scrobble.life
← Back

Title · no scrobbles indexed yet

Strangers on a Train

The first scrobble for this title is still propagating, but a community review is already indexed below.

Reviews

Longform community posts about this title

Film Review: Strangers on a Train (1951)@drax876d
Permalink·Open on PeakD ↗·Linked from existing Hive post

Comments

No comments yet — be the first.

4 more reviews

  1. Strangers on a Train (1951)@andreseloy5811037d

    image.png Image

     

    "Strangers on a Train" tells the story of two men who meet by chance on a train. One of them, Guy, is a successful tennis player, while the other, Bruno, is a disturbed man with a strange obsession. Bruno proposes a macabre plan: both men should exchange murders to get rid of the people who cause problems in their lives.

    As the plot unfolds, the tension builds and the viewer is drawn into a dangerous game of intrigue and manipulation. The film is full of surprising twists and iconic scenes that keep the audience on the edge of their seats.

    image.png Image

     

    The main character is Guy Haines, played by Farley Granger. Guy is a talented tennis player who gets caught up in the twisted plot proposed by Bruno. He is caught between his desire to protect his career and his growing desperation to free himself from the implications of Bruno's plan.

    On the other hand, Bruno Antony is played by Robert Walker. Bruno is the disturbed and obsessed man who proposes the murder exchange to Guy. He is a manipulative and sinister character who becomes the driving force behind the film's plot.

    "Strangers on a Train" is a shining example of Hitchcock's ability to create suspense and keep the viewer on edge. The cinematography, direction and performances are excellent, making this film a classic that is still enjoyable today.

    image.png Imagen

    The film was nominated for several major awards at the time, including the Academy Awards. The film received a nomination for Best Black and White Cinematography, which went to Robert Burks, recognized for his outstanding work in cinematography.

    Although "Strangers on a Train" did not take home any Academy Awards, it is important to note that a film's recognition and impact does not always translate into awards. The film's lasting influence and its status as a classic thriller are testament to its quality and legacy.

    Permalink·Open on PeakD ↗·Linked from existing Hive post
  2. Review - Strangers on a Train (1951)@thunderjack1046d

    Alfred Hitchcock is considered by many to be one of the best film directors of the 20 th century, and the film, Strangers on a Train (1951), is a fine example of his work. Hitchcock specialized in suspense films, dealing with murder and mystery. This time around Hitchcock introduces us to the main characters, Guy Haines (Farley Granger) and Bruno Antony (Robert Walker), who randomly meet on a train traveling along the East Coast. They had never met, and Antony engages Haines in conversation, having recognized Haines as a fairly well-known tennis player, who seems to be involved the daughter of a U.S. Senator. Haines is a bit putoff by Antony, but ends up lunching with Antony in his private compartment, where Antony suggests an idea for the perfect double-murder – he would kill Haines’ wife while Haines would kill his father. Needless to say, Haines blows off the idea as if it were some kind of joke. It turns out that the novel and film became the catalyst for a later movie, Throw Mama from the Train (1987) with Billy Crystal and Danny deVito (a pretty funny movie worth watching).

    *Strangers on a Train* poster - [IMDB](https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0044079/mediaviewer/rm2083078656?ref_=ttmi_mi_all_pos_116)
    Robert Walker in his role as Bruno Antony does a great job of putting the “strange” in “stranger”, playing a psychopath very well, and convincingly so. My Bonnie Bride and both thought he looked very familiar, and it turns out he looks a lot like his son, Robert Walker, Jr., which is why we thought the elder Walker looked so familiar. A fine actor whose life was cut short. There are also a couple of actors who are familiar to us, including Leo Carroll (*The Man from U.N.C.L.E.*) as Senator Morton, and John Doucette (way too many films, best of which is *Patton*) appeared in a minor supporting role as one of the detectives.
    Farley Granger and Robert Walker - [IMDB](https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0044079/mediaviewer/rm872750337?ref_=ttmi_mi_all_sf_40)
    The film itself is brilliant made, keeping a good level of suspense as we learn more and more about Bruno Antony, and how creepy he is. He’s the kind of guy if you meet randomly as Haines did, don’t walk, run away fast. Antony keeps showing up in Haines’ life, stalker-like, and causing Haines a lot of anxiety, and is noticed by Haines’ love interest, Anne Morton (Ruth Roman), who becomes suspicous of Antony, and curious as to his hold over Haines. The creepy factor in this film is pretty high thanks to the way Walker and Granger are able to play well off of each other.
    Interesting shot, I don't think it would have had the same impact if it had been made in color [IMDB](https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0044079/mediaviewer/rm2258645504?ref_=ttmi_mi_all_sf_104)
    Filmed in black and white, which I think is a darn good medium for film noir and psycho thrillers, there are some truly incredible shots in the film that just wouldn’t work if *Strangers on a Train* had been shot in color. The shot of the glasses on the ground reflecting the action taking place is one example of a cool bit of photography.
    Bruno watching Guy - [IMDB](https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0044079/mediaviewer/rm632721409?ref_=ttmi_mi_all_sf_87)
    Another shot that is a bit creepy is when we see Antony attending a tennis match and is focused only on Haines. The dude is completely creepy, and I can see anyone being wigged out by having someone constantly watching you, stalking you, because he has a hold on you and is trying to manipulate you.

    Overall, my Bonnie Bride and I both enjoyed Strangers on a Train quite a lot and would recommend seeing it. If you do find the time to watch it, I hope you will enjoy it as much as we did.

    Thanks for stopping by.

