Longform reviews of films, TV, anime, books, and audiobooks, written by the scrobble.life community and published to the Hive blockchain, so each one is owned by its author and can earn rewards from readers. 34,437 reviews and counting.
This science-fiction series on Apple-TV is something that I find refreshing and a new take for shows that are post-apocalyptic. The overall theme of what would humanity be like after a world-ending or world-changing event is something that I think has been done probably too many times so the fact that they were able to come up with something really original has left me mostly impressed.
one of the first things that drew me to this show was that it has the same creator as Breaking Bad which is a show I consider to be top-5 of all time. Also, the lead actress Rhea Seehorn did an absolutely outstanding job in Better Call Saul so I felt as though she wouldn't disappoint, and she doesn't.
There is potential for mild spoilers in this write-up so if you want to go in fresh, just know that I heartily recommend this show to anyone, not just sci-fi fans. It is one of the better series that I have seen in recent years and if they carry on making it like they have been so far, that "recent years" will change to "all time."
this series can be legally streamed on AppleTV+
Once again, Spoilers Ahead!!
Things start out a big vague in episode one as we are shown a bunch of different sets of people that are all working in different fields such as research and stargazing in a SETI (search for intelligent life) sense. They are all going nuts because they have discovered a signal that is coming from 600 light years away that appears to be intelligent. Unfortunately for these people doing the discovery, the signal isn't as innocent as they had hoped.
In a research lab that is replicating the signal in the form of an injection RNA sequence to rats, one of the scientists ends up getting infected and starts to convulse. A bit later she comes back to consciousness and then kisses the person who was with her when she started to convulse and then he goes through the same process of first convulsing, then coming back in a sort of robotic sense. No words are spoken, nobody is injured, but these zombie-like people are just spreading their infestation to everyone by saliva.
It's strange, weird, and kind of confusing, but it all starts to make sense later when we are introduced to exactly what this infestation is. It isn't an alien invasion per se, but it also kind of is. The zombie-like people only remain that way for a short while, but during their conversion they can sometimes fall and hurt themselves or others and in the case of people operating vehicles such as airplanes, the results can be quite disastrous. We only see snippets of this.
Basically the entirety of the world is taken over in a very short amount of time by this infestation and the new inhabitants of the bodies are not really the individual that they were before, but it doesn't really matter because out of the entire planet only 13 people were not infected. Our main character, Carol Sturka (played by Seehorn) is one of them.
At first we are not made aware if the infested are dangerous or not but we soon realize that they are reaching out to Carol and trying to help her, as they say they will "move heaven and earth to make her happy." All of the infested share a hive-mind and everyone knows everything that the other know including their most intimate thoughts and secrets. The infested claim to be happy and are working around the clock to figure out why it is that Carol isn't one of them and they want to change that.
Carol, being one of the only people on the earth that is not one of them, has a different perspective on this though and doesn't see their "glee" as a good thing and doesnt' want to be converted even though every single infested that she encounters doesn't appear to be a prisoner against their will at all.
Not only do they not appear to be unhappy or enslaved, they are completely incapable of processing anger so when Carol has a freak-out session (which she does frequently) they go into "blue screen" mode and when this happens to one of them, it happens to all of them. This might seem like a great way for Carol to get what she wants but the thing is, and you will discover this very early on, the infested only want to do whatever it takes to make Carol happy - or any of the other 12 people on the planet who were immune to the takeover.
Carol can have literally anything that she wants that they can possibly bring to her, even if the things they bring her are to her own detriment which you will see in episode 3, can be very dangerous.
Should I watch it?
As I mentioned near the start of this write-up, this is one of the most imaginative series I have seen in many years and I am thoroughly enjoying it. one of the only things I don't like is how Carol regularly freaks out even though it is determined very early on that this is an extremely dangerous thing for her to do. This isn't Rhea Seehorn's fault, she is just doing the lines and script that was handed to her... I just think they return her to an enraged state much more frequently than they should seeing as how Carol doesn't really have to remember very many things and I think that this one thing would be something that she would definitely remember.
You'll see what I am talking about when you watch it as it is a bit frustrating to see this happen over and over again.
Even with that going on though, there is so much about this show that is extremely entertaining and original and that is something that we just don't see very often in movies or series these days.
The only thing I am disappointed about now is that I was unaware that this series is being released one-episode-a-week and if I had known that I would have waited until more of them are out before I started on it. The remaining episodes of season 1 will be released once per week until the end of 2025. At the moment, only 3 episodes are available and only on Apple TV+
It would be foolish of me to expect a masterpiece from a film like "A Merry Little Ex-Max," considering it has all the hallmarks of a Hallmark Christmas movie: a generic but enjoyable plot, a couple of familiar faces in the cast, and an aesthetic that takes few risks but effectively captures the most superficial aspects of American holidays.
I don't mean this disparagingly; it's just that every now and then it's fun to give a chance to a film that doesn't aim for more than a few moments of fun and Christmas warmth, even if we forget it a couple of hours later.
Starring Alicia Silverstone and Oliver Hudson, "A Merry Little Ex-Max" follows Kate and Everett, a couple who started their family in a small rural town in the United States and who, after a series of misunderstandings and irreconcilable differences, decide to divorce amicably.
Although Kate and Everett are no longer husband and wife, they've decided that the best thing for their children and their families is to spend Christmas together, making the transition easier. However, things take a turn for the worse when Kate discovers that Everett has met another woman, and, considering they've been separated for several months, she thinks this is the perfect opportunity to introduce her and try to bridge the gap between their old and new lives.
I don't need to explain much more, do I?
Directed by Steve Carr, A Merry Little Ex-Max is one of those typical stories where two people who don't seem to get along are forced by circumstances to connect.
Beyond the predictable and generic nature of its plot, we're presented with a succession of amusing sequences, and if we don't waste energy questioning the logic and reasoning of its characters, we can enjoy it all without a problem.
Aesthetically, it's well done, and the script captures the frustrations of a middle-class mother who ends up trapped in a small town with the love of her life.
While I prefer the Christmas nostalgia that films like Home Alone or the animated beauty of Klaus bring me, A Merry Little Ex-Max is a solid comedy, perfect for killing some time on a boring Sunday in December.
Lamento no tener la novela para establecer una especie de comparación con la versión cinematográfica.
Un día pregunté a un escritor amigo si había leído no recuerdo cuál novela y me respondió "no, pero vi la película" .
Yo, verdaderamente me quedé muy preocupado porque aquel amigo tenía intenciones de convertirse en escritor.
Por mucho que le expliqué las diferencias entre una novela y su versión al cine, él creía estar el seguro de que con haber visto la película ya era suficiente.
Dicho lo dicho, vamos a lo que vamos. "27 Noches", es una película que prácticamente acaba de estrenarse. Una producción Argentina de 2025.
El cine argentino en los últimos años para mí se ha vuelto esquivo, por alguna u otra razón no he tenido acercamiento a las producciones bonaerenses.
Así que, encontrarme con esta historia ha sido una especie de exorcismo intelectual.
La crítica la califica como una cinta delicada y al mismo tiempo audaz. Algunos les atribuyen tonos de comedia ácida. Y otros simplemente hablan de un drama tradicional.
A mí me parece que una cosa no niega necesariamente a la otra. En "27 Noches", el asunto es cómo se logra una puesta que se filtre en los terrenos pantanosos de la memoria, de la familia y la honestidad.
La anécdota central ni por asomo es original en su esencia: una anciana aquejada de demencia es ingresada por sus hijas en una clínica psiquiátrica.
Parece un acto simple una decisión incluso hasta práctica pero en esta historia es mucho más que eso... es como un torbellino, algo existencial.
Algo que me agradó muchísimo es que la película no juzga, observa y tal propuesta la traslada, obviamente al espectador.
El título, "27 Noches", hace referencia al período de internación que la ley argentina establece para la evaluación del paciente.
No esperes ver aquí una paleta lúgubre, tradicional del cine que apuesta por desdibujar la cordura cotidiana. Ese cliché fue borrado de un plumazo por el director.
Me arriesgo incluso, a decir que tal decisión, dota la película de una extraña normalidad. A veces resulta incluso inquietante.
La protagonista, Marilú Marini, nos regala un performance justo que va del humor negro a la lucidez y se mezcla con la rebeldía de momentos inesperados.
El plato perfecto qué sirve para revelar verdades incómodas y recuerdos enterrados.
El elenco de apoyo, está compuesto por figuras sólidas del cine argentino como Humberto Tortonese, Julieta Zylberberg, Paula Grinszpan y Carla Peterson.
Cada uno encarna las reacciones, a menudo contradictorias, ante la enfermedad de un ser querido: la culpa, la impotencia, el hastío, el negacionismo y un amor que a veces duele más de lo que consuela.
El guión, coescrito por Hendler, Martín Mauregui y Agustina Liendo a partir de la novela de Natalia Zito, es una pieza de ingeniería narrativa brillante.
¿Quiénes somos cuando nuestros recuerdos nos abandonan? ¿Qué queda de una persona cuando su historia personal desaparece?
El humor y el drama de mezclan de manera creíble... catártica.
"27 Noches" trasciende el tema de la demencia para hablar de la identidad.
Solo lamento no haber leído la novela. Tal vez algún día tropiece con ella. Entonces mi opinión sobre esta película será más completa.
I regret not having the novel to make a comparison with the film version.
One day I asked a writer friend if he had read a certain novel—I can't remember which one—and he replied, "No, but I saw the movie."
I was truly worried because this friend had aspirations of becoming a writer.
No matter how much I explained the differences between a novel and its film adaptation, he seemed certain that having seen the movie was enough.
That said, let's get down to business. "27 Nights" is a film that has practically just been released. An Argentine production from 2025.
Argentine cinema has become elusive for me in recent years; for one reason or another, I haven't had any contact with productions from Buenos Aires.
So, encountering this story has been a kind of intellectual exorcism.
Critics describe it as a delicate yet audacious film. Some attribute to it tones of dark comedy. And others simply call it a traditional drama.
