scrobble.life
← Back

Title · no scrobbles indexed yet

The Talented Mr. Ripley

The first scrobble for this title is still propagating, but a community review is already indexed below.

Reviews

Longform community posts about this title

The Talented Mr. Ripley@steemychicken1779d
Permalink·Open on PeakD ↗·Linked from existing Hive post

Comments

No comments yet — be the first.

2 more reviews

  1. Film Review: The Talented Mr. Ripley (1999)@drax1187d

    (source: tmdb.org)

    Alfred Hitchcock used to say that the best films had to have the strongest villain. Few villains were as strong as Tom Ripley, sociopath that serves as main character in the series of novels by American writer Patricia Highsmith. The first in the series, The Talented Mr. Ripley, was adapted to screen four times. The best known adaptation is Purple Soon, 1960 French film which turned Alain Delon into star, followed by 1999 Hollywood film written and directed by Anthony Minghella.

    The plot begins in 1958 America where Tom Ripley (played by Matt Damon), young, impoverished but ambitious young man works as toilet supervisor and makes ends meet by playing piano at weddings and parties for rich elite. He borrows Princeton jacket for one of such occasions, so gets mistaken for former student by shipbuilding magnate Herbert Greenleaf (played by James Rebhorn). Ripley does nothing to correct him, especially after learning why the magnate is interested in him. Greenleaf’s son Dickie (played by Jude Law), former Princeton student, has left to Italy and doesn’t want to return. Ripley is offered 1000 US$ and all travelling expenses paid if he goes there and, using his alleged friendship, talk Dickie into coming back. When Ripley meets Dickie in Italy, he realises why he is reluctant to return to America – as a wealthy and spoiled young man he does nothing other than enjoying beaches, luxurious villas, night clubs, restaurants and hotels with people who belong to the same social circles. Ripley becomes enthusiastic about that way of life and manages to manipulate Dickie and his girlfriend Marge Greenwood (played by Gwyneth Paltrow) into accepting him into their company and allowing him to live at their expense. This idyll, however, is coming to an end when Dickie gets tiresome of Ripley’s company and disturbed with Ripley’s apparent obsession with his rich friend. Ripley is at the end forced to assume Dickie’s identity and take extreme measures to preserve his deception.

    Many critics called The Talented Mr. Ripley a “Hitchockian thriller” although the film, at least in the first half, looks more like psychological drama. Minghella, best known for his “Oscar”-winning (and overrated) epic English Patient, pays great attention to detail description of characters and their surrounding, while the proper thriller content like bloodshed, suspense and intrigues gets covered in the second half. Matt Damon, who has gained stardom with Good Will Hunting, at first didn’t look suitable for the role of suave, charming villain, but at the end of the film his boyish looks and seemingly harmless demeanour makes him more menacing. Jude Law is more effective as young rich man whose great physical looks is at sharp contrast with the shallow character. Philip Seymour Hoffman, who was at the time building reputation as one of the most formidable character actors of his generation, bring another great performance as Dickie’s more intelligent friend Freddie Miles. Actresses fared much worse in this film – a year after winning “Oscar”, Paltrow plays rather thankless role of a girlfriend who only at the end realise with what kind of men she was dealing with. Cate Blanchett plays another not particularly bright socialite in a role that didn’t exist in literary source and was specifically written for this film. Minghella was more fortunate in using picturesque Italian locations (Rome, Venice, Southern Italy) and The Talented Mr. Ripley can be viewed as some sort of homage to 1950s Italy, at least its picture you could get from Hollywood or Fellini’s films. All those who like period settings would probably enjoy this film.

    Minghella, on the other hand, tries a little bit too hard to conform Highsmith’s material to the 1990s notions of “political correctness”, mainly by putting too much emphasis on Ripley’s homosexuality. Unlike Highsmith, which was vague on the issue and considered her character’s sexuality mainly as a tool for manipulations of both men and women, this film considers Ripley’s attraction to men, and especially Dickie, as the main source of his criminality. By having to hide his true nature in those bigoted and intolerant times, Ripley was forced to pretend and deceive, which ultimately led him to fraud and, finally, murder. And, unlike Highsmith, who considered Ripley to be completely amoral, Minghella refuses to treat him as a proper villain and tries to add him redeeming qualities in form of conscience that would ultimately plague him in rather weak and unsatisfying finale. Yet, despite those flaws, good acting, relatively high production quality and likeable period setting would make The Talented Mr. Ripley enjoyable even for audience that doesn’t care much about period thrillers.

