scrobble.life
← Back

Title · no scrobbles indexed yet

The Tree of Life

The first scrobble for this title is still propagating, but a community review is already indexed below.

Reviews

Longform community posts about this title

'The Tree of Life' by Terrence Malick Review: Experimental existentialism@namiks1114d
Permalink·Open on PeakD ↗·Linked from existing Hive post

Comments

No comments yet — be the first.

4 more reviews

  1. The Tree Of Life (2011) | Movie Review@gonklavez91770d

    Movie Thumbnail.png

    Terrence Malick does not like to be rushed. Held in high esteem for great films Days Of Heaven and The Thin Red Line, at the time of release, The Tree Of Life was only the fourth film for which he's stood behind the camera in 33 years. That kind of output makes the Gran Turismo team look Usain Bolt-quick in comparison. Fortunately, he's come back with a truly exceptional piece of work – albeit one that lapses into self-indulgence a little too often.

    This isn't a film for everyone. If you're happiest in front of a Michael Bay flick or regard anything with subtitles as you would an alien interloper, then steer clear. Despite the appearance of stars such as Pitt and Penn, this is not your catch-all blockbuster. It's surreal and challenging – and downright inexplicable in places – but fortunately, the whole that's been created is a beautiful, touching, and unique piece of cinema.

    In essence, it's – and try not to do a little sick into your mouth here – a meditation on the nature and meaning of life. This is primarily told through the story of one family's life in '50s Texas, with Chastain and Pitt raising three young boys while the latter tries to find success as an inventor.

    image.png

    Ruling through fear, Pitt's a fierce disciplinarian – frustrated by his failures, demanding respect, but also fostering resentment in his kids. The emotional notes are intense and well-portrayed, mixing tenderness with explosive outpourings.

    But it's far from a traditional narrative, interspersed with the internal monologue of the eldest child, as well as flash-forwards to him as an adult (played by Penn). It's also prefaced by an extraordinary opening of 40 minutes, both unexpected and breathtakingly beautiful. They set out the questions that the film attempts to explore, such as the individual's place within the universe.

    This is no a lighthearted watch, and some of the footage goes beyond artistic and into pretentious. But it's an enriching experience for those who invest in it. Painful, uplifting, demoralizing, and exquisite all at once, it's a one-of-a-kind work that deserves to be seen. Even if it's so that you can tell people how much you hated it afterward.

    Permalink·Open on PeakD ↗·Linked from existing Hive post
  2. The Tree of Life - Movie Review@smendel2166d

    The Tree of Life centers on a man, Jack, who is looking back on his life and is trying to figure out the meaning of life, and how religion fits into it all.

    image.png source

    Permalink·Open on PeakD ↗·Linked from existing Hive post
  3. The Tree of Life - Movie Review@coldsteem2853d

    Where were you when I laid the earth's foundation? Tell me, if you understand.  Who marked off its dimensions? Surely you know! Who stretched a measuring line across it?  On what were its footings set, or who laid its cornerstone while the morning stars sang together and all the angels shouted for joy?  -Job 36: 4-7.  

    With this biblical scripture begins a surrealist journey into the mind of Terrence Malick.

    Surrealism tells a story in a nontraditional manner.  Thoughts are not screened.  Instead, the full effect of thought and daydream are run out in a series of messages and imagery that form a topic.  At least, that is my interpretation of Surrealism, I am not certain that there is a finite definition of the art form.  Surrealism likes to create dichotomies that can then be juxtaposed for the purpose of comparison and contrast.  Tree of Life examines life through the eyes of one  family, but within the broader context of creation.

    After explaining the concept of creation through Job (which is later reiterated in a Sunday sermon) we meet the eventual mother of this family, Mrs. O'Brien (Jessica Chastain).  Mrs. O'Brien sets up the dichotomy through a series of reflections on lessons "the nuns" taught her.  Among them were the paths of Grace and Nature.  Nature fulfills its own desire while Grace rewards you in the end.  This concept is explored through surreal sequences that depict the creation of our world.