It seems to me that one thing doesn't necessarily negate the other. In "27 Nights," the issue is how to achieve a narrative that delves into the murky waters of memory, family, and honesty.
The central anecdote is by no means original in its essence: an elderly woman suffering from dementia is admitted to a psychiatric clinic by her daughters.
It seems like a simple act, even a practical decision, but in this story, it's much more than that... it's like a whirlwind, something existential.
Something I really appreciated is that the film doesn't judge; it observes, and this perspective is then conveyed, obviously, to the viewer.
The title, "27 Nights," refers to the period of hospitalization that Argentine law establishes for patient evaluation.
Don't expect to see here a somber palette, traditional in cinema that aims to blur everyday sanity. That cliché was swept aside by the director.
I would even venture to say that this decision lends the film a strange normalcy. At times, it's even unsettling.
The protagonist, Marilú Marini, delivers a perfectly crafted performance that ranges from dark humor to lucidity, interwoven with unexpected moments of rebellion.
It's the perfect recipe for revealing uncomfortable truths and buried memories.
The supporting cast is comprised of established figures in Argentine cinema, such as Humberto Tortonese, Julieta Zylberberg, Paula Grinszpan, and Carla Peterson.
Each embodies the often contradictory reactions to the illness of a loved one: guilt, helplessness, weariness, denial, and a love that sometimes hurts more than it comforts.
The screenplay, co-written by Hendler, Martín Mauregui, and Agustina Liendo, based on the novel by Natalia Zito, is a brilliant piece of narrative engineering.
Who are we when our memories abandon us? What remains of a person when their personal history vanishes?
Humor and drama blend in a believable... cathartic way.
"27 Nights" transcends the theme of dementia to explore identity.
My only regret is not having read the novel. Perhaps I'll stumble upon it someday. Then my opinion of this film will be more complete.
Nostalgists lament many things no longer found in cinemas today, yet few will admit that exploitation films are among them. Cheap low-budget productions that once dominated global cinema repertoires often compensated for their creators’ lack of budget, inspiration, or enthusiasm by readily catering to the basest public appetites—typically through explicit depictions of sex and violence, including content of an undeniably sadistic nature. Today, such films can only sneak into cinemas if they disguise themselves as the antithesis of exploitation films, most commonly as pseudo-politically engaged art dramas. A prime example of such successful camouflage is Brimstone, a Western by Dutch filmmaker Martin Koolhoven, which premiered at the 2016 Venice Film Festival.
The word in the title is commonly used as part of the phrase 'fire and brimstone,' describing hellfire or serving as a metaphor for Hell. For the film’s protagonist, a young woman named Liz (Dakota Fanning), the entire narrative largely amounts to little more than enduring Hell itself. At first, things seem relatively promising, as we meet her as the wife of a significantly older but well-meaning and relatively prosperous farmer in a mountainous settlement in the Wild West. Despite being practically mute, Liz has won the locals’ affection as a skilled midwife. However, matters change when she attends church with her family one day and encounters a new preacher (Guy Pearce), whom she clearly recognises and who fills her with terror. It becomes clear that things will go awry when the preacher strokes a pregnant woman, triggering a premature birth with unimaginably horrific consequences—not only for the woman but also for Liz’s mental health and standing within the community. Yet this is merely the beginning of Liz’s unimaginably gruelling trials, as she and her family become the preacher’s obsession—a man whose malevolent intentions and ability to enact them Liz had long tried to forget from a past she spent years suppressing.
Brimstone is occasionally cited as one of Dutch cinema’s most successful recent achievements, though this accolade is rather dubious, as its festival premiere immediately polarised critics into two extreme camps—those hailing it as an undisputed masterpiece and those branding it one of the worst pieces of celluloid manure. As with many such cases, both sides have valid arguments. Supporters can point to Koolhoven’s directorial skill and outstanding performances, particularly Pearce’s, who clearly relishes portraying arguably the most unsettling character of his career. Meanwhile, the proverbially talented Dakota Fanning excels in a complex role requiring her to remain almost entirely silent throughout. Cinephiles will appreciate the numerous nods to spaghetti western classics such as Leone’s Once Upon a Time in the West and Corbucci’s The Great Silence. Koolhoven has also won over snob-oriented critics primarily through its non-linear structure—comprising four chapters, the first three of which unfold in reverse, akin to Nolan’s Memento—allowing viewers to gradually uncover increasingly harrowing and unpleasant details of Liz’s past. Perhaps most crucial for Koolhoven, however, is that the film is marketed as feminist—portraying women as near-exclusive victims of unspeakable degradation, torture, murder, and sexual humiliation, while men are depicted either as abusive scum or ineffectual bumbling fools, forcing Liz to resolve her own predicaments single-handedly.
Those who disliked the film often cite its deeply disturbing content, featuring scenes that would turn even the stomachs of hardened viewers, alongside a disturbing inventiveness in depicting methods of killing, torturing, and maiming. From start to finish, Brimstone, with the exception of a few brothel scenes, maintains an exceptionally dark and serious tone. However, Brimstone’s chief flaw is not that Koolhoven has lost restraint, but that he has lost rhythm and inspiration, rendering certain segments overly protracted. A case in point is the subplot featuring Kit Harington as a young outlaw, laced with black humour that momentarily lightens the mood. Despite his prominent placement on the official poster, the actor appears far more briefly than Game of Thrones fans of Jon Snow might expect. The greatest disappointment, however, lies in the finale, which shifts from a dark yet somewhat plausible narrative into an almost self-parodic 'slasher film,' transforming Liz into a caricatural embodiment of the 'Final Girl' trope characteristic of such endings.
The epilogue, foreshadowed in the prologue, adds further disappointment, including a final enigmatic shot hinting at a sequel in the vein of Friday the 13th. Such a follow-up seems unlikely, though most viewers who endure this film will likely be grateful for its absence.
RATING: 4/10 (++)
(Note: The text in the original Croatian version is available here.)
Hello, cinema fans. Since we're on the subject of virtual worlds, what better way to continue than with a film that raised the bar for cinematic quality to its highest point in the past decade. One of the best sequels I've seen since I was a kid, and one that I still consider a masterpiece of modern cinema. Tron: Legacy was directed by Joseph Kosinski and stars Garrett Hedlund, Jeff Bridges, Olivia Wilde, Bruce Boxleitner, and Michael Sheen. I invite you to revisit one of the best science fiction and action films released in the last century.
SPANISH VERSION
Hola, fanáticos del cine. Ya que estamos dentro del tema de los mundos virtuales, qué mejor forma de continuar que con una cinta que elevó la vara de la calidad cinematográfica a su punto máximo en la década pasada. Una de las mejores secuelas que he visto desde que era pequeño y que aún ahora sigo considerándolo como una obra maestra del cine moderno. Tron: Legacy fue dirigida por Joseph Kosinski y cuenta con el protagonismo de Garrett Hedlund, Jeff Bridges, Olivia Wilde, Bruce Boxleitner y Michael Sheen. Te invito a recordar una de las mejores películas de ciencia ficción y acción que han sacado en este último siglo.
The film begins with a father telling his son about his greatest creation: The Grid. A virtual world where all information can have life and freedom like never before. It then continues with a summary of what he and his companions (Tron and CLU) did in this world. After putting him to bed, Kevin Flynn says goodbye to his young son Sam and goes to work that night. However, that is the last day he will see him, as he disappears afterwards. Twenty years later, a more adult and rebellious Sam visits his father's company ENCOM to play a prank on the board of directors as they announce their new operating system.
SPANISH VERSION
Trama
La película inicia con un padre contándole a su hijo sobre su más grande creación: La Red. Un mundo virtual donde toda información puede tener vida y libertad como nunca antes se había visto. Luego continúa con una especie de resumen sobre lo que él y sus compañeros (Tron y CLU) hicieron en este mundo. Después de llevarlo a la cama, Kevin Flynn se despide de su pequeño hijo Sam y se va a trabajar esa noche. Sin embargo, ese es el último día que lo vería ya que después desaparece. Veinte años después, un Sam más adulto y rebelde visita la compañía de su padre ENCOM para jugarles una broma a la junta directiva mientras ellos anuncian su nuevo sistema operativo.
There are very few films that I have seen that have fascinated me as much on an audiovisual level as this gem from the past decade. Yes, I know it is a sequel to a cult film that deserves to be remembered now even more than before, but I honestly admit that I am one of those who grew up watching this installment that revived and elevated the franchise to the highest possible level in the world of cinema and entertainment in general. That's why I decided to review it, not Tron itself, but this second installment, which, at the time, was one of the most anticipated comebacks in cinema.
Rather than talking about the reviews and/or opinions it received at the time, I prefer to focus on what I think of this film and what I think of it today. Clearly, my opinion of Tron: Legacy has changed a lot over the years, especially recently, after the release of the latest installment of the franchise and its direct sequel called Tron: Ares. It's not to discredit what I haven't even seen to date, but something inside me makes me think that there is no better sequel than the one Joseph Kosinski achieved with this film.
SPANISH VERSION
Hay muy pocas películas que he visto y me han fascinado tanto a nivel audiovisual como lo ha logrado hacer esta joya de la década pasada. Si, sé que es una secuela de una cinta de culto que merece ser recordada ahora aún más que antes, pero sinceramente admito que soy de los que crecieron viendo esta entrega que revivió y elevó dicha franquicia hasta lo más alto posible en el mundo del cine y el entretenimiento en general. Es por eso que decidí hacerle una reseña, no a Tron como tal, sino a esta segunda entrega que, en su momento, fue de los regresos más esperados que hubo en el cine.
Más allá de hablar de las críticas y/o opiniones que obtuvo en su momento, prefiero mejor centrarme en lo que yo opino de esta película y lo que a mí me pareció al día de hoy. Claramente, mi opinión acerca de Tron: Legacy ha cambiado mucho con el paso de los años, sobre todo recientemente, luego del estreno de la última entrega de la franquicia y su secuela directa llamada Tron: Ares. No es por desprestigiar lo que ni siquiera he visto hasta la fecha, pero algo en mi interior me hace pensar que no existe mejor secuela que la que consiguió Joseph Kosinski con esta película.
