scrobble.life
← Back

Title · no scrobbles indexed yet

Stranger Than Fiction

The first scrobble for this title is still propagating, but a community review is already indexed below.

Reviews

Longform community posts about this title

Stranger Than Fiction (2006): a character in search of his author | un personaje en busca de su autor@cristiancaicedo822d
Permalink·Open on PeakD ↗·Linked from existing Hive post

Comments

No comments yet — be the first.

2 more reviews

  1. A review of: "Stranger than fiction": a tragicomedy which was much better than I could have expected@aurzeq1305d

    Source

    Plot

    When Harold Crick wakes up one day, a voice in his head describes his routine actions, flaws, and everyday life. Crick is a boring, unremarkable man who works as a tax collector, which perfectly encapsulates his personality. He is a respectable, stuffy, dry, and fussy citizen. Hilbert, a literature professor, advises him to determine whether his story is a comedy or a tragedy in order to try to put an end to this voice...

    Source

    Why you should watch it?

    We are in the world of meta-narrative, a literary genre that has become increasingly popular in recent years. In this genre, the story's workings—which are typically well concealed beneath the plot and its twists and turns—are dramatically exposed: the writers are staged, and the main characters predict and evade the literary scheme the writer has created for them.  Moreover, the main character receives assistance from a literature professor of an university. Nobody had anticipated a literary critic and a fictitious character working together to attack a writer. And Harold , will learn an important truth from Professor Hilbert, played convincingly by Dustin Hoffman. Paper heroes may die, but if they deviate from the usual and illustrate fresh perspectives on time, space, emotions, and life, their stories live on in perpetuity.

    Source

    Forster conveys a powerful message about the inevitable nature of destiny and the capacity of individuals to interact with it, to shape, if not entirely, at least some fundamental traits. A message, offered to the viewer in many small but juicy portions, with the thoughtful considerations mostly put into the mouth of Dustin Hoffman's character. A final message on life's philosophy reminds us of the significance of small things, of simple gestures or actions, because... the subtleties are what really counts: they are here to save our lives. Some technological devices, by which specific diagrams placed in overlays in the various frames accompany the character's obsessive actions and manias, with which we thus get our first introduction to him, add a light and humorous glamour.

    Source

    The movie's beauty lies precisely in the brave decision to use the lighthearted tones of comedy to lightly say serious things that everyone knows but that one prefers not to think about. This operation might make one think of a reused recipe, but this is what gives the film its unique charm. Who controls our destiny and what can we do about it? might be used to sum up the entire situation.

    Passing to the narrative, I must object to one crucial line where the psychologist—to whom Mr. Crick desperately asks for assistance—suggests the patient to seek assistance from a literature professor. The option is undoubtedly effective for the narrative's goals and succeeds in presenting a Dustin Hoffman who can make viewers smile and think, but in my opinion, it is distinctly forced. The rest of the plot, while certainly telegraphed and linear, is so expertly told that the rest is unnecessary.

    The tone is neither snobbish nor intellectualistic. Above all, surprisingly (at least for me) a character stands out, Harold Crick, played by Will Ferrell in his most complex and mature performance. Harold Crick is a person like many others, harmless and subdued by his institutional role, who when faced with the possibility of an unpredictable death is overcome by the allure of the lovely Ana (a captivating Maggie Gyllenhaal), who is presented to the viewer as his opposite: a proud anarchist, a libertine spirit and hostile to rules.

    Source

    Conclusion

    I must be honest, I watched this film without much pretension. I did not have high expectations, and frankly (and here I have to make mea culpa) the fact that the main actor was Will Farrel did not excite me too much. But True as Fiction, surprised me, it never becomes tedious because it is so effective at keeping the audience interested, and the story (although not as original as one may think), is nice and enjoyable. So we are not talking of a masterpiece (and this is why also the mark is not too high), but still I really recommend you to watch it.

    Rating

    My personal vote is:

    7.5/10


    If you enjoyed the post, please leave an upvote and/or a comment, and feel free to follow me (at the link below) if you want to see my next movie review.

    ➡️ hive.blog/@aurzeq ⬅️

    fIRMA_hIVE.png

    Permalink·Open on PeakD ↗·Linked from existing Hive post
  2. Stranger than Fiction: Not what you expect from Will Ferrell@gooddream2937d

    I think this is one of those movies that simply passed most people by but I for one really appreciated Ferell's capabilities in a serious role. Up until this point I am relatively certain that Will had only been involved in over-the-top comedic roles which is fine. I mean, that is what we all love him for and he is very good at it. The being said, this film, while it does have it's comedic moments (from time to time) is a drama.

    Stranger-Than-Fiction.jpg

    There aren't very many actors out there that can transition from slapstick comedy to serious drama and nail it. I believe that Adam Sandler is quite good at it (more on that later,) and of course Robin Williams was so good at it that he mostly transitioned to serious roles. Will Ferrell shows his depth as an actor in this film and it was a surprise to me because I knew NOTHING about this movie when I first watched it.

    He plays the lead role of Harold Crick, an IRS auditor who lives an almost robotic life of routine. His entire life is dictated by a very specific system including how many times he brushes each side of his teeth each morning. His wristwatch is his life, and he sticks to his timetables with complete accuracy. He is humorless around his colleagues and also happens to be a human calculator - a gift that his coworkers test on a regular basis when they throw complex math problems at him throughout the day. He occasionally will respond to the voice and that is where moments of comedy shine through in this otherwise serious production.

    He wakes up one morning to discover that his life is being narrated by a voice and this isn't a spoiler as it is revealed very early on in the film. Harold simply thinks he is imagining it and the narrator is completely unaware that Glick is a real person and has no idea that he can hear her (I know this sounds convoluted but trust me, it works.)

    stranger-than-fiction-1200-1200-675-675-crop-000000.jpg

    He accidentally meets his love interest in the film, Ana , played by Maggie Gyllenhaal when he is auditing her bakery. Ana is totally different than Harold in that she is free-spirited, outgoing, and a bit of a hippie. I don't want to reveal too much of the story but the whole "opposites attract" interactions between the two of them is quite humorous in a way that is completely different from what you would expect of Ferrel roles. She insults him and he either doesn't get it or responds to her sarcastic questions in a very matter-of-fact type way.

    They develop a relationship and it is actually quite touching. However, Glick is torn because he is extremely dedicated to the the myriad of rules the IRS has, one of which specifically prohibits precisely what he is doing.

    will-ferrell-maggie-gyllenhaal-stranger-than-fiction.png

    This film has an all star cast of very accomplished actors and let's see if the trailer does it any justice.

    I find it refreshing when accomplished actors in one field will successfully cross over to another. Many have tried but so few can pull it off. I think Ferrel has done a great job in this movie and the rest of the cast is fantastic as well. I can't rate this film too high because a bit part of the reason why it is good is simply because Will Ferrell is such an unlikely choice for a serious film.

    7 / 10

    Permalink·Open on PeakD ↗·Linked from existing Hive post