scrobble.life
← Back

Title · no scrobbles indexed yet

American Fiction

The first scrobble for this title is still propagating, but a community review is already indexed below.

Reviews

Longform community posts about this title

American Fiction (2023) - REVIEW - [ENGLISH-SPANISH]@maaasha271d
Permalink·Open on PeakD ↗·Linked from existing Hive post

Comments

No comments yet — be the first.

5 more reviews

  1. Reseña: American Fiction // Review: American Fiction@presidentx785d

    image.png

    Fuente

    Ya ha pasado un tiempo desde los Oscar de este año, pero aún así me interesaba ver este título nominado a Mejor Película. Ya se encuentra en Prime, así que pude verlo hace poco. Estrenado el 2023, siendo su director Cord Jefferson.

    It's been a while since this year's Oscars, but I was still interested to see this Best Picture nominated title. It's already on Prime, so I was able to see it a little while ago. Released in 2023, with its director being Cord Jefferson.

    Sinopsis: Thelonious Ellison, llamado Monk, es un escritor que debido a una suspensión debe volver a su ciudad natal, reconectando con su familia. Es en ello, que debido a una situación limite, acaba escribiendo un libro que parodia lo que se busca en un autor negro; sin embargo, esta incursión acaba teniendo un exito inesperado, haciendo que momento tenga que enfrentar diversos problemas como a su propia persona.

    Synopsis: Thelonious Ellison, called Monk, is a writer who due to a suspension must return to his hometown, reconnecting with his family. It is in this, that due to a limit situation, he ends up writing a book that parodies what is sought in a black author; however, this incursion ends up having an unexpected success, causing him to have to face various problems such as his own person.

    image.png

    Fuente

    La historia se sitúa entre el drama, mucha sátira y su cierto toque de comedia. En donde vemos al personaje principal mostrando sus problemas familiares, pero especialmente los que tiene con su propia personalidad; a su vez, se muestra mucho del problema que genera estereotipar o reducir lo que puede ser una historia de un escritor negro.

    The story is situated between drama, a lot of satire and a certain touch of comedy. In which we see the main character showing his family problems, but especially those he has with his own personality; at the same time, it shows much of the problem that generates stereotyping or reducing what can be a story of a black writer.

    La sátira es abundante. Sobre el tema, muestra que los lectores o espectadores, queremos simplemente algo demasiado masticado, y sin la real profundidad o diversidad que tiene cualquier tema.

    Satire is abundant. On the subject, it shows that readers or viewers, we simply want something too chewed up, and without the real depth or diversity that any subject has.

    image.png

    Fuente

    El final tiene una parte experimental, que le da un toque especial a la cinta. De alguna manera alecciona al espectador del título, de no dejarse engatusar por el camino típico.

    The ending has an experimental part, which gives a special touch to the film. In a way it cautions the viewer of the title, not to be lulled into the typical path.

    En temas de producción, no destaca nada en particular, pero todo mantiene un nivel aceptable. La actuación es excelente, destacan Jeffrey Wright como el protagonista y Sterling K. Brown como su hermano Cliff.

    In terms of production, nothing in particular stands out, but everything maintains an acceptable level. The acting is excellent, with Jeffrey Wright as the lead character and Sterling K. Brown as his brother Cliff.

    El mezclar el tema del estereotipo, con los problemas del protagonista, acaba generando una película entretenida. Recomendable.

    Mixing the stereotype theme, with the problems of the protagonist, ends up generating an entertaining film. Recommended.

    Calificación personal: 7.8 de 10.

    Personal rating: 7.8 out of 10.

    Permalink·Open on PeakD ↗·Linked from existing Hive post
  2. American Fiction | Reseña | Review@irvinc834d

    PORTADA-M.jpg





    De vez en cuando algunos directores se arriesgan y nos presentan películas valientes que interpelan al espectador sobre temas que quizá no haya tomado en cuenta.

    Es el caso de American Fiction (2023), Ópera prima del director y escritor norteamericano Cord Jefferson, quien acaba de recibir el Oscar como mejor guión adaptado por esta película. Buen inicio para este cineasta.

    La historia comienza presentándonos a Thelonious "Monk" Ellison (Jeffrey Wright), un escritor afroamericano de poco éxito que dedica parte de su tiempo a la docencia. Monk es un hombre exigente, sincero, directo, de esos que no tienen reservas en expresar sus puntos de vistas a quien sea.

    imagen2-580.jpg

    En una oportunidad Monk, harto de la mediocridad que respira en su aula de clases, reprende fuertemente a una alumna. Sus colegas le llaman la atención y le sugieren que se tome unos días de licencia, para descansar y sobre todo para apaciguar su ánimo. La excusa para sacárselo de encima es la asistencia a una feria del libro en la ciudad donde vive su madre y su hermana.

    Mientras prepara el viaje se le ocurre hacer una travesura. En pocas noches escribe un libro sobre negros, con un lenguaje vulgar y lleno de lugares comunes, crea un seudónimo y lo manda a su editor. En principio el editor no puede creer lo que está leyendo, sabe que es muy distinto al estilo de Monk quien tiene una obra de mucho mayor “altura”.