Surely those of you reading this who are fans of this franchise may question what I have to say about this sequel without even having seen the 1980s film of the same name. And it's normal to think that way, since I'm also a proponent of watching a saga/series of films in order rather than randomly and without any sense. However, personally, I think that Tron: Legacy managed—in one way or another—to give us a story that works independently of its predecessor. At least that's how it was for me when I was a teenager and watched it over and over again on television.
This can be clearly seen by watching just the first ten minutes of the film, which begins with a brief summary of what Tron was, in essence, as if it were a fairy tale that a father always tells his son before bedtime. Right after that, we see how the child grows up with the almost forgotten hope of seeing his beloved father again, who disappeared two decades ago. His life has become a series of pranks where we can glimpse Sam Flynn's ingenuity and talent with technology. However, what he does next will completely change his perception of reality as he knows it forever.
SPANISH VERSION
Seguramente para los que me estén leyendo y son fanáticos de esta franquicia puedan cuestionarse sobre lo que yo tengo que decir acerca de esta secuela sin siquiera haber visto la cinta homónima de los años 80. Y es normal que piensen así, ya que también soy partidario de ver una saga/serie de películas en orden que ir al azar y sin sentido alguno. Sin embargo, en lo personal, pienso que Tron: Legacy consiguió -de alguna forma u otra- darnos una historia que funciona de manera independiente a su antecesora obra cinematográfica. Al menos para mí fue así desde que era apenas un adolescente y lo veía repetidas veces en la televisión.
Esto se puede ver claramente con sólo presenciar los primeros diez minutos de la película, la cual inicia con un pequeño resumen de lo que -en esencia- fue Tron como si fuera un cuento de hadas que siempre le cuenta un padre a su hijo antes de dormir. Justo después vemos cómo dicho niño crece con la casi olvidada esperanza de volver a ver a su querido padre quien desapareció hace dos décadas atrás. Su vida se ha vuelto una serie de bromas pesadas donde se puede ver ligeramente el ingenio y talento que tiene Sam Flynn con la tecnología. Sin embargo, lo que hará a continuación cambiará por completo su percepción de la realidad tal y como la conoce para siempre.
A familiar message from a place that should have been abandoned decades ago awakens Sam's deepest memories of his father. So he heads to the old Flynn's GamesStore with the faint hope of finding something that will prove his father is alive. As he searches the place, he finds a secret passageway that leads to a room where his father apparently spent all his time before disappearing. We see a computer and high-tech devices around him. Sam finds out what his father was doing here when, suddenly, he is transported to the virtual world of The Grid.
As you can see, the story told by Tron: Legacy is easy to follow, as it is about a young protagonist who is transported to a virtual world while searching for his father, who disappeared decades ago. What's more, with this brief description, one could even consider Tron to be—without exaggeration—an Isekai. But beyond being a story that matches or depends so much on its predecessor, it is a sequel that manages to function more as a standalone story than anything else. It even works better this way, since in the film itself we see Tron as an inspiration or something distant from what is shown to us.
SPANISH VERSION
Un mensaje bastante familiar procedente de un sitio que debería estar abandonado hace décadas atrás despierta los viejos y más profundos recuerdos de Sam sobre su padre. Es así como este se dirige a la vieja tienda de Juegos de Flynn con la leve idea de encontrar algo que le demuestre que su padre está con vida. Cuando investiga el lugar se encuentra con un pasadizo secreto que lleva a una habitación donde al parecer se la pasaba su padre todo el tiempo antes de desaparecer. Vemos una computadora y aparatos de alta tecnología alrededor. Sam averigua qué es lo que estaba haciendo su padre aquí cuando, de repente, este es transportado al mundo virtual de La Red.
Como ven, la historia que nos cuenta Tron: Legacy es sencilla de seguir al tratarse de un joven protagonista que es transportado a un mundo virtual mientras busca a su padre que ha desaparecido hace décadas atrás. Es más, con esta breve descripción se puede incluso considerar el hecho de que Tron sea -sin exagerar- un Isekai. Pero más allá de ser una historia que compagine o dependa tanto de su predecesora, es una secuela que logra funcionar más como una historia independiente que como cualquier otra cosa. Incluso sirve mejor así ya que en la misma película vemos a Tron como una inspiración o algo lejano a lo que se nos muestra.
One of the criticisms that Tron: Legacy received at the time was regarding its story, which seemed to be one of the most generic in the film industry. Personally, I don't know what the hell fans were expecting to see back then, since this film not only expands the Tron universe, but also gives us a much more complete view of that universe and its relationship with the real world. What I would complain about a little is how little we see of the story between "The Miracle" and "The Purge", which is limited to a story of no less than ten minutes in length.
There is also the issue of ISOS (Isomorphic Algorithms) and their impact on the story. I don't know, there are some things between the plot and the characters that overshadow the influence and presence of truly interesting characters in the story, such as the ISOS, for example. I think the main problem lies in how some elements of the story and certain important characters are slightly ignored by the plot, the impressive action scenes, or the performances of certain main characters. Be that as it may, I'm not saying that the story itself is bad, just that it doesn't get as much credit as it should at the beginning.
SPANISH VERSION
Una de las críticas que tuvo Tron: Legacy en su momento fue con respecto a su historia, la cual parecía ser de las más genéricas que se pueden conocer en la industria del cine. En lo personal, no sé qué rayos era lo que esperaban ver los fanáticos en aquel entonces, ya que esta película consigue no solo extender el universo de Tron, sino que nos da una visión mucho más completa de dicho universo y su relación con el mundo real. De lo que sí me quejaría un poco sería en lo poco que vemos de la historia entre “El Milagro” y “La Depuración”, limitándose a solamente ser un cuento de no menos de diez minutos de duración.
También está el tema de los ISOS (Algoritmos Isomórficos) y su impacto en dicha historia. No sé, hay algunas cosas entre la trama y los personajes que opacan bastante la influencia y presencia de personajes verdaderamente interesantes para la historia como lo son los ISOS, por ejemplo. Creo que el problema principal radica en cómo algunos elementos de la historia y ciertos personajes importantes son levemente ignorados por la trama, las escenas impresionantes de acción o las actuaciones de ciertos personajes principales. Sea como sea, no digo que la historia en sí sea mala, solo que no se consigue valorar tanto como debería al principio.
It is only when we stop to think about it that we realize everything that the film was trying to show us. A virtual world created from nothing by a technological genius obsessed with perfection, an intelligent, virtual, and autonomous form of life that goes beyond human understanding, and the consequences of certain decisions made by said genius after encountering something that escapes his control and knowledge. All this and more is what we see in this two-hour feature film. We could also mention how the film ultimately shows us a digital version of what we know as oppression and dictatorship.
This is where we talk about those characters who have given us so much to talk about in this film and who are difficult to overlook even if we want to. To begin with, I don't think there's much need to talk about the supposed main character, Sam Flynn, who is the son of the genius and famous Kevin Flynn. He simply plays a very typical and familiar role in the world of cinema, the typical protagonist and hero who travels to a virtual world to save someone and ends up saving the world. He is a typical rebellious young man who did not have a very happy childhood, and so on. He is one of those characters who stands out more in action scenes than in anything else.
SPANISH VERSION
No es sino cuando nos ponemos a pensar en ella que caemos en cuenta en todo lo que se nos intentó mostrar en dicha película. Un mundo virtual creado de la nada por un genio de la tecnología obsesionado por la perfección, una forma de vida inteligente, virtual y autónoma que va más allá de la comprensión humana y las consecuencias de ciertas decisiones que toma dicho genio luego de encontrar algo que escapa de su control y conocimiento. Todo esto y más es lo que vemos en dicho largometraje de dos horas de duración. También se podría mencionar cómo la película nos muestra al final una versión digital de lo que conocemos como opresión y dictadura.
Es aquí cuando hablamos de esos personajes que han dado mucho de qué hablar en esta película y que es difícil pasarlos por alto aunque uno quiera. Para empezar, creo que no hace falta hablar mucho sobre el que se supone es el protagonista principal, Sam Flynn, quien es hijo del genio y famoso Kevin Flynn. Este solo cumple con darnos un papel muy típico y conocido en el mundo del cine, el típico protagonista y héroe que viaja a un mundo virtual para salvar a alguien y termina salvando al mundo. Típico joven rebelde que de niño no tuvo una infancia muy feliz que digamos y todo eso. Es de esos personajes que destacan más en escenas de acción que en cualquier otra cosa.
On the other hand, we have Kevin Flynn, now aged and with a whole life spent in this virtual world where he has lived all these years. I don't know what Kevin Flynn was like in Tron, but here in Legacy I don't like him at all. Perhaps it's because he takes on the role of a philosophical old man who does nothing but meditate and utter profound phrases, but at the same time without any feeling. Ultimately, he just comes across as a character who failed at almost everything and whose only salvation was to walk away and do nothing. He may show moments of wisdom and brilliance, but in the end, he's just an absent father trying to earn his son's forgiveness.
Now it's time to talk about his evil copy, that version of Jeff Bridges that we would never see on the big screen, especially with so much CGI on top of it. A rejuvenated version of Kevin Flynn's character, but with a colder and more calculating way of thinking and doing things. We are talking about CLU (a digital copy or replica of Kevin), who is the villain of this story. Apart from his computer-generated physical appearance, something else I don't like about this particular character is the way he acts and thinks. Although, of course, the idea is that he should be ruthless, being a digital version of a cruel dictator who sees "users" as the enemy and any unknown program as a threat to his world.
