safety net" - at the expense of all other users of Steem.

    Asking recipients of delegation to promise not to simply sell their acquired STEEM through this program and telling them that they should be evangelizing Steem will do very little to mitigate a variety of exploitation...and is quite a bit naive.

    Secondly, there is no "sacrificing of opportunity costs." (I think you meant "sacrificing of potential gain/revenue" or "assuming the opportunity costs," as sacrificing opportunity costs would mean that there is a loss of costs - i.e., it's a net positive for you.) But I'm assuming that you mean there is an opportunity cost to delegating your stake...which is BS, unless your only plan was to continue the programmatic selling of STEEM. But even then, you're simply suppressing market prices even further and the losses taken from a lower STEEM price are largely your own doing.

    And then there's the fact that this stake was never supposed to be used for voting in the first place - per the original ownership. For three years, every opportunity to not use the "ninja-mine," as originally described and rationalized, has been taken by your company. The code of the Steem blockchain has been changed several times just to make it easier for Steemit, Inc. to avoid using that STEEM as originally intended - and then to delegate it or sell it instead, decreasing the influence of all other stakeholders on the platform and adding significant downward price pressure on the Steem currencies.

    Claiming that users have a better experience when their influence matters and then diluting that influence by making your previously dormant stake active in the allocation of rewards is ignorant and contradictory, at best. At worst, it reeks of manipulation and malice. I would hope that it's not the latter...although, the former is not much more confidence-inspiring.

    Please consider that your continued actions are having a detrimental impact on this blockchain and token prices. The potential of this blockchain is continually stifled by poor leadership, Steemit mismanagement, and what appears to be abject obliviousness by much of the community (your company and many Steem witnesses included) - as we can see in this very comment section.

    I would also like to note that, if Steemit, Inc. had to apply for this delegation, based on the questions and rules/procedures listed in this post, their request would be rejected.

    That's something to seriously think about.

  • @theguruasia(69)· 2600d

    @steemitblog, Interesting, definitely I will give a try! $trdo

    Cheers~

  • @itstime(61)· 2600d

    This makes a lot of sense....

    so far the process has been a little like

  • @jayplayco(76)· 2600d

    Incentivizing users for the purpose of increasing revenue which is then powered up

    Just to get it clear and understand it. :)

    It means that you can upvote your users (incentivizing) for specific behaviors that would help your project but need to control that they power their revenue up? So it means that a posting, as an example from your project is running a third party condensor and that would need to setup a posting from the user always to "powerup 100%" and not 50%/50%?

    Otherwise the use of delegation would be an immediate grounds for withdrawal?

  • @newageinv(74)· 2600d

    This is truly encouraging to see being proposed as transparency in the process will better prepare those building projects for the community with long term sustainability in mind which is fundamental in order to create value in the ecosystem over time. Thanks for sharing!

  • @bozz(83)· 2600d

    This is pretty awesome. Like many things on here though I can't wait to actually see it in practice. There are many great ideas that once implemented they kind of fall flat. This doesn't seem like one of those and I hope that proves to be the case.

    Posted using Partiko Android

  • @sequentialvibe(68)· 2600d

    @dsound

  • @freebornangel(72)· 2600d

    Jeebus, do y'all hold contests to see who can damage steem the most?

    If your business needs a crutch, get a new business.

    Instead of stinc taking from me involuntarily and giving to their golden boys and girls, how about we let the market decide? If the community doesn't support your business, it's an f'n clue.

    Just when i had a glimmer of hope at stinc's redemption, y'all tell me my vote is going to get even smaller. More taxes to support stinc's 'vision' A few months ago steemit was deprecated due to lack of interest. Was this somehow thought to be a way to resurrect it?

    I don't give two sh**s about any business that doesn't meet MY needs. Stop using the ninjamine against the unfavored regular users.

    It must be idiot day in Austin. Give the person that thought this was a good idea a cigar!

  • @paulag(74)· 2600d

    You have "see LEAN startup"....where do I see it?

    Posted using Partiko Android

  • @investingpennies(60)· 2600d

    Much needed. We need more stake going into the hands of project creators, not into whimsical participants who will death spiral this coin only because they cant fathom to invest into their community.

  • @mistakili(77)· 2600d

    Go guys! Amazing

  • @paulag(74)· 2600d

    Awesome

    Posted using Partiko Android

  • @bigbot(59)· 2600d

    See market condition of steem coin i don't say anything you are also intelligent and think once again what are you doing with steem blockchain?

  • @jarvie(75)· 2600d

    Sometimes the best changes are the most obvious and easily accepted ones that mostly take sitting and down and just getting it written and posted. I think we're all on board with what you're proposing.

    Very happy to see a sunset clause and fighting entitlements.

    QUESTION:

    When does this start?

  • @bigbot(59)· 2600d

    I don't get what you really wanted to do with delegation API. I just want to ask 3 (Questions) When SMT is ready to launch, When HF21 is ready to launch, When steem price get ready to go upward? Why you going so lazy why you making fool us i'm hearing SMT is coming soon from last 2 years but it's doesn't happened until now. kindly tell me @steemitblog thank you.

  • @steemitqa(64)· 2600d

    Good to see this be wrangled in. Great step!

  • @tibfox(74)· 2600d

    Good move in the right direction - I personally would be happy if you also would offer a delegation to communities like @ddaily or @innerblocks (to just name two here) to give them power and motivation to actually move things forward. DApps are a big factor of mass adoption of course, but without communities we would be all on our own here and we all know how much communities are doing for the individuals.

