src

My Demon is a fantasy-spiritual South Korean drama series, that revolves around a sham marriage between a heiress and a demon who had lost his powers.

Jung Gu-won, played by Song Kang, was a demon who had lived for decades on Earth, making contracts with humans who were helpless. He made deals with people at the cost of their souls and took them to hell once the deal was fulfilled. But Gu-won's fate took a surprising and drastic turn after he met Do Do-hee.

Do Do-hee was the successor of a conglomerate's future group. She was an independent and hard-working young lady, but lost her parents at a tender age. Regardless, the woman her father worked for when he was alive—Joo Cheon-sook (Kim Hae-sook) took Do-hee in as her grandchild and took care of her. Joo Cheon-sook had children she didn’t trust at all hence, made Do-hee the next leader of her prestigious company. But Do Do-hee was hated by the children of Cheon-sook, they felt threatened by her as she was loved deeply by their Cheon-sook and shared a tight bind with her .

__

To protect herself from danger, Do-hee, as the next heir of the future group, entered a contract marriage with Gu-won. Gu-won, on the other hand, had no option than to agree because his powers mysteriously got transferred to Do Do-hee. And for his survival, he had to ensure the well-being of Do Do-hee until he figured out a way to get his powers back. But this was just the beginning of what seemed like unending battles. They had to work together to triumph!

My Demon has so many twists added to it, it’s an "enemies to lovers" trope. The added twists made the series an even more entertaining and thrilling one. Drops of lighthearted jokes were added also throughout the series and a heartfelt romance wasn't left out.

A blend of romance, love and fantasy. I definitely recommend— 8/10. Available to watch on Loklok.

Thank you very much for your continuous support 🙏

This episode of Revival just went from zero to absolute chaos in the span of forty five minutes and I have mention this before but Im loving this series until although it had a little twist that Im not so sure about, is it Aliens now?. Episode four titled "Run Along Little Lamb" still got me loop into what at the moment is the most interesting problem of the entire series, even aside from the revivers themself, who the F killed Em? and this episode seem to put some light into it, well at least thats what episode three and four have tried. The opening scene alone had me all tense as someone breaks into Professor Aaron's house while his sick wife sleeps, stealing what appears to be crucial evidence that could blow this whole thing wide open, not an action scene but the fact that she is so weak and fragile, most likely the person who got into their house was not aggressive, beside she didnt get to see anyone just felt the person going by. Romy Weltman as Em continues to evolve from confused revivor to someone actively hunting for answers about her own murder, her transformation feels great as she kinda evolve in every aspect and earned rather than forced. Melanie Scrofano also keeps killing the role as Officer Dana Cypress, showing us a woman who refuses to back down even when the investigation puts her directly in danger, the chemistry between these sisters hold together every scene they share. What really gets me a bit worried is the supernatural aspect of this specific episode with what looks like an Alien or some sort of supreme living thing, this confuse me because at the end the revival event was it generated by humans or aliens?

• IMDB: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt13951052/
• Platform: Peacock

The episode keeps going right into the meat of the story with Em finally starting to piece together fragmented memories from the night she died on that bridge. Her relationship with her college professor Aaron becomes very very complicated as we learn more about their affair and how it might connect to her death but it gets worst as the episode keeps going not only we dont know who got into Aaron's house, we dont know what he was working on that keeps burning papers as they were possible proof or something? revival day probably? is his wife really sick? is she a reviver?. Sheriff Wayne continues to deal with the growing prejudice against revivers in his town, his character shows a man trying to maintain order while his own biases cloud his judgment and I wonder where his bias will be the moment he finds out Em is one of them too?. The introduction of mandatory revivor registration feels like a mirror to real world discrimination although from the security stand point considering what happen to Arlene its understandable, there is also that guy in the therapy group who also went rogue for a minute showing his how strong revivors are. Dr Ibrahim played by Andy McQueen brings scientific curiosity to the mix, his relationship both personal and professional with Dana feels like it could be crucial moving forward as they try to understand what exactly happened on revival day, him been the one that always seem to be in the middle of everything, science, discoveries, murder, craziness, Ibrahim is always there.