    Posted using CineTV

    Permalink·Open on PeakD ↗·Linked from existing Hive post
  3. Strangers on a Train - Movie Review@smendel2057d

    I have heard about Strangers on a Train over the years and I've even seen a few television shows and movies that tell versions of the story. I only just saw the movie for the first time.

    image.png source

    Permalink·Open on PeakD ↗·Linked from existing Hive post
  4. REVIEW : "Strangers On A Train" (1951) - Movie by Alfred Hitchcock@mandibil2318d

    vlcsnap-2020-02-21-10h56m37s259.png

    Hitchcock was a prolific director - he directed more than 50 feature length movies during his career. But it is really only a handful of them that is now considered masterpieces, even if he is likely the most celebrated director in history. It only goes to show, that even for best of them, things are never that easy.

    After the Selznick years, he started the Transatlantic Company, which went down due to the total failure of "Under Capricorn", a costume piece produced in the same long take fashion as the suspense piece "Rope". The last Transatlantic was the forgettable "Stage Fright". So now back in the studio system at Warner Bros., Hitch needed a hit to consolidate his position in the filmmaking world. That one was the adaptation of the novel "Strangers On A Train", by Patricia Highsmith.

    vlcsnap-2020-02-21-10h55m05s352.png

    vlcsnap-2020-02-21-10h55m58s119.png

    Two "strangers" meet on a train... or rather one stranger, Bruno Antony (Robert Walker), casually strikes up a conversation with a famous tennis star Guy Haines (Farley Granger) and circumstances has it, they end up eating dinner together. Bruno is aware of Guy´s slightly complicated girlfriend situation and understands that he really wants to get rid of her for another woman.

    Since Bruno himself is fed up with his dominating father, they both want to get rid of someone, as he puts it. So he suggests that they each do each others "murder", thus being able to create a perfect alibi. Guy Haines has not really caught up to the psychological nature of Bruno or understands that he is actually deadly serious about his suggestion. Guy sort of goes along on the "game" saying "sure we have a deal".

    vlcsnap-2020-02-21-10h57m24s609.png

    vlcsnap-2020-02-21-10h58m09s506.png

    Bruno carries out what he believes is his part of the deal and then proudly reveals the deed to Guy. This was not exactly what Guy had planned, he is now considered the main suspect in the murder of his ex fiancée. He cannot reveal Bruno since he will expose the whole ordeal and make things even worse for Guy.

    But Bruno wants his "part" of the "deal" executed and presses Guy to do something about it. Guy is now in a situation where the only solution is for himself to "eliminate" Bruno´s ability to put the final blame on him.

    vlcsnap-2020-02-21-10h58m36s535.png

    vlcsnap-2020-02-21-10h59m02s260.png

    We are here once again dealing with a version of "the wrong man" plot. This is a recurring theme in several of Hitchcock´s most revered movies. In this case Guy has a bit of responsibility for ending up where he is, even if none of the "crime" is his fault. This kind of grey zone plot is a newer development in his curriculum and points towards a more modern and slightly less clear cut plot structure than before.

    It still has the central protagonist forced to take care of his situation himself, but it has more subconscious elements that gives this movie a more interesting and more dual flow than the straight up "39 Steps" kind of structure. Hitchcock manages to keep the suspense at maximum pretty much from start to finish, and in my opinion only some of the tennis match thrill is encumbering it a bit.

    vlcsnap-2020-02-21-10h59m31s443.png

    vlcsnap-2020-02-21-10h59m54s129.png

    A few scenes like those with the father in law and fiancee at home are a bit dated in their suspense, but these are small things. For some reason, Strangers On A Train, seems to get lesser praise in the pantheon of Hitchcock. In my opinion it is in the top 5, certainly in a top 10 list. In a way I see it as the purest, quintessential "early" (American) Hitchcock movie. It has all the trademarks of classic suspense, brilliant camera work throughout and solid acting performances.

    Most memorable is Robert Walker as Bruno. His face has the perfect duality of the superficially "normal" and nice gentleman and the raving mad psychopath right underneath. Check out the scene where he uses an elderly lady's neck to show his strangulation skills and how his expression changes when he spots Pat Hitchcock´s face which is a spitting bespectaled image of the girl he has recently killed.

    vlcsnap-2020-02-21-11h01m06s569.png

    vlcsnap-2020-02-21-11h02m00s208.png

    Another magnificent scene is when Guy´s "girlfriend" is strangled by Bruno. look how the camera stops following the young persons and just "stares" over the lake. Then the "victim" enters into the frame backwards and is slightly surprised by the presence, you, right behind her, as she turns a round. The efficiency of Bruno is portrayed in how he lights a lighter that reflects in her glasses and gets a confirmation of her name, immediately followed by a two hands grabbing her neck.

    Now the view switches to the glasses that she has dropped and we see the "deed" being done as a reflection in the glasses. This is just classic Hitchcock and it is a small precursor to the highly stylised montage of the shower scene in Psycho a decade later. It has a bit of the same "efficiency" to it and the meticulously put together shots.

    vlcsnap-2020-02-21-11h02m15s868.png

    vlcsnap-2020-02-21-11h03m01s821.png

    It is not the best Hitchcock there is, but it certainly is a serious step up in quality of most of what he had previously done, since Shadow Of A Doubt. It suffers a little from a somewhat wooden Guy Haines, who is a little hard to identify with, as he seems to have no faults at all, except for being easy to woo into a "criss cross" murder. Not exactly what a viewer wants to be associated with.

    But overall there are plenty of things to be entertained by. A tricky plot, an interesting villain, very good camera work and a decent climax. it comes highly recommended.

    9/10

    Permalink·Open on PeakD ↗·Linked from existing Hive post