Longform reviews of films, TV, anime, books, and audiobooks, written by the scrobble.life community and published to the Hive blockchain, so each one is owned by its author and can earn rewards from readers. 60,001 reviews and counting.
Hola mi gente bella de internet, y de esta gran plataforma, un gran abrazo les mando a todos y les deseo un feliz dia, y espero que disfruten de la ediciòn de la revista del dia de hoy.
Portada realizada por mi.
INTRODUCCIÒN.
-
La italianita fue emitida por RCTV entre el 10 de marzo y el 28 de abril de 1973, una adaptación de una historia original de Inés Rodena, dramatizada por Ana Mercedes Escámez, bajo la dirección de Juan Lamata.
-Título: La Italianita.
-Canal: RCTV.
-Emisión original: Del 10 de marzo al 28 de abril de 1973.
-Número de episodios: 55.
-Historia original: Inés Rodena, adaptada por Ana Mercedes Escámez.
-Dirección: Juan Lamata.
-Protagonistas: Marina Baura como Rina Galeana de Zubizarreta, Elio Rubens como Carlos Augusto.
-Elenco Destacado en la trama:
Entre los intérpretes principales y secundarios se encuentran:
Amalia Pérez Díaz (Doña Rafaela), América Barrios (Dionisia), Wendy Torres (Bettina), Edmundo Valdemar (Don Carmelo), Marisela Berti (Zarina), María Antonieta Gómez, Humberto Tancredi (Javier), Carlos Olivier (Daniel), Alberto Marín (Chicho), Violeta González (Rosario), Luis Calderón (Don Leopoldo), Helianta Cruz (Norita) y Agustina Martín (María Julia).
Rina es una joven de origen humilde que lucha por cuidar de su familia en medio de la pobreza y dificultades. Cierta vez ofrece un boleto de lotería al adinerado y enfermo Don Leopoldo, quien, intrigado, la convence de ir a vivir en su mansión. Tras el fallecimiento del anciano, Rina se convierte en su heredera, lo que desencadena la envidia de Doña Rafaela, quien intentará manipular la situación para que su hijo Carlos Augusto se case con ella y así apoderarse de la fortuna. Rina, ingenua y bondadosa, se ve envuelta en conflictos de clase, traición y corazones en disputa, sin sospechar que una mujer acomodada en París, María Julia, es en realidad su madre biológica.
La italianita obtuvo una audiencia cercana al 39 %, consolidándose como un éxito para RCTV en ese horario vespertino . La actuación de Marina Baura en el papel de Rina destacó por su sensibilidad, proyectando inocencia y coraje. Elio Rubens, en una de sus primeras figuras protagónicas, aportó profundidad emocional a su personaje masculino . El guion, clásico y emotivo, incorporó elementos populares del melodrama venezolano: conflicto de clases, herencias ocultas, mujeres fuertes y traiciones familiares, que lograron conectar con gran parte del público.
Además, el éxito de esta producción inspiró múltiples adaptaciones internacionales, incluyendo la mexicana Rina (1977), María Mercedes (1992), Inocente de ti (2004) y versiones brasileñas y filipinas, subrayando su importancia narrativa.
La italianita es un clásico emblemático del melodrama venezolano. Su mensaje sobre la resiliencia frente a la pobreza, la injusticia y la búsqueda de identidad encarnado por una joven humilde, hizo de esta telenovela una pieza inolvidable y una fuente de inspiración para generaciones posteriores.
Esta novela a pesar de que no consegui muchas imagenes de la trama y de losprotagonistas juntos, es una obra que inspiro para que otras versiones salieran luego a la luz en otros paises, por lo tanto tal es de gran importancia en la tv Venezolana. Espero les guste y les traiga recuerdos esta historia, dejame en comentarios si sabias de esta telenovela. Bendiciones.
Back in Action se estrenó en Netflix hace unos meses pero no vi mucha bulla o sería que yo no andaba my pendiente de esa peli y por eso no le paré, la verdad no es tan mala como pensaba que iba a ser la verdad. Cameron Diaz y Jamie Foxx regresan a la pantalla después de años haciendo los papeles de Emily y Matt, son dos ex espías de la CIA que ahora viven tranquilos como familia normal hasta que un video viral de la hija los expone y tienen que volver a la acción para proteger a sus hijos y recuperar una llave tecnologica super importante. La historia no es nada del otro mundo de hecho es predecible desde el primer minuto, pero funciona bien para cuando uno quiere algo rápido y fácil sin tener que pensar mucho, tiene una mezcla de acción con comedia y drama familiar que aunque no siempre funciona perfecta al menos mantiene la atención y no te aburre. Lo que más me gusto fue ver a estos dos actores como dos padres normales que de repente tienen que volver a sus viejas mañas de espías, aunque la química entre ellos a veces no cuadra mucho como si no estuvieran completamente convencidos de lo que están haciendo. Los hijos están ahí mas que todo para crear el conflicto familiar tipico, la hija adolescente rebelde que se mete en problemas y el hermano menor super inteligente con tecnología son ese tipo de personajes que funcionan para la historia pero que no tienen mucho desarrollo.
Seth Gordon dirigió esta cosa y aunque no hace nada revolucionario si mantiene un ritmo decente durante el tiempo que dura con persecuciones, peleas y ese ambiente de película familiar que hace que sea fácil de tragarse. Los efectos especiales están bien para lo que es, nada espectacular pero tampoco se ven baratos y las escenas de acción son predecibles pero no están mal, sobretodo cuando tienen que huir con los niños y toda esa locura de ir corriendo de un lado para otro. Glenn Close aparece como la mama de Emily y Jamie Demetriou hace del novio británico medio tonto pero gracioso son personajes secundarios que le dan un poco de color a la película aunque son equis solo están y ya, en general todos los actores funcionan bien. Lo que no me gustó es que hay algunas escenas que son muy forzadas, como que las pusieron allí solo para avanzar la trama y hay algunos momentos de comedia que dan mas pena ajena que risa, pero bueno es lo que pasa con este tipo de peliculas de Netflix que quieren agradar a todo el mundo al mismo tiempo. El que hace de malo tampoco es gran cosa, otro malo común y corriente más que quiere la llave para hacer maldades sin mucha motivación interesante, Kyle Chandler hace lo que puede con el papel pero el personaje está escrito muy básico.
Creo que lo que mejor funciona de Back in Action es cuando se enfoca en la dinámica familiar, en los momentos donde los padres tienen que explicarles a los hijos que son espías retirados y como toda la familia se adapta a esta nueva realidad loca que se les viene encima. Cameron Diaz se ve cómoda volviendo a actuar después de tanto tiempo fuera y auqneu no es su mejor actuación pero demuestra que todavía tiene esa chispa que la hizo famosa, Jamie Foxx la acompaña bien aunque a veces parece que está en piloto automático haciendo lo mínimo necesario para que su personaje funcione. Hay algunas persecuciones en carro que son buenas y peleas que se sienten reales sin caer en exageraciones ridiculas, aunque si hay algunos momentos donde la lógica se va por la ventana más cuando se supone que llevan dos años retirados pero siguen peleando como si fuera ayer. Los diálogos entre los personajes principales tienen sus momentos buenos me gustó cuando hablan de ser padres normales tratando de proteger a sus hijos, pero también hay partes donde se nota que el guión no sabe muy bien que hacer con tantos personajes y situaciones. Aunque en lo técnico la peli se ve bien sentí que le falta esa personalidad que diferencia las buenas películas de las que solo cumplen su función.