This episode hits different, everything just clicks together in a way that keeps you invested on the series without feeling like they are trying too hard, every scene cranks up the tension but it never feels forced, just builds naturally as Em starts remembering more about that night she died, piece by piece its all coming together. That whole thing with the ring she puked after coming back, especially when they track it down to some pawn shop and find out somebody ordered it during lockdown and payed way more than what it costs because he knew it could be the downfall to what he did, in this case suppose to kill Em!. Blaine also keeps doing a great job as this weird religious freak lurking around, always popping up at the worst times but sometimes with the right ideas like when he stop Arlene, his whole "revivers are evil but Im doing Gods work" thing is so messed up but it works for the show. CM Punk showing up as one of the Czech brothers was cool, when I first saw him didnt recognize him, they gave him a cool and important role in the short term, you can tell his character is mixed up in some shady shit that goes way beyond this little town, makes you wonder what kind of bigger mess is going on. The way they shoot this episode is pretty solid too, everything feels heavy and dark like something bad is always about to happen, even boring scenes like Dana checking out that garage or Em in therapy feel like someone might get shot any second.

Romy Weltman and Melanie Scrofano really carry this episode on their shoulders as the most part of the series but the thing is that when they are not on scene you dont are not constantly missing them or feel the lack of presence since the rest of the cast is as important, specially on this episode when we get many others from the police force involve, but I cant denied that their sister thing feels so real and you can see how much they care about each other. Em going from this confused girl to someone who is actually fighting for answers feels right, not like they just flipped a switch and made her tough overnight, it builds up naturally as she gets more memories back. Those flashback scenes where Em remembers getting attacked are handled really well, they give you enough to understand what went down without being gross about it or making it feel like torture porn. Dana doing detective work with that rental car and hospital parking thing shows Scrofano knows how to play a cop, she gets that balance between being professional but also personally close to others like when she tells the guy "you nice but so stupid" lol that made me laugh as she tells him to his face and the guy just smiles. Rodie keeps being the emotional support Em needs, their relationship feels natural without rushing into romance bullshit and it feels nice because the cliche is that he would push her into been part of his world but he is not, he always seem like so different and irrelevant to everything is going on with Em's life but at the same time he is very supportive to her. Aaron making those panicked phone calls to somebody we cant see hints at way bigger problems, you can feel how scared he is as everything starts falling apart around him. The episode plays so well with all these different threads really well, nothing gets forgotten or half assed, everything serves the bigger mystery while still feeling important on its own.

The ending in the woods really is everything you want from a mid season episode, when Em, Aaron and Dana all end up there things go to hell real quick and how everything comes together in the very same spot without each one of them knowing exactly whats going to happen, well Aaron did called Dana but she had no clue why and that others would be there, she thought he was going to confes and wanted privacy probably. That first gunshot drops Aaron and for a second you think okay mystery solved but then that second shot changes everything and suddenly both sisters are bleeding in the dirt screaming for help although only one can regenerate. The cliffhanger actually shocked me without feeling like a cheap trick, they earned this moment after building up the emotional connection all season long. What I really dig about Revival is how it manages to be a murder mystery and supernatural horror at the same time without dropping the ball on either side, these writers know how to blend genres without making it feel messy. The whole thing about prejudice and family loyalty and keeping secrets hits without beating you over and over during the season, they trust the audience to get it without spelling everything out. This episode proves Revival has found its sweet spot, everything moves at the right speed, the characters feel real and the mystery keeps getting deeper in ways that make sense. If they keep this quality up we might be looking at one of the best shows of the year, the whole dead people coming back thing combined with solid writing makes it must watch TV. Im giving this episode an 8/10, it hits on every level while setting up what should be a crazy second half of the season, I know Im a bit behind but will caguth up this week.

#skiptvads, #inleo, #hive, #revival, #episode, #recap, #mystery, #murder, #sisters, #supernatural, #investigation, #secrets, #tension, #conspiracy, #revivor, #violence, #cliffhanger, #drama, #characters, #wisconsin, #death, #memories, #professor, #registration, #prejudice, #therapy, #confrontation, #shocking

Posted Using INLEO

Jurassic World Rebirth | Official Trailer

Hello to all my CineTV friends. After watching the movie titled Sultan, I knew for the countless number of times that love is above everything. I was just scrolling through Netflix a few days ago and saw a movie titled, Sultan. Then, I remembered that there is one particular person who told me about this movie sometime ago and I decided to give it a watch.

Sultan centers around what people do for love. Also, it talks about a man who gave up on his career but found an opportunity to take it up again. This means that it’s never too late to be whoever and whatever you want to be.

Image

Movie Plot

Sultan, a middle aged wrestler settles his lonely life in the area of Rewari. Mr Patel, the father of Aakash implores Aakash to travel to Rewari so as to recruit Sultan. On getting to Rewari, Sultan bluntly refuses his offer on recruiting him but something happened.

