scrobble.life
← Back

Title · no scrobbles indexed yet

Drive My Car

The first scrobble for this title is still propagating, but a community review is already indexed below.

Reviews

Longform community posts about this title

"Drive My Car" is just art.@richardalexis335d
Permalink·Open on PeakD ↗·Linked from existing Hive post

Comments

No comments yet — be the first.

4 more reviews

  1. Drive My Car (2021): about loneliness and grief | sobre la soledad y el duelo@cristiancaicedo1018d

    Based on a story by Haruki Murakami Basada en un relato de Haruki Murakami

    One of my favorite categories at the Academy Awards (perhaps my favorite one) is Best International Film. I like to discover stories from the most remote corners of the planet and that is why I like to see all the nominated ones, and even those that have appeared in previous editions. That's why I had this movie on my radar for a while, but it wasn't easy for me to find three free hours to watch it. Finally last night and thanks to MUBI I was able to do it.

    Una de mis categorías favoritas en la entrega de los premios de la Academia (quizás la que más me gusta) es la de Mejor Película Internacional. Me gusta descubrir historias provenientes de los más remotos rincones del planeta y por eso me gusta ver todas las nominadas, e incluso las que han figurado en ediciones anteriores. Por eso mismo tenía esta película en mi radar hacía un tiempo, pero no se me hizo fácil encontrar tres horas libres para verla. Finalmente anoche y gracias a MUBI pude hacerlo.

    Directed and co-written by Ryûsuke Hamaguchi (who's responsible for another film that I have on my list, but have not seen yet, called Wheel of Fortune and Fantasy) Drive My Car is a film based on a story by the same name of the famous writer Haruki Murakami, included in his book Men without Women, which I read a few years ago. Given the insufficient adaptations that summarize six hundred pages in two hours, I think viewers will be in favor of the fact that those 20 or 30 pages that Murakami wrote have made for three hours of film. It is logical that the director has changed some things and added others, but the essence of the story and the characters is Murakami in his purest form: lonely characters (even the city itself sometimes seems alone, abandoned), stories within the story, that reference in the title to a song by The Beatles (included in Rubber Soul, one of my favorite Fab Four albums), the melancholy that floats in the atmosphere and the references to Western writers, all of that is part of the Murakami's seal, so if you haven't read it, this movie can give you a good idea of ​​how the author of 1Q84 writes. But in a nutshell, Drive My Car tells the story of Yusuke Kafuku, an actor and theater director who tries to overcome the loss of his recently deceased wife and as part of that grieving process - but also as part of his job - he agrees to stage the play Uncle Vania by Anton Chekhov in a theater festival to be held in Hiroshima.

    Dirigida y co escrita por Ryûsuke Hamaguchi (es responsable de otra película que tengo en mi lista, pero aún no he visto, llamada Wheel of Fortune and Fantasy) Drive My Car es una cinta basada en un relato del mismo nombre del famoso escritor Haruki Murakami, incluido en su libro Hombres sin mujeres, el cual leí hace algunos años. Ante las adaptaciones insuficientes que resumen seiscientas páginas en dos horas, creo que los espectadores estarán a favor de que esas 20 o 30 páginas que escribió Murakami hayan dado para tres horas de película. Es lógico que el director ha cambiado algunas cosas y ha agregado otras, pero la esencia de la historia y de los personajes es Murakami en estado puro: personajes solitarios (es que hasta la propia ciudad parece a veces sola, abandonada), historias dentro de la historia, esa referencia en el título a una canción de The Beatles (incluida en Rubber Soul, uno de mis discos favoritos de los Fab Four), la melancolía que flota en la atmósfera y las referencias a escritores occidentales, todo eso es parte del sello de Murakami, así que si no lo han leído, esta película les puede dar una buena idea de cómo escribe el autor de 1Q84. Pero en pocas palabras, Drive My Car cuenta la historia de Yusuke Kafuku, un actor y director de teatro que intenta superar la pérdida de su esposa, recientemente fallecida y como parte de ese proceso de duelo - pero también como parte de su trabajo - acepta montar la obra Tío Vania de Antón Chéjov en un festival de teatro a celebrarse en Hiroshima.