    Sin embargo, y por no dejar, envía el manuscrito a una prestigiosa editorial, pensando que, como le ha ocurrido tantas veces, lo van a rechazar. Pero para su sorpresa quedan maravillados con el libro, le hacen la mayor oferta económica que ha tenido en su vida, y el nuevo autor se convierte en una celebridad. Monk tendrá que tomar entonces algunas decisiones que le van a cambiar la vida…

    imagen3-580.jpg

    La película nos abre varios frentes para la reflexión. Quizá el más fuerte sea su crítica a la banalidad que reina en la sociedad actual. ¿Qué debe hacer un autor, complacer al mercado o ser fiel a sus valores…?

    Monk es un escritor “profundo” que se ha empeñado en presentarle al lector otras perspectivas alejadas de los estereotipos. Pero ese estilo no agrada a los lectores, no vende. A la gente parece que no le gusta complicarse más de la cuenta, le gustan las cosas sencillas, las que no les exigen mucho.

    Y es por eso que Monk alcanza el éxito cuando se “rebaja”, cuando se pone a repetir lugares comunes, cuando va en contra de todo lo que pregona. Pero el peso del triunfo es muy grande cuando se obtiene haciendo todo aquello en lo que no se cree. Y aquí se presenta un gran dilema difícil de resolver: cómo ser coherente con lo que piensa si se necesita dinero, por ejemplo, para mantener a una madre enferma en un asilo…

    La película también nos presenta el complejo entramado de manipulaciones de la industria editorial para ganarse a los lectores. Cualquier autor, por muy malo que sea, puede lograr ser posicionado en el gusto masivo con una eficiente campaña de marketing. Esto tiene mucho de verdad, después de todo solo se compra lo que se conoce, de allí el tremendo poder de la publicidad y de los medios de difusión de información en nuestros días. Hay maneras muy eficientes de opacar o de resaltar la obra de un autor. Esto es una realidad.

    imagen4-580.jpg

    Me gustó mucho como se combinan los problemas de la banalidad y la dinámica de la industria editorial con los dramas familiares vividos por el protagonista.

    Monk siempre se ha creído un poco distinto, con una manera de pensar un poco más racional que la de sus hermanos. Esas creencias lo han llevado al aislamiento, le han creado dificultades para mantener relaciones de pareja y lo han a alejado de los suyos. Pero en medio de su conflictivo “éxito” ha logrado reconsiderar sus opciones y se ha dado la oportunidad de corregir sus errores. Pareciera que el director nos invita a pensar en aquello de que “no hay mal que por bien no venga”. En lo malo siempre podremos conseguir algo bueno…

    Más de uno pudiera decir que la película es la negación de lo que cuestiona, porque ciertamente ha sido bastante exitosa. Desde su estreno ha tenido una buena acogida por parte de la crítica y ha cosechado numerosos premios. Acá tendríamos un ejemplo de que cuando las cosas se hacen bien también se valoran.

    Creo que la película tiene suficientes méritos como para darle un visionado, es de esas que seguramente resistirán el paso del tiempo. Tiene un buen tono de comedia que ofrece numerosos momentos para aflojar la tensión, lo que la hace agradable de ver. La actuación de Jeffrey Wright es más que solvente, logra construir un personaje bastante complejo que se confronta permanentemente con su rigidez, por su desempeño en esta cinta estuvo nominado como mejor actor. Los dramas familiares son bastantes cercanos y es muy probable que nos dejen alguna enseñanza.

    Todos esos ingredientes son suficientes para mí, si tienen la oportunidad denle una oportunidad, ahorita está disponible en Prime video.

    Gracias por tu tiempo.

    Fuente de imágenes. I II III IV

    cinti 800x20 - copia.jpg

    TITULO INGLES.jpg



    From time to time, some directors take risks and present us with courageous films that challenge the viewer on issues he may not have taken into account.

    This is the case of American Fiction (2023), the debut film of American director and writer Cord Jefferson, who has just received the Oscar for Best Adapted Screenplay for this film. A good start for this filmmaker.

    The story begins by introducing us to Thelonious "Monk" Ellison (Jeffrey Wright), an unsuccessful African-American writer who devotes part of his time to teaching. Monk is a demanding, sincere, straightforward man who has no reservations about expressing his views to anyone.

    On one occasion Monk, fed up with the mediocrity in his classroom, strongly reprimands a student. His colleagues call his attention and suggest that he take a few days off to rest and, above all, to calm his spirits. The excuse to get it off his chest is to attend a book fair in the city where his mother and sister live.

    imagen2-580.jpg

    While preparing for the trip, he decides to get into mischief. In a few nights he writes a book about blacks, with vulgar language and full of commonplaces, creates a pseudonym and sends it to his publisher. At first the editor cannot believe what he is reading, he knows that it is very different from Monk's style, who has a much higher "height" work.