SPANISH VERSION
Por otro lado, tenemos a Kevin Flynn, ya envejecido y con toda una vida hecha en este mundo virtual donde ha pasado todos estos años. No conozco cómo era el Kevin Flynn de Tron, pero aquí en Legacy no me agrada en lo absoluto. Tal vez y sea porque asume un rol de anciano filosófico y que lo único que hace es meditar y decir frases profundas, pero a la vez sin sentimiento alguno. Finalmente solo demuestra ser un personaje que falló casi en todo y que su única salvación fue alejarse y no hacer nada. Puede que en algunos momentos demuestra ser alguien sabio y genial, pero al final solo es un padre ausente que intenta ganarse el perdón de su hijo.
Ahora toca hablar de su copia malvada, esa versión de Jeff Bridges que jamás veríamos en la pantalla grande y menos con tanto CGI encima. Una versión rejuvenecida del personaje de Kevin Flynn, pero con una forma de pensar y hacer las cosas de manera más fría y calculadora. Estamos hablando de CLU (una copia o réplica digital de Kevin), quién es el villano de esta historia. Aparte de su aspecto físico hecho por computadora, algo que no me agrada tampoco de este personaje en particular es la manera de actuar y pensar que tiene. Aunque, claro está, la idea es que sea así de despiadado al ser una versión digital de un cruel dictador que ve a los “usuarios” como el enemigo y cualquier programa desconocido como una amenaza para su mundo.
Leaving aside the clear references in this film to racism, oppression, genocide, and dictatorship, seeing this side of history as a dangerous virtual world, very different from anything we may have seen before, is something that catches our attention. Normally, the virtual worlds shown to us in this industry are mind-blowing and fantastic, but on this occasion, it strays far from that dreamlike vision and only recreates a dark and dangerous version of that world, surely inspired by real life. Obviously, this does not compare in the slightest to what The Matrix showed us long before with its vision of a virtual world that made us question even our own reality.
But beyond that, the film does manage to be quite entertaining to watch despite its long running time. Sure, there are scenes that I sincerely think were unnecessary, but it's not that big of a deal. The light disc battles, light cycle races, fights, and chases on The Grid are some of the most entertaining things you'll find in this great sequel to Tron. We can say that this result was mainly achieved thanks to the spectacular audiovisual work, but we mustn't forget the cast and their work in playing characters that are difficult to forget, for better or for worse.
SPANISH VERSION
Dejando de lado las claras referencias que tiene esta película con el racismo, la opresión, el genocidio y la dictadura; ver este lado de la historia como un mundo virtual peligroso y muy diferente a lo que posiblemente se ha visto antes es algo que llama la atención. Normalmente los mundos virtuales que nos muestran en esta industria son alucinantes y fantásticos, pero en esta ocasión se aleja mucho de dicha visión soñada y solo recrea una versión oscura y peligrosa de dicho mundo, seguramente inspirado en la vida real. Obviamente, esto no se compara en lo más mínimo a lo que nos mostró The Matrix mucho antes con su visión de un mundo virtual que nos hizo cuestionarnos hasta nuestra propia realidad.
Pero más allá de eso, la película sí consigue ser bastante entretenida de ver a pesar de su larga duración. Claro, hay escenas que pienso sinceramente que estaban de más, pero tampoco es para tanto. Las batallas de discos de luz, las carreras de motos de luz, los combates y las persecuciones en La Red es de lo más entretenido que puedes encontrar en esta grandiosa secuela de Tron. Podemos decir que lo que consiguió dicho resultado fue mayormente el espectacular trabajo audiovisual que tiene, pero tampoco hay que olvidarnos del elenco y su labor al interpretar personajes difíciles de olvidar, ya sea para bien o para mal.
Finally, and most importantly, let's talk about the audiovisual aspect of this film. This is what made Tron: Legacy go from being a simple sequel to an 80s classic to one of the best-produced films of the past decade. The style, colors, designs, and vision of this virtual world are what make this film an unparalleled audiovisual marvel. The enormous amount of work behind all this is reflected in the different scenes, which have a fluidity and detail that make it a unique film in its style. The cinematography, the fixed shots, the slow motion, the transitions, the views, and the color palette are fantastic.
The costumes, the types of suits, the makeup, and the excellent use of light and shadow are also worth mentioning. But nothing stands out more than the computer-generated imagery (CGI), which practically takes up a large part of the film's attention. Starting with rejuvenating Jeff Bridges to play CLU, the designs of the light cycles, the ships, the cities, the surroundings, etc. It is interesting that they have also given meaning and value to the color palette in the film itself. The sound effects, on the other hand, are spectacular. But nothing compared to what Daft Punk achieved with the soundtrack. In short, this is a film that redefines the classic with the modern.
Personally, I give it a 9/10 rating in terms of the science fiction, action, and adventure genre.
SPANISH VERSION
Por último y lo más importante de todo, hablemos -ahora sí- del apartado audiovisual de esta película. Esto fue lo que hizo que Tron: Legacy pasará de ser una simple secuela de un clásico de los 80 a convertirse en una de las películas mejor producidas de toda la década pasada. El estilo, los colores, los diseños y la visión de este mundo virtual es lo que hace de esta película una maravilla audiovisual sin par. El enorme trabajo que tuvo detrás de todo esto se refleja en las diferentes escenas que tiene con una fluidez y unos detalles que lo hacen una cinta única en su estilo. La cinematografía, los planos fijos, las cámaras lentas, las transiciones, las vistas y la paleta de colores son fantásticas.
También hay que recalcar la parte del vestuario, los tipos de trajes, el maquillaje y el excelente manejo de luces y sombras. Pero no hay nada que se destaque más que los efectos visuales hechos por computadora (CGI) que, prácticamente, toman una gran parte de la atención en la película. Empezando por rejuvenecer a Jeff Bridges para interpretar a CLU, los diseños de las motos de luces, las naves, las ciudades, los alrededores, etc. Es interesante que también le hayan dado hasta un significado y valor a la paleta de colores en la misma película. Los efectos de sonido, por otro lado, son espectaculares. Pero nada comparado con lo que logró Daft Punk con la banda sonora. En fin, esta es una película que redefine lo clásico con lo moderno.
Personalmente, le doy una calificación de 9/10 en lo que respecta al género de ciencia ficción, acción y aventura.
Tell me, have you seen this movie yet? What did you think of it? You can leave your answer in the comments.
Dime, ¿ya has visto esta película? ¿Qué te ha parecido? Puedes dejarme tu respuesta en los comentarios.
Written by: Kevin Arkadie
Directed by: Stephen Gyllenhaal
Running Time: 45 minutes
The visceral intensity of The Shield was never conjured from pure fiction; its DNA was forged in the sordid reality of the LAPD's Rampart scandal. This infamous episode, where members of the elite CRASH unit moonlighted as security for prominent Los Angeles rap figures, inherently entangled them with the Bloods gang and the increasingly lethal violence permeating the city's music scene. Shawn Ryan, the series' creator, drew direct inspiration from this toxic intersection of law enforcement, celebrity, and gang culture. Dawg Days, the fourth episode of the inaugural season, plunges headfirst into this very milieu, utilising the Rampart blueprint to craft a narrative where the Strike Team's blurred lines of duty and criminality collide catastrophically with the rap world's brutal power struggles.
The episode explodes into action at a raucous album release party for Kern Little (a compellingly authentic turn by real-life rapper Sticky Fingaz), an aspiring star and close associate of Vic Mackey's criminal partner, Rondell Robinson. Officers Danny Sofer and Lemansky, moonlighting as security, find themselves amidst escalating tensions. Kern's rival, the volatile drug dealer and would-be rapper T-Bonz (Dex Elliot Sanders), crashes the event, nursing grievances over money and Kern's girlfriend, Tyesha (Chene Lawson). Verbal sparring rapidly degenerates into gunfire, leaving two dead and multiple injured. Crucially, Rondell Robinson is present during the chaos, witnessed by Danny. While Vic, ever the manipulator, guarantees Rondell he can make the weapons charges (and potentially worse) disappear, Rondell fatally misjudges the boundaries of their arrangement by sending thugs to threaten Danny. Vic’s ensuing fury is palpable and absolute; in his worldview, cops are untouchable sovereigns, and Rondell’s transgression demands immediate, brutal retribution. The Strike Team’s response – the systematic vandalism of Rondell’s home – is a chilling demonstration of their self-appointed authority and the swift, extrajudicial punishment meted out to those who dare challenge their perceived immunity.
Yet, the nightclub massacre proves merely the spark for a far more devastating conflagration. The Kern-T-Bonz feud spills onto the streets, escalating into a bloody drug war with innocent bystanders caught in the crossfire. The killing of a young boy, someone connected to the mayor’s circle, delivers a stark wake-up call: not only is Vic personally unsettled by the collateral damage, but Assistant Chief Gilroy explicitly warns that higher-ups can no longer shield the Strike Team from scrutiny. Faced with this pressure and a genuine, if self-serving, desire to quell the violence threatening his own position, Vic attempts mediation, forcing Kern and T-Bonz into a fragile truce. However, T-Bonz’s vicious act of poisoning Tyesha’s cat shatters the peace. Kern, now consumed by vengeance, demands Vic eliminate T-Bonz – but with the chilling stipulation that he must witness the execution. Vic, operating within his own warped moral calculus, delivers a solution far more brutal than mere assassination. He confines both men to a shipping container overnight, decreeing they must either broker peace or kill each other. Come morning, only Kern emerges, the implication of his survival – and Vic’s tacit approval of the outcome – a stark testament to the episode’s central thesis: in this world, "justice" is often indistinguishable from savage, self-determined retribution.
Concurrently, Captain Aceveda navigates the treacherous waters of political ambition. Attending a function hosted by Jorge Machado (Efrain Figueroa), a powerful figure in the city's Hispanic community, Aceveda is solicited for a favour concerning Machado’s nanny, Ellie Ruiz (Linda Medina), whose husband Manuel has vanished. Dutch and Claudette’s investigation leads them to Eduardo Salcido (Christopher Perez), Manuel’s undocumented friend who crossed the border with him. They uncover that Manuel died accidentally at a construction site, but Jamison (Marc McLure), the site foreman, concealed the death to avoid immigration complications, burying the body and convincing Eduardo it was murder. While Jamison faces obstruction charges and Ellie learns of potential civil damages, Machado subtly dangles future political support for Aceveda – support contingent on the Captain making his name by exposing LAPD corruption. This subplot masterfully layers Aceveda’s motivations, revealing his crusade against Vic is not purely principled but intricately tied to his own political ascent, adding significant complexity to his character and critiquing the pervasive intertwining of law enforcement and political opportunism within the city’s changing demographic landscape.
