scrobble.life
← Back

Title · no scrobbles indexed yet

The Mechanic

The first scrobble for this title is still propagating, but a community review is already indexed below.

Reviews

Longform community posts about this title

Film Review: The Mechanic (1972)@drax449d
Permalink·Open on PeakD ↗·Linked from existing Hive post

Comments

No comments yet — be the first.

4 more reviews

  1. Serial killer expert in mechanics and armaments / The Jason Statham we have the mechanic / (ENG/ESP)@lauracraft1555d

    Fuente / Source

    Reciban todos un cordial saludo, Amigos el día de hoy vengo a compartir con ustedes una película que me gusto mucho. Esta Película es para un público mayor de edad.

    La película se llama El Mecánico, entra en los géneros de Suspenso y Acción, Los actores que me gustaron en esta película son, Jason Statham interpretando el papel Arthur Bishop, siendo este un personaje fio y calculador, Y Ben Foster interpretando el papel de Steve, siendo este alegre y relajado.

    Les Mostrare un pequeño resumen y mi opinión del porqué recomiendo que vean esta película.

    Friends, today I come to share with you a movie that I liked very much. This movie is for an adult audience.

    The movie is called The Mechanic, it falls into the genres of Suspense and Action, The actors that I liked in this movie are Jason Statham playing the role of Arthur Bishop, being this a cold and calculating character, and Ben Foster playing the role of Steve, being this cheerful and relaxed.

    I will show you a little summary and my opinion of why I recommend you to see this movie.

    Fuente / Source

    El Mecánico

    Vemos como una persona en particular llama a la profesión en la que ejerce como mecánico, pero en el transcurso de la película nos damos de cuenta que para nada su trabajo es de mecánico, y que realmente su trabajo es de otra cosa, pero que uno de sus pasatiempos es la mecánica automovilística, ya que nos muestra como desde hace un tiempo está reconstruyendo un carro.

    Su trabajo Real

    El personaje principal de este Film se llama Bishop, se dedica a hacer asesinatos por encargo, a él no le importa quienes sean, solo se dedica a matarlos, ya que estos representan una amenaza para sus clientes.

    Siendo esta una persona amable, fría y calculadora, ya que, a base de sus experiencias buenas o malas, les han enseñado a que su trabajo requiere de cierto grado mental para llevar a cabo con éxito sus encargos, vemos como lo contratan para muchas misiones, porque es un profesional y sabe cómo hacer que ciertas muertes parezcan accidentes, homicidios para culpar a alguien más, o simples muertes.

    Me sorprende mucho en la manera en la que interpreta su papel como un asesino en serie, es increíble ver como se las ingenia para tapar sus asesinatos sin complicaciones, de hecho, no es solo un mecánico y un asesino, sino que también es un buen conductor…

    The Mechanic

    We see how a particular person calls his profession as a mechanic, but in the course of the film we realize that his job is not a mechanic at all, and that really his job is something else, but that one of his hobbies is car mechanics, as he shows us how he has been rebuilding a car for some time.

    His Real Job.

    The main character of this film is called Bishop, he is dedicated to do contract killings, he does not care who they are, he is only dedicated to kill them, as they represent a threat to their customers.

    Being this a kind, cold and calculating person, since, based on their good or bad experiences, they have taught them that their work requires a certain mental degree to successfully carry out their assignments, we see how they hire him for many missions, because he is a professional and knows how to make certain deaths look like accidents, homicides to blame someone else, or simple deaths.

    I am very surprised in the way he plays his role as a serial killer, it is amazing to see how he manages to cover up his murders without complications, in fact, he is not only a mechanic and a murderer, but he is also a good driver....

    Fuente / Source

    Su mejor amigo y Maestro

    Bishop solamente tiene una persona a la cual él confía, y cree siendo este como una figura paterna para él, ya que nuestro amigo es una persona solitaria, su maestro se lo dice aconsejándole que Bishop busque una mejor compañía y que haga una vida normal, pero nuestro amigo le responde que con su amistad y su compañía para él es suficiente y que no necesita de nadie más.

    Este maestro es quien le ha enseñado a Bishop todo lo que sabe y lo ve como un hijo, ya que Bishop se destaca en su trabajo, y por eso siempre lo contratan, por eso lo admira y lo ve como un hijo, a pesar de que esta persona ya tiene una, pero para él su hijo es una decepción.

    Una Decisión Difícil de tomar

    Bishop le encargan una misión que para él es difícil de tomar, ya que para la compañía en la que él trabaja descubren una traición, por lo que mandan a nuestro mecánico a ejecutar a esa persona.