    Scene from the movie | Escena de la película

    Now, what does that have to do with the title? Well, the festival organizers assign Yusuke a driver (female driver in this case) to take him everywhere. Yusuke likes to drive, so it is not easy to give control of his vehicle to the young Misaki, but he has no choice and as the days, routes and experiences together go by, both characters begin to get closer and confess dark secrets of their respective pasts.

    Ahora bien, ¿qué tiene que ver eso con el título? Pues que los organizadores del festival le asignan un conductor (conductora en este caso) para que lo lleve a todas partes. A Yusuke le gusta conducir, así que no es fácil ceder el control de su vehículo a la joven Misaki, pero no tiene opción y a medida que pasan los días, los recorridos y las experiencias en común, ambos personajes comienzan a acercarse y a confesarse oscuros secretos de sus respectivos pasados.

    Now, by way of clarification and preparation, almost a third of the film shows the relationship between Yusuke and his wife Oto. This means that it is after almost an hour of film that she dies and (two years later) Yusuke leaves for the festival, which is when Misake appears. That would make the story seem almost like two different stories, but there are enough connections and references to make it clear why the director spent so much time showing a character who wouldn't be in most of the movie. And then, the montage of Uncle Vania is incredible because it is being done in different languages. That is, they selected actors from Japan, Korea, Thailand, among other places, but each one interprets their lines in their native language (in the staging there will be a screen with subtitles for the audience) and even one of the actresses is mute and communicates through sign language. I thought this was wonderful and I would love to see a play like this sometime. Hence, more than a story of love and heartbreak, much of the film is seen as an artistic drama, theatrical in this case, with readings, rehearsals and staging. But, above all those things, Drive My Car is a film that talks about loneliness and grief.

    Ahora bien, a manera de aclaratoria y preparación, casi un tercio de la película muestra la relación entre Yusuke y su esposa Oto. Esto quiere decir que es después de casi una hora de cinta cuando ella muere y (dos años más tarde) Yusuke se marcha para el festival, que es cuando aparece Misake. Eso haría parecer la historia casi como dos historias diferentes, pero hay suficientes conexiones y referencias para que se entienda por qué el director dedicó tanto tiempo a mostrar un personaje que no estaría en la mayor parte de la película. Y luego, el montaje de Tío Vania es increíble porque se está realizando en diferentes idiomas. Es decir, seleccionaron actores provenientes de Japón, Corea, Tailandia, entre otros lugares, pero cada uno interpreta sus líneas en su idioma materno (en la puesta en escena habrá una pantalla con subtítulos para la audiencia) e incluso una de las actrices es muda y se comunica a través de lengua de señas. Esto me pareció maravilloso y me encantaría poder ver una obra así alguna vez. De allí que, más que una historia de amor y desamor, gran parte de la película se vea como un drama artístico, teatral en este caso, con lecturas, ensayos y la puesta en escena. Pero, por sobre todas esas cosas, Drive My Car es una película que habla de la soledad y el duelo.

    Scene from the movie | Escena de la película

    Not only that of Yusuke, the most direct and obvious, but also that of other characters, the main one being Misaki, the young driver who gains prominence as we see her appear more and more on the screen. Yusuke and Misaki are characters surrounded by immense loneliness and immense pain that is revealed to us little by little as they confess to each other. I really liked the evolution of the relationship between the two of them and I liked that it was free of romantic connotations. Yusuke, older to the point of being able to be Misaki's father, finds in the young woman someone he trusts, who can understand the situation he is going through and she, almost always sparse in words and with a professional seriousness that borders on the stoic, opens up emotionally with this man who shares with her the weight of the past, the guilt and the pain. Drive My Car is a serene, emotional, beautifully photographed film, in which the details count for a lot and in which - as in a Chinese box dynamic - each story contains another that complements, opposes or denies it, making us stay attentive at all times despite its three hours duration, have any of you seen this movie? what did you think ? I read you in the comments.