    RATING: 6/10 (++)

    Blog in Croatian https://draxblog.com Blog in English https://draxreview.wordpress.com/ Leofinance blog https://leofinance.io/@drax.leo Cent profile https://beta.cent.co/@drax Minds profile https://www.minds.com/drax_rp_nc Uptrennd profile https://www.uptrennd.com/user/MTYzNA

    Unstoppable Domains: https://unstoppabledomains.com/?ref=3fc23fc42c1b417 Hiveonboard: https://hiveonboard.com?ref=drax Bitcoin Lightning HIVE donations: https://v4v.app/v1/lnurlp/qrcode/drax Rising Star game: https://www.risingstargame.com?referrer=drax 1Inch: https://1inch.exchange/#/r/0x83823d8CCB74F828148258BB4457642124b1328e

    BTC donations: 1EWxiMiP6iiG9rger3NuUSd6HByaxQWafG ETH donations: 0xB305F144323b99e6f8b1d66f5D7DE78B498C32A7

    Simple Posted with Ecency footer

    Permalink·Open on PeakD ↗·Linked from existing Hive post
  2. The Talented Mr. Ripley [ENG|ESP]: Valeria's favorite movie | La película favorita de Valeria@cristiancaicedo1877d

    Adaptation of a novel by Patricia Highsmith Adaptación de una novela de Patricia Highsmith

    Yesterday I posted a review of a novel by Patricia Highsmith (Carol) and when I mentioned its film adaptation, I remembered another adaptation of a work of hers that I had seen recently and whose review I had not been posted, so it seemed only fair to share it with you today.

    Ayer subí la reseña de una novela de Patricia Highsmith (Carol) y cuando mencioné su adaptación cinematográfica, recordé otra adaptación de una obra suya que había visto recientemente y cuya reseña no había subido, así que me pareció justo compartirla con ustedes hoy.

    Although I had known for a long time that this movie existed and that it was based on a book by Patricia Highsmith, I had never really wanted to see it, I don't know why. I think I had just seen the poster without reading the synopsis, I didn't know what the story was about and for some reason it couldn't get my attention enough. It wasn't until I had a conversation with Valeria, a Norwegian friend of mine who lives in Oslo, that I was really curious to see it since, according to what she told me, this was her favorite movie in the whole world. A person with whom I had talked about other films and themes in common and that of all that, precisely this was her favorite film; I had to know why, so I decided to watch it and then discuss it with her and see what it was about this story that could amaze a young Nordic woman in her twenties.

    A pesar de que desde hace tiempo sabía que existía esta película y que estaba basada en un libro de Patricia Highsmith, nunca había tenido verdaderas ganas de verla, no sé por qué. Creo que sólo había visto el póster sin leerl la sinopsis, no sabía de qué iba la historia y por alguna razón no lograba captar mi atención lo suficiente. No fue sino hasta que tuve una conversación con Valeria, una amiga Noruega que vive en Oslo, que me dio verdadera curiosidad de verla ya que, según ella me dijo, esta era su película favorita en el mundo. Una persona con la que había hablado de otras películas y temas en común y que de todo eso, precisamente esta fuese su película favorita; tenía que saber por qué, así que decidí verla para luego comentarla con ella y ver qué tenía esta historia que pudiese maravillar a una joven nórdica de veintitantos años.

    Long story short, The Talented Mr. Ripley is the story of an impostor. Set in the late 1950s, the film tells the story of Tom Ripley (Matt Damon), a young Manhattan service company employee who borrows a Princeton jacket to play the piano at an outdoor party, to pretend he went to that prestigious house of studies. When the wealthy owner of the house talks to him, Ripley makes him believe that he not only knows but is a friend and college classmate of his son Dickie (Jude Law). Mythomaniac, playful, joker, Tom makes the comment to defend the prestige (the lie) that surrounds the jacket he's wearing without knowing that this simple comment is going to change his life completely.

    En pocas palabras, The Talented Mr. Ripley es la historia de un impostor. Ambientada a finales de los cincuenta, la película cuenta la historia de Tom Ripley (Matt Damon), un joven empleado de una empresa de servicios de Manhattan que pide prestada una chaqueta de Princeton para tocar el piano en una fiesta al aire libre, para fingir que acudió a esa prestigiosa casa de estudios. Cuando el rico propietario de la casa charla con él, Ripley le hace creer que no sólo conoce sino que es amigo y compañero de universidad de su hijo Dickie (Jude Law). Mitómano, juguetón, bromista, Tom hace el comentario para defender el prestigio (la mentira) que envuelve la chaqueta que lleva puesta sin saber que ese simple comentario va a cambiar su vida por completo.