    ¿Realmente hubo una traición?

    ¿Quién fue el traidor y porque Bishop se la hace difícil cumplir esa misión?

    His best friend and Master

    Bishop only has one person to whom he trusts, and believes being this as a father figure to him, since our friend is a lonely person, his teacher tells him so advising Bishop to look for a better company and make a normal life, but our friend answers him that with his friendship and his company for him is enough, and he doesn't need anyone else.

    This teacher is the one who has taught Bishop everything he knows and sees him as a son, since Bishop excels in his work, and that's why he is always hired, that's why he admires him and sees him as a son, even though this person already has one, but for him his son is a disappointment.

    A Difficult Decision to Make.

    Bishop is given a mission that is difficult for him to take, because for the company he works for they discover a betrayal, so they send our mechanic to execute that person.

    Was there really a betrayal?

    Who was the traitor, and why does Bishop find it difficult to fulfill this mission?

    Fuente / Source

    El hijo de su maestro

    Steve es un muchacho que, al tener el desprecio de su padre, ha tomado malas decisiones en su vida, ya que él siempre busco el cariño de su padre, pero este no lo reconoce y lo aleja, porque Steve no es el hijo que él siempre quiso.

    Al pasar por esa experiencia con su padre, Steve no sabe cómo lidiar con ese problema detestando a su padre, pero a su vez esperando que algún día cambie y se acerque más como padre para él.

    Convertirse en el compañero de Bishop

    Al morir su padre, él se acerca a nuestro amigo el mecánico, pidiéndole que lo convierta en su alumno, ya que Bishop fue el más cercano a su padre y aprendió todo de él, en lo cual Steve quiere conseguir ese cariño y respeto en Bishop, porque su padre nunca lo fue.

    Al ser un experto en asesinatos, Bishop le va enseñando a Steve lo que sabe, inculcándole sus valores y sabiduría para que este sea como él y sepa defenderse en la vida. A pesar de sus entrenamientos veremos como Steve comete errores causándole problemas a nuestro mecánico, pero a pesar de esto él lo aconseja y le va enseñando mejor.

    Dos traiciones Inesperadas

    Al ver esta película vemos como surgen dos traiciones en la cual la historia cambia y vemos como este dúo de mecánicos lidian con estos problemas.

    Una de las traiciones la sabemos desde el principio de esta historia y la otra la vemos más adelante.

    ¿Cuáles fueron? ¿Quién traiciono a quien?

    The son of his master.

    Steve is a boy who, having the contempt of his father, has made bad decisions in his life, since he always sought the affection of his father, but this does not recognize it and pushes him away, because Steve is not the son he always wanted.

    Going through this experience with his father, Steve does not know how to deal with this problem, detesting his father, but at the same time hoping that someday he will change and become closer to him as a father.

    Becoming Bishop's partner.

    When his father dies, he approaches our friend the mechanic, asking him to make him his student, since Bishop was the closest to his father and learned everything from him, in which Steve wants to get that affection and respect in Bishop, because his father never was.

    Being an expert in assassinations, Bishop teaches Steve what he knows, instilling in him his values and wisdom so that he can be like him and know how to defend himself in life. Despite his training, we will see how Steve makes mistakes causing problems to our mechanic, but despite this he advises him and teaches him better.

    Two Unexpected Betrayals.

    As we watch this movie, we see how two betrayals arise in which the story changes, and we see how this duo of mechanics deal with these problems.

    One of the betrayals we know from the beginning of this story, and the other we see later on.

    Who betrayed whom?

    Fuente / Source

    Conclusión

    En lo personal me gusto mucho esta película, las escenas de acción están muy bien realizadas, tiene un buen ritmo al contar esta historia, los efectos especiales son muy buenos, te deja con una buena impresión de la película, Tiene un buen ritmo y no sientes que estás perdiendo el interés para seguirla viendo, el director de esta película hizo un buen trabajo en ello.

    La actuación de los dos compañeros “Mecánicos” es excelente, sientes que de verdad son un dúo, y el papel de Steve te hace entenderlo y saber cómo él se siente, entiendes por qué busca a Bishop y lo ve como un padre.

    La recomiendo ver si te gustan este tipo de películas, no es apta para menores de edad, ya que posee muchos elementos que no están aptas para esas edades.

    Datos Extras

    La película tiene una duración de 1 hora y 32 minutos, fue estrenada en el año 2011.

    Tuvo una aceptación de los críticos del 53% y una aceptación de la audiencia del 51% según la página más usada Rottentomatoes.