Sultan meets with Aarfa, a female wrestler and a daughter of a wrestling coach and falls in love with her but he didn’t have what she wanted. Aarfa wanted a well trained wrestler and due to love, Sultan picked up his wrestling career again and the lovers were doing well with their career.

Sadly, Sultan leaves Aarfa who was eight months pregnant to win a gold medal in Turkey. Aarfa gives birth to the child who suffered from Anaemia and died. At last, Sultan reconciled with his wife after series of events and they gave birth to a new baby girl whom Sultan trains as a wrestler.

Sometimes, I wonder if two people pursuing the same career can get married but it looks like that can actually happen. Just like Sultan and Aarfa, I think one thing which made their love to continue to wax stronger despite the challenge they have was because they have the same career.

But, there is something I don’t like about the movie. I feel Aarfa heart is too soft. If I put myself in such position, I would have waited for Sultan to come beg me so things can work well between us again but instead, Aarfa shows up at the hospital where Sultan landed after winning the fight and motivates him to keep fighting. Well, that taught me something that we have to make peace. That was just the best way to end the marital issues they had. In the end, we don’t always have to pay evil for evil. We can always make peace. What I didn’t like about the movie became the greatest lesson to me.

Image

At the same time, this movie has a great influence on me. Normally, when I don’t get to talk to my man, all I ever think of is him going away with another woman. That’s what Aarfa must have thought but that’s not it. He was busy fighting for a prize. Well, he didn’t do the right thing. He wasn’t supposed to leave his wife all to focus on a prize.

I just think it is necessary to ask questions in relationships instead of jumping into conclusion. This is a movie that may require you to compare your marital life or dating life to it.

I didn’t regret watching it and I’ll give it a 8.5/10 rating. When you watch it, you will surely enjoy it.

Good day my fellow Hive users 🤗❤️🙏 Hope you're all doing well and enjoying life’s cinematic adventures 🙂

Introduction & Movie Plot

The movie I’m sharing today is The Unholy Trinity (2024), a gritty and atmospheric Western set against the harsh backdrop of 1870s Montana. Unlike the classic cowboy flicks of the past, this one dives deeper into themes of revenge, redemption, and the complicated morality of frontier justice. It’s a tale where every character is haunted by choices some made for survival, others born out of pain.

source

The story kicks off in a grim, isolated prison where Isaac Broadway (played by Tim Daly) is on death row. Moments before his execution, he proclaims his innocence and leaves his estranged son Henry (Brandon Lessard) with a heavy task: find and kill the man who framed him. With nothing left to lose, Henry sets out for the dusty town of Trinity, determined to uncover the truth and carry out his father’s dying wish.

But things don’t go as planned. Henry expects to confront a notorious outlaw named Saul Butler, but instead finds the town being run by Sheriff Gabriel Dove (Pierce Brosnan), a composed and seasoned lawman with secrets of his own. Soon, Henry’s path crosses with a mysterious and dangerous outlaw named St. Christopher (played by Samuel L. Jackson), a former slave turned feared gunslinger with his own vendetta and connection to a stash of stolen Confederate gold. As alliances shift and truths unravel, Henry must decide what kind of man he wants to be and whether justice is worth the blood it demands.

source

Themes, Characters & Direction

What makes The Unholy Trinity stand out from other Westerns is its moral complexity. It’s not a simple story of good guys and bad guys. Every character is layered, flawed, and driven by personal demons. Henry, the young man at the heart of the story, begins as a lost soul torn between loyalty to a father he barely knew and the desire to forge his own identity. Brandon Lessard brings a mix of vulnerability and quiet determination to the role that makes him believable and relatable.

Pierce Brosnan, as Sheriff Dove, adds weight and gravitas to the film. He’s not your typical lawman he’s calm, reflective, and clearly burdened by a past that complicates his present. His interactions with Henry feel authentic and meaningful, often more about emotional tension than gunplay.

source

Samuel L. Jackson is the film’s powerhouse. As St. Christopher, he walks a fine line between villain and avenger. He’s charismatic, dangerous, and unpredictable, often stealing every scene he’s in with just a glare or a chilling line of dialogue. His character represents the raw anger and mistrust that grew from centuries of oppression, and his presence gives the film an edge that most Westerns don’t dare to touch.