    However, not wanting to leave, he sends the manuscript to a prestigious publisher, thinking that, as has happened so many times before, it will be rejected. But to his surprise they are amazed with the book, they make him the biggest financial offer he has ever had in his life, and the new author becomes a celebrity. Monk will then have to make some life-changing decisions...

    The film opens several fronts for reflection. Perhaps the strongest is its criticism of the banality that reigns in today's society: what should an author do, please the market or be true to his values...?

    Monk is a "deep" writer who has endeavored to present the reader with other perspectives far removed from stereotypes. But that style doesn't appeal to readers, it doesn't sell. People don't seem to like to overcomplicate things, they like simple things, things that don't demand too much of them.

    imagen3-580.jpg

    And that is why Monk achieves success when he "lowers himself", when he repeats common places, when he goes against everything he preaches. But the weight of triumph is very great when it is obtained by doing everything he does not believe in. And here is a great dilemma difficult to solve: how to be coherent with what you think if you need money, for example, to support a sick mother in a nursing home...

    The film also introduces us to the complex web of manipulations of the publishing industry to win over readers. Any author, no matter how bad, can be positioned in the mass taste with an efficient marketing campaign. After all, people only buy what they know, hence the tremendous power of advertising and the media nowadays. There are very efficient ways to overshadow or highlight the work of an author. This is a reality.

    I liked very much how the problems of banality and the dynamics of the publishing industry are combined with the family dramas experienced by the protagonist. Monk has always believed himself to be a bit different, with a slightly more rational way of thinking than his siblings. These beliefs have led him to isolation, created difficulties in maintaining relationships and alienated him from his family. But in the midst of his conflicted "success" he has managed to reconsider his choices and has given himself the opportunity to correct his mistakes. It seems that the director invites us to think that "every cloud has a silver lining". In the bad, we can always get something good...

    imagen4-580.jpg

    More than one could say that the film is the negation of what it questions, because it has certainly been quite successful. Since its release it has been well received by critics and has won numerous awards. Here we would have an example that when things are done well they are also valued.

    I think the film has enough merits to give it a viewing, it is one of those that will surely stand the test of time. It has a good comedic tone that offers numerous moments to loosen the tension, which makes it enjoyable to watch. Jeffrey Wright's performance is more than solvent, he manages to build a quite complex character who is permanently confronted with his rigidity, for his performance in this film he was nominated for best actor. The family dramas are quite close and it is very likely that they leave us some teaching.

    All these ingredients are enough for me, if you have the opportunity give it a viewing, it is now available on Prime video.

    Thanks for your time.

    Image source. I II III IV

    Translated with DeepL.com (free version)

    separador verde.jpg

    Todos tus comentarios son bienvenidos en este sitio. Los leeré con gusto y dedicación.

    Hasta una próxima entrega. Gracias.

    MARCA LIBRO POSTALdef-sombra-m.jpg

    Las fotos, la edición digital y los Gifs son de mi autoría.





    separador verde.jpg

    Banner 5 años.png

    ![separador verde.jpg](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmSwfcpwQtRr6kbHJrAFTmBM9xae781YBq3Cdpyab5h3iN/separador%20verde.jpg)

    logo holos1.jpg





    logo ser emprendedor.jpg

    Comunidad Be Entrepreneur separador verde.jpg

    Permalink·Open on PeakD ↗·Linked from existing Hive post
  3. American Fiction | Protestant film or advertising hoax? [ENG/SPA]@danielcarrerag835d

    When the awards season arrives we are attracted to see the films nominated or more acclaimed by the audience, those that begin to win good reviews and be among the favorites. Particularly the Oscars are intended to reward films that stand out for their various technical details such as an outstanding screenplay, prominent performances, incredible special effects, photography, costumes, soundtrack, etc. but not because they have been the audience's favorite.

    American Fiction | Película contestataria o engaño publicitario

    Cuando llega la temporada de premios nos vemos atraídos por ver las películas nominadas o mas aclamadas por la audiencia, aquellas que empiezan a ganar buenas críticas y estar entre las favoritas. Particularmente en los Oscars se pretende premiar las películas que destacan por sus distintos detalles técnicos como un guión que destaque, actuaciones prominentes, efectos especiales increíbles, fotografia, vestuario, banda sonora, etc pero no porque hayan sido las favoritas de la audiencia.

    Thanks to the awards these films reach our radar, because sometimes they are more artistic and not part of the mainstream as to give them more publicity. This was the case, at least for me, with American Fiction, which won the Oscar for Best Adapted Screenplay, one of the awards that most catches my attention because it is the adaptation of books into screenplays, which for me is a great feat, developing dialogues where there are none and adapting complex plots to an hour and a half or more of film.

    Gracias a los premios algunas de estas películas llegan a nuestro radar, quizas porque son mas artísticas y no parte del mainstream que no les da la publicidad debida. Este fue el caso, o por lo menos para mi con American Fiction que ganó el Oscar a mejor guión adaptado, uno de los premios que mas me llama la atención por tratarse de la adaptación de libros a guiones, lo que para mi es una gran proeza, desarrollar diálogos de donde no los hay y adaptar tramas complejas a hora y medio o mas de pelicula.