    Posted using Partiko Android

  • @abitcoinskeptic(75)· 2600d

    I think this is fair. Delegation is a unique way to get seed money tool and should operate with different metrics. Projects risk detaching from Steem or burning out otherwise.

  • @greencross(70)· 2600d

    Who will choose or how will the independent committee members be chosen?

    Posted using Partiko Android

  • @smooth(74)· 2600d

    complete a Delegation Renewal Form and post it to the Steem blockchain on the first day of every quarter

    This seems unnecessarily strict and not account for regional work days, holidays, downtime, etc.

    How about requiring that it be posted and active for voting on the first day of the quarter, which means it could be posted at any time up to 7 days prior.

    Also, I would suggest asking the projects about their plans not only to power up STEEM but also to burn STEEM. Of course, there would be no requirement to do so but burning tokens is a great way that some projects could provably demonstrate value returned to Steem, especially if the economics of the project involve external value (e.g. fiat sales of in-game items, promotion, services, etc.) used to buy the STEEM which is then burned. Power up is nice but it can also easily be powered down and dumped in the future. Burned tokens can never be sold.

  • @camzy(67)· 2600d

    Finally, those stalked up tokens will become useful Great move tho, awaiting comments that'll point out the flaws :-)

  • @chekohler(76)· 2600d

    Lets put that SP to work guys! So many cool projects here that need support! Onwards and upwards!

  • @justtryme90(71)· 2600d

    This seems well thought out and a reasonable protocol for applying for a delegation. Better late than never I guess. I hope the steemit team will actually delegate to worthwhile projects rather than another dlive.

  • @jonsnow1983(76)· 2600d

    Fucking finally! (not complaining)

  • @felander(73)· 2600d

    Decentralising that steem stake (in a sense) is good to spread growth to all parts of the economy. The SP will trickle down from all projects and that will prop up a middle class

    Posted using Partiko iOS

  • @uyobong(78)· 2600d

    This is an awesome step towards the rebuild of Steem. Thanks for thinking this.

    Posted using Partiko Android

  • @elipowell(60)· 2600d

    Thanks @andrarchy for getting this done. We've been talking about a more structured process for a while because we get so many requests from great projects asking for delegations. This provides a clear-cut, transparent way of making it happen. I've worked with many non-profits in the past and utilizing a "grant application" process keeps everyone accountable. It's all for the greater good - Steem!

  • @joythewanderer(81)· 2600d

    Projects that receive delegations shall conduct themselves with the highest regard for the Steem blockchain and its community. They shall not in any way abuse their position or their delegated stake in a way that causes net harm to the blockchain.

    Sounds quite ideal, abuse sounds vague. I hope you find a good way to decide which projects to delegate.

    Although I’m not a fan of the whole delegation system, I think it’s about time to change the way you delegate to dapps, if delegation system has to be kept. Especially with 50/50 reward split post HF21, as the dapps with huge delegation normally get hugest curation rewards.

  • @movingman(71)· 2600d

    So steemit have cancelled the powerdown?

    Posted using Partiko Android

  • @tarazkp(86)· 2600d

    Great, it is about time.

  • @knowledges(70)· 2600d

    I am wowed. I think this is a very nice approach and a way to strengthen the value of Steem and the other interesting projects built around it. Bravo to this very well thoughtful idea.

  • @moneygram(49)· 2600d

    Perfection at it's best. KEEP Growing steem blockchain. And price too.

  • @elsiekjay(77)· 2600d

    While I am very excited to see Steemit Inc's Stake finally being put to use, I must say it would suck to see you reduce delegation to some of the most promising projects that you have already delegated to, namely DTube, Oracle-D & Steemhunt...

    Nonetheless, great job with this initiative, hopefully now we can see more activity on the platform and active communities that will help with user retention.

  • @marki99(62)· 2600d

    Great step. Steemit’s stake should be used in other ways too.

    For example, bidbots can and should become a great sink for STEEM. Bidbots burning a percentage of their rewards will be amazing for the price of STEEM.

    Of course, they will never do that left on their own. Why not use Steemit, Inc’s stake to downvote bidbots that are not burning?

    Posted using Partiko iOS

  • @luegenbaron(65)· 2600d

    Finally something that sounds interesting

    Now we need a good implementation which leverages the community

    Posted using Partiko Android

  • @acidyo(84)· 2600d

    How many tokens will you offer Steemit Inc. in exchange for the delegation?

    This is an interesting point considering Steemit has refrained from receiving any shares from their past delegations, but not a bad idea for Steemit to diversify into SMT's either. ;)

  • @acidyo(84)· 2600d

    Good job @steemit team, about time they are taken more seriously and hopefully will empower a lot more applications on our network while making sure they're doing their best to benefit every stakeholder as a whole.

  • @meno(80)· 2600d

    I take it some salty comments are incoming, but I believe this is a great step in the right direction. We can't have another dlive happen just because.

  • @drakos(70)· 2600d

    This should have been done a long time ago. Better late than never.

  • @lunaticpandora(70)· 2600d

    This is amazing! Hopefully a lot of the rising up steem projects manage to get delegations!

  • @tendershepard(25)· 2600d

    This looks good. If it's going to be done at all it should be open to the public and through review. Nice move!

  • @melip(61)· 2600d

    PERFECT 👍