Visually, the film is striking. Director Richard Gray makes excellent use of Montana’s open landscapes long stretches of prairie, old churches, run-down saloons, and muddy streets. The cinematography captures the loneliness and wildness of the frontier, while the slow-burning soundtrack enhances the emotional undercurrent. There’s an intentional stillness in many scenes, allowing the tension to build gradually rather than relying on constant action.

source

Final Thoughts

The Unholy Trinity is not your typical shoot-’em-up Western. It’s slower, more reflective, and more interested in human flaws than cowboy bravado. That’s not to say it lacks action there are shootouts, standoffs, and plenty of high-stakes moments but they are woven into a larger narrative about guilt, justice, and choosing your own path.

While some critics have noted the film’s dialogue can be uneven at times, and the pacing may feel slow for those expecting a more action-packed Western, its strength lies in its character development and emotional tension. The performances particularly from Jackson and Brosnan elevate the film, making it worth the watch even when the story dips into familiar territory.

If you’re a fan of morally complex stories set in the Old West, or if you enjoy watching legendary actors take on roles with emotional weight, then The Unholy Trinity might just be your next favorite film. It’s a movie that sticks with you, not because of flashy visuals or explosive endings, but because of the difficult questions it asks about justice, revenge, and redemption.

A Necessary Introduction

If the question “would you rather marry a rich yet emotionally absent partner or marry a relatively wealthy but emotionally present partner” arises, a good number of people would rather marry rich because money rules the world right? This is a controversial topic to discuss but in the end, everyone knows what they want and it's okay to go for that.

Another controversial question would be “why do people get married?” Is it because they are lonely, hopeful or simply because everyone is getting married around them and hence it seems like a good thing to do? Many of such controversial and thought provoking questions were stirred up in my mind after seeing the movie I'll be making a review of today—Materialists.

About The Movie

Materialists is a modern romantic drama that centers around Lucy, a matchmaker navigating the intricacies of the dating world in New York. Lucy tries to always ensure that anyone who contracts her is satisfied with their matches but Lucy is lagging behind in her own romantic life. Entangled in a love triangle with her ex-boyfriend and a charming millionaire, Lucy must decide what she truly wants for herself; love or money.

Released on the 13th of June, 2025, this romance comedy (rom-com) movie features veteran actors like Dakota Johnson as Lucy, Pedro Pascal as Harry and Chris Evans as John. The movie was directed by Celine Song and has a runtime of about 1 hour and 57 minutes.

My Opinion

The movie explores themes of love, marriage and materialism. Asides from the themes, the movie questions whether genuine happy long lasting relationships can occur in a society where partners are often evaluated like commodities—based on criteria like wealth, height and even the colour of their skin. This offers observations on the modern dating scenes where many people are tied between cold calculations versus the hopeful persistence of love.

The tone of Materialists is more sophisticated and grounded than typical rom-coms with moments of warmth and humour alongside darker, more dramatic turns including candid discussions of challenges in relationships. This– lack of vulnerability in relationships– happens to be one of the leading causes of failed relationships and I was absolutely thrilled when this movie portrayed the importance of having certain uncomfortable conversations with our partners. The movie went ahead to show how easy this makes things.

Dakota Johnson delivered a very strong performance as Lucy, balancing confidence with vulnerability. This was really captured when she was caught between two men; a wealthy and charming Harry and her ex, John. The three lead actors in this film performed pretty well and they somehow manage to blend rom-com with serious emotional depth.

The movie has a visually absorbing quality, capturing the different moods of New York City. The sound effects and music compliment every scene beautifully, enhancing the movie’s atmosphere. The dialogues also stand out as one of the movie’s strengths.

One moral lesson I picked from the movie is that when the heart truly connects with someone, loving that person would be the easiest thing. Love shouldn't be forced or bought.

Recommendation and Rating

Materialists is a compelling rom-com movie that thoughtfully questions the intersections of love and materialism in today’s dating world, anchored by solid performances by the casts. However, it wasn't a memorable watch for me as I'm not a big fan of rom-coms. I would give the movie a 7 out of 10 rating.

If you enjoy romantic comedies with substance, Materialist would be a good watch for you.

^{Image 1 Image 2 Image 3}

LIEBE🤍

Nuevamente, un film basado en el héroe más icónico de los comics ha llegado a las salas de cine; "Superman", película dirigida y escrita por James Gunn, oficialmente da comienzo al "DC Universe" en su etapa cinematográfica relatando una nueva historia que no es completamente de orígenes, pero que si demuestra el difícil comienzo que deberá transitar un alienígena quien está destinado a ser el gran salvador de la humanidad.