Se nota que Back in Action es una película de entretenimiento familiar con un poco de acción y comedia sin ser más nada solo funciona perfecto para pasar un rato sin complicarse la vida, no vas a quedar pensando en temas profundos ni recordando frases memorables pero tampoco vas a sentir que perdiste el tiempo viendo algo completamente malo. Es el tipo de película que Netflix hace muy bien, producciones que se ven bien y tienen actores conocidos pero que al final no dejan mucha huella, yo la vi un doingo cuando no sabía que poner y me provocaa algo ligero para ver con mi hijo. Como a mi me gusta Cameron Diaz y Jamie Foxx me divertí viéndolos aunque aquí ninguna de sus actuaciones me voló la cabeza. Lo bueno es que la historia se desarrolla de manera fluida sin altibajos dramáticos y manteniendo un tono consistente que y el final aunque es predecible deja las cosas resueltas sin grandes sorpresas pero tampoco con cabos sueltos molestos en este tipo de películas que son tan sencillas. kLa peli se dedica a ser lo que es y ya no es mas pero tampoco menos como te dije es para esos días donde solo quieres relajarte y ver algo que no te exija mucho mentalmente pero que si te mantenga entretenido durante un rato.
Yo le doy un 6.5/10 a Back in Action porque no es una peli mala solo que tampoco es algo que vaya a recordar mucho tiempo, es entretenida mientras la ves pero se olvida fácil una vez que se termian. La recomiendo si eres fan de las películas de acción familiar o si simplemente quieres ver el regreso de Cameron Diaz a la pantalla después de tantos años pero eso sí no la veas esperando una obra maestra porque vas a quedar decepcionado. Para lo que es, una película de Netflix hecha para el consumo masivo, cumple su función y probablemente se convertirá en una de esas películas que pones cuando no sabes que ver, especialmente si te gustan las historias donde los padres tienen que proteger a sus hijos mientras lidian con su pasado. Si tienes expectativas bajas y solo buscas pasar un buen rato sin pensar mucho Back in Action te va a funcionar perfecto, pero si buscas algo mas original te recomiendo que veas otra cosa porque esta película se queda en lo seguro sin arriesgar nada nuevo.
Back in Action was released on Netflix a few months ago but I didn't see much buzz or maybe I wasn't paying attention to this movie and that's why I didn't pay attention to it, it's really not as bad as I thought it was going to be. Cameron Diaz and Jamie Foxx return to the screen after years playing the roles of Emily and Matt, they are two former CIA spies who now live quietly as a normal family until a viral video of their daughter exposes them and they have to return to action to protect their children and recover a super important technological key. The story is nothing to write about, in fact it's predictable from the first minute, but it works well for when you want something quick and easy without having to think too much, it has a mix of action with comedy and family drama that although it doesn't always work perfectly at least it keeps your attention and doesn't bore you. What I liked the most was to see these two actors as two normal parents who suddenly have to go back to their old spy ways, although the chemistry between them sometimes doesn't quite work as if they are not completely convinced of what they are doing. The kids are there mostly to create the typical family conflict, the rebellious teenage daughter who gets into trouble and the super-smart tech-savvy younger brother are the kind of characters that work for the story but don't get much development.
Seth Gordon directed this thing and while it doesn't do anything revolutionary it does maintain a decent pace for the duration with chases, fights and that family movie vibe that makes it easy to swallow. The special effects are okay for what it is, nothing spectacular but they don't look cheap either and the action scenes are predictable but not bad, especially when they have to run away with the kids and all that crazy running around. Glenn Close appears as Emily's mom and Jamie Demetriou plays the British boyfriend who is kind of dumb but funny, they are secondary characters that give a little color to the movie even though they are just a couple, in general all the actors work well. What I didn't like is that there are some scenes that are very forced, like they put them there just to advance the plot and there are some moments of comedy that give more grief than laughter, but well that's what happens with this type of Netflix movies that want to please everyone at the same time. The guy who plays the bad guy isn't much either, just another run-of-the-mill bad guy who wants the key to do evil without much interesting motivation, Kyle Chandler does what he can with the role but the character is written very basic.
I think what works best about Back in Action is when it focuses on the family dynamics, the moments where the parents have to explain to the kids that they are retired spies and how the whole family adapts to this crazy new reality coming upon them. Cameron Diaz looks comfortable returning to acting after so long away and auqneu is not her best performance but shows she still has that spark that made her famous, Jamie Foxx accompanies her well although at times it seems like he is on autopilot doing the minimum necessary to make her character work. There are some good car chases and fights that feel real without falling into ridiculous exaggerations, although there are some moments where logic goes out the window when they are supposed to have been retired for two years but are still fighting like it was yesterday. The dialogues between the main characters have their good moments I liked when they talk about being normal parents trying to protect their children, but there are also parts where you can tell that the script does not know very well what to do with so many characters and situations. Although technically the movie looks good, I felt that it lacks that personality that differentiates good movies from those that only fulfill their function.
You can tell that Back in Action is a family entertainment movie with a bit of action and comedy without being anything more just works perfect to spend some time without complicating life, you will not be left thinking about deep issues or remembering memorable phrases but you will not feel that you wasted your time watching something completely bad. It's the kind of movie that Netflix does very well, productions that look good and have known actors but in the end don't leave much of an impression, I watched it one doingo when I didn't know what to put on and it provoked me something light to watch with my son. Since I like Cameron Diaz and Jamie Foxx I had fun watching them although neither of their performances here blew my mind. The good thing is that the story develops smoothly without dramatic ups and downs and maintaining a consistent tone that and the ending although predictable leaves things resolved without big surprises but not with annoying loose ends in this type of movies that are so simple. kThe movie is dedicated to be what it is and is no more but no less as I said it is for those days where you just want to relax and watch something that does not demand much mentally but that if you keep you entertained for a while.
Source
I give Back in Action a 6.5/10 because it's not a bad movie, it's just not something I'm going to remember for a long time, it's entertaining while you watch it but it's easy to forget once it's over. I recommend it if you are a fan of family action movies or if you just want to see the return of Cameron Diaz to the screen after so many years but don't watch it expecting a masterpiece because you will be disappointed. For what it is, a Netflix movie made for mass consumption, it serves its purpose and will probably become one of those movies you put on when you don't know what to watch, especially if you like stories where parents have to protect their children while dealing with their past. If you have low expectations and are just looking for a good time without thinking too much Back in Action will work perfect for you, but if you are looking for something more original I recommend you to watch something else because this movie stays on the safe side without risking anything new.
One of the depressingly resonant conclusions permeating David Simon’s meticulously constructed Baltimore in The Wire is that profoundly dysfunctional and incompetent institutions, particularly the Baltimore City Police Department (BPD), remain trapped in a state of bureaucratic lethargy until jolted awake by events of extraordinary tragedy, shock, or public embarrassment. Only then do they momentarily transcend their inherent inertia and perform the core functions they are ostensibly mandated to fulfil. This grim, systemic truth forms the chilling backbone of The Hunt, the eleventh episode of the first season, where the near-fatal shooting of Detective Kima Greggs acts as the brutal catalyst forcing the machine, however imperfectly, into motion. It is a stark illustration that within Simon’s world, institutional efficacy is not a baseline state but a desperate, reactive response to catastrophe – a conclusion that feels less like dramatic licence and more like a documentary observation of urban decay.