Supporting narratives further enrich the episode’s tapestry. Julien’s compassionate handling of elderly Dottie Cummings (Marlene Warfield), whose son’s body was stolen from a grave for ransom, provides a rare moment of procedural decency while adding some black humour. Simultaneously, Vic confronts the unsettling reality of his mentally unstable son, Matthew, posing a potential threat to his younger sister, a deeply personal crisis that momentarily punctures his usual bravado. Notably, Dawg Days is one of only three episodes in the entire series devoid of Shane Vendrell, a consequence of Walton Goggins’ delayed contract finalisation, subtly altering the Strike Team’s dynamic without diminishing the episode’s impact.
Directed by Stephen Gyllenhaal (father of actors Jake and Maggie), the episode was affected by significant behind-the-scenes tension. Gyllenhaal reportedly favoured a less sympathetic portrayal of Vic, a vision firmly overruled by Michael Chiklis. Chiklis’ perspective ultimately prevailed, shaping the scene’s uncompromising tone. Despite this creative friction, Gyllenhaal’s direction is taut and effective, particularly in the visceral nightclub shootout and the oppressive claustrophobia of the container. The final shot – Kern and Vic silently watching the sunrise, bound by the unspeakable act they have just facilitated – stands as one of Season One’s most haunting and memorable images, radiating a chilling, wordless understanding born of shared violence.
Kevin Arkadie’s script is largely exceptional, driving the narrative with relentless momentum. While the escalation of the drug war occasionally veers towards the operatically spectacular, flirting with gangsta rap clichés, it is counterbalanced by sharp socio-economic observations. The Aceveda/Machado subplot offers nuanced commentary on the precarious position of undocumented immigrants and the evolving political influence of Los Angeles’s Hispanic community. Crucially, it deepens Aceveda, transforming him from a simple antagonist into a figure whose motives are admirably complex yet morally compromised by ambition. Dawg Days works not merely as a gripping crime drama, but as a potent, unflinching dissection of the corrupting symbiosis between power, street violence, and political aspiration, proving that in Vic Mackey’s world, the line between cop and criminal isn’t just blurred – it’s often deliberately erased with brutal, finality.
Hello dears friends of @Moviestvshows a pleasure to be here and this time I want to talk about the movie Deadpool & Wolverine, really for me very good, entertaining and did not stop laughing in several scenes, clearly not a movie for children as we know that Deadpool (Ryan Reynolds) is a rude character, does not stop to say strong words, but it does not imply that it is not something entertaining and funny the way he expresses himself.
Really a movie to watch as friends, as we know Deadpool is a mercenary who can regenerate as Wolverine, he has long wanted to be an avenger or belong to the X-men but because of his peculiarity to behave and say the right things he is not the hero that everyone would be noticed and respected by the little ones, however, at a time in his life he has to be a hero or at least join one that was known as the last X-men and returns to the screen with greater force, this is Wolverine (Hugh Jackman).
Although it is known that he is not himself, but because of the multiverse, he appears and will help Deadpool to save his timeline, which is good the union of these two is explosive, not only because they clash with each other because of their personalities, but also as much as they fight, they can't kill each other because they both regenerate, their battles are good and laughable, they are like a bad marriage for real, they argue more than they can sit still and think about what they can do.
Despite their differences and at first bad relationship intensified in both, they decide to support each other, since the world where this Logan comes from is lost for him, he supports Deadpool to save his and can live with those he loves, in the course will get several really interesting characters like The Human Torch (Chris Evans), Gambit (Channing Tatum) and Elektra (Jennifer Garner) were the ones that caught my attention and I loved their participation.
As well as having Doctor X's sister as an enemy, joining each universe and intervening things in that way was something interesting and exciting at the same time, a movie that summarizes certain points of the connections between past and future events, the idea of changing the lines and wanting to return heroes who fell or disappeared in others, the reality of many Deadpool until woman that part was really funny and with the participation of the doggie more. But not to fall into complete spoiler I invite you to watch it and enjoy it, the fights are brutal and entertaining, you laugh at the way they act.
Director: Shawn Levy
Starring: Ryan Reynolds, Hugh Jackman, Emma Corrin, Morena Baccarin, Rob Delaney, Leslie Uggams, Aaron Stanford and Matthew Macfadyen
Country: United States
Year: 2024
Film Genre: Superhero movies, action and black comedy films
Production Companies: Marvel Studios, Maximum Effort and 21 Laps Entertainment
Distribution: Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures.
Thank you very much for reading it. I hope you like it. If you have any comments I'll be glad to answer and if you want to know more about me I leave you my:
Translated Using Deepl
ESPAÑOL
Hola queridos amigos de @Moviestvshows un gusto pasar por acá y en esta ocasión quiero hablarles de la película de Deadpool & Wolverine, realmente para mi muy buena, entretenida y no paraba de reírme en varias escenas, claramente no es una película para los pequeños ya que sabemos de por sí que Deadpool (Ryan Reynolds) es un personaje grosero, no se detiene a decir palabras fuertes, pero no implica que no sea algo entretenido y gracioso la forma como se expresa.
Realmente una película para ver como amigos, como se sabe Deadpool es un mercenaria que puede regenerarse como Wolverine, desde hace tiempo quiere ser un vengador o pertenecer a los X-men pero por su peculiaridad de comportarse y decir las cosas bueno no es el héroe que a todos les llamaría la atención y seria respetado por lo más pequeños, sin embargo, en un momento de su vida le toca ser un héroe o al menos unirse a uno que fue conocido como el último X-men y regresa a la pantalla con mayor fuerza, se trata de Wolverine (Hugh Jackman).
Aunque se sabe que es no es él mismo, pero por el multiuniverso, este aparece y ayudará a Deadpool a salvar su línea de tiempo, lo cual bueno la unión de estos dos es explosiva, no solo porque chocan entre sí por sus personalidades, sino que también por más que se pelean bueno no pueden matarse ya que ambos se regeneran, sus batallas son buenas y da risa como quedan después, son como un matrimonio mal hecho de verdad, es más lo que discuten que lo que pueden quedarse quieto y pensar bien en lo que podrán hacer.
Pese a sus diferencias y al principio mala relación intensificada en ambos, deciden apoyarse, ya que el mundo donde viene este Logan está perdido para él, apoya a Deadpool a salvar el suyo y que pueda vivir con los que quiere, en el transcurso se conseguirá varios personajes realmente interesantes como La antorcha Humana (Chris Evans), Gambito (Channing Tatum) y Elektra (Jennifer Garner) fueron los que me llamaron más la atención y me encanto su participación.
Así como tener de enemiga a la hermana del Doctor X, unir cada universo e intervenir las cosas de esa manera fue algo interesante y emocionante al mismo tiempo, una película que resume ciertos puntos de las conexiones entre eventos pasados y futuros, la idea de cambiar las líneas y querer devolver a héroes que cayeron o desaparecieron en otras, la realidad de muchos Deadpool hasta mujer esa parte fue cómica de verdad y con la participación del perrito más. Pero para no caer en completo spoiler invito a verla y disfrutarla, las peleas son brutales y entretenidas, te ríes de la forma en cómo actúan.
Dirección: Shawn Levy
Protagonistas: Ryan Reynolds, Hugh Jackman, Emma Corrin, Morena Baccarin, Rob Delaney, Leslie Uggams, Aaron Stanford y Matthew Macfadyen
País: Estados Unidos
Año: 2024
Género: Cine de superhéroes, acción y cine de humor negro
Compañías Productora: Marvel Studios, Maximum Effort y 21 Laps Entertainment
Distribución: Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures.
Hello everyone, fellow fans of good stories, dear Movies and TV Shows community, this time I want to share a new review with my opinions, this time it's Mickey 17's turn, I finally got to see it this weekend and I'm still processing it... I mean, let's be honest, where do you start? Since we found out that Bong Joon Ho, the director, was back, expectations... boom! They went through the roof, I mean, we're talking about the genius behind Parasite, the guy who rocked the Oscars, who won Best Picture and who made the whole world turn to look at Korean cinema, the pressure of overcoming that... imagine, it must have been brutal. So yeah, I started watching it with a mix of "how excited!" and a little fear of "will he do it again?"... but anyway, first things first: the central idea of the film. Because it's both brilliant and completely crazy, think about it: in the future, humanity is colonizing an ice planet, and for the most dangerous missions, the suicidal ones, they have the "expendables" ... enter Robert Pattinson, who is Mickey, our poor devil who signs up for this job.
And what does it mean to be expendable? They save your DNA and your memories on a disk, so when you die a horrible death—and believe me, people die a lot—the company just reprints you. Bam! A brand new clone, with all your memories up to that point, ready to go die again, the concept is amazing, and the first hour of the film is, without exaggeration, a masterpiece of black comedy with science fiction ... it is Bong Joon Ho at his purest. The way he shows you Mickey's deaths, one after the other, is horrifying but at the same time you're laughing your ass off, at one point you're like "no, how horrible!" and the next second you burst out laughing... that's his genius, isn't it?
That unique ability he has to mix something disturbing with something ridiculously comical, this is where the film's review hits you hard... it's a direct, no-nonsense anti-capitalist satire about how mega-corporations view their employees as... literal, disposable parts. Your life is worthless, only what you produce, if you break, well, nothing, they bring in a new one... it's a topic I've already touched on, for example in Okja with the meat industry, but here it feels much more personal, more human, because the "product" that is discarded again and again is a person... that first hour is brutal. If the entire film had maintained that level, we'd be talking about another instant classic, simple as that.