Once again, a film based on the most iconic comic book hero has hit theaters; "Superman", directed and written by James Gunn, officially kicks off the "DC Universe" in its cinematic phase, telling a new story that is not entirely about origins, but does show the difficult start that an alien destined to be the great savior of humanity must go through.

En este nuevo film, Gunn tenía primeramente el gran trabajo de crear una versión de Superman que sea aceptada por acérrimos fans y capte la atención de nuevos; personalmente sin ser un hardcore fan, ni mucho menos uno nuevo, la versión del gran héroe para el comienzo de este nuevo proyecto es la mejor, es la necesaria porque inmediatamente te demuestra el simbolismo que tiene el personaje para el mundo, el cual es primordialmente de esperanza, un símbolo de ayuda, lo cual es lo que justamente representa al personaje, pero no es solo eso, ya que se deja atrás esa imagen de divinidad y se genera una conexión con la humanidad, aceptado por muchos y sí, también aborrecido por otros, lo cual es lo que siempre he considerado como correcto porque es un reflejo real de la sociedad tanto en el momento de creación del personaje como en la actualidad; estos aspectos en dónde le sumo que es un héroe inexperto, pasional, con la afirmación de creer fielmente en el bien y que recibe ayuda cuando más la necesita, puedo decir que es una excelente versión por parte de James Gunn.

Lo interesante de que no es una historia de origen, es que permite al espectador presenciar como los protagonistas deben cumplir con roles a causa de los motivos que impulsan o influyen en cada uno de sus actos; por ejemplo, Superman cree fielmente en que fue enviado a La Tierra a ser su protector y salvador, en cambio, "Lex Luthor", cree que como humano tiene la inteligencia y recursos para salvar a su especie; esto genera el gran enfrentamiento entre ambos en dónde es cierto que se explora más los motivos antes dicho desde el punto de vista del héroe, pero eso no evita que el personaje de Lex tenga un importante protagonismo y sea de los puntos que más he admirado del film; siempre he creído que para que un héroe funcione, su contraparte debe ser una verdadera y gran amenaza y en esta ocasión, la manera de escribir a ese personaje es la mejor aunque me sucedió así como con Superman y es que todavía no se está ni de cerca del potencial de ambos y eso me genera aún más expectativas para el futuro.

In this new film, Gunn first had the daunting task of creating a version of Superman that would be accepted by die-hard fans and capture the attention of new ones. Personally, without being a hardcore fan, much less a new one, I think the version of the great hero at the beginning of this new project is the best, and it's necessary because it immediately shows you the symbolism that the character has for the world, which is primarily one of hope, a symbol of help, which is precisely what the character represents. But it is not only that, as it leaves behind that image of divinity and creates a connection with humanity, accepted by many and, yes, also hated by others, which is what I have always considered to be correct because it is a true reflection of society both at the time of the character's creation and today. these aspects, to which I add that he is an inexperienced, passionate hero who faithfully believes in good and receives help when he needs it most, I can say that it is an excellent version by James Gunn.

The interesting thing about it not being an origin story is that it allows the viewer to witness how the protagonists must fulfill roles because of the motives that drive or influence each of their actions. For example, Superman faithfully believes that he was sent to Earth to be its protector and savior, while Lex Luthor believes that as a human, he has the intelligence and resources to save his species. This leads to the great confrontation between the two, where it is true that the aforementioned motives are explored more from the hero's point of view, but that does not prevent Lex's character from playing an important role, which is one of the things I admired most about the film. I have always believed that for a hero to work, his counterpart must be a real and great threat, and on this occasion, the way that character is written is the best, although I felt the same way about Superman, and that is that neither of them is even close to reaching their full potential, which makes me even more excited about the future.

Con respecto a quien considero un protagonista más de la historia, el diseño de la ciudad de Metrópolis es excelente, la arquitectura de sus grandes y números edificios, lo multicultural de sus también numerosos habitantes, es algo que me pareció correcto, ya que es el lugar de muchas aventuras a ocurrir y me gustó la decisión de que las escenas de acción ocurrieran en pleno día lo cual provee excelente iluminación, colorido y mejor captación para el espectador. Las escenas de vuelo por parte de Superman son excelentes, me gustó que Gunn use diferentes perspectivas para captar la manera de volar en dónde se percibe en momentos que son calmadas, pero a la vez son frenéticas, algo que también depende de la situación; otro aspecto que me agradó fue las escenas de peleas, todas son excelentes, existe un uso bueno del CGI en los combates, son muy dinámicas y me gusta que los rivales de Superman sean una amenaza para él y posiblemente mi única crítica negativa sea al diseño de escenografías en dónde creo que se puedo hacer algo mucho mejor, pero de igual manera Gunn genera escenas que son tomadas directamente tanto del comic como de series animadas de Superman.