    No sólo el de Yusuke, el más directo y evidente, sino también el de otros personajes, siendo el principal de ellos el de Misaki, la joven conductora que va ganando protagonismo a medida que la vemos aparecer más y más en la pantalla. Yusuke y Misaki son personajes rodeados por una inmensa soledad y un inmenso dolor que se nos va revelando de a poco a medida que se van confesando uno con otro. Me gustó mucho la evolución de la relación entre ellos dos y me gustó que estuviera libre de connotaciones románticas. Yusuke, mayor al punto de poder ser padre de Misaki, encuentra en la joven alguien de confianza, que puede entender la situación que él atraviesa y ella, parca en palabras casi siempre y con una seriedad profesional que raya en lo estoico se abre emocionalmente con este hombre que comparte con ella el peso del pasado, la culpa y el dolor. Drive My Car es una película serena, emotiva, bellamente fotografiada, en la que los detalles cuentan mucho y en el que - como en una dinámica de cajas chinas - cada historia contiene otra que la complementa, la opone o la desdice, haciendo que nos mantengamos atentos en todo momento a pesar de sus tres horas de duración, ¿alguno de ustedes ha visto esta película? ¿qué les pareció ? Los leo en los comentarios.


    Reviewed by | Reseñado por @cristiancaicedo


    Other posts that may interest you | Otros posts que pueden interesarte:

    Le Pardon (2020): between revenge and justice |

    --- | ---
    Permalink·Open on PeakD ↗·Linked from existing Hive post
  2. Drive My Car Review | Laberintos de la creatividad| Review | Labyrinths of Creativity [ESP/ENG]@irvinc1503d

    PORTADA-M.jpg



    Uno de mis autores de novela favoritos es Haruki Murakami, he disfrutado mucho algunas de sus obras como “El findel mundo y un despiadado país de las maravillas”, “Crónica del pájaro que da cuerda al mundo”, “Kafka en la orilla”, y “1Q84”, además de algunos ensayos.

    En todas las novelas que he leído de él predominan ambientes fantásticos, surrealistas y oníricos. Así que cuando me enteré que “Drive My Car” (2021) era basada en un cuento suyo pensé que podría tratarse de algo similar, esperaba ver algo de esos mundos de fantasía. Pero no, la película coescrita y dirigida por Ryūsuke Hamaguchi, es un film profundamente dramático y muy terrenal.

    SINÓPSIS-ESPAÑOL.jpg



    Yūsuke Kafuku (Hidetoshi Nishijima), es un actor y director de teatro que vive con su esposa Oto Kafuku (Reika Kirishima), en la ciudad de Tokio. Su tiempo lo distribuye entre el montaje de obras de autores famosos como Anton Chejov y Samuel Beckett, la actuación en esas obras y, además, dicta talleres de formación teatral. Oto, por su parte, escribe guiones muy exitosos para la televisión japonesa.

    Los dos están tratando de reconstruir su relación matrimonial luego de un período en el que Oto estuvo sumida en una profunda depresión, como consecuencia de la muerte de la única hija del matrimonio cuando tenía cinco años de edad. Ese trágico acontecimiento hizo que la pareja llegara a considerar su separación. Sin embargo, el trabajo de Oto como escritora logró sacarla del abismo sentimental, recobrando los bríos necesarios para continuar el matrimonio.

    El proceso creativo de Oto es muy particular. Las musas la visitan en los momentos del orgasmo y en los minutos posteriores a esos instantes supremos. En ese breve lapso de tiempo se le ocurren las historias que luego formaran parte de sus libretos. Pero ella tiene un problema de memoria por lo que al día siguiente no recuerda nada.

    La solución que han encontrado los esposos a esa caprichosa inspiración, es que Oto va contando la historia en pleno acto sexual, Yusuke se la aprende, él si tiene buena memoria, la transcribe y le da las notas a la esposa para que luego termine los guiones. Una ayudita sin la cual hubiese sido difícil para Oto alcanzar el éxito.

    Pero la tragedia no deja de perseguir a Yusuke, un día encuentra muerta a su esposa debido a un problema cerebral, justo cuando iba a tener una conversación trascendental con ella. Ese acontecimiento lo sume en un período oscuro, hasta que dos años después recibe una oferta de una agrupación de teatro de Hiroshima para hacer el montaje del “El tío Vania”, una obra de Chejov que trata sobre las miserias de la vida.

    imagen2-550.jpg

    En ese viaje a Hiroshima Yosuke se va a encontrar con dos personajes con los que va a vivir un terremoto emocional.