    But then the father offers him a thousand dollars to go to Italy to convince Dickie to come back home. Being of limited resources and faced with the adventure that the old world and the eternal city represent, Tom decides to accept the proposal. Master in the art of lying, he meets Dickie and makes him believe that they were fellow students and that they just happened to meet in Italy. Generous and kind, Dickie invites him home and Tom realizes that the young man is a playboy and becomes fascinated with the lifestyle that he and his girlfriend Marge (Gwyneth Paltrow) lead, which is why he decides to stay with them.

    Pero entonces, el padre le ofrece mil dólares para que vaya a Italia a convencer a Dickie de que vuelva a casa. Siendo de recursos limitados y ante la aventura que significan el viejo mundo y la ciudad eterna, Tom decide aceptar la propuesta. Maestro en el arte de mentir, conoce a Dickie y le hace creer que fueron compañeros de estudio y que acaban de encontrarse en Italia de casualidad. Generoso y amable, Dickie lo invita a casa y Tom se da cuenta de que el joven es un playboy y se queda fascinado con el estilo de vida que llevan él y su novia Marge (Gwyneth Paltrow), razón por la que decide quedarse con ellos.

    Esta convivencia tiene una alta influencia en Tom quien comienza a querer estar con Dickie y luego acaba deseando ser Dickie. Es difícil explicar lo que sucede sin hacer más spoilers, pero aunque hasta ahora parezca una historia normal, créanme que no lo es. Las más de dos horas que siguen a ese encuentro entre los protagonistas están cargadas de mentiras, enredos, violencia, secretos, asesinatos, desapariciones, excusas dilatorias, enredos amorosos y sobre todo se va formando un conglomerado de mentiras del que a Tom se le hace cada vez más difícil salir. Y por si no fuera suficiente tener a Matt Damon, Gwyneth Paltrow y Jude Law, en la película también aparecen Cate Blanchett y Philip Seymour Hoffman.

    Esta convivencia tiene una alta influencia en Tom quien comienza a querer estar con Dickie y luego acaba deseando ser Dickie. Es difícil explicar lo que sucede sin hacer más spoilers, pero aunque hasta ahora parezca una historia normal, créanme que no lo es. Las más de dos horas que siguen a ese encuentro entre los protagonistas están cargadas de mentiras, enredos, violencia, secretos, asesinatos, desapariciones, excusas dilatorias, enredos amorosos y sobre todo se va formando un conglomerado de mentiras del que a Tom se le hace cada vez más difícil salir. Y por si no fuera suficiente tener a Matt Damon, Gwyneth Paltrow y Jude Law, en la película también aparecen Cate Blanchett y Philip Seymour Hoffman.

    When I asked Valeria why this was her favorite movie she listed several reasons for me: _ "Picturesque. Genius acting. Unexpected plot. And the main protagonist, anti-hero, is really so talented no one sees what's going on. And it teaches a great lesson about how some would love to have what you have. In a bad way"_. I agree with that assessment, I think all that is true, but if I had to describe it in two words it would be unexpected and creepy. The plot twists surprise you and then when you want to know what else is going to happen in the life of this liar Tom Ripley, the movie ends, leaving you with a breath of confusion, wonder, not sure if you liked it or not, if you want to see it again or not, but it kept you glued to the seat for more than two hours, which is no small feat. According to my friend, the movie has a French version that is even creepier than this and makes me very curious, but I haven't seen it yet.

    Cuando le pregunté a Valeria por qué esta era su película favorita me enumeró varias razones: "Pintoresca. Actuaciones geniales. Trama inesperada. Y el protagonista principal, el antihéroe, es realmente tan talentoso que nadie ve lo que está pasando. Y enseña una gran lección sobre cómo a algunos les encantaría tener lo que tienes. De mala manera". Coincido con esa valoración, creo que todo eso se cumple, pero si tuviera que describirla en dos palabras sería inesperada y espeluznante. Los giros de la trama te sorprenden y luego cuando quieres saber qué más va a suceder en la vida de este mentiroso Tom Ripley, la película termina, dejándote un aliento de confusión, de asombro, de no estar seguro si te gustó o no, si quieres verla de nuevo o no, pero te mantuvo pegado al asiento durante sus más de dos horas, lo que no es poca cosa. De acuerdo con mi amiga, la película tiene una versión francesa que es aún más espeluznante que esta y me da mucha curiosidad, pero aún no la he visto.

    Reviewed by | Reseñada por @cristiancaicedo

    Other posts that may interest you:

    Otros posts que pueden interesarte:

    Carol (Libro): una historia de amor de la maestra del misterio |

    --- | ---

    When the wind blows [ENG/ESP]: a touching nightmare / una conmovedora pesadilla |

    Étienne de La Boétie: sobre la esclavitud voluntaria |

    Permalink·Open on PeakD ↗·Linked from existing Hive post