    Tuvo un presupuesto de $40, 000,000 en dólares y contó con una recaudación de $76, 130,093 de dólares en todo el mundo, si quieren ver más detalles sobre esto pueden visitar esta página.

    Pueden Disfrutar el tráiler de esta película aquí.

    Y pueden disfrutar de esta película aquí

    Conclusion

    Personally I really liked this movie, the action scenes are very well done, it has a good rhythm when telling this story, the special effects are very good, it leaves you with a good impression of the movie, It has a good rhythm, and you don't feel like you are losing interest to keep watching it, the director of this movie did a good job on it.

    The acting of the two "Mechanic" partners is excellent, you feel that they really are a duo, and Steve's role makes you understand him and know how he feels, you understand why he looks for Bishop and sees him as a father.

    I recommend watching it if you like this kind of movies, it is not suitable for minors, as it has many elements that are not suitable for those ages.

    Extras

    The film has a duration of 1 hour and 32 minutes, was released in 2011.

    It had a critical acclaim of 53% and an audience acclaim of 51% according to the most used website Rottentomatoes.

    It had a budget of $40, 000,000 in dollars and had a gross of $76, 130,093 dollars worldwide, if you want to see more details about this you can visit this page.

    You can enjoy the trailer of this movie here.

    And you can enjoy this movie here

    social networks / redes sociales

    Traductor Deepl

    Translated Deepl

    Ediciones Canva

    Editions Canva

    Permalink·Open on PeakD ↗·Linked from existing Hive post
  2. The Mechanic (2011) - A special recommendation for weekends.@valentin861658d

    The Mechanic (2011) - A special recommendation for weekends. A good movie not to be missed.

    **Bombs, coffee, some special effects, some sex and the movie is good to see with some popcorn. It's an easy movie to digest, just good for wasting some weekend time.** **Synopsis** >*A remake of the 1972 film of the same title, "The Mechanic" stars professional assassin Arthur Bishop and his disciple Steve McKenna. Arthur Bishop has always worked on his own, with a meticulousness, ingenuity and efficiency that made him famous in the field of paid criminals, carefully studying his victims before perfecting his plan of attack and leaving no clues behind, regarding his identity. Operating in a world where the conventional rules of morality do not apply and where any mistake can cost him his life, the veteran reluctantly agrees to take young Steve McKenna under his protective wing and train him in the art of killing for money. . The ambitious apprentice shows an ability and a cruelty that annoys even his mentor, which is why a conflict occurs between the two assassins. Does Arthur Bishop want to introduce Steve McKenna to the secrets of his profession so that there is someone to successfully pursue his career or to reward himself for his former victim?* **A superb movie, worth watching, an action in the true sense of the word - engaging, interesting and not boring at all. Jason Statham played very well in the lead role, which was also expected, he starred in very good movies: Transporter 3, Death Race, The Expendables. Jason Statham is definitely the attraction of this movie and makes almost the whole movie but the idea of ​​the movie and especially the script completes all the details of a Thriller that is well worth watching - You won't regret.**
    Permalink·Open on PeakD ↗·Linked from existing Hive post
  3. "The Mechanic" by Simon West - movie review@godflesh2945d

    Wherever we rotate it, "The Mechanic" is a typical (but really typical) film by Jason Statham. That is, exactly what those of you who have been watching the actor's career have expected. I do not remember where and on what occasion I mentioned, but this guy really starts to really impress me with how he give us the same thing, I do not know which time and people still enjoy it - especially if he take off his shirt. Whether he is going to get away with it this time is a matter of personal sensation.

    the-mechanic-poster.jpg

    Arthur Bishop (Statham) is a "mechanic" - a hired killer with exceptional qualities, a strictly next set of rules that allow him to eliminate his victim in countless ways, depending on the requirements of the guarantor (whether it should look like an accident or the blame to fall on another). Bishop is loyal to his employer, and when he gets the job to kill his mentor and friend Harry McKenna (Donald Sederland) for his treachery, he does it with his usual coldness and emotional distancing. At the funeral of Harry Bishop he meets his son, Steve (Ben Foster), who is chased by a desire to pay off. By the act of blame (in part) Bishop agrees to become a teacher and show him the secrets of the trade. Steve, however, is disgusting, and it does not matter to Bishop's employers, who are soon on their steps. What they do not know, however, is that Bishop revealed that not Harry was guilty of reprimand and undertook his own attack. Clearly, the film is not particularly original, but when was that really important? And, as we all know, "original" is a relative term, and it usually means omissions in your personal knowledge. Here, however, people have tried the cliché for the costumed villain and the ubiquitous personal principles. But that's not the reason not to get things done. For me the number one problem is the final! In order not to release anything, if someone did not watch the original film with Charles Bronson - which, of course, is the beginning of the podium with the hired assassins - I will say that there is also a disorder here, which we find for the most part from the contemporary American remakes and personally, the only thing that irks me more than this particular case is the final of "Italian Affair" - by chance, also with the participation of Statham. There is not much left of the idea of ​​existentialism, which as we assure "Wikipedia" is covered in the original.