The specific tragedy that shatters the department’s complacency is the ambush targeting Kima Greggs and her confidential informant, Wendell "Orlando" Blocker. The episode opens not with the shooting itself, but with its chaotic, sprawling aftermath. The scene is a microcosm of Baltimore’s fractured law enforcement landscape: officers from patrol, detectives from Homicide, task force, and even representatives from other agencies converge on the street corner, a rare moment of forced collaboration born of shared outrage. The immediate focus shifts from the slow, painstaking work of dismantling the Barksdale Organisation to the singular, visceral imperative of avenging one of their own. As Kima fights for her life in the hospital, the BPD undergoes a startling, almost unnatural transformation. Jurisdictional squabbles and personal vendettas – the oxygen of daily police work – are temporarily suspended. Major William Rawls, Homicide’s notoriously abrasive and politically astute head, seizes the initiative, directing his unit with an efficiency rarely seen outside such crises. His detectives uncover crucial physical evidence at the scene. Combined with the wiretap intelligence painstakingly gathered by Lieutenant Cedric Daniels’ sidelined task force, the disparate pieces coalesce. The reconstruction is swift: Barksdale enforcer Wintell "Little Man" Royce (Micaih Jones) is identified as one shooter, while Savino Bratton, the architect of the ambush that claimed Orlando’s life, makes a coldly pragmatic, self-serving decision. Leveraging the corrupt defence attorney Maurice Levy, Savino surrenders, striking a plea deal that reduces his potential life sentence to a mere three years – a transactional betrayal highlighting the system’s own moral bankruptcy even as it ostensibly pursues justice.
This sudden police momentum, however, forces Lieutenant Daniels’ hand regarding the planned raids on the Barksdale stash houses. Deputy Commissioner Ervin Burrell and Commissioner Warren Frazier (Dick Stilwell), sensing a potent public relations opportunity amidst the outrage over Greggs, launch a highly visible, politically motivated campaign of raids designed for television cameras – a stark contrast to Daniels’ methodical, evidence-based approach. Daniels’ desperate attempts to prevent a premature raid on the primary stash house, fearing it will scatter evidence and compromise the wire, are met with suspicion and hostility. The reaction from certain superiors strongly suggests a leak within his own task force, a betrayal that underscores how the very crisis uniting the department also exposes its internal rot and the ease with which political expediency corrupts operational integrity.
Conversely, the Barksdale Organisation finds itself reeling under an unprecedented, intensely public police assault – a situation Avon Barksdale never anticipated. The irony is thick: Stringer Bell, whose strategic miscalculation in authorising Savino’s ambush directly triggered this firestorm, now advocates for a swift, brutal cover-up. Wee-Bey, the other shooter, is dispatched to Philadelphia (a city where he has no connections, amplifying his isolation), while Little Man is marked for execution – a desperate attempt to contain the fallout through violence, mirroring the police response in its brutality but lacking its institutional cover.
Written by Joy Lusco, a veteran of Simon’s earlier Homicide: Life on the Street, The Hunt masterfully exploits these layered ironies. The episode’s core satirical thrust lies in observing how the department’s usual roster of lazy, corrupt, or indifferent personnel suddenly operates with remarkable efficiency and unity of purpose when one of their own blue uniforms is struck down. This efficiency, however, is born of tribal loyalty and political pressure, not systemic reform. A particularly potent moment sees Major Rawls, McNulty’s most persistent bureaucratic antagonist, delivering an unexpected, almost gruff pep talk to the devastated detective – a fleeting human connection forged in shared trauma that momentarily transcends their usual enmity, yet does nothing to alter Rawls’ fundamental nature.
Yet, the episode’s most profoundly tragic irony centres on Bubbles. The series’ most sympathetic figure – a gentle, non-violent addict striving for basic decency – becomes the victim of the very institutional frenzy the Kima shooting unleashed. Mistakenly identified as a suspect after pagers lead detectives to him, Bubbles is subjected to a brutal beating in the interrogation room by Detective Holley (Brian Anthony Wilson). His near-murder at the hands of the very people supposedly hunting Kima’s shooter epitomises the systemic blindness and casual cruelty that The Wire relentlessly exposes; the machine gears up efficiently for its own, while crushing the most vulnerable outsiders without a second thought.
Further dark humour emerges with D'Angelo Barksdale. Convinced he is being taken to a remote house for execution by Wee-Bey as punishment for Orlando’s death, D'Angelo faces a moment of pure existential terror. The reveal – that Wee-Bey merely needed him to feed the fish before his exile – is a masterstroke. It underscores the pervasive paranoia of the drug game while highlighting the absurd, mundane realities that underpin its deadly stakes. Directed with taut precision by Steve Shill, a veteran of British television known for the gritty realism of The Bill, "The Hunt" avoids sensationalism. Shill’s background in procedural drama allows him to capture the chaotic energy of the police response and the tense, claustrophobic fear within the Barksdale crew with equal authenticity, grounding the episode’s powerful themes in visceral, believable detail.
Ultimately, The Hunt is not merely an episode about solving a shooting. It is a devastating dissection of institutional pathology. It reveals that the BPD’s capacity for effective action is tragically contingent upon the sacrifice of one of its own – a horrifyingly high price for temporary competence. The system remains fundamentally broken; it merely appears to function when the stakes become unbearably personal. The efficiency displayed is a flickering candle in the overwhelming darkness of bureaucratic inertia and moral compromise, illuminating not progress, but the sheer depth of the rot that requires such a horrific catalyst to stir even momentarily. It is a triumph of writing and direction that leaves the viewer not with catharsis, but with a deepening sense of despair about the possibility of meaningful change within such a profoundly flawed structure.
Ending a movie saga as long-lived as Mission Impossible which is very important for cinema and especially for the action genre is not an easy task at all and Tom Cruise and all his team knew it more than anyone, that's why this final movie not only brought with it some of the best action scenes of the entire franchise, but it is also a very emotional movie and for those who have grown up watching Ethan Hunt over the years, they could really appreciate what was achieved with this ending. But I can also understand that for many people this final film is weak compared to the previous one, however I have read some comments about it, calling it a "bad movie", which is a total mistake by those people, because although it is not the best of all, it is not the worst and I personally loved it, I personally loved it, since Mission Impossible, despite not being part of my childhood, because I started watching these movies more seriously about 10 years ago, I took quite fond of his characters and each film impressed me at a cinematic level, at the level of extreme stunts performed by Tom Cruise, which is one of the actors, who most loves the movies. Without going into personal issues concerning this actor, he is undoubtedly one of the most important exponents of cinema and especially of action movies in history.
He has known how to take a film franchise to quite high levels of success, perhaps the last two films in terms of money collection did not meet their goals, no doubt in terms of criticism and legacy, will be marked throughout the history of cinema. I remember starting to watch these movies as a child, I always saw them on television but never saw them completely but there were certain scenes that I remembered a lot, one of them being in the first film when he is falling and almost touches the ground, that mythical scene where he goes down with the rope and must not touch the ground or the alarm was activated, this is also a scene parodied in many audio-visual media. There is also the mythical scene where Ethan is fighting against someone on the sand and hides a gun underneath, to then make a rather exaggerated movement that makes the gun fly through the air, to later grab it and then shoot his enemy, this last scene may not have aged so well, especially if compared as are the action scenes of more recent films, however, it is a pretty clear proof of how it was in action movies a few years ago and how this franchise evolved to a point of showing action scenes a little more "realistic", taking into account that in action movies there is always the touch of exaggeration to make it more eye-catching and visually impressive.