    The creation sequences created their own juxtaposition for me, apart from the story of the O'Briens.  I questioned whether I was watching Intelligent Design or Evolution.  The film appeared to depict a version of creation that had a more Darwinian feel.  Either way, the very act of creating the parallels between creation and evolution pose the question that makes the thought process surreal.  It creates comparison and contrast that can be further debated or mused upon once the film has finished.  I enjoyed that part, but felt a disconnect between the creation story and the O'Briens.

    The O'Briens are depicted as a typical 1950s era family.  They eat meals together, they call their father "sir" and the family dynamic has a formal quality to it.  You may be able to ferret out more symbolism in a stern but loving father (Brad Pitt), but the story really focuses on the eldest son, Jack (Hunter McCracken, Sean Penn).  Jack has many of his fathers qualities.  He realizes that his younger brother RL (Laramie Eppler) is clearly favored by both his parents.  The father appreciates RL's musical gifts while he shares a tenderness with his mother.  Jack is harder.  He has an edginess that never develops the way I thought it might.  Instead, it is RL that lacks the tolerance for the complexities of life.

    The family dynamics are explored a variety of ways, from the sibling relationships to the undercurrent of tension.  The characters have an interesting depth, especially the father figure.  The stern Mr. O'Brien seems short-tempered, yet his passion for music and his twenty-seven patents demonstrate his clearly artistic leanings.  Jack's inherits his father's inner struggles without the talent.  His constant struggles as a twelve-year old are typical and telling.  In the background, the mother continues to question God, who simply answers in dreams of creation, as if he were still addressing Job.

    The Tree of Life relies heavily on imagery to move the story along.  Knowledge of the symbolism used in the film will help your understanding of the message.  The film has a preoccupation with water, which primarily represents life.  Still waters can reflect serenity, while rushing waters (or the ocean) convey strength and power.  In this case, the water generally represents God's (or natures) power and ability to create life.  Interestingly, the Bible mentions water nearly a thousand times.  The film frequently employs doors, which can convey a variety of similar meanings.  In one scene, a child swims through an open door, which (to me) indicates passage from one life to another.  Doors are generally passages and may also convey hope, opportunity, liberation or new life.  When represented simply as a threshold, as it is in the final scene, it is generally a passage between the natural and supernatural (which brings us back to the nature versus grace concept).

    Ultimately, I gave The Tree of Life an Incomplete.  It is a good film on many levels.  The film is stunningly visual, but the message is muted.  While the themes are supported with a minimalist dialogue, the connection between creation and Jack's inner turmoil are never fully connected.  The film uses juxtaposition, but never with the two major themes.  The film opens with God lecturing Job on the wonder of his creation.  That strong opening and reaffirmed concept never fully played out for me alongside Jack's struggle.  There were also sub-plots involving the youngest brother that were never fully explored.

    Tree of Life presented difficult challenges for the cast.  The hushed quality of the dialogue and purely visual aspect of many scenes required careful direction and focused performances.  The cast handled that challenge superbly, but I had trouble hearing the full dialogue at times.  The exceptional soundtrack occasionally drowned out important tidbits of dialogue, which were scarce to begin with.  Pitt was exceptional, but may have been upstaged by the edgy McCracken, who has been surprisingly silent since this film.  For a young actor in his first film, McCracken deserves some accolades.  He was superb.

    I have mixed feelings about The Tree of Life.  As a fan of Salvador Dali, I like surrealism when it is properly done (not that all of his work appealed to me).  For a feature length film (and this one is long at 139 minutes), the film had awkward pacing at times.  The surreal qualities compromised the message, parts of which were lost in the translation.  If the broader themes were tied together somehow, I did not see it.  I enjoyed the performances but wish the soundtrack had not overpowered the subdued dialogue.  Visually, this film is nothing short of incredible.  But I want more than purely visual stimulation from a film.  I want a level of completion, which I felt this film lacked.  Because there were so many positive qualities, I will recommend this film with 6/10.  However, this film is not for everyone.  If you prefer linear stories with cohesive plots, this is not for you.