    [Source](https://aframe.oscars.org/news/post/oppenheimer-best-picture-2024-oscars)

    I'm not going to lie, I don't usually watch the Oscars, I usually look for a summary of the nominees and then others of who won and from there I decide what to watch of what won, that's how I got to American Fiction because I was impressed that it beat Greta Gerwig for Barbie, Nolan for Oppenheimer and Tony McNamara's Poor Creatures script which was one of the best adaptations made in recent times I read, but this was not what attracted me the most to see this movie.

    No voy a mentir, no suelo ver los Oscar, normalmente busco un resumen de los nominados y luego otros de quienes ganaron y a partir de allí es que decido que ver de lo que gano, fue asi como llegue a American Fiction porque me causó impresión que le ganara a Greta Gerwig por Barbie, Nolan por Oppenheimer y a el guion de Pobres criaturas de Tony McNamara que era una de las mejores adaptaciones hechas en los últimos tiempos segun lei, pero esto no fue lo que mas me atrajo para ver esta pelicula.

    [Source](https://twitter.com/TheAcademy/status/1749788191258009797)

    I couldn't believe that a movie that criticizes Hollywood won one of its highest awards, not only criticizes the film industry, it criticizes everything related to entertainment in the United States and all the countries that consume the audiovisual and literary products that come from there, or at least that's what the movie makes you believe until you watch it completely, that concept seduced me completely and I immediately decided to watch it, fortunately it is on Prime video, since it hasn't been released in theaters in Latin America.

    No podía creer que una película que critica a Hollywood ganara uno de sus máximos galardones, y solo no critica la industria del cine, critica todo lo relacionado con el entretenimiento en los Estados Unidos y todos los paises que consumen los productos audiovisuales y literarios que de ahí provienen, o por lo menos eso hace creer la película hasta que la vez por completo, ese concepto me sedujo por completo y de inmediato me propuse verla, por fortuna se encuentra en Prime video, ya que para Latinoamérica no ha sido colocada en cines.

    The film chronicles the experience of Thelonious "Monk" Ellison played by Jeffrey Wright, an African-American writer with a Ph.D. who has written several books on mythology, but finds himself frustrated that his books are not selling because he refuses to write what the white people of his country believe a black writer should write about what they believe are African-American stereotypes.

    La película narra la experiencia de Thelonious "Monk" Ellison interpretado por Jeffrey Wright, un escritos afroamericano con un doctorado que ha escrito varios libros sobre mitología, pero se encuentra frustrado porque sus libros no se venden, debido a que se niega a escribir lo que las personas blanca de su pais creen que un escritor negro, debe escribir sobre lo que ellos creen son los estereotipos afroamericanos.

    After witnessing how other authors get carried away with this train of thought, he decides to write a book that contains all the clichés that white audiences and literary critics prefer about people of color in the United States. He starts the writing initially out of frustration and with a certain tone of mockery to show that he is smart enough to make the point that they are only focused on reading what he believes to be junk content.

    Luego de presenciar como otros autores se dejan llevar por esta corriente de ideas, decide escribir un libro que contenga todos los cliches que la audiencia de personas blancas y los críticos literarios prefieren sobre las personas de color en los Estados Unidos. Inicia la redacción en un principio por un arranque de frustración y con cierto tono de burla para demostrar que es lo suficientemente inteligente para hacer ver que solo se concentran en leer lo que él cree es contenido basura.

    This story made me see things through a lens I never imagined, it is a story that criticizes the falsity of the entertainment world that hides its true agenda, behind a discourse that appears to be inclusive, giving space to voices that have not been heard, such as the African American community, but as long as they adapt to what the elites believe is the true story of oppressed communities, that is, there is no room for the version from the point of view of those who suffer from it.

    Esta historia me hizo ver las cosas con una óptica que jamas imagine, es un relato que critica la falsedad del mundo del espectáculo que esconde su verdadera agenda, tras un discurso que aparenta ser inclusivo, dando espacio a las voces que no han sido escuchadas, como la comunidad afroamericana, pero siempre y cuando se adapten a lo que las elites creen es la verdadera historia de comunidades oprimidas, es decir, no hay espacio para la versión desde el punto de vista de quienes la sufren.

    american_fiction-808600580-large.jpg

    The story includes scenes where we see the dynamics of those who make the decisions for a story to be published, the directors of a publishing house, or the film director who is only interested in a story if it helps him win an Oscar, all sharing the main idea of making money through drama in the shortest possible time, due to the accelerated dynamics of content creation by the demands of consumption that currently exist in the world.

    La historia incluye escenas donde se ve la dinámica de quienes toman las decisiones para que una historia sea publicada, los directores de una editorial, o el director de cine que solo le interesa una historia si le ayuda a ganar un oscar, todos comulgando en la idea principal de ganar dinero gracias al drama en el menor tiempo posible, debido a la dinámica acelerada de creación de contenido por las exigencias de consumo que existen actualmente en el mundo.