As a child I always remembered those scenes and more, but it wasn't until I had internet at home and was already an adult that I set out to watch the movies of this saga that a little more than 10 years ago were already released and without a doubt this was a franchise that I loved from beginning to end. The tension, the action, the intelligence of the characters, the shots of the villains and even the humor, made Mission Impossible become one of my favorite action movies. That's why this finale, with Mission: Impossible - Final Reckoning was for me quite special, it was several years of watching their movies and re-watching them, getting attached to the characters, their personalities and the bond that was created between them. It was an emotional ending that commemorated many years in the cinema, not a sad ending, which I really expected because of how it was shown in the trailers and because of a specific movie poster and also, I also expected a sad ending because of how the last James Bond movie saga ended. But luckily it was a happy ending, but bittersweet because this would be the last time we see Ethan Hunt in the movies and perhaps, it may be the last time we see Tom Cruise to perform action scenes so crazy and totally senseless with respect to security, but certainly this is a franchise that will remain for posterity in the film industry and this posts, rather than being a review of Mission: Impossible - Final Reckoning, is more a kind of small tribute and explain how much I like this saga.
This message will be destroyed in 5 seconds...
Finalizar una saga de películas tan longeva como lo es Mision Imposible la cual es muy importante para el cine y especialmente para el género de acción no es una tarea para nada fácil y Tom Cruise y todo su equipo lo sabían más que nadie, es por eso que esta película final no solo trajo consigo gran parte de las mejores escenas acción de toda la franquicia, sino que también es una película bastante emotiva y que para aquellos que hayan crecido viendo a Ethan Hunt a lo largo de los años, pudieron apreciar realmente lo que se logró con este final. Pero también puedo llegar a entender que a muchas personas esta película final sea floja a comparación a la anterior, sin embargo he leído unos comentarios sobre ella, tachándola de “mala película”, lo cual es una total equivocación por parte de esas personas, ya que si bien no es la mejor de todas, tampoco es la peor y a mí personalmente me encanto, ya que Misión Imposible pese a no ser sido parte de mi infancia, debido a que empecé a ver estas películas de forma más seria hace unos 10 años, le tomé bastante cariño a sus personajes y cada película me impresionaba a nivel cinematográfico, a nivel de acrobacias extremas que realizaba Tom Cruise, el cual es uno de los actores, que más ama al cine. Sin entrar en temas personales referentes a este actor, el sin dudas es uno de los exponentes del cine y especialmente, del cine de acción más importantes de la historia.
Ha sabido cómo llevar una franquicia cinematográfica a niveles de éxito bastante elevados, quizás las dos últimas películas en cuanto a recaudación de dinero no cumplió con sus objetivos, sin dudas en temas de críticas y legado, quedará marcado a lo largo de la historia del cine. Recuerdo haber empezado a ver estas películas de niño, siempre las veía en la televisión pero nunca las veía por completo pero habían ciertas escenas que recordaba mucho, siendo una de ellas en la primera película cuando va cayendo y casi toca el suelo, esa mítica escena donde va bajando con la cuerda y no debe tocar el suelo o se activaba la alarma, además esta es una escena parodiada en muchísimos medios audio-visuales. También está la mítica escena donde está Ethan está luchando contra alguien sobre la arena y esconde un pistola debajo, para luego hacer un movimiento bastante exagerado que hace volar a la pistolas por los aires, para posteriormente agarrarla y luego disparar a su enemigo, esta última escena quizás no haya envejecido tan bien, especialmente si se comparan como son las escenas de acción de las películas más recientes, sin embargo, es una prueba bastante clara de cómo era en cine de acción de hace unos años y como está franquicia evolucionó a un punto de mostrar escenas de acción un poco más “realistas”, teniendo en cuenta que en las películas de acción siempre está el toque de exageración para que sea más vistoso y visualmente impresionante.
De niño siempre recordaba esas escenas y otras más, pero no fue hasta que tuve internet en mi casa y ya era un adulto que me dispuse a ver las películas de esta saga que hace poco más de 10 años ya estaban estrenadas y sin duda esta fue una franquicia que me encantó de principio a fin. La tensión, la acción, la inteligencia de los personajes, los planos de los villanos e incluso el humor, hizo que Misión Imposible se convirtiese en una de mis películas de acción favoritas. Es por eso que este final, con Mission: Impossible - Final Reckoning fuese para mi bastante especial, fueron varios años viendo sus películas y volviéndolas a ver, encariñándome con los personajes, sus personalidades y el vínculo que se creó entre ellos. Fue un final emotivo que conmemoro mucho años en el cine, no es un final triste, el cual yo realmente lo esperaba debido a como se nos mostró en los trailers y por un poster de la película en específico y además, también me esperaba un final triste debido a como termino la última saga de películas de James Bond. Pero por suerte fue un final feliz, pero agridulce debido a que esta sería la última vez que vemos a Ethan Hunt en el cine y quizás, puede que ser la última vez que veamos a Tom Cruise a realizar escenas de acción tan alocadas y totalmente sin sentido con respecto a la seguridad, pero sin duda esta es una franquicia que quedará para la posteridad en la industria del cine y este posts, más que ser una review de Mission: Impossible - Final Reckoning, es más una especie de pequeño homenaje y explicar lo mucho que me gusta esta saga.
Hi guys, how are you all? Hope many of you are well. Friends, for quite some time I was thinking to watch a movie because this movie is a Bollywood movie, and the movie is based on true events, many movies are made based on true events and become very commercial successful movies or very inspirational type movies but this movie is made on a cricketer, there are many movies about cricketers not too many movies but this movie is a little exception. My friends gave me information about this movie a few days ago, but I didn't pay much attention. Today, when my friend said something about this movie, I got curious to watch this movie, so I decided to watch this movie and thought to share something about this movie with my friends.
The beginning of the movie shows a boy getting off the bus and going to a book stall. Before entering the book stall, he is happy to see the cover page of a book, which means he will get that book in that shop; that book is called Jersey. Which is the name of this movie, then went to the shopkeeper and asked about this book, the shopkeeper told him that no other book has sold as much as this book has sold in the past 50 years, saying this two more girls came to buy the book, but the shopkeeper had no more stock so the shopkeeper forbade them, he has no more books,
Immediately, the two girls went out, but from behind, the boy who bought the book first called the girls and wanted to give the book back. The two girls asked why they would take the book from you, then the boy replied I am the son of the person you came to buy the book. The girls were very surprised to hear, and they were very happy. This is how the movie started. The beginning seemed very simple to me, but I liked the way the director presented it.
source<?center>
Basically, the story of this film is that a very good cricket player scored the highest score at the district level. Even after scoring the highest score for five years, he is not able to enter the national team. Meanwhile, his love marriage, the relationship between the two of them slowly deteriorates, because his wife earns and runs the family, while Hero does not do any work. Meanwhile, they have a son.
After a time, there was a big dispute between the two. Looking at the child, the father started playing cricket to build his career anew. But once he retires from the game, if he has to start again, he has a lot of preoccupations. Finally, he achieves success in life, but the day before he plays the first international match for the country, he dies. This incident is beautifully shown by the director in this movie. I like it very much. After a long time, I became very emotional after watching a movie. I very enjoyed it in simple words.
I hope everyone who has seen this movie likes this movie, and those who haven't seen this movie yet, if you have seen Bollywood movies, then you can watch this film.
After three years, it has become increasingly apparent that Marvel Comics’ ambitious attempt to replicate the commercial triumph of its film universe by repeating the narrative and structural formula on Netflix’s small screens has ultimately failed to achieve similar success. Truth be told, Marvel and Netflix struck gold three times over—with Daredevil, Jessica Jones, and Luke Cage—series that impressed audiences with their quality and exceptional diversity of characters, style, and atmosphere. The fourth series, Iron Fist, by contrast, drew fierce criticism and raised concerns that Netflix and Marvel had lost their “mojo,” with each subsequent release seemingly growing worse.