    Una es Misaki Watari (Tōko Miura), una joven conductora de vehículos asignda obligatoriamente por la institución que lo contrata para el montaje teatral. Ella es una muchacha huérfana, que se siente muy culpable de la muerte de su madre ocurrida durante un deslave en el pueblo donde residían cerca de Hiroshima. El otro personaje es Kōji Takatsuki (Masaki Okada), un joven actor, estrella de la televisión, pero que no tiene control sobre su terrible carácter. Koji fue amante de Oto, y en muchas oportunidades testigo de los raptos de inspiración de la guionista.

    En Hiroshima Yasuke va a vivir un proceso existencial donde el teatro y la realidad se solapan.

    asteriscos.png

    OPINIÓN ESPAÑOL.jpg



    El largo tiempo de duración de la película, unas tres horas, puede desanimar a muchos espectadores. Creo que el film pudo haberse hecho en un poco menos de tiempo. Hay largas escenas filmadas en las carreteras y en túneles donde no logré captar la intención del director, pienso que se pudiera prescindir de ellas sin que afecte el relato.

    Pero más allá de este detalle de la larga duración, la película puede ser interesante por varias razones. A mí me gustó mucho, por ejemplo, lo que va mostrando sobre cómo se da el proceso creativo y cómo es el mundo del teatro por dentro.

    Me pareció completamente original esa idea de que alguien reciba la inspiración creativa mientras experimenta un orgasmo, un asunto que el guión destaca al darle una existencia efímera. Porque si bien es cierto que Oto recibe la inspiración en ese momento, no la puede recordar mucho tiempo después, de allí que necesita obligatoriamente la ayuda de su esposo, el que se convierte para ella en una especie de amanuense. Esta es una de las tantas formas en que puede complementarse una pareja que trata de levantar un matrimonio en problemas.

    La película sigue el modelo de otros films donde se presenta la obra dentro de la obra. Un enfoque que permite ir solapando la ficción con la realidad.

    asteriscos.png

    Yasuke tiene un método muy particular para aprenderse los guiones de las obras en las que va actuar: los escucha mientras conduce. Su esposa le graba en casetes las líneas correspondientes de los otros personajes y él va repitiendo de memoria las suyas, de ese modo garantiza la sincronización y la fluidez necesaria para encarnar su papel cuando esté en escena. Este es otro detalle que destaca las infinitas formas de compartir que tienen dos personas que han decidido vivir juntas.

    Pero esas líneas que ha grabado la esposa y las que él recita mientras conduce, todas tomadas de la obra de Chejov, El Tío Vania, están tan bien escogidas que se confunden con los conflictos que viven en ese momento los protagonistas de la película. A veces pareciera que los textos no hablan de una obra de teatro próxima a ser presentada, sino del drama que viven Yasuke y Oto. Esa forma de desarrollar la trama de la película me pareció magistral.

    imagen3-550.jpg

    Entre los tantos temas de los que se pudiera hablar en este film destaca el de la dificultad para formar pareja. Yasuke y Oto son dos personas que se aman profundamente y que logran mantener su relación aún en medio de situaciones complicadas. La primera, cuando la esposa entra en una profunda depresión luego de la muerte de la hija. Luego, cuando Yasuke descubre que su esposa le es infiel. En ese momento el esposo siente que la relación se tambalea, pero opta por tolerar la situación. En ambos casos el amor logra ser suficiente para seguir adelante.

    Otro tema que también está presente en la película es la tensión entre culpa y resiliencia. Tanto Yasuke, como Misaki (la joven conductora), cargan a cuestas con un profundo sentimiento de culpa. El primero porque se cree responsable de la muerte de su esposa, piensa que si hubiese llegado más temprano a su casa, quizá la hubiese podido salvar. Y Misaki también confronta una situación parecida, piensa que no actuó a tiempo para socorrer a su madre, la que le daba muchos maltratos. Ambos personajes se sienten muy mal por haber actuado de ese modo, sin embargo, han logrado encontrar la energía suficiente para poder seguir adelante aún con el peso del remordimiento.