    The most ironic message offered by this story is the description of a society that has found in the stories of the most marginalized social strata with each of their tragedies, the perfect excuse to sell the idea that consuming this type of content gives inclusion and helps to give a voice to these people, creating a fetish for this type of content, which helps the industry to have more and more demand from the audience for the same.

    El mensaje mas ironico que ofrece esta historia es la descripción de una sociedad que ha encontrado en las historias de los estratos sociales mas marginados con cada una de sus tragedias, la excusa perfecta para vender la idea que consumir este tipo de contenido da inclusion y ayuda a dar una voz a estas personas, creando un fetiche por este tipo de contenido, lo que le ayuda a la industria a que haya mas y mas demanda por parte de la audiencia de lo mismo.

    We could say then the film openly criticizes this dynamic that seems to have become a game that exploits misery as a pop element, playing with the empathy of white people by making them believe they are socially engaged by watching a movie or reading a related book, as a capitalist exploitation of what appears to be the "politically" correct discourse in our days. Stop and think about how much of this content you have consumed and how you almost always end up sympathizing with these "oppressed" groups.

    Podríamos decir entonces que la película critica abiertamente esta dinámica que parece haberse convertido en un juego que explota la miseria como elemento pop, jugando con la empatía de las personas blancas haciéndoles creer que están socialmente comprometidos al ver una película o leer un libro relacionados, como una explotación capitalista de lo que aparenta ser el discurso "políticamente" correcto en nuestros días. Detente y ponte a pensar, cuánto de este contenido haz consumido y como casi siempre terminas simpatizando con estos grupos "oprimidos".

    But despite all this criticism the film deserved an Oscar, it seems ironic that the academy and system that criticizes it so much gives it an award, which makes me think that instead of being a contentious film it is a publicity stunt on behalf of the industry to validate itself. Whatever the case, I think it's very good, funny and dramatic enough to keep you hooked from beginning to end.

    Pero pese a toda esta crítica la película se hizo merecedora de un Oscar, parece irónico que la academia y sistema que tanto criticas te de un premio, lo cual me hace pensar que en vez de ser una película contestataria es un engaño publicitario de parte de la industria para validarse a sí misma. Cualquiera que sea el caso me parece muy bueno, divertido y dramático lo suficiente para mantenerte enganchado de principio a fin.

    [Source](https://twitter.com/TheAcademy/status/1767290135618486733/photo/1)

    Images from [Filmaffinity](https://www.filmaffinity.com/ve/filmimages.php?movie_id=779260)
    Permalink·Open on PeakD ↗·Linked from existing Hive post
  4. 'American Fiction' by Cord Jefferson Review: A satire on identity and representation@namiks866d

    american.fiction.2023.hdr.2160p.web.h265-wedeservewestworldseasonfive-0004.png

    I think by now we're all very much used to the political fire that has been burning for the last decade. The ways in which things such as identity and representation have been made talking points rather than actually utilised to improve things for all. There's a fight that has been going on between sides as a result of this, and it's no surprise given how much the media actually profits from the controversy rather than actually moving in the pursuit of something more, as they would claim should be, inclusive. The war of modern politics doesn't want things to actually improve, naturally. And the way things have been going has only made things more and more tense. There's no doubt that there's a stronger anxiety in people these days, almost the idea that one must pick sides, that everyone is ready to get angry about something. The world of entertainment media is at the forefront of it all: music, literature, and film. Coincidentally these are the most profitable areas for controversy to arise. Hollywood itself has increased in its insanity, doubling-down almost. It does this because it's free marketing. Something it loves in this age of social media, where the public can market a product with outrage, not even knowing the outreach something is being given as a result; remember that whole idea that bad press is still good press?

    One look at how the Oscar award ceremony operates these days shows that Hollywood is thriving on keeping people disconnected. Even going as far as changing the rules behind what creations can be considered for an Oscar nomination. The result is endless race bait that caters again to this agenda. Where the idea of intense oppression is thrown around, where things like identity and representation turn people against each other under this idea that we, the general public, are in fact against each other, responsible for this in a way. Things like privilege get thrown around, ignoring the realisation that each person has their own problems, ambitions, and pain to deal with. A lot of modern cinema merely exacerbates these social problems. American Fiction, coincidentally nominated for multiple Oscar awards, is a satire on this entire fragility of the modern world. Shining light at its insanity, from the perspective of those who are supposedly pushed down, given a victim mentality.

    It's an insanely good film. And its one that I think many people can relate to regardless of their race. Even down to the industries they work in. I know that when I was back in England, I worked on film shoots that were created by black people, emphasis on the black cast and the importance of it all. The hypocrisy was how these productions just hired an all white crew to create it all. It is a display on how so much of this is all for show. A big pat on the back for the assumption of a good job, again that idea that two sides are constantly against each other and that it's an active war to fight. But in the end, who really benefits from it all? Of course, the elites. The ones running the show. Really making the big money when these agendas print money.