This issue is far more pronounced on television than in cinema, precisely because the television audience—accustomed to a far broader and higher-quality range of alternative content—is far more discerning than the teenage demographic, for whom it is considerably easier to slot in two or three hours of CGI-heavy superhero escapades once every few months. Thus, the fifth series, intended to unite the four previously introduced heroes for the first time, was met with intense scrutiny.
The Defenders was conceived as a miniseries—a kind of “special” event meant to serve as the television equivalent of The Avengers, which brought together far more iconic figures like Iron Man, Hulk, and Thor. The plot weaves together seemingly unrelated events culminating in a New York earthquake that, while causing minimal damage, is mysteriously covered up by city authorities. Danny Rand (Finn Jones), a billionaire, former Buddhist monk, and martial arts master, suspects the clandestine and immensely powerful criminal organisation known as The Hand—his mortal enemy—is responsible. Luke Cage (Mike Colter), fresh out of prison in Harlem, investigates a string of local youths exploited by a shadowy criminal syndicate. The alcoholic private investigator Jessica Jones (Krysten Ritter) is hired to uncover a missing husband’s explosive plot tied to underground construction beneath New York. Into their investigation steps Matt Murdock (Charlie Cox), a blind lawyer juggling his legal career with his nocturnal vigilante activities on the streets of New York. Meanwhile, The Hand falls under the control of Alexandra (Sigourney Weaver), an exceptionally sophisticated businesswoman diagnosed with a terminal illness. Her crowning ambition is the “Black Sky” project, helmed by Elektra Natchios (Élodie Yung), Murdock’s former lover and martial arts prodigy, resurrected by The Hand to serve as their secret weapon after her fatal demise.
For fans of the earlier series, The Defenders delivers exactly what they expected or enjoyed: familiar allies, the same gritty aesthetic, and unflinching violence. Much of the action unfolds at night, the dialogue remains unusually coarse by television standards, and the brutality is explicit, including graphic depictions of cold-weapon trauma to the human body. However, viewers will soon realise there is little new here. The antagonists’ convoluted conspiracy—revealed late to have surprisingly human motivations—fails to evoke the same menace as in prior series. The sole fresh element is Alexandra, masterfully portrayed by Sigourney Weaver, who elevates a thinly written character through sheer presence.
Marvel’s far greater challenge lies in the unsustainable pace of churning out new series every few months, straining both creative and financial resources. Unavoidable comparisons to the opulent cinematic universe underscore the Defenders’ comparatively bleak, prosaic reality. Instead of grand daylight battles, the heroes grapple with villains in dimly lit tunnels or windowless rooms, often wielding knives in sequences that—particularly when poorly edited—become bewilderingly chaotic. Nowhere is this more evident than in the finale, where what should have been an apocalyptic underground showdown feels cheap and anticlimactic, undermined further by a perfunctory cliffhanger.
The creators of what was once hailed as television’s most dynamic franchise must now confront reality. Without recalibrating their approach, the future for these heroes looks decidedly grim.
RATING: 5/10 (++)
(Note: The text in the original Croatian version is available here.)
En estos últimos meses he tenido la oportunidad películas de terror que, aunque no tienen el mismo impacto de antes que no dejaban dormir por el temor, han sido muy buenas y entretenidas. Pero recientemente vi una película que logro cortar esa buena racha que llevaba de películas y esta fue The woman in the yard, una película que sinceramente no me gusto y, aunque después de verla sentí que no entendí nada y busqué la explicación sigue sin gustarme por diferentes razones.
In recent months, I've had the opportunity to watch horror films that, while not having the same impact they used to have, where you couldn't sleep with fear, have been very good and entertaining. But recently, I saw a film that managed to break that streak I was on, and that was The Woman in the Yard. I honestly didn't like it. Although after watching it, I felt like I didn't understand anything and searched for an explanation, I still don't like it for various reasons.
Esta película nos muestra la vida de Ramona y sus dos hijos que hace poco perdieron a su padre (Y esposo de Ramona) durante el transcurso de los primeros minutos de película vemos que Ramona no se encuentra bien, no se encarga de sus hijos ni de su mascota, incluso no tienen electricidad en casa, pero luego pasa algo extraño y es que aparece una mujer en frente de su casa vestida de negro, solo está ahí sentada viendo hacia la casa. Y es donde todos comienzan a asustarse.
This film shows us the life of Ramona and her two children who recently lost their father (and Ramona's husband) during the first minutes of the film we see that Ramona is not feeling well, she does not take care of her children or her pet, they even have no electricity at home, but then something strange happens and a woman appears in front of her house dressed in black, she just sits there looking towards the house. And that's where everyone starts to get scared.
Sinceramente llegue a un punto de la película donde me sentí estúpida ya que no entendía nada de lo que pasaba y eso provoco que perdiera el interés y casi dormirme, mi esposo quien veía la película conmigo estaba exactamente igual que yo, teníamos altas expectativas de esta película ya que habíamos visto muchas recomendaciones por plataformas como TikTok, esperábamos una película de terror pero termino siendo mas bien una especie de “terror psicológico” de esos que no se entienden demasiado… Incluso como mencioné anteriormente tuve que buscar explicaciones para poder entender de que va esta película.
Honestly, I reached a point in the movie where I felt stupid because I didn't understand anything that was happening and that caused me to lose interest and almost fall asleep. My husband, who was watching the movie with me, was exactly the same as me. We had high expectations for this movie since we had seen many recommendations on platforms like TikTok. We were expecting a horror movie, but it ended up being more of a kind of "psychological horror" of those that are not very understandable... Even as I mentioned before, I had to look for explanations to be able to understand what this movie is about.
Y viendo la explicación entendí que la película nos quiere mostrar o reflejar como se ve la depresión, básicamente la mujer de negro era una representación de la depresión que tenía Ramona (o eso entendí de los videos que vi) tambien busque comentarios de personas que le gusto esta película diciendo lo mismo y tambien recalcando que a quienes no le gusto la película son unos idiotas que no entendieron el profundo mensaje. Odio a la gente que se cree superior por entender una película, lo cual para mi suena más bien personas que buscan justificar una película mala, que no sabe contar la historia de manera correcta.
And seeing the explanation I understood that the film wants to show us or reflect what depression looks like, basically the woman in black was a representation of the depression that Ramona had (or so I understood from the videos I saw) I also looked for comments from people who liked this film saying the same thing and also emphasizing that those who did not like the film are idiots who did not understand the profound message. I hate people who think they are superior for understanding a movie, which to me sounds more like people looking to justify a bad movie, who do not know how to tell the story correctly.
Y entiendo el punto de la película, representar la depresión y todo lo que causa dentro de nosotros es algo bastante difícil. Sin embargo, esta película no solo carece de la fuerza para transmitir el real mensaje sino que tambien las actuaciones no te ayudan a conectar con los personajes, empezando por los niños quienes parecían dos cubos de hielo, no me transmitían nada… Siento que en definitiva el mejor actor de esta película fue el perro.
And I understand the film's point: depicting depression and everything it causes within us is quite difficult. However, this film not only lacks the strength to convey a real message, but the acting also doesn't help it connect with the characters, starting with the children, who looked like two ice cubes. They didn't convey anything to me. I feel that the best actor in this film was definitely the dog.
Esta película fue promocionada como una película de terror donde suponía que trataba de fantasma o algo asi, pero fue algo totalmente diferente, a muchas personas les gusto y a otras no, yo personalmente no la volvería a ver jamás.
