scrobble.life
← Back

Title · no scrobbles indexed yet

To Be or Not to Be

The first scrobble for this title is still propagating, but a community review is already indexed below.

Reviews

Longform community posts about this title

Film Review: To Be or Not to Be (1942)@drax1011d
Permalink·Open on PeakD ↗·Linked from existing Hive post

Comments

No comments yet — be the first.

3 more reviews

  1. Film Review: To Be or Not to Be (1983)@drax1741d

    (source: tmdb.org)

    Phrase “pointless remake” is these days associated with lack of creative ideas within major Hollywood studios, but at times it can be applied to the works of talented and accomplished film makers who should have known better. One such person is Mel Brooks, immensely successful actor, producer, screenwriter and director, who in decided to produce his own version of To Be or Not to Be, 1942 Hollywood black-and-white WW2 comedy by Ernst Lubitsch which is nowadays considered to be one of that era’s classics. The new version, released in 1983, was directed by famous choreographer and Brooks’ long time associate Alan Johnson.

    The plot begins in August 1939. The protagonists are Frederick Bronski (played by Mel Brooks) and his wife Anna (played by Anne Bancroft), two main stars of their own Warsaw theatre company. Frederick is prone to overacting, especially when he is playing Hamlet at stage. And that is usually the time when his wife backstage is visited by Lt. Sobinski (played by Tim Matheson), dashing Polish air force officer who is in love with her. Bronskis’ martial problem are soon overshadowed by more important events like German invasion of Poland and start of World War Two. Poland is quickly defeated and Warsaw occupied and Bronski’s company struggles to survive under Nazi regime. Sobinski has managed to escape Nazis and join Polish squadron within British RAF. There he realises that resistance figure Professor Siletski (played by José Ferrer) is actually a German double agent, so his superiors order him back to Poland in a desperate bid to prevent Siletski from giving the list of resistance members of Gestapo. Sobinski kontakt Bronskis after which they use their acting talents in complicated and dangerous ruse first against Siletski, then against Gestapo Colonel Erhardt (played by Charles Durning).

    More than four decades since the original version Brooks and Johnson were trying to improve film with elements Lubitsch could not. The most obvious was use of colour (too expensive and too precious technology for Hollywood in early 1940s) and less obvious was character of Anna Bronski’s dresser being changed from a woman into flaming homosexual (played by James Haake). This allowed the film to become one of the first Hollywood production to deal with the subject of Nazi persecution of homosexuals and, indirectly, with the Holocaust, in the scenes depicting Bronski and members of his troops hiding Jewish families from Nazis. This gives Brooks’ version of To Be or Not to Be seriousness that original version haven’t got. In 1942, when Lubitsch made his film, Poland is still under German occupation and the real volume of Nazi genocidal barbarity was not generally known. Unlike Lubitsch, who could have allowed himself luxury to make his film as light-hearted comedy in which Nazis were portrayed as pathetic buffoons, Brooks had to be more careful. Brooks’ task is even harder because he decided to stick with the original script as much as possible. Result is film that indulges in too much theatricality, and this is most visible in quality of acting, which often goes overboard, especially in the case of otherwise fine character actor Charles Durning. Apart from Brooks’ real wife Anne Bancroft, who successfully plays femme fatale, few members of cast leave particularly good impression. To Be or Not to Be is somewhat entertaining but, in the end of the day, not particularly inspired film and it could be recommended only to those who haven’t seen the original version.

    RATING: 5/10 (++)

    Blog in Croatian https://draxblog.com Blog in English https://draxreview.wordpress.com/ Leofinance blog https://leofinance.io/@drax.leo Cent profile https://beta.cent.co/@drax Minds profile https://www.minds.com/drax_rp_nc Uptrennd profile https://www.uptrennd.com/user/MTYzNA

    Hiveonboard: https://hiveonboard.com?ref=drax Rising Star game: https://www.risingstargame.com?referrer=drax 1Inch: https://1inch.exchange/#/r/0x83823d8CCB74F828148258BB4457642124b1328e

    BTC donations: 1EWxiMiP6iiG9rger3NuUSd6HByaxQWafG ETH donations: 0xB305F144323b99e6f8b1d66f5D7DE78B498C32A7

    Simple Posted with Ecency footer

    Permalink·Open on PeakD ↗·Linked from existing Hive post
  2. To Be or Not to Be - Movie Review@smendel2063d

    I've seen several Mel Brooks movies over the years and I tend to enjoy them. I have added some of them to my movie collection, but I don't own them all. I recently watched To Be or Not to Be again when I found it on HBO.

    source
    Permalink·Open on PeakD ↗·Linked from existing Hive post
  3. Insomniac Film Festival #42: To Be or Not To Be@rvgenaille2983d

    image Mel Brooks! Anne Bancroft! In a film not directed by Brooks but still pretty good. The couple are a famous, theatrical couple in Warsaw, Poland in 1939, as the Nazi war machine rolls into the country, launching World War II. The gist of the story is a Polish bomber pilot, the performers and their theatrical troupe seek to escape Poland.

    They also work to stop the Polish underground from being exposed.

    Hijinks ensue. image Much more low key than usual for a film starring Mel Brooks but it is still an entertaining. There is a lot of darkness here and Brooks actually gives a performance with more depth than I’m used to seeing from him.

    Surprisingly Good. Worth the watch.

    image -all photos via IMDb.com.

    Permalink·Open on PeakD ↗·Linked from existing Hive post