    American Fiction

    american.fiction.2023.hdr.2160p.web.h265-wedeservewestworldseasonfive-0001.png

    If you have ever been a writer of some sort, you'd be fully aware of how insanely difficult it is to make any money in the industry. In an era of self-publishing, now artificial intelligence, and insane competition that keeps payment options low and applications very high, it would be sheer luck to get anything published from an actual publishing company. In American Fiction, that is the case of our black protagonist. A fortunate teacher and writer that has been stagnating for a few years, incapable of advancing and now growing tired of the fragility in the youth that he teaches. The hypocrisy of agenda pushing reaches into the classroom, leading to him ultimately getting put on leave by the school. From the start you can get the perspective of these modern day political talking points hitting just a regular person. How someone preaches those talking points directly to those who are apparently victimised in society, but don't even feel it. Again moving back to my time in the film industry in England, we talked of this often. Black actors would say how odd it feels to almost be treated like gold by productions. But they sell out, why wouldn't they take up the work that pays well?

    This brings us to the next stage of American Fiction: our tired writer, now essentially unemployed, finds himself speaking to his publisher, surrounded by stereotypical books that exaggerate the black identity for profit. The idea that black people all speak in slang, have broken families, drama that involves prison time or crime to some degree. The film doesn't shy away from the reality that this does take place, and that sometimes there can be prejudice, but that the modern world isn't as dark as the media suggests. As a satire, our protagonist, while suffering from the loss of his sister and mental degradation of his mother, decides to write a similar book that exaggerates the idea of being black in America. He creates a persona, encouraged by his publisher, that promotes this perspective. Turning away from being a black man in America, to this idea of a black man in America that is from a background of crime, talks in slang, and is even wanted for murder. You can see how something like this may end up blowing up in his face.

    The comedy here is in that satire, the ways in which this character now has to, well, play a character. The truth is, nobody knows what he is doing other than his publisher, and the world around him quickly falls for this act. Leading to the hypocrisy of the media as it quickly draws attention to him and his book. Nobody ever cared about his works until he decided to live the stereotype of his skin colour. And the powerful aspect of this film is how this character rejects the modern world's coddling of black people. Going as far as trying to remove his books from the category of book stores that is aimed towards black identity. Knowing that his works are not about his skin colour or background, and that they truly shouldn't be. After all, do people care about his work at all? Or is it merely agenda pushing that makes them feel the need to purchase them, the idea that they are part of something greater. A political war that makes them feel part of a side, again coddling a demographic that actually doesn't need nor want to be coddled.

    american.fiction.2023.hdr.2160p.web.h265-wedeservewestworldseasonfive-0002.png

    By introducing the struggles he has at home, it does show that he is a regular person too. He suffers the same problems as others. Family death, the decline of health. Love, even. But these are not part of an identity. It removes the idea of race from him entirely, and it's precisely how it should be. The irony is that those around him that fall for his satirical character are of both different race. The elites of award ceremonies are mostly white that are just out of touch or pursuing a paycheck. The readers of the book are black, falling for the tricks of marketing, again cementing this idea of controversy and victimhood into their minds. Even some of the judges that read his book are black, falling for the trick and trying to push it into the public eye more. It shows that this is a complex web in which everyone is falling for something. That no matter the race, it's a problem that is deeply integrated into society. That no singular person can stop it, nor is responsible for it. The complexities of society, ultimately.

    I've talked a lot about the film and its narrative, but I haven't mentioned that the film is actually beautifully written and directed. I looked up Cord Jefferson and realised he has actually written some incredibly good shows in recent years: A Good Place, Station Eleven, and even Master of None. I think his experience in the film industry is what makes the film so good, his realisation of how things really are, having worked on vastly different projects. Not being part of the insanity and working specifically on black productions. I'm looking at Jordan Peele here. A director that really profits from the race war. And this isn't to say that there are no problems in society, because it certainly is fucked up, definitely far from perfect. But things are not as simple as they seem.

    At the same time, American Fiction plays out beautifully as a film. The cinematography and use of colour is really beautiful. Incredibly warm tones that show the beauty of America. The interior scenes are lit beautifully, often with a wide angle lenses that give things a bit of a wider perspective, but not too stretched. You don't really feel the two hour runtime, which really surprised me as I went in almost with some hesitation over it. The humour ran throughout, the silliness of the whole situation kept me engaged. And the directing felt gentle enough when it needed to be over the more serious matters. Jeffrey Wright's performance was absolutely what pushed the film forward, however. His speech and look are far from what's considered the stereotype of a black man, instead portraying a regular person with their own ambitions and struggles in life, void of the insanity of the modern world, but unfortunately now playing his own part in it.

    Definitely check this film out. It's one of the best in years.

    movies-and-tv-shows-BANNER-03.png

    Join the Movies and TV Shows Community Discord.

    Follow our curation trail!

    Follow me over on Twitter!