    Otro asunto que me gustó de la película es que se presenta el arte como una posibilidad para poder tener una vida más plena. Esto lo podemos observar en Yasuke, en Oto, y en la pareja compuesta por el asistente de dirección del grupo teatral de Hiroshima y su esposa, una actriz sorda. Todos ellos han logrado enrumbar su vida y vencer los momentos difíciles gracias al arte. No ocurre lo mismo con el joven Koji, el que aún siendo una gran estrella de la televisión al final sucumbe como consecuencia de su furia incontrolada.

    Drive My Car es una película que nos deja muchos aprendizajes sobre el alma humana, es un poco larga, pero creo que vale la pena darle un visionado. Se las recomiendo.

    Gracias por tu tiempo.

    Fuente de imágenes. I II III

    cinti 800x20.jpg

    TITULO INGLES.jpg



    One of my favorite novel authors is Haruki Murakami, I have really enjoyed some of his works such as "The World and a Merciless Wonderland", "Chronicle of the Bird that Winds the World", "Kafka on the Shore", and "1Q84", as well as some essays.

    All the novels I have read by him are dominated by fantastic, surreal and dreamlike atmospheres. So when I heard that "Drive My Car" (2021) was based on a short story of his I thought it might be something similar, I expected to see something from those fantasy worlds. But no, the film co-written and directed by Ryūsuke Hamaguchi, is a deeply dramatic and very earthy film.

    SYNOPSIS- INGLES.jpg



    Yūsuke Kafuku (Hidetoshi Nishijima), is an actor and theater director who lives with his wife Oto Kafuku (Reika Kirishima), in the city of Tokyo. He divides his time between staging plays by famous authors such as Anton Chekhov and Samuel Beckett, acting in those plays and, in addition, giving theater training workshops. Oto, on the other hand, writes very successful scripts for Japanese television.

    The two are trying to rebuild their marital relationship after a period in which Oto was plunged into a deep depression following the death of the couple's only daughter when she was five years old. That tragic event caused the couple to consider separation. However, Oto's work as a writer managed to pull her out of the sentimental abyss, recovering the necessary strength to continue the marriage.

    Oto's creative process is very particular. The muses visit her in the moments of orgasm and in the minutes after those supreme moments. In that brief lapse of time she comes up with the stories that will later become part of her scripts. But she has a memory problem, so the next day she remembers nothing.

    The solution that the husband and wife have found to this capricious inspiration is that Oto tells the story in the middle of the sexual act, Yusuke learns it, if he has a good memory, transcribes it and gives the notes to his wife so that she can then finish the scripts. A little help without which it would have been difficult for Oto to succeed.

    imagen2-550.jpg

    But tragedy does not stop following Yusuke, one day he finds his wife dead due to a brain problem, just when he was about to have a transcendental conversation with her. That event plunges him into a dark period, until two years later he receives an offer from a theater group in Hiroshima to stage "Uncle Vanya", a play by Chekhov about the miseries of life.

    On that trip to Hiroshima Yosuke is going to meet two characters with whom he is going to live an emotional earthquake. One is Misaki Watari (Tōko Miura), a young car driver who is obligatorily assigned to him by the institution that hires him for the theatrical staging. She is an orphan girl, who feels very guilty about her mother's death that occurred during a landslide in the village where they resided near Hiroshima. The other character is Kōji Takatsuki (Masaki Okada), a young actor, a TV star, but who has no control over his own life about her terrible character. Koji was Oto's lover, and on many occasions witnessed the scriptwriter's inspirational raptures.

    In Hiroshima Yasuke will live an existential process where theater and reality overlap.

    asteriscos.png

    OPINION-I.jpg



    The long running time of the film, about three hours, may put off many viewers. I think the film could have been made in a little less time. There are long scenes filmed on the roads and in tunnels where I failed to grasp the director's intention, I think they could be dispensed with without affecting the story.

    But beyond this detail of the long duration, the film can be interesting for many reasons. I really liked, for example, what it shows about how the creative process takes place and what the theater world is like inside.