Hola a todos, amigos fanáticos de las buenas historias, querida comunidad de Movies and TV Shows, en esta ocasión les quiero compartir una nueva reseña con mis opiniones, está vez me toca a Mickey 17, por fin la pude ver este fin de semana y todavía la ando procesando.. es que, seamos honestos, ¿por dónde empiezas? Desde que supimos que Bong Joon Ho, el director, estaba de vuelta, las expectativas... ¡pum! Se fueron hasta la luna, o sea, estamos hablando del genio detrás de Parásitos, el tipo que la rompió en los Oscares, que ganó Mejor Película y que hizo que todo el mundo volteara a ver el cine coreano, la presión de superar eso... imagínense, debió ser una cosa brutal. Así que sí, yo empecé a verla con una mezcla de "¡qué emoción!" y un miedito de "¿lo logrará de nuevo?".. pero bueno, primero lo primero: la idea central de la película. Porque es una genialidad y una locura total, piénsenlo: en el futuro, la humanidad está colonizando un planeta de hielo, y para las misiones más peligrosas, las que son suicidas, tienen a los "prescindibles".. ahí entra Robert Pattinson, que es Mickey, nuestro pobre diablo que se anota para este trabajo.
Y qué significa ser un prescindible? Que guardan tu ADN y tus recuerdos en un disco, así que cuando te mueres de una forma horrible —y créanme, se muere mucho— la empresa simplemente te vuelve a imprimir. ¡Zas! Un clon nuevecito, con todos tus recuerdos hasta ese punto, listo para ir a morir otra vez, el concepto es una pasada, y la primera hora de la película es, sin exagerar, una obra maestra de comedia negra con ciencia ficción.. es Bong Joon Ho en su estado más puro. La forma en que te muestra las muertes de Mickey, una tras otra, es horrible pero al mismo tiempo te estás cagando de la risa, en un momento estás como "¡no, qué horror!" y al segundo siguiente tienes una carcajada.. es que ese es su genio, ¿no?
Esa habilidad única que tiene para mezclar algo perturbador con algo ridículamente cómico, aquí es donde la crítica de la película te pega con todo.. es una sátira anticapitalista directa, sin pelos en la lengua, sobre cómo las mega corporaciones ven a sus empleados como... literal, piezas de usar y tirar. Tu vida no vale nada, solo lo que produces, si te rompes, pues nada, traen uno nuevo.. es un tema que ya había tocado, por ejemplo en Okja con la industria de la carne, pero aquí se siente mucho más personal, más humano, porque el "producto" que se desecha una y otra vez es una persona.. esa primera hora es brutal. Si toda la película hubiera mantenido ese nivel, estaríamos hablando de otro clásico instantáneo, así de fácil.
And now, Robert Pattinson, we have to talk about this man... honestly, I think this could be the best performance of his entire career. We've already seen him grow, haven't we? From being a teen idol to becoming one of the most interesting and daring actors around. But this... this is a different story. He has to play a bunch of versions of the same person, and he does it with such subtle differences that it's brilliant. The way his voice changes, his posture for each "Mickey," it's crazy. You feel the confusion, the tiredness, and how his anger grows with each clone. It's not like he's playing himself multiple times, not at all!
He's creating different characters who yes, share a past, but who are marked by the traumatic way in which they were "born" ... I read somewhere that he based the voice on Steve Buscemi's in Fargo and, I swear, once you realize it, you can't stop hearing it, it's a very strange but perfect decision that gives all the flavor to this character who is half comedy and half tragedy ... he deserves to have his name in the running for all the awards, because he alone carries all the emotional and philosophical weight of the film. And visually, people ... it's a delicacy!
You can't review Mickey 17 without talking about the photography, the director of photography is Darius Khondji, the guy is a master at creating environments and it shows here, the interiors of the ship, which are very clean but at the same time you feel trapped, they overwhelm you, each shot is perfectly taken care of, creating this world that looks advanced but at the same time depressing and dirty. The music is also a gem and perfectly accompanies the film's strange mood swings... really, this is a film that begs to be seen on a big screen; the scale, the sound, the art... it's an experience that can't be experienced the same way on a smaller screen.
Y ahora, Robert Pattinson, tenemos que hablar de este hombre.. de verdad, creo que esta podría ser la mejor actuación de toda su carrera, ya lo vimos crecer, ¿no? De ser el ídolo adolescente a convertirse en uno de los actores más interesantes y arriesgados de ahorita, pero es que esto… esto es otro pedo, le toca hacer de un montón de versiones de la misma persona y lo hace con unas diferencias tan sutiles que es una genialidad.. la forma en que cambia la voz, su postura para cada "Mickey", es una locura. Sientes la confusión, el cansancio y cómo le va creciendo la rabia con cada clon, no es que se esté actuando a sí mismo varias veces, ¡para nada!
Está creando personajes diferentes que sí, comparten un pasado, pero que están marcados por la forma tan traumática en que "nacieron".. por ahí leí que para la voz se basó en la de Steve Buscemi en Fargo y, se los juro, una vez que te das cuenta, ya no puedes dejar de oírlo, es una decisión rarísima pero perfecta que le da todo el sabor a este personaje que es mitad comedia y mitad tragedia.. se merece que su nombre suene para todos los premios, porque él solito carga con todo el peso emocional y filosófico de la película. Y visualmente, gente... ¡es un manjar!No puedes reseñar Mickey 17 sin hablar de la fotografía, el director de foto es Darius Khondji, el tipo es un maestro para crear ambientes y aquí se nota, los interiores de la nave, que son como muy limpios pero a la vez te sientes encerrado, te agobian, cada toma está perfectamente cuidada, creando este mundo que se ve avanzado pero a la vez deprimente y sucio. La música también es una joya y acompaña perfecto esos cambios de humor tan raros que tiene la película.. de verdad, esta es una película que te pide a gritos que la veas en alguna pantalla grande, la escala, el sonido, el arte… es una experiencia que no se vive igual en una pantalla más chica.
Buuuut, and this is a really big "but," after that first hour, which is wonderful, the film kind of starts to fall apart... this is where I think people are going to be divided. The problem is that Mickey 17 can't decide what it wants to be... is it a super-deep science fiction drama about identity? Is it a pitch-black comedy about corporations? Or is it some kind of half-joking environmental fable? And in trying to be all three, I feel like it falls short on all of them... all that sharp criticism from the first half is lost, and the second half feels much more... silly, more scattered. The plot becomes a kind of crazy run-around, and you get the feeling that there are a couple of stories and characters too many, that if they had been cut, everything would be more focused. And speaking of characters, that's where the rest of the cast comes in, especially Mark Ruffalo.
Bong Joon Ho himself said that his character, the colony’s leader, a bumbling, narcissistic man, is a mockery of politics, and he’s actually completely over the top, a total caricature of incompetence and ego. Yes, he does give you the biggest laughs. Toni Collette is also in the mix, in an equally weird role... but while they’re entertaining, their performances make the film feel too broad, too cartoonish, and they take away from the more serious questions I was asking you in the first place. It’s as if the film is putting these brutal philosophical questions in front of you—what makes us human? Does a clone have a soul? What is a life worth?—but just when you expect it to get insightful, it gets distracted by its own antics and never really explores them.
Peeeero, y este es un "pero" bien grande, después de esa primera hora que es una maravilla, la película como que empieza a hacer aguas.. aquí es donde creo que la gente se va a dividir, el problema es que Mickey 17 no se decide qué quiere ser.. es un drama de ciencia ficción súper profundo sobre la identidad? ¿Es una comedia negrísima sobre las corporaciones? ¿O es una especie de fábula sobre el medio ambiente, medio en broma? Y al intentar ser las tres cosas, siento que se queda a medias en todas.. toda esa crítica tan afilada de la primera mitad se va perdiendo y la segunda parte se siente mucho más… boba, más dispersa. La trama se vuelve un corredero medio loco, y te da la sensación de que le sobran un par de historias y personajes, que si los hubieran cortado todo estaría más centrado, y hablando de personajes, ahí entra el resto del elenco, sobre todo Mark Ruffalo.
El mismo Bong Joon Ho dijo que su personaje —que es el líder de la colonia, un tipo torpe y narcisista— es una burla de los políticos, y la verdad es que está pasadísimo, es una caricatura total de la incompetencia y el ego, y sí, te saca las mejores carcajadas,Toni Collette también anda por ahí, en un papel igual de raro.. pero, aunque te entretienen, sus actuaciones hacen que la película se sienta demasiado amplia, demasiado caricaturesca, y le quitan peso a las preguntas más serias que te había planteado al principio. Es como si la película te pusiera sobre la mesa estas preguntas filosóficas brutales —¿qué nos hace humanos?, ¿un clon tiene alma?, ¿cuánto vale una vida?— pero justo cuando esperas que se ponga profunda, se distrae con sus propias payasadas y nunca las explora de verdad.
And that brings me to something that made me a little sad. It really didn't have much of an impact or recognition. I mean, you have a film from one of the most acclaimed directors on the planet, with a huge star and a budget of over $100 million, and it seems like nobody even noticed it came out. My fear, my real fear, is that the studios will learn the wrong lesson from this, that they will see that it didn't fill theaters and say, "See? People don't want weird, original, visionary films... let's just make Captain America 17 instead." That makes you worry because it's films like Mickey 17 that keep cinema exciting. They're different, they challenge you, they don't feel like they were made by a robot... they feel like they were made by an artist with a clear idea in mind, one who didn't sell out. So, what's my final verdict?
Look, it's not a bad movie at all... it's not like you're going to waste your time, it's... a flawed masterpiece... maybe a brilliant disaster. It's one of those movies that I know people are going to argue about whether it's good or terrible, it's not a Happy Meal product designed for everyone to like, it's art... it's weird, it's beautiful, it's funny, it frustrates you and you don't forget it. For me, it's a well-placed 7.5/10. The first hour is a 9, easy. The second half... wow, it drops to like a 5... but even with its arguments, it's good that it exists, I'd much rather see a movie like this, all messy but ambitious and unique, from a genius like Bong Joon Ho, than another safe and predictable blockbuster... another Fast and Furious 15, ending up wanting to argue about it with someone... And isn't that what good cinema is all about? So, if you can, see it on the biggest screen you can find. It's daring cinema, but it has soul, and it's sure to captivate more than one person. And well, that's it for today's review. We'll see you in the next ones. Take care! Bye!