    Trailer and images subject to copyright.

    Permalink·Open on PeakD ↗·Linked from existing Hive post
  4. "The Tree of Life" by Terrence Malick - movie review@godflesh2939d

    "The Tree of Life" is not a conventional film. You will hear it be defined as a visual poem, prayer or meditation, and each of these definitions will be true. It is also true that it is a journey. A odyssey of the singular origin of creation that our limited consciousness is incapable of rationalizing until the very end of the time when the laws of physics cease to work. And in the midst of this vastness is life that, despite its fragility and timidity, is perhaps the most significant and complex creation of the universe. But how does such a comprehensive philosophical journey begin? It starts with something specific. It starts with death. In the 1950s in the US Midwest, the O'Brien family received news of the untimely death of one of their sons. Years later, the memory of this day causes their eldest son, Jack, living in the sterile, isolated modern world of glass and steel towers, to reevaluate his life, to try to find the answer to the most difficult question "Why "And to reconcile the two eternal warriors in him with the view of life - the path of nature and the way of love that are embodied by his two parents. Father is the raw force of nature - he believes you are weak, you will be crushed, and the only chance you succeed is to be strong and the mother is the way of love - she teaches that the right way is good, to love real and if you help the people around you, you will succeed.

    6873e92450e2a751d0b57a1c4e802987.jpg

    But before Jack came to personal catharsis, the memory of the tragedy and the lost innocence reverberated over time and sent us on an incredible journey to the beginning of the immense universal creation. Here the film undergoes a huge transformation and takes the form of a unique audio-visual impression of the birth and evolution of life. A transformation on a journey calling for the mention of Kubrick's "Space Odyssey" - an equally ambitious film exploring where we came from and where we are going. A journey leading us through the history of the stars and the Earth. Here is the moment that all fans expect, the appearance of dinosaurs. She, of course, is not big, but she is not self-centered, philosophically busy, and has a lot to say, which - I admit - I can not get to a conclusion from one view. Interestingly, however, in the global perspective we look smaller than in the case of sand, it does not in any way diminish the dimensions of human life, but on the contrary, it succeeds in conveying the importance of each individual individual for the achievement of harmony. If you know Malick's work, you will not be wrong with the assumption that the idea of God is an indispensable part of the film. From the initial quotation from Job's book to the frequent appeals to Him in search of an answer and sense of existence (if you've seen at least something about Malick , you know that the conversations are voice behind the frame). This, however, does not mean that the film is some kind of religious confession. No, it is an expression of the material and spiritual symbiosis, the purely scientific understanding of the beginning and the hidden mysterious moment in which everything begins and in which, by chance, the church has found the last refuge.

    tree-of-life-1-1140x584.png

    If all of this seems to you to be overly referenced, philosophical or pseudo-intellectual, you probably have to stay farther from the film, because in its essence it is called this - an attempt to understand the world in which we live and our essence. The film has no conventional dramaturgic structure, no traditional narrative arches, little dialogue, and the characters are not developed the way you would expect to see in a quality drama - yet they are deep and plausible, which is largely due to performance of the actors. Brad Pitt is doing one of his best roles so far, and Jessica Chastain, though not shining, reminiscent of the feminine beginning. If you are not tuned for any movie experiments and deviations from the well-traveled road of romantic comedies and action, it is better not to get on the Tree. For me personally, "The Tree of Life" is one of the most original works I've seen the next few years. I like every angle, the movement of the camera, the natural pictures, the shadows, even the voice behind the picture, and I can not wait to see it again and again, to rediscover it and share it with friends.

    Image source: 1, 2

    Permalink·Open on PeakD ↗·Linked from existing Hive post