    I found completely original that idea of someone receiving creative inspiration while experiencing an orgasm, an issue that the script highlights by giving it an ephemeral existence. Because although it is true that Oto receives the inspiration at that moment, she cannot remember it for a long time afterwards, hence she necessarily needs the help of her husband, who becomes for her a sort of amanuensis. This is one of the many ways in which a couple can complement each other as they try to get a troubled marriage back on its feet.

    The film follows the model of other films where the play within the play is presented. An approach that allows the fiction to overlap with reality.

    Yasuke has a very particular method to learn the scripts of the plays in which he is going to act: he listens to them while driving. His wife records the corresponding lines of the other characters on cassettes and he repeats his own lines from memory, thus ensuring the synchronization and fluency necessary to embody his role when he is on stage. This is another detail that highlights the infinite ways of sharing that two people who have decided to live together have.

    But those lines that the wife has recorded and those that he recites while driving, all taken from Chekhov's play, Uncle Vanya, are so well chosen that they blend in with the conflicts that the characters are experiencing at that moment. At times it seems that the texts do not speak of a work of fiction but of the drama that Yasuke and Oto live. This way of presenting the film seemed masterful to me.

    imagen3-550.jpg

    Among the many themes that could be present in the film, the difficulty of forming a couple stands out. Yasuke and Oto are two people who love each other deeply and manage to maintain their relationship even in the midst of complicated situations. First, when the wife goes into a deep depression after the death of their daughter. Then, when Yasuke discovers that his wife is unfaithful to him. At that moment the husband feels that the relationship is faltering, but chooses to tolerate the situation. In both cases love manages to be enough to move on.

    Another theme that is also present in the film is the tension between guilt and resilience. Both Yasuke and Misaki (the young driver) carry a deep sense of guilt. Yasuke believes he is responsible for his wife's death, thinking that if he had arrived home earlier, he might have been able to save her. And Misaki also faces a similar situation, he thinks that he did not act in time to help his mother, who mistreated him a lot. Both characters feel very bad for having acted in that way, however, they have managed to find enough energy to be able to move forward even with the weight of remorse.

    Another thing I liked about the film is that art is presented as a possibility to achieve a fuller life. This is present in Yasuke, in Oto, in the couple composed by the assistant director of the theater group in Hiroshima and his wife, a deaf actress. All of them have managed to get their lives back on track and overcome difficult times thanks to art. The same is not true for the young Koji, who even though he is a great star, in the end he succumbs as a consequence of his uncontrolled rage.

    This is a film that leaves us many lessons about the human soul, it is a bit long, but I think it is worth a viewing. I recommend it.

    Thank you for your time.

    Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)

    separador verde.jpg

    Todos tus comentarios son bienvenidos en este sitio. Los leeré con gusto y dedicación.

    Hasta una próxima entrega. Gracias.

    MARCA LIBRO POSTALdef-sombra-m.jpg

    Las fotos, la edición digital y los Gifs son de mi autoría.





    separador verde.jpg

    banner delfin cumpleaños 4.png

    separador verde.jpg

    No te olvides de votar @cervantes como witness en esta página:

    https:/wallet.hive.blog/~witnesses

    Te invito a apoyar este proyecto como witness y a formar parte de esta gran comunidad uniéndote a su Discord en el siguiente enlace:

    [Discord de la comunidad Cervantes](https://discord.gg/hqpERg)

    separador verde.jpg

    You can vote for @ocd-witness, with HiveSigner or on Hive Witnesses.

    separador verde.jpg

    Permalink·Open on PeakD ↗·Linked from existing Hive post
  3. The Philosophy of DRIVE MY CAR by Ryusuke Hamaguchi@nazirullsafry1531d

    278684102_10160342830571042_9031402614935201922_n.jpg

    The wise told me once that life is metaphorical. The problem comes when you take it too literally. The second sentence is what I think.

    In this country especially, talking about the education system, the top scorers are moved to the science classes. The lower scoring ones to the literature classes.

    Moving forward 30 years, we are reaping what the system has sown. Just read the daily news. Read the posts on social media. The mentality of the general population.