    Permalink·Open on PeakD ↗·Linked from existing Hive post
  5. American Fiction (2023): a brave and necessary statement | un pronunciamiento valiente y necesario@cristiancaicedo866d

    Nominated for five Academy Awards Nominada a cinco premios de la academia

    Of all the films nominated for the main category of the next Oscars - Best Picture - I have already seen six, but among those that I have yet to see there are a couple that I didn't know anything about until they published the list of nominees. One of them is The Zone of Interest, which I plan to see soon in the cinema and the other is this film, American Fiction, written and directed by Cord Jefferson and starring Jeffrey Wright.

    De todas las películas nominadas a la categoría principal de los próximos premios Oscar - la de Mejor Película - ya he visto seis, pero de entre las que me falta ver hay un par de las que no sabía nada hasta que publicaron la lista de nominados. Una de ellas es The Zone of Interest, que pienso ver proximamente en el cine y la otra es esta película, American Fiction, escrita y dirigida por Cord Jefferson y protagonizada por Jeffrey Wright.

    The story begins with English teacher Thelonious Ellison (nicknamed Monk for obvious reasons) who begins to be questioned for his teaching methods and some statements made in the classroom. Monk believes that this generation of young people he teaches is too sensitive and takes offense very quickly, which - in his opinion - harms the debate on controversial but necessary topics. It's not that Monk is provocative, it's that it seems that now you can't talk about anything that matters without offending anyone. With this introduction I felt immediate sympathy for the character of Monk, because I think something similar about the current times, and I was interested in a film that seemed to openly question something that many avoid mentioning. However, I could not imagine - since I had not seen any promotional trailer for the film - to what extent American Fiction is a criticism of the mental reality of an entire country. It turns out that in addition to being a teacher, Monk is also a writer. He published a couple of very good books before, but he hasn't published anything in nine years because his latest manuscript doesn't interest publishers. They consider it too intellectual (you have to make an effort to understand it) and not black enough. In short, Monk is falling victim to stereotypes: what he writes does not correspond to what he should write, to what people would expect from someone like him: an African-American writer.

    La historia inicia con el profesor de inglés Thelonious Ellison (apodado Monk por obvias razones) quien comienza a ser cuestionado por sus métodos de enseñanza y algunas declaraciones hechas en el salón de clases. Monk cree que esta generación de jóvenes a quienes enseña es demasiado sensible y se ofende muy rápido, lo que - en su opinión - perjudica el debate de temas polémicos, pero necesarios. No es que Monk sea provocador, es que pareciera ser que ahora no se puede hablar de nada que importe sin ofender a nadie. Ya con esta introducción sentí inmediata simpatía por el personaje de Monk, porque pienso algo parecido respecto a los tiempos que corren, y me interesó una película que parecía cuestionar abiertamente algo que muchos evitan mencionar. Sin embargo, no podía imaginar - pues no había visto ningún avance promocional de la cinta - hasta qué punto American Fiction es una crítica a la realidad mental de todo un país. Resulta que además de profesor, Monk también es escritor. Publicó un par libros muy buenos antes, pero hace nueve años que no publica nada porque su último manuscrito no interesa a las editoriales. Lo consideran demasiado intelectual (hay que esforzarse para entenderlo) y no lo suficientemente negro. En pocas palabras, Monk está siendo víctima de los estereotipos: lo que él escribe no se correponde con lo que debería escribir, a lo que la gente esperaría de alguien como él: un escritor afroamericano.

    Thelonius "Monk" Ellison (Jeffrey Wright)

    Monk is tired of the stereotypes present in the stories of his people. Slavery, low-income communities, crime, drugs, fragmented families, rappers, domestic violence, use of inappropriate language, speech with little diction... always the same story, always the same characters, gang members, absent parents, who have filled pages and screens for decades. It's not that the writer denies that reality, but he's convinced that the black community in the United States is so much more than that. Limiting themselves to the same old labels reduces them to their usual role: that of victims of society, of circumstances, of destiny.

    Monk está cansado de los estereotipos presentes en las historias de su gente. Esclavitud, comunidades de escasos recursos, delincuencia, drogas, familias fragmentadas, raperos, violencia doméstica, uso de un lenguaje inapropiado, un habla con poca dicción... siempre la misma historia, siempre los mismos personajes, pandilleros, padres ausentes, que han llenado las páginas y las pantallas durante décadas. No es que el escritor niegue esa realidad, pero está convencido de que la comunidad negra en los Estados Unidos es mucho más que eso. Limitarse a las mismas etiquetas de siempre los reduce al papel de siempre: el de víctimas de la sociedad, de las circunstancias, del destino.