This movie was promoted as a horror movie where it was supposed to be about a ghost or something like that, but it was something totally different, many people liked it and others didn't, I personally would never watch it again.
I saw this one a couple of nights ago but with so much content in queue and irl stuff didnt have time to write my review for The Orphanage (2007), lights low, phone off, this is not a typical horror ride, it is a slow burn mystery with a heart full of ghosts, not the jump scare machine some people expect and that is honestly why it works. Laura comes back to the big seaside orphan home where she grew up, she wants to open it again for kids who need extra care, her husband backs her, her little boy is sweet, strange, curious and from there the movie just keeps diging the past until the past return back harder and not in the best way. What got me this time was how the move takes its time, it never rubs your face in the dread, it just lets things feel off, a door that moves, a game that sounds childish but goes deep, a mask what looks silly at first and then looks like a nightmare once the camera holds, the story keeps handing you small clues, a hidden space where no one looked, a nurse with an old grudge, whispers that sound like play time but are not and the whole time I kept thinking this is grief walking around in daylight pretending to be something else, the movie knows it and plays it out perfeclty, it is more mother and memory than monster and gore and that is why it all works. Also keep in mind that this is a movie of Spanish director Juan Antonio Bayona under the production of Guillermo del Toro, two masters in suspense and terror.
I do not think this thing is very scary in the classic sense, there are two or three moments that make you jump, a blast of sound here, a reveal there but the movie is not about punishing your nerves every five minutes, it is really about Laura trying to hold her life together while the house keeps telling her she is missing something, that angle pulls sympathy out of you, you get on her side fast, she is stubborn and loving and a bit reckless when the fear takes over, there is a sense that if the house had no ghosts, her mind would build them anyway because the past is still sitting at the dinner table asking to be served. I like that tug of war, it makes the supernatural stuff feel heavier and even though the movie makes it pretty clear early that the rules are not just in her head. I kept feeling like it would still work if it was, the mystery would still track, the pain would still hurt and for me that is the good line this kind of story should walk. Technically the whole thing is tight, clean direction, smooth camera angles, the house looks lived in and cold at the same time, the rhythm is patient, sometimes almost too patient for anyone who want constant fireworks but the waiting and patience really paysoff.
Belen Rueda carries the whole story on her back without having to show off or go over the top, the fear is not just big eyes and shaking hands, it is quiet bad decisions that feel like love at the time, the husband has that calm logic that sometimes feels helpful and sometimes feels like a wall she keeps bouncing off, the kids sell the kid stuff, which matters here since games and imagination drive a lot, the side roles do not overcook the soup, even the figure who appears with answers late does not break the tone. I never felt like the movie was throwing a new genre at me mid way it all stays in the same sad lane, which I like as it stays focus and never goes off rails, there is a reveal path that is simple enough to follow but still rewarding and I appreciate that it does not try to be smarter than it needs. I think the movie sometimes telegraphs a beat a half step early, like you can see a door moment coming and your brain prepares, also there are a couple staging choices that feel a bit neat for the chaos we are told is brewing in the house and one talky explanation could have been cut out but I am honestly reaching there, most of the time the movie just does what it should do, it builds mood, it watches a mom fall apart and rebuild herself with the same pieces but in a different order and it lets the final stretch hit you in the chest not just the eyes.
The one that keeps banging across the movie is how it treats loss, not as a twist to slam at the end but as a presence sitting in every room , an old friend is now a stranger, a game is now a map, that is the proper rhythm, the house is a memory palace with locked drawers and Laura keeps finding keys by being brave and being wrong at the same time, that is pretty real and it is why the finale lands hard, it is not really a gotcha. I like that the supernatural here is not just punishment, it is also connection, guilt and mercy all tangled, it sits near stuff like The Devil’s Backbone in my head, old places holding on to old pain, kids knowing the truth first because adults forgot how to listen, makes me think about how houses keep secrets like people do and how games kids play can be maps to the worst room in the house if no one pays attention. I like how the movie uses space, there is also this mask, looks simple, almost homemade and the way they frame it becomes a small thesis about how ordinary things can turn violent its just amazing how simple things can turn scary and creepy under the right circumstances, the movie uses that idea again and again, a door is a door until it is not, I like movies that go for that kind of swing and find gold on the simple things.
I end up enjoying very much this movie as a fan of horror, specially psychological horror where everything happens in the character reminds me a little to The Possession of Michael King (2014), although The Orphanage carries something more just form the name, at the beginning give us a certain emotion watching Laura starting a new life and giving the same opportunity she received to all those kids that are living with her in the orphanage because she wanted to give a better life to them but when things start to change and the place start giving that sense of fear, that Laura decisions was wrong, that she has placed her family in special her son in a terrible place and that the kids are the one who are receiving and sending messaging for the adults to understand what is happening, in that moment you know that it is a good story. Is not mind blowing, is not your classic horror movie, it is a movie with a story full of history about a place that is more of what we can see and the end of it is a twisted scenario that probably you will hate or think brilliant, even thought is not the end you were expecting. It is a movie that I can see once a year with no doubt and would totally recommended.
In 1988, when The Naked Gun: From the Files of Police Squad! hit theaters around the world, no one expected the project to be so successful that it would earn a sequel, much less become a trilogy. This was only a matter of time, as not only many critics, but also mainstream audiences ended up succumbing to the comedic tone of a genuinely funny project within its own vein of almost non-stop fun. Now, in 2025, the trilogy has gained a new chapter (which could become a new trilogy).
It all started when the project was confirmed, which would later bring Liam Neeson to "replace" an irreplaceable character (the late Leslie Nielsen) as the protagonist within the saga. What until then was "unlikely" gradually became a reality. At the helm of the project is Akiva Schaffer (who, in addition to directing this project, also partially helped to write it, alongside Dan Gregor and Doug Mand), and the way he managed to “evoke” the nostalgia of the past was admirable (mainly because he managed to mix what already exists with something current).
I don't watch many comedies these days (whether at home or in theaters), but I recently had a great surprise when I saw this sequel in theaters (if you want to read my full review of the movie, just click here). I can say - without a shadow of a doubt - that everything done in this movie is of the highest quality in its main aspect: making the audience laugh. Specifically, at times, I cried laughing. Not only because of the jokes themselves (which, by the way, are mostly great), but also because of the nostalgic feel.
The script is clever (and connects with today's technology-driven world) and becomes something above average for comedies within this same more absurd standard by consistently eliciting laughs (and without having to put in much effort). The direction is convincing, as is the cast (which, in addition to featuring Neeson in the role of a character that is ironically fun, also features Pamela Anderson with a hilarious and somewhat “noir” embodiment of a femme fatale) and what they represent.
The Naked Gun is a true cinematic revival of nonsense comedy, and its highly polished technical production reinforces my point. We're literally watching a "machine gun of jokes," where you have to pay attention to even the simplest moments within trivial dialogue, even to events completely disconnected from reality (where the jokes are often even more ridiculously funny). I already want a new trilogy to be made official, because there's definitely a lot of potential for that to happen.
Concurso CineTV: “Agárralo como puedas”, así se hace una película de comedia (basada en el pasado).
En 1988, cuando Agárralo como puedas llegó a los cines de todo el mundo, nadie esperaba que el proyecto tuviera tanto éxito como para merecer una secuela, y mucho menos una trilogía. Era solo cuestión de tiempo, ya que no solo la crítica, sino también el público en general, sucumbieron al tono cómico de un proyecto genuinamente divertido, dentro de su propia línea de diversión casi ininterrumpida. Ahora, en 2025, la trilogía ha dado paso a un nuevo capítulo (que podría convertirse en una nueva trilogía).