    Jason-Statham-Returns-For-The-Mechanic-2.jpg

    On the positive side, I can say that the film has a decent amount of quality action - but not that obscene type of "Transporter", but more realistic and to our joy bloody - and the few scattered heads that we enjoyed in the trailer, enjoy here as well. As for the battle between Foster's hero and giant Jeff Chase, we can hardly call it realistic, but I'm pleased. Overall, director Simon West, who is still waiting to make a second film like "The Daughter of the General," is doing well. Look at one or two dramatic moments solved in some "fashion" visual style, which have no other function than time filling, are another job. On the actors. I have already mentioned Statham and there is nothing more to say. No matter how bad he is, I just can not blame him. Ben Foster is a big fan of me and I am glad that here, although he is in something I would call a typical role, we are not getting the well-known brand of a hot, hysterical psychopath. Donald Sederland appears for about 5-6 minutes, but man is a legend. Bishop's love interest is an absolutely unnecessary image that appears for two minutes - again just for stuffing and for the extra touch of our "image" - but Mini Andean is in the role and is unlikely to be dissatisfied. The only one I'm unhappy with is 100% Tony Goldwood, who is more "typecast" than Statham and Foster. Standard and poor performance!

    That's right. If you are not annoyed by something specific, as happened to me, there is a chance that "The Mechanic" will appeal to you, especially if you like such films and you do not care for anything special. But if you are not fond of Statham movies, for which you know exactly what will happen at any moment, I would not recommend it to you.

    Image source: 1, 2

    Permalink·Open on PeakD ↗·Linked from existing Hive post
  4. The Mechanic (2011) - Movie Review@coldsteem3102d

    image.jpeg

    Jason Statham was cast in the revamped and updated versions of this 1972 Michael Winner Film. I fould have figured Javier Bardem or Benecio Del Toro, but what do I know? One thing I know for sure, the original felt more realistic than the over-the-top remake.

    Arthur Bishop (Charles Bronson) works for a mysterious organization conveniently known as...well, the organization. He is a mechanic, a fixer, or as the profession is more commonly known, a hitman. With his health failing, he takes on an understudy, Steve McKenna (Jan-Michael Vincent), the son of a recently deceased associate.

    image.jpeg

    Arthur has a meticulous approach to his work, thoroughly studying his targets before concocting elaborate plans to make the hits look like accidents or natural causes. He teaches his young apprentice the nuance of their profession. The duo complete several jobs before being dispatched to a job in Italy that is actually a set-up. The pair work together, while remaining suspicious of each other right until the end.

    image.jpeg

    Having the benefit of seeing this classic script rewritten and updated to 21st Century technology, I must say that the original was better. The characters and plot seemed to be more carefully crafted, with personalities and motives that make more sense. The remake changed the dynamics, taking away some of the essence of the characters in the process. Both scripts are solid, with this one moving at a slower pace, but delivering greater credibility. There were a few continuity issues (like shotguns that sound like pistols and never run out of bullets), but the story was solid.

    image.jpeg

    Charles Bronson as a hitman? Now there is a stretch. Cold and aloof, calculating, tough, that is the essence of Charles Bronson in every role I recall. It was a perfect fit. Jan-Michael Vincent was solid as Steve McKenna, although I liked Ben Foster better in the role in the 2011 remake. Bronson and Vincent worked well together.

    The Mechanic was rated PG. Unlike the remake, this verion does not use graphic gratuitous sex and violence to spice things up. It broods a bit more, with heavy stretches of soundtrack taking the place of dialogue and over-the-top visual effects. While this film is about a hitman, it is handled with minimal gore and surprisingly little violence.

    image.jpeg

    While I like this version better, both films deserve ratings in the 6 range. I would give this one the nod, but it wasn't quite "highly recommended" material for me. The sluggish pacing lends greater credibility to the film, but does bog down at times. The dialogue was campy, as one would expect from a 1972 film. This version has a more believable story, with characters who have motives that make sense. If you like the remake, you are bound to enjoy the original. 6.5/10.

    Permalink·Open on PeakD ↗·Linked from existing Hive post