scrobble.life
← Back

Title · no scrobbles indexed yet

The Tutor

The first scrobble for this title is still propagating, but a community review is already indexed below.

Reviews

Longform community posts about this title

REVIEW: The Tutor (2023) [ENG - ESP]@aaalviarez916d
Permalink·Open on PeakD ↗·Linked from existing Hive post

Comments

No comments yet — be the first.

1 more review

  1. 'The Tutor' by Jordan Ross Review: Bad, but had potential@namiks1173d

    vlcsnap-2023-04-16-02h21m38s224.png

    The young cast of Stranger Things have a troubling time ahead of them as the massive show that gave them instant fame comes to an end. This cast being thrown into the spotlight almost overnight as they entered their teenage years. But Hollywood's parasitic history has displayed poor results from its once loved child actors as it chews them up and spits them out. For child actors these days, it's most likely a result of a one-time hit. A series that carries them into adulthood rather than multiple feature films. The challenge for these actors is the threat of falling quickly into irrelevancy as that main attraction fades off. How many of them actually have what it takes to make it? Just how much of their established success was purely good luck? A lot of the time these actors sizzle out and move on with their lives, and unfortunately I can't help but feel that we are already witnessing this with this cast as they attempt to find their feet in the already horrific modern film industry. A game of musical chairs that seems to have no winners as of late.

    Noah Schnapp seems to be taking a chance at the industry with a relatively low budget thriller called The Tutor. A film I had no idea existed until maybe five minutes prior to viewing it. Tempted to skip it entirely based on incredibly low reviews, this idea of whether he could actually act came to mind. It wasn't that long ago that I saw another film from one of the Stranger Things teenagers and had similar concerns, ending up actually quite surprised over how decent the film was. I figured it was worth checking out to see just how bad it really is. And, well, it is quite bad. Certainly career killing bad if you're trying to really break it into Hollywood and establish some interest from the hand that feeds. While I do admit it is a very bad film, it likely isn't for reasons one would assume.

    The Tutor

    vlcsnap-2023-04-16-02h56m07s562.png

    The most glaring issue with The Tutor is that the story is just bad. The idea itself is actually quite interesting and certainly has been done before: an unsuspecting individual is pulled away from the safety of their home and thrown into an unfamiliar environment. Quickly this individual notices that things aren't as they initially seem, and slowly discovers a larger puzzle at hand in a slow series of events that pull us along with mystery. Through psychological events the protagonist is toyed with, a victim at hand that seems undeserving based on the setup that introduced the character. The Tutor aims to have you feeling initially for this protagonist: a tutor with a child on the way and with a loving partner takes up some high paying work for some elite. Tutoring a child that seems to have a few difficulties.

    What doesn't work is that the film treats our protagonist like a total fool. He soon discovers a laptop in which photographs of him and his partner can be seen. Where someone had been following him around and taking photographs of his daily life outside. It is evident as to who is responsible, but not really why. Instead of this being an immediate red flag that something is drastically wrong and very strange, it doesn't really have any weight to it in terms of reaction. Our protagonist sort of shrugs it off and continues with staying in this remote location, eventually bringing it up elsewhere as if it's totally normal. We see a scene beforehand which provides a much stronger reaction, though for the wrong reasons. This means that the film has some terrible pacing and emotional weight to the events. What we see and react to for natural reasons, the protagonist we follow seems oblivious or just doesn't really care.

    I would not say this is down to the performances from the actors, but more a problem with the directing. Emotional range is clearly decided upon by the director and the actors are just being guided into what they're being told to do. I looked up the director having never heard of him before, and his work was relatively thin and inexperienced, so this makes quite a lot of sense. Which is unfortunate given the cinematographer actually does quite an impressive job on this film. Visually, the directing and cinematography are quite beautiful, albeit let down by poor guidance towards the actors. The colours and range are very appealing, with cinematography that is immersive with unique perspectives and compositions. We get focus racking to provide depth to the scene as one character stands in the foreground and another in the background. Close-ups of objects with a shallow depth of field to display the performance of certain actions. With a blur to the shots that seems like the lens has been somewhat smeared with grease, only casting our attention to what really matters in the shot. While that last one doesn't sound so appealing, it actually works well to have that sort of bloom under certain lighting conditions. And with specific lighting scenarios and limited colours in the frame, it doesn't pull your attention away at all.

    Again, unfortunately, we fall into poor writing and pacing. The build up of events don't seem to feel all that impactful, even if the performances and reactions do improve. This is because nothing happens and then suddenly everything happens in this film. It jumps between weirdness and chaos too often, trying to be psychological while also trying to be a bit thrilling. But the feeling is far from that. The story halfway through does start to pull you in a bit with some questions as to what's going on and why, but it gets sluggish and gets a bit predictable. This is bad for a film thaf has the runtime it does, while not being too long, it doesn't quite utilise the time it has to maintain your attention and show you events that actually contribute to the mystery. A lot of it seems a bit pointless. I don't think this is a film that suits Schnapp at all, perhaps a bit too old for the sort of character he's playing. Beyond the bratty elite child aesthetic for sure. That said, he wasn't absolutely terrible in this. But it does have me questioning just where he may sit in Hollywood going forward. For low budget thrillers and horrors, this isn't going to work out. Does he have the charisma to really be a lead? The Tutor doesn't even seem to think so, as he has more of a supporting role here.

    I did say the film is quite terrible, but I don't think it's 20% terrible. This is a story and film that hit a few good marks but just failed in such important areas that took it down. This could've been a low budget thriller that worked very well, of which we have seen a few of lately that managed to be hits with both audiences and critics. But teething problems got in the way for director Jordan Ross.

    Join the Movies and TV Shows Community Discord.

    Follow our curation trail!

    Follow me over on Twitter!

    Permalink·Open on PeakD ↗·Linked from existing Hive post