Regarding what I consider to be another protagonist of the story, the design of the city of Metropolis is excellent. The architecture of its large and numerous buildings and the multicultural nature of its equally numerous inhabitants seemed appropriate to me, as it is the setting for many adventures. I liked the decision to have the action scenes take place in broad daylight, which provides excellent lighting, color, and better visibility for the viewer. The flying scenes featuring Superman are excellent. I liked that Gunn uses different perspectives to capture the way he flies, which at times feels calm but at other times frenetic, depending on the situation. Another aspect I liked was the fight scenes, which are all excellent. there is good use of CGI in the fights, they are very dynamic, and I like that Superman's rivals are a threat to him. Possibly my only negative criticism is the set design, where I think something much better could have been done, but even so, Gunn creates scenes that are taken directly from both the comic and the animated Superman series.

En un film en dónde no es perfecto para quienes esperaban una historia superépica, estoy seguro de que es el correcto comienzo no solamente para el ahora conocido como "DCU", sino para el personaje en sí, ya que según palabras del mismo Gunn, cada historia dentro de ese universo tendrá total dependencia y espero que así sea porque este film me generó expectativas a futuro, creo que es necesario ver a Superman/Clark Kent, crecer como persona y por supuesto como héroe y esto lo digo porque el mensaje esperanzador y humano que refleja está historia, que es repetidamente dicho y muy bien interpretado por David Corenswet, es necesario que en el futuro muestre liderazgo que su influencia sea mayor para todos, que no sea un solo hombre quien ayude a Superman a levantarse después de una batalla, que sean muchos más que estén a su lado y ese sentimiento que la película generó en mí es lo que hace que tenga nuevamente ganas de ver películas basadas en comics, que se  recupere o retomar esa sensación de quien lee o quien ve series animadas, que sea reconocible y que genere una nostalgia correcta, eso es lo que espero de futuras producciones en este nuevo universo de DC Comics. Antes de cerrar está reseña, resaltaré la manera brevemente en que Gunn demostró la relación de Clark junto a sus padres terrícolas o como muchos dicen, con sus verdaderos padres, en realidad señaló la relación entre Jhonatan Kent y su hijo, esa escena fue algo especial, fue profunda, de las mejores que tiene el film, una conversación verdadera llena de sentimiento, de preocupación, pero a la vez con las palabras necesarias en el momento adecuado, son frases de apoyo, llenas de orgullo y de amor incondicional de un padre a su hijo; ese fue mi momento favorito del film porque me hizo recordar mis conversaciones con mi padre y estoy seguro de que a él le hubiera gustado está película.

In a film that isn't perfect for those who were expecting a super-epic story, I'm sure it's the right start not only for what is now known as the "DCU," but also for the character himself, since, in the words of Gunn himself, every story within that universe will be completely dependent on it, and I hope that's the case because this film has generated expectations for the future. I think it's necessary to see Superman/ Clark Kent** grow as a person and, of course, as a hero. I say this because the hopeful and human message reflected in this story, which is repeatedly stated and very well interpreted by David Corenswet, is that in the future he needs to show leadership so that his influence is greater for everyone. It should not be just one man who helps Superman get up after a battle; but many more who are by his side. That feeling that the film generated in me is what makes me want to see comic book-based films again, to recover or recapture that feeling of reading or watching animated series, to make it recognizable and generate the right kind of nostalgia. That is what I hope for from future productions in this new DC Comics universe. Before closing this review, I will briefly highlight the way in which Gunn showed Clark's relationship with his Earth parents, or as many say, with his real parents. In reality, he pointed out the relationship between Jonathan Kent and his son. that scene was something special, it was profound, one of the best in the film, a real conversation full of feeling, concern, but at the same time with the right words at the right time, phrases of support, full of pride and unconditional love from a father to his son; that was my favorite moment in the film because it reminded me of my conversations with my father, and I'm sure he would have liked this movie.

Cover image edited in canva; the image was taken from the following source