    And the socmed influencers are the clever ones. While the real intellects are at the backseats.

    Talking about reaping what you sow. The system we are using now are opt on recycling the same garbage on top of the country’s administration. Same as the scenes in socmed, the not-so-smart ones will get the votes.

    Oh, am I supposed to talk about the film? Yes. Sorry. For a society where the majority like to take things literally, this 3-hour long film won't appeal much to you guys.

    Probably 6 hours of tik-tok clips make you a happier person, and if watching films for you just mean looking for easter eggs, cameos, and plot-twist, multiversity of your favorite franchise. And like the government, they will just reboot the same shit over and over again.

    They are quickly losing the plot, on why you do things, like using prettier special fx won't make it a better movie. Jesus Christ. Because the literature students are cast down below and the science students become the yes man. Don’t ask me who and how those ministers are being chosen.

    The first 40 minutes of Drive My Car will go to the general public as porn because they are too busy to read between the lines. It is also around the time the opening credits start. And so does my review lah.

    The main hint for me is when the inclusion of Misaki's character is somewhat being forced into the narrative. The reason - is a driver has to be assigned to avoid the accident like the previous year. Sort of like a ‘MacGuffin’. (and she is the same age as Kafuku’s dead daughter if she was still alive)

    That has triggered my suspicions. And then near the end of the dinner scene, she suddenly dives down the table, off the frame, to reach out for something. First, we cannot see what. But then it is revealed that it is the dog.

    For this film to be regarded as highly as it is, the director won't do that for no reason. The nail in the coffin is when she was there for the main show. And the audience’s clap at the end was cut short.

    The ending came to no surprise for me for the hints I stated above. The whole film is of Misaki’s making. All of it was just in her head.

    Reminded me of the opening of Life of Pi showing the Brahman’s endless loop of the fractal universe. Our whole life could just be a blip in someone’s head.

    And when Joseph Campbell talked about it, he mentioned Schopenhauer (which Kafuka mentioned many times along with Dostoevsky) said,

    “The only way you can talk about this great tide in which you're a participant is as Schopenhauer did: the universe is a dream dreamed by a single dreamer where all the dream characters dream too.”

    Misaki is the director, dreaming. She is also like Lucky, the servant in Waiting for Godot (a HUGE hint of Absurdism). The moment she (Misaki) speaks (through this film), no one has any idea what she is saying, because while the rest are looking for meaning, Lucky (also like Camus’s Sisyphus) accepts the meaninglessness of it all, and drives away happy in acceptance…along the road to the oscars.

    Permalink·Open on PeakD ↗·Linked from existing Hive post
  4. 'Drive My Car' by Ryusuke Hamaguchi Review: Visually pleasing, unique, and also too long@namiks1566d

    vlcsnap-2022-03-15-18h46m56s558.png

    I've read stories by Haruki Murakami in the past. Many of which refer the to the idea of romance and youth and the heartbreak that time brings as the two come together to form lifetimes of happiness, regret, and isolation. I've enjoyed reading these stories, despite their more depressive nature in which nostalgia takes reign and fills your body, leading to your own mind falling victim to the many thoughts that roam your mind as your read each page.

    With a film adaptation of one of his works, I roughly knew what to expect prior to watching the film, even without watching any trailers of the film. With Haruki Murakami, you simply know what you're getting.

    These days, it's almost rare for a Japanese film to enter the public eye, and I'm really happy that Drive My Car has had an impact on highlighting the demand and appreciation for Japanese films that aren't simply animation or live action adaptations of those animated series, but I feel from the praise the film was getting over the last few weeks that my already somewhat low expectations were still met with some mild disappointment in parts.

    However, there's still plenty to appreciate about Drive My Car, providing your have the interest in literature either prior or after watching, as well as time to invest into what is three hours of a film that continuously references it.

    Drive My Car

    vlcsnap-2022-03-15-14h46m07s892.png

    Drive My Car centralises itself around the lives of writers and actors, utilising the conscruction of plays to match the parallels of the dramatic and deeply heartbroken and corrupt lives the actors themselves live. Through this, the film serves more as a love letter to playwrights and the performances of actors in theatre as they pull their emotions and hardships and turn them into influence and art in stories.