Y eso me lleva a algo que me puso un poco triste, realmente no tuvo mucho impacto o reconocimiento, o sea, tienes una película de uno de los directores más aplaudidos del planeta, con una estrellota y un presupuesto de más de 100 millones de dólares, y parece que nadie se enteró que salió.. mi miedo, mi verdadero miedo, es que los estudios aprendan la lección equivocada de esto, que vean que no llenó las salas y digan: “¿Ya ven? La gente no quiere películas raras, originales, con visión.. mejor vamos a hacer Capitán América 17”.. eso te hace preocuparte porque son películas como Mickey 17 las que hacen que el cine siga siendo emocionante. Son diferentes, te retan, no se sienten como si las hubiera hecho un robot.. se sienten hechas por un artista con una idea clara en la cabeza, uno que no se vendió. Entonces, ¿cuál es mi veredicto final?
A ver, no es una mala película, para nada.. no es que vayan a perder su tiempo, es… una obra maestra con defectos.. a lo mejor un desastre brillante. Es de esas películas que sé que la gente va a discutir si es buena o terrible, no es un producto de cajita feliz, diseñado para que a todo el mundo le guste, es arte.. es rara, es hermosa, es divertida, te frustra y no se te olvida. Para mí, es un 7.5/10 bien puesto. La primera hora es un 9, fácil. La segunda mitad… baja como a un 5.. pero con todo y sus broncas, qué bueno que existe, prefiero mil veces ver una película así, toda desordenada pero ambiciosa y única, de un genio como Bong Joon Ho, que otro blockbuster seguro y predecible.. otro Rápido y Furiosos 15, termine con ganas de discutirla con alguien.. ¿Y no es de eso que se trata el buen cine? Así que, si pueden, véanla en la pantalla más grande que ncuentren, es cine atrevido pero tiene alma, seguro cautiva a más de uno. Y bueno, hasta aquí la reseña de hoy, nos veremos en las próximas reseñas, cuidense mucho! Byebye!
Tell me... have you seen this movie? Has it caught your attention? Tell me what you thought of this review with my opinion, and tell me if it has made you want to watch this movie. You can leave me in the comments your recommendations for future publications! 😊
📲 My social media:
See you next time! 👀🎞💗
Traduced with DeepL
Banners y separadores hechos con Canva Pro. Banners and dividers made with Canva Pro.
The Avengers and their superhero allies must be ready to risk everything to stop the almighty Thanos before his wave of destruction brings an end to the entire universe.
Released in 2018, it served as the first of the two-part storyline centered on Thanos, the most menacing villain in the MCU.
Countless characters try to claim their moment and shine, and the Russo brothers at the helm deliver strong directing work.
Infinity War revolves around the possibility of contemplating the unthinkable: annihilation, extinction, the end of the immortal Avengers.
It features plenty of large-scale action scenes, packed with effects, enjoyable character interactions with some genuinely funny moments. The Scarlet Witch–Vision romance lacked the emotional weight it needed, the nonstop cinephile references from Spider-Man are a delight, the Thanos battle against the Guardians, Dr Strange, Spider-Man and the rest is visually striking, as is Thor’s entrance in the final fight and the film’s opening sequence.
Josh Brolin as Thanos is outstanding, giving real depth to the CGI character he brings to life through motion capture, along with the threatening presence required for this type of story.
The entire runtime follows a single narrative that stretches across different locations and emotional beats. Still, for the most part, the film doesn’t stray far from the usual Marvel formula. Impressive battles and effects, some humor, and a degree of creative restraint.
The finale, shocking at first with its outcome, is of course left unresolved since the story continued the following year with Endgame.
Avengers: Endgame
After their defeat by Thanos and the disappearance of half the living beings in the universe, the Avengers pick up the pieces and try to plan their retaliation. The mother of all comic-book battles begins with a narrative surprise, continues with time-travel, and reaches its peak with a series of emotional farewells.
Released in 2019, it marked the end of a major era for the MCU with a three-hour spectacle that, in my view, left very few people unmoved. Its box office performance, which climbed close to 3 billion, speaks for itself.
It is an entertaining, grand film where every hero returns, everyone gets their moment and shines, some less and some more. Whatever flaws it has are easy to overlook because the spectacle satisfies and the experience is fun, even though there are some coherence issues.
In the final battle I would have preferred a longer sequence rather than spending so much time on how the team arrives at that point. The deaths are portrayed with genuine emotion and the ending offers a gentle epilogue. Despite its long runtime, it never bored me. It carries the fan service that many viewers hoped for, the finale is predictable but it does not hurt the film, and there are some narrative conveniences that simply help move the story along.
Australia owes much of the vitality of its cinema to its specific geographical and climatic conditions, which have made its exotic landscapes ideal backdrops for Westerns and post-apocalyptic films. Part of this exotic appeal was also embodied by its Indigenous people, the Aboriginal Australians, whose fate following the arrival of white settlers was in many ways similar—and could even be said to be far worse—than that of American Indians. Unlike Hollywood, which has featured Native Americans in its Westerns from the very beginning, Australian cinema has largely ignored them. Even rarer were films that seriously sought to address the economic and other challenges faced by Aboriginal people, marginalised within Australian society and forced to live in ghettos ruled by poverty, alcohol, drugs, and crime. One of the few productions attempting to address this is Mystery Road, a crime film that portrays Aboriginal people from an exceptionally authentic perspective, given that its writer, director, and creator, Ivan Sen, is himself of partial Aboriginal heritage.
The lead actor, Aaron Pedersen, who is also of Aboriginal descent, portrays the character Jay Swan, a police detective returning to his hometown in rural Australia after a long absence. The plot begins with the discovery of an Aboriginal teenager’s body, and Swan, who knew the victim personally, takes charge of the investigation. It quickly becomes apparent that his task will be far from easy, partly because he himself faces racist prejudices from the white population, while his own community greets him with distrust, viewing him as a traitor. A far more serious issue is that his superiors and colleagues display a clear lack of enthusiasm for the investigation, preferring instead to cover it up—especially as the evidence begins to point towards connections with the case of a murdered police officer, as well as a drug trade in which officer Johnno (Hugo Weaving) may even be implicated. What weighs most heavily on Swan, however, is that the murdered girl was a close friend of his own daughter Crystal, with whom, along with his ex-wife and her mother Mary (Tasma Walton), he has long been estranged.
Sen has crafted his film in a style that, at first glance, seems more suited to an art-house drama than a conventional thriller. The narrative unfolds at an exceptionally slow pace, but Sen attempts to compensate by employing striking landscapes of the Australian Outback, which, largely thanks to Sen’s own cinematography, create a palpable atmosphere and serve as a kind of alternative character within the film. Sen skilfully plays with Western iconography, including the protagonist, who wears a white cowboy hat and carries a revolver at his belt for almost the entire film. Pedersen delivers an exceptional performance, making the character convincing both in scenes where, like a classic Western protagonist, he confronts local racist thugs, and in those depicting his vulnerability, such as during encounters with his estranged family. Pedersen’s performance is significantly supported by his fellow cast members, particularly Weaving in the role of his colleague, about whom it remains unclear until the very end whether Jay intends to eliminate him or, out of genuine friendship, advise him not to interfere with the local drug dealers. The film’s strongest section comes at the very end, where Sen and his team reward the audience’s patience with an exceptionally realistic yet thrilling final confrontation worthy of Western genre classics. Although Sen prioritises atmosphere and character over plot in his film, allowing certain details to remain unexplained or overly ambiguous for a single viewing, Mystery Road remains an exceptionally high-quality genre production, notably superior to the stylistically and thematically similar American film Wind River. Perhaps unsurprisingly, this Australian film, unlike Wind River, has been followed by a sequel in the form of the film Goldstone and a television mini-series of the same name.
RATING: 8/10 (+++)
(Note: The text in the original Croatian version is available here.)
The Haunting of Hill House is one of those shows that seriously messed me up for a while after watching it and you cant stop thinking about what you just saw for days, specially how that house fucked all those kids on the head and their lives, poor Luke and Nell. Mike Flanagan took this old Shirley Jackson book and turned it into something way more than just another ghost story on Netflix, Im not going to argue how close to the lore it is but I would say tight since the scores on sites like IMDB and RTT, he made it about family and loss and grief and how trauma can stick with you for years and completely destroy you as a person. This thing jumps back and forth between when the Crain family lived in that creepy ass house as kids and how fucked up they all are as adults because of what went down there and it works so damn well because you actually care about these people and there problems and there pain. Every single one of them is dealing with there own stuff from drug addiction too anger issues too just straight up refusing too believe what happened to them was real and watching them try too function as broken adults while dealing with ghosts from their past is what makes this show so good and different from all the other horror shit on streaming right now. The scares are legit too like there are moments where I had too pause because something jumped out that I was not expecting, but what really gets you is the emotional weight of everything and how heavy it feels the hole time your watching it.