Todo comenzó cuando se confirmó el proyecto, que posteriormente llevaría a Liam Neeson a "reemplazar" a un personaje irremplazable (el fallecido Leslie Nielsen) como protagonista de la saga. Lo que hasta entonces era "improbable" se convirtió gradualmente en realidad. Al mando del proyecto está Akiva Schaffer (quien además de dirigir este proyecto, también ayudó parcialmente a escribirlo, junto a Dan Gregor y Doug Mand), y fue admirable el modo en que logró “evocar” la nostalgia del pasado (principalmente porque logró mezclar lo ya existente con algo actual).
No veo muchas comedias últimamente (ni en casa ni en el cine), pero hace poco me llevé una grata sorpresa al ver esta secuela en cines (si quieren leer mi reseña completa, hagan clic aqui). Puedo decir - sin lugar a dudas - que todo en esta película es de altísima calidad en su aspecto principal: hacer reír al público. En concreto, por momentos, lloré de la risa. No solo por los chistes (que, por cierto, son en su mayoría geniales), sino también por la nostalgia que transmite.
El guion es ingenioso (y conecta con el mundo tecnológico actual) y se destaca entre las comedias de este mismo nivel, más absurdo, provocando risas constantemente (y sin mucho esfuerzo). La dirección es convincente, al igual que el reparto (que, además de contar con Neeson en un personaje irónicamente divertido, también incluye a Pamela Anderson en una encarnación hilarante y con cierto aire “noir” de una femme fatale) y lo que representan.
Agárralo como puedas es un auténtico renacimiento cinematográfico de la comedia nonsense, y su impecable producción técnica refuerza mi argumento. Estamos ante una auténtica "ametralladora de chistes", donde hay que prestar atención incluso a los momentos más simples de los diálogos triviales, incluso a los eventos completamente desconectados de la realidad (donde los chistes suelen ser aún más ridículamente graciosos). Ya quiero que se haga oficial una nueva trilogía, porque sin duda hay mucho potencial para que eso suceda.
Esta publicación es mi entrada para el Concurso CineTV #143, que está siendo promovido por la comunidad CineTV.
Concurso CineTV: “Corra que a Polícia Vem Aí!”, é assim que um filme de comédia (baseado no passado) é feito.
Em 1988, quando Corra que a Polícia Vem Aí! chegou aos cinemas em diferentes partes do mundo, ninguém esperava que o projeto fosse ser tão bem sucedido a ponto de ganhar uma sequência, ou muito menos se tornar em uma trilogia. Isso foi apenas uma questão de tempo, porque não apenas muitos críticos especializados, mas também o público mais comum, acabaram se rendendo ao teor cômico de um projeto genuinamente engraçado dentro do seu próprio viés de diversão quase ininterrupta. Agora em 2025, a trilogia ganhou um novo capítulo (que pode se tornar uma nova trilogia).
Tudo começou quando houve a confirmação do projeto, que posteriormente traria Liam Neeson para “substituir” uma pessoa insubstituível (o saudoso Leslie Nielsen) como protagonista dentro da saga. O que até então era “improvável”, aos poucos foi se tornando em realidade. A frente do projeto, está Akiva Schaffer (que além de ter dirigido esse projeto, parcialmente também ajudou a escrevê-lo, ao lado Dan Gregor e Doug Mand), e o modo como ele conseguiu “evocar” a nostalgia do passado foi algo admirável (principalmente por ter conseguido mesclar o que já existe, com algo atual).
Eu não ando assistindo muitos filmes de comédia atualmente (seja em casa ou no cinema), mas recentemente eu tive uma grande surpresa ao assistir esta sequência nos cinemas (caso queira ler o meu review completo sobre o filme, só clique aqui) e posso dizer - sem a menor sombra de dúvidas - que tudo o que foi feito neste filme tem um nível de alta qualidade no seu principal aspecto: fazer o público rir. Particularmente falando, em alguns momentos, eu chorei de rir. Não apenas pelas piadas em si (que por sinal, em sua grande maioria são ótimas), mas também pelo senso nostálgico.
O roteiro é inteligente (e faz uma conexão com o cenário mundial que temos hoje em dia, que é conectado a tecnologia) e se torna algo acima da média para comédias dentro desse mesmo padrão mais estapafúrdio ao arrancar risadas das pessoas de maneira consistente (e sem precisar fazer muito esforço para isso acontecer). A direção é convincente, bem como o elenco (que além de trazer Neeson na pele de um personagem que é ironicamente divertido, ainda traz Pamela Anderson com uma personificação hilária e um tanto quanto “noir” de uma femme fatale) e o que eles representam.
Corra Que a Polícia Vem AÍ! é um verdadeiro resgate cinematográfico da comédia nonsense, e à sua produção técnica muito caprichada reforça o que eu estou dizendo. Literalmente, nós estamos diante de uma “metralhadora de piadas”, onde é preciso estar atento até os momentos simples de dentro de um diálogo trivial, até mesmo aos acontecimentos totalmente desconectados da realidade (onde as piadas costumam ser ainda mais estupidamente engraçadas). Desde já, eu quero que uma nova trilogia seja oficializada, porque definitivamente, existe muito potencial para isso acontecer.
Este post é a minha participação para o Concurso CineTV #143, que está sendo promovido pela comunidade CineTV.
Hello everyone and welcome to another edition of reviews ✨🤌🏻 I hope you are all doing well. On this special occasion, I want to introduce you to a little-known anime, but a tremendous gem, with a great story and full action. I hope you like it. And yes, I am talking about "Hellsing Ultimate."
Hola a todos y bienvenidos a otra edición de reseñas ✨🤌🏻 espero que se encuentren muy bien, en esta linda ocasión quiero presentarles un anime no conocido pero tremenda joyita, con una historia muy buena y full acción espero que les guste, y ,sí estoy hablando de "Hellsing Ultimate "
Our story focuses on the character Abraham Van Hellsing who creates an order of warriors with the intention of protecting the queen of his country from all existing supernatural threats, however this organization later passes to Sir Integra Fairbrook Wingates Hellsing, who is his son and bears the responsibility of his father when he saw them die when he was 12 years old. In his current organization Hellsing is in command, Alucard one of the most powerful vampires who was captured by this family more than 100 years ago apart from him, there is also Walter C. Dornez and Serás Victoria (Vampire turned by Alucard) they have to deal with surprise attacks on the organization's office led by the "valentin" brothers, eternal enemies of the organization.
Nuestra historia se centra en el personaje Abraham Van Hellsing quién crea una orden de guerreros con la intención de proteger a la reina de su país de toda amenaza sobrenatural existente, no obstante esta organización tiempo después pasa a Sir Integra Fairbrook Wingates Hellsing ,quién es su hijo y carga con la responsabilidad de su padre al verlos morir cuando este tenía 12 años. En su actual organización Hellsing tiene al mando a, Alucard uno de los vampiros más poderosos quién fue capturado por esta familia hace más de 100 años aparte de él, también está Walter C. Dornez y Serás Victoria ( Vampiresa convertida por Alucard) estos tienen que lidiar contra ataques sorpresas a la oficina de la organización liderados por los hermanos "valentin"eternos enemigos de la organización.
Apart from fighting all kinds of monsters that try to usurp or harm the Queen of England, Hellsing also fights with another organization that is Iscariot, from the Vatican which is in charge of eliminating all kinds of demons and heretics including vampires who work for him, thus offering a line of battles between organizations and monsters that want to end the Hellsing organization.
