I read something that might be called interesting (or perhaps insane) today, where Trump is "promising" (his promises and deals are worthless) to give $5000 dollar handouts to "every American adult citizen" if the Republicans win the House and the Senate. Remember the days when vote-buying was limited to making policies to benefit a group? Now, it is just unfettered and shamelessly direct.
Show me the money!

I am sure that there are a lot of people who might switch their vote to get their hands on $5000 dollars when they are already experiencing additional cost of living pressures (facilitated by tariffs and war with Iran) in order to ease their struggles. Even with the caveat that they would "have to spend it in America", as if there is some way they can control that in place. But. let's have a little think about it though, because nothing comes for free.
Firstly, there are 270 million adult citizens in the US, which means the immediate "cost" of this promise would be around 1.35 trillion dollars. Just a week or so ago I wrote a post about big numbers that might be relevant. For perspective though, $1.35T would build 1,350,000 one-million-dollar homes. There are about one million homeless in America each night. Not that homeless people deserve any help - they brought it all on themselves, right?
So, about 1.35 million in direct cost.
The current US national debt is sitting at a little over 40 trillion (40 million, million-dollar-houses), which means that this one act of vote-buying would add an additional 3.375 percent to the total. At a time where the government is already fighting resistance to keep upping the debt ceiling in order to cover its current explosion in costs due to war and of course, the many tax cuts for corporations and the wealthy. Which puts this promise on shaky ground economically, even if it wasn't coming out of Trump's mouth. Then there is the legal ramifications of attempted vote-buying, because this would of course be challenged in the courts and is unlikely to pass - but that would happen after the elections. So people would vote for the handout, and very likely not get it anyway.
And of course, there is also the fact that governments don't have ANY OF THEIR OWN MONEY. Not a dollar. Everything they have comes from the people, which means that a handout is just a transference of tax flow into pockets. Of course, people will argue that this "dividend" is a return on their investment, of a kind, but what it actually is, is a way to stimulate the economy and (surprise, surprise) make the rich, richer. This is even more blatantly the case with the stated "spend in America" statement that came with it. If this did happen, it would be a boon for American business, but will only really benefit investors and shareholders. You might say that an individual could for instance pay down their house loan with it, and that might be true - but all the evidence of the past suggests that most people will see it as "free money" and buy a bigger TV.
The best TV's are made in America. Everyone is saying it.
Obviously though, people don't care about any of this and will just vote in ways that they believe benefit them directly the most right now. Getting a handout benefits them directly now, even if it has a much higher cost down the road. But this is what governments do (albeit not as blatantly), they kick the can down the road so they can get what they want now. And for Trump, what he wants is to enrich himself and he is using his position to do so. That is the American way. The land of opportunity to be greedy and selfish at the expense of everyone else.
Having said all this though, I agree with taking on more government debt. The global economic system is fundamentally broken due in large part to the practices of the US economy, and that debt is never going to get paid off. That means it is bad debt, they know it and they are going to keep expanding it to the point that the rest of the world can no longer ignore it, and then we will end up wiping it clean.
With WWIII
We should just speed up the process and at a global level, all governments that can should be expanding their own debt models to the extreme and forcing the global economy into a meltdown that is so nuclear, nothing will survive. Maybe then, we can build something again. Or just be wiped from earth for a smarter creature to come along and take our place.
For now though, we are stack with the monsters of the swamp.
Taraz [ Gen1: Hive ]
Be part of the Hive discussion.
- Comment on the topics of the article, and add your perspectives and experiences.
- Read and discuss with others who comment and build your personal network
- Engage well with me and others and put in effort
And you may be rewarded.