    And yes, Monk is right, but that doesn't mean others see or understand it. That's why the latest publishing success of the summer is a black novel written by a young black writer that feeds all those topics consumed by a mostly white society. Trapped in the middle of a rather complicated economic and family situation (which I don't advance much, but which gives a lot of body to the personal history of the characters), Monk decides to protest against editorial standards, do they not accept his latest book because it's not black enough? Okay, Monk is going to rub the stupidity of that argument in their faces by delivering the kind of product they expect to receive. He then decides to write, under a pseudonym, a book like so many others that already exist, a novel in which all the clichés of black stories that have tired him, but that society consumes with fervor are present, a very black novel. Monk hopes that upon receiving the manuscript, the publishers will realize how absurd what they are asking is, he makes a satire of society, the publishing market and his own community that seems to feel comfortable and proud of exploiting these worn-out clichés, but to his surprise, the manuscript is accepted and received as a true masterpiece. The ridiculous thing he just wrote is celebrated as the greatest literary achievement of recent times and even before being published there is already talk of hundreds of thousands of copies sold and an adaptation to the big screen, how is that possible?

    Y sí, Monk tiene razón, pero eso no significa que los demás lo vean o lo entiendan. Por eso el último éxito editorial del verano es una novela negra escrita por una joven escritora negra que alimenta todos esos tópicos que consume una sociedad mayoritariamente blanca. Atrapado en medio de una situación económica y familiar bastante complicada (que no adelanto mucho, pero que le da mucho cuerpo a la historia personal de los personajes), Monk decide protestar contra los estándares editoriales, ¿no aceptan su último libro porque no es lo suficientemente negro? De acuerdo, Monk les va a restregar en la cara la estupidez de ese argumento entregándoles el tipo de producto que ellos esperan recibir. Decide entonces escribir, bajo seudónimo, un libro como tantos otros que ya existen, una novela en la que estén presentes todos los clichés de las historias de negros que lo tienen cansado, pero que la sociedad consume con fervor, una novela negrísima. Monk espera que al recibir el manuscrito, las editoriales se den cuenta de lo absurdo que es lo que piden, hace una sátira a la sociedad, al mercado editorial y a su propia comunidad que parece sentirse cómoda y orgullosa de explotar esos tópicos gastados, pero para su sorpresa, el manuscrito es aceptado y recibido como una verdadera obra maestra. La ridiculez que acaba de escribir es celebrada como el mayor logro literario de los últimos tiempos e incluso antes de publicarse ya se habla de cientos de miles de copias vendidas y de una adaptación a la gran pantalla, ¿cómo es posible?

    The characters | Los personajes

    American Fiction is a dramatic comedy, loaded with satire and necessary social criticism that points in several directions. Although its plot revolves around black American society, several of its questions can be applied to other contexts. The film addresses the issue of racism, homosexuality, the publishing market, stereotypes, but above all freedom of expression, thought and creative freedom, the fight against typecasting, labels and prejudices. Art, artistic creation, must be free, not responding to a market but to the desire for expression of the artist who wants to transmit the message that his soul imposes on him. The script for the film was written by the director himself based on the novel Erasure by Percival Everett, published in 2001, the direction is very good, as are the performances (especially those of Jeffrey Right and Sterling K. Brown) and although the academy has sometimes been criticized for nominating some black stories solely for reasons of inclusion (ironic, right?) the nominations received by American Fiction are not a product of chance or the academy's intention to include a black film just because. This story has a lot of merit, it's a very good film and if any of its main ideas make you uncomfortable in any way, it's time for you to review your prejudices. I know it's not the most popular among the nominees, but have any of you seen it? what did you think? I read you in the comments.

    American Fiction es una comedia dramática, cargada de sátira y de una necesaria crítica social que apunta en varias direcciones. Aunque su trama gira en torno a la sociedad negra estadounidense, varios de sus cuestionamientos se pueden aplicar a otros contextos. La película toca el tema del racismo, la homosexualidad, el mercado editorial, los estereotipos, pero sobre todo la libertad de expresión, de pensamiento y la libertad creativa, la lucha contra el encasillamiento, las etiquetas y los prejuicios. El arte, la creación artística, debe ser libre, no responder a un mercado sino al deseo de expresión del artista quien quiere transmitir el mensaje que su alma le impone. El guión de la cinta fue escrito por el propio director a partir de la novela Erasure de Percival Everett, publicada en 2001, la dirección es muy buena, las actuaciones también (sobre todo las de Jeffrey Right y Sterling K. Brown) y aunque a veces se ha criticado a la academia por nominar algunas historias de negros solamente por un tema de inclusión (irónico, ¿cierto?) las nominaciones recibidas por American Fiction no son producto del azar ni de la intención de la academia de inlcuir una película de negros sólo porque sí. Esta historia tiene mucho mérito, es una muy buena película y si alguna de sus ideas principales te incomoda de alguna forma es hora de que revises tus prejuicios. Sé que no es la más popular entre las nominadas, pero ¿alguno de ustedes la ha visto? ¿qué les pareció? Los leo en los comentarios.


    Reviewed by | Reseñado por @cristiancaicedo


    Other posts that may interest you | Otros posts que pueden interesarte:

    The Boy and the Heron (2023): drowned in symbols and metaphors |

    --- | ---
    Permalink·Open on PeakD ↗·Linked from existing Hive post