Aparte de combatir todo tipo de monstruos que traten de usurpar o dañar a la reina de Inglaterra, Hellsing también lucha con otra organización que es Iscariote, del Vaticano la cual se encarga de eliminar a todo tipo de demonios y herejes incluyendo los vampiros que trabajan para él, ofreciendo así una línea de combates entre organizaciones y monstruos que quieren acabar con la organización Hellsing
Ultimate is an extravagant series that focuses on dark fiction, fantasy, and mystery. If you like short anime, this series is perfect for you. The anime itself consists of 13 episodes that aren't as faithful to the manga, but it has 10 OVAs that are faithful to the original manga, and it has 10 manga volumes. In my opinion, it's somewhat underrated since it has a lot of potential, and the producers have managed to balance the manga with the anime and the OVAs. They have an anime that isn't faithful to the manga, but the story takes place in the same timeline as the manga. There's another option, the OVAs, which are 100% faithful to the manga, including the ending. It's excellent to watch, I always highly recommend it, although it is very gory. There isn't as much censorship in the fights or in the atrocities that other organizations commit apart from Hellsing.
Ultimate es una serie extravagante que se centra en la ficción y fantasía oscura y el misterio, si eres una persona a la que le gustan los animes cortos está serie es perfecta para ti. Ya que el anime como tal consta de 13 episodios que no son tan fieles al manga, sin embargo tiene 10 OVAS que sí son fieles al manga original y cuenta con 10 volúmenes de Manga;a mi parecer es algo infravalorada ya que tiene mucho potencial y los productores subieron equilibrar el manga con el anime y las OVAS, teniendo un anime que no es fiel al manga pero sí ocurre la historia en la misma línea del tiempo que los mangas y hay otra opción que son las OVAS las cuales son 100% fiel al manga inclusive el final, es excelente de ver siempre lo recomiendo mucho aunque sí es muy gore, no hay tanta censura en los combates, ni en las atrocidades que hacen las demás organizaciones a parte de la de Hellsing.
In my opinion Koura Hirano did an excellent job writing and illustrating the anime, it has a design from the 90s which makes this production more elaborate than it already is, apart from having influences from other works like Castlevania, Dracula (by Bram Stoker) in the manga we can observe hallucinations of video games like Gungrave, series like Fullmetal Alchemis, movies where Bruce Willis appears, even Elvis Presley, so it is a curious series and worth seeing, it preserves the essence of vampires and the gothic apart from being an anime from the late 90s, which makes Hellsing Ultimate one of the many works that closed the golden decade of animation with that style as delicate and striking as the animation of that time, which for many was not good but in my opinion contrasts perfectly with series like this.
A mi parecer Koura Hirano hizo un excelente trabajo escribiendo e ilustrando el anime, tiene un diseño de los años 90 lo que hace a esta producción más elaborada de lo que ya es, a parte de tener influencias de otros trabajos como Castlevania, Drácula( de Bram Stoker ) en los manga podemos observar alucines a vídeojuegos como Gungrave, series como Fullmetal Alchemis, películas dónde sale Bruce Willis, hasta de Elvis Presley, así que es una serie curiosa y vale la pena verla, conserva la esencia de los vampiros y lo gótico a parte de ser un anime de finales de los 90, lo que hace a Hellsing Ultimate una de las tantas obras que cerró la década dorada de la animación con ese estilo tan delicado y llamativo como la animación de esa época, que para muchos no era buena pero a mi opinión contrasta perfecto con series como está.
You know that feeling when the world feels too loud, and suddenly, the quiet of the night feels safer than daylight? That’s what Call of the Night pulled me into. At first, it looks like just another vampire anime—boy meets mysterious vampire girl—but it hit me in a way I didn’t expect. The main character, Kou Yamori, is this restless teen who just can’t sleep. And instead of lying there, tossing and turning, he slips out into the night like a ghost wandering through neon-lit streets. That restlessness—God, it felt like it mirrored something in me.
Then he comes across Nazuna. She is not a vampire as you would think her to be the dark, broody, romantic type. She is sarcastic, untidy, straight-forward, even shameless. And it was that which made her so human. She did not make any efforts to conceal her personality, she was not polished to make a good impression on anybody. And Kou, in his shy, lost fashion, just gravitated towards her. Watching them was like watching two lonely parts slowly rotate around each other, not quite sure whether they fit, but eager to make an attempt.
One of the scenes which really resonated with me was when Kou starts doubting what it means to live. He does not want to become as lifeless and tired as the people around him who are adults. That is what struck me so painfully--as though he was saying out aloud the apprehension we all have, in our secret hearts: what would life be but this endless cycle of working, sleeping and awaiting something better? Nazuna, and all her weird humor, suddenly turns out to be this anchor to him. She is not a problem solver, but she gives him a reason to desire more.
Then the surprise, Kou tells her he wishes to be a vampire. I initially believed that it was a simple adolescent rebellion cranked to the next level. Then you find it goes deeper. He seeks liberation, flight, a new form of life in which he does not need to adhere to the rules as other people do. The condition however is harsh; he must fall in love with Nazuna in order to get it to occur. That is when the story takes a different turn as now it is not just about sleepless nights, but also about the horrifying, awkward and messy process of opening your heart to someone.
There’s this one episode that wrecked me quietly: Kou sees a group of other vampires, and they’re not like Nazuna. They’re dangerous, manipulative, almost predatory. And suddenly, the dream of becoming one doesn’t look so simple. It’s like being hit with the realization that the thing you’ve been chasing might destroy you too. That shook me because it reminded me of how sometimes the things we think will save us—quitting everything, running away, reinventing ourselves—aren’t always the perfect cure.
But the actual tear-jerker moment was? It was not the spectacular battles of vampires, it was not the crazy turns. It was when Kou in this raw, vulnerable manner reveals that he does not know what love feels like. He is almost ashamed to ask Nazuna whether what he feels is even real. And I swear that I felt that crack in my chest. How many times have we been in that position where we were trying to call out some emotions that we cannot really describe, afraid of making a mistake? The sincerity of that scene was more penetrating than any battle ever was.
Nazuna--she does not offer him some platitudinous encouragement. She shoves him off, flirts with him, but on her terms, she comes to his rescue. It came to me then: love does not always have to be big things or understanding everything. Sometimes it is simply remaining. Choosing one when he/she does not have it all figured out.

When I completed Call of the Night, I understood that it was not just a vampire anime. It was a story of loneliness, identity and that restless desire of something more. It reminded me of my sleepless nights when I wanted someone to share with and to stroll with along the streetlights and just live without any pressure. It is the kind of anime that creeps under your skin- quietly, softly and leaves you hanging at the ceiling long after the credits end.
If you are looking for a fun, lighthearted diversion from the seriousness of life, this movie is not it. Instead, it is a dark and surprisingly deep action movie with great characters.
When I first saw the ad for this movie appear on Hulu, I did a double take. "From the writer of Deadpool" and starring Samara Weaving who I loved in Ready or Not and Guns Akimbo? That sounds awesome!
I couldn't wait to watch and was expecting an over-the-top action/ comedy that would be highly entertaining. Although it was indeed very entertaining, it was not exactly what I expected. It was far more dark than I would have imagined. They wrap some really serious stuff into a joking package, but it is more like using humor to dull the pain rather than for a fun romp. Personally I loved that this did not go exactly how I thought it would. I actually would have been mad if it just stuck to the cliche formula.
First, this movie was definitely inspired by Quentin Tarantino. It stresses dialogue and cool characters (and some super annoying ones... but they are supposed to annoy you). It also has hints