    This is an evident inspiration behind the film's own dramatic events, where between are the many discussions of playwrights and their works, as these artists connect themselves to the stories of the past in effort to accept and deal with their own problems.

    It was through this that I rather appreciated the film's performances, where the cast seemed painfully numb for the most part, with limited expressions and rather monotone sounds in their voices. It showed that much of their pain was bottled up, kept hidden, waiting to be used later. We even see in parts where our protagonist breaks down into tears during performances, with dialogue that often mirrors his own worries and hardships in life.

    The film's narrative takes on the troubles of an actor, as he witnesses the reality in which his partner isn't faithful and frequently lies to him, he never really confronts her about the fact that he knows, and her life quickly comes to an end with all those bottled up emotions kept hidden, with many words never being said. The result is a life of sadness and regret, where he wishes he had talked to her and confronted her, to see what she had to say.

    There's the pain of hate, sadness, and loss in our protagonist, where his trust was neglected and he had no real method of approaching the issue. It speaks of our own lives and how we rarely communicate, often keeping things to ourselves and ultimately resulting in more pain that could've been avoided by simply talking and communicating with each other.

    Instead, our protagonist speaks of his emotions and problems to his driver, though he still is never direct in what he's referring to, there's reflection and emotion through the works of others, often relating to writers and theatre.

    Cinematography

    vlcsnap-2022-03-15-16h14m17s882.png

    For the most part, Drive My Car's cinematography doesn't do anything all that interesting. It's most effective moments are during movement, with a strong emphasis on environment rather than characters. There's a heavy attention to composition in these moments, and it's certainly quite visually appealing.

    Though I feel that the choice to make most shots of characters static goes alongside the film's attention to theatre, where the main focus and perspective from an audience is direct. Where our characters speak directly towards us and the entirety of the production is aimed at an audience.

    Whether this was intentional or not, it's something I did quite like. There's more awareness in the cinematography and how scenes are connected to each other, and how the story unfolds; which for the most part reflects the production of a play. Though this brings me into an area of the film that I feel most certainly was a weakness: length.

    I couldn't help but feel that Drive My Car did not need to have a runtime that clocked in at just under three entire hours. Its narrative is one that is simple and manages to get its point across within a significantly short duration of time. It simply lingers and refuses to let go, but one could also make the argument that the incredibly long runtime was a decision that thus amplifies the connection to emotion and how heartbreak and loss can stick with us even as the years go by.

    I typically struggle to support films that do overstay their welcome, and feel that even two hours of runtime is often pushing it for most productions -- though while I don't enjoy it, I can appreciate when it's done intentionally to connect and immerse the audience to the very points and focus the film has to offer.

    There's areas of the directing and cinematography that do contribute to this theory that the runtime contributes to the conveying of emotional trauma and the passing of time, particularly in the moments where there is movement, where our protagonist is in his car and the locations are changing, displaying the passing of time as well. Even when we see the same few roads and locations over and over, it does in fact add to the feeling that while we move from one place to another in life, things ultimately remain. We hold our deepest regrets, and we feel our greatest pains as if they started the day before.

    Haruki Murakami's writing often tells us of such life lessons: that our deepest desires and emotions follow us through time; even so in his book Norwegian Wood, where it's protagonist is landing in another country, yet a simple song brings back an entire lifetime of events to reflect upon.

    Japanese Cinema

    vlcsnap-2022-03-15-18h47m33s718.png

    While Drive My Car was a film I still managed to enjoy, it was one that didn't really pique my interest all that much. It didn't feel very refreshing, and as mentioned above it has a runtime that's just far too long. But I can really appreciate that Japanese cinema could be taking a turn and starting anew; I look forward to seeing more from the country, especially given its rich cultural elements and history -- these two alone provide such support to narrative structure alone and offer a lot of possibilities.

    Haruki Murakami's works almost seem like a safe bet to start with, where people recognise the name and the style and ultimately know what they're going to get. With the film being successful, I'm sure it'll open the gates to even more creative productions going forward.

    Permalink·Open on PeakD ↗·Linked from existing Hive post