Source
Steven Crain is this paranormal investigator and writer but hes also a huge skeptic witch is funny because he grew up in a haunted house although he doesnt believe or choose not to believe in any of what people experience because thats how he be coping with what has been chasing them all this hears. Shirley is the funeral home owner and she is basically the mom of the family specially after they abandon Hill House and left their mom behind, she is constantly taking care of everyone else problems and worrying about Luke and Nell too the point where its destroying her own life and marriage. Theo is the middle child and shes got this ability where she can feel emotions from people and objects when she touches them so she wear gloves all the time to avoid feeling others people, she helps kids but she cant help herself because shes so disconnected from everyone. Luke is the drug addict twin whos been in and out of rehab like a million times and nobody believes him anymore, truth is that nobody believe him as a kid and was a very very dark story and probably top two but now that I think about it the twins story were the worst thats Nell and Luke, as a kid mom and dad never believe him not about the ghosts he sees or the tall man with the floating hat or his friend that came out during the day who in fact was an actual girl, and Nell is his twin sister whos depressed and seeing this bent neck lady ghost that scared the shit out of her as a kid and is still following her around as an adult but never saw her face. Timothy Hutton plays the dad Hugh as an adult and Henry Thomas plays young Hugh in the flashbacks, both of them are so good you can see how much he cares about his kids while also being overwhelmed by what is happening in that house and not knowing what too do about it. The mom Olivia is played by Carla Gugino and shes amazing, you watch her slowly lose her mind over the episodes and its heartbreaking because shes trying so hard too protect her kids but the house is getting too her and messing with her head. The kid actors are surprisingly good too witch is rare because usually kid actors in horror stuff are annoying as hell, but these ones actually made me care about what was happening too them specially the young Nell and young Luke.
Source
The structure of the show is really smart where each episode focuses on one of the five kids and shows you there perspective on what happened at Hill House and what there dealing with now as adults. Episode five is Nells episode and its called The Bent Neck Lady, and holy shit that reveal at the end completely destroyed me emotionally I wont spoil it but its one of the best twists I have seen in any show period like it made me sit there staring at the screen for like five minutes just processing what I just watched, what a way to TERRORIZE a human as a kid and all the way up through adulthood, thats some sick shit in the head. Episode six is when all the siblings come together at Shirleys house for Nells funeral and its called Two Storms, its this one long take that goes back and forth between the present and the past during a storm, the technical stuff is insane and the acting is incredible because everyones just yelling at each other and all the family drama comes pouring out to the point that not even dead Nell can take it and her casket falls to the side. The ghosts in this show are actually scary not like cheap jumpscare scary but like disturbing scary in a way that sticks. Theres this tall floating man with a bowler hat that follows Luke around and hes creepy as hell, not that much at the house but you can feel Luke been paranoic about it, theres the bent neck lady that haunts Nell, theres hidden ghosts in the background of scenes that you dont even notice until someone points them out too and then you go back and watch it again and your like holy shit how did I miss that, but the scariest thing about the show isnt the ghosts its the family stuff and how real it feels, like if you have ever had someone die suddenly in your family this show is gonna hit you hard because it captures that weird fog you walk around in for weeks after where nothing feels real, this happen TWICE in the show. The way the siblings all deal with there grief differently and how they blame each other and there dad for what happened but it was never his fault, its so well written and acted that sometimes I forgot I was watching a horror show and just got hooked in there drama. Mike Flanagan really understands trauma and how it effects people and how it can tear families apart over time, hes also really good at making you care about characters before he scares the crap out of you witch is something most horror directors dont get right. The red room reveal is great though like finding out that all these different rooms the kids remembered were actually the same room the hole time, that was a cool twist I did not see coming.
Source
The ending though man the ending is where things get messy and I know other like have different things too say about it and argue about it online because I think the ending was very emotional but there could have been a more drastic fight against this danm house, like how Hugh was never able to neither open the Red Room or find where all the fungus was coming from but ALL his kids spend time inside the damn room. Without spoiling too much the last episode kind of goes against everything the show was building too for nine episodes, it feels way too happy for a show that was so dark and depressing and relentless with its sadness for so long. Some people think everyone actually died at the end and the happy ending is just the red room tricking them one last time witch would make sense with how the house works, would have been cool if the series had gave me some classic context on why this all happen, most like it was that crazy lady form the 60s who started all but who knows, the sure thing is that all her family was staying there stuck. The tone of that final episode is so different from everything else that it almost feels like a different show, its like Flanagan didnt have faith in his own dark ending and tried too give everyone a happy resolution witch just feels wrong for a story this tragic. I wanted it too end sad I wanted it too hurt because thats what the show earned over ten episodes of building up all this trauma and pain, instead we get this weird hopeful ending that dont really fit.
But even with that ambiguos or lets call it the ending that nobody wanted I still think The Haunting of Hill House is one of the best horror shows ever made and definitely the scariest show I have ever seen on any streaming service period, Im getting this one Blue Ray next month and re watch off line. It made me care about characters in a horror story witch does happen but this time we not only talking about the poor kit getting possesed, we talking about an entire family and its how the fkn Red Room play out EVERYONE!!! even Steven who didnt believe anything about the house, it was in his face like "Yeah you too... that game room was no game room, was more like a Red Room", it scared me in ways that werent just cheap jumpscares or loud noises too startle you but got into my mind and it made me think about family and grief and trauma, like what would you do if you were Hugh?? you still be watching and hearing your dead wife?? damn. Mike Flanagan is the real deal when it comes too horror and hes one of the few people working right now who understands that the best scares come from real human emotion not just spooky ghosts jumping out at you. If you havent seen it yet and your into horror or even just good tv you need too watch this thing as soon as possible because its really something special. The performances are all incredible specially the kids who play the younger versions, the production quality is way better than most stuff on Netflix, and the way they structure each episode around a different family member really works. 8 out of 10 for me because that ending really did bother me, but everything else about this show is pretty much perfect and its one of those things Ill probably rewatch just too catch all the stuff I missed the first time around
If you are not clear about who Tim Robinson actually is you are not alone. He is one of those comedians out there that it doesn't really make much sense to me how it is that people keep shoving money in his direction because most of what he does isn't really worth watching.
One of his clips from his sometimes ok show I Think You Should Leave might be something you recognize because it has become a meme.
Apparently, Robinson was on Saturday Night Live and that is how he got his foot in the door. He was on there from 2012-2016 and that is probably why I never heard of the guy because who watched SNL anymore?
I saw his face on the advert for The Chair Company and I basically just ignored it because while Tim does have his moments that are hilarious in some of the things that he does, I Think You Should Leave was mostly unfunny crap and I expected this to be the same.
I'm actually pretty delighted to say that this is a departure from his usual short sketch comedy and instead is a big-picture series - which of course is about something stupid - but somehow manages to work.
So the story here is that Ron Trosper (Robinson), who is a project manager for a property development company that builds shopping malls and I guess that is supposed to be funny because shopping malls aren't really something that people go to anymore.
When he is giving a presentation one day at a corporate events he goes to sit down on a chair and the chair breaks, briefly rendering him unconscious and making him feeling embarrassed about the fact that he fell. After being picked on a bit and getting harassed by HR because on the ground he accidentally looked up an unattractive coworker's skirt, he decides that he is going to reach out to the company that makes the chairs and demand answers about how it is that a chair could collapse and break so easily.
When he attempt to get in touch with the comaany "Tecca" who manufactures the chairs he ends up going through something that I think most of us can relate to. It is nigh on impossible to get any contact information from their website, you end up speaking to an AI chatbot with no real helpful information, then when you do get a phone number and call, you are put through an enormous menu to automate as much of the process as possible then when you actually talk to a human being, they are powerless to provide you with any real answers.
Most people would just let it go at this point but Ron feels as though he has been seriously wronged by the chair manufacturing company and keeps digging until he starts to unravel that Tecca the office furniture company, is some sort of covert operation that is doing bad things to society. Ron has a lot of theories about this but then one day he is attacked in the parking lot of his work by a thug that was hired by Tecca.
He keeps digging into the company and starts to find what he believes is a massive operation built on smuggling among other things and the more he digs the more he discovers that all of the information put online about this chair company is false including who works there, where they are located, and even what they manufacture.
All the while he is still forced to carry on with his corporate life and for me, this is where a lot of the real comedy came into play.
If you have never had to work in an office like this consider yourself extremely fortunate: The drab environment that is filled with everything looking the same and how everyone just starts to seem like an lifeless wage-slave starts to get to you after just a very short while. Things only get much worst (in real life) whenever you have to interact with Human Resources and their new and ever evolving rules and safety videos that you are forced to endure.
As Ron keeps digging he starts to reveal other aspects of this chair company and we, the viewer, can't really tell if this is a real conspiracy, or if Ron is just made to feel this way because every corporation has awful customer service. I can relate to a lot of what happens in this series because honestly, fast and good customer service doesn't really exist anymore and the only way that a company is going to help you is if you are relentless and dig really deep in order to actually find a phone number.
In one particularly funny scene, Ron is elated that he finally got the contact information for Tecca's parent company called "Red Ball" think it was, only to call the number and end up being on hold listening to repetitive music and a repeating message about how "your call is important to us" for 5 hours before he finally gives up.
There is an ever growing list of side characters that Ron enlists to help him bring down this nefarious global operation and the comedy that we encounter along the way isn't particularly intelligent, but it is more of a stupid and well to be honest, very specific to Tim Robinson that reminds me of some of his skits on I think You Should Leave.
The team of writers probably didn't know any other way to write but somehow managed to make something that are 30 minute episodes stick a lot better than the vignettes that were in the sketch comedy that he has done in the past.
Should I watch it?
I will admit that the trailer above doesn't do much to entice people to watch it but I think they were trying to not reveal all the characters before you have even seen the show because a lot of them join in very unsuspecting ways.
But the show actually is quite funny in an unusual way that I haven't really seen in any other comedy. It combines the tedium of everyday life and work with the potential of accidentally uncovering something important. Yet, the show is presented in such a way that even after all 6 existing episodes I can't decide if the conspiracy is real, or if Ron is just making the situation out to be bigger than it is.
If you ever been driven to near madness by office jobs or poor to non-existent customer service, you'll be able to relate to a lot of what happens in this and that is part of the reason why it works so well.
The episodes are only 30 minutes long also and this appeals to me because it seems like these days that there is some sort of mandate that everything has to be an hour long even if you only have 20 minutes of actual material. Things move fast in this, so after half an hour you will know if you want to carry on. I did, and now I've run out of episodes.
If you are the type of person that needs to have all episodes available before watching, season 1 will be fully released by the end of November, 2025.
the only LEGAL way to watch this at the moment is to stream it as part of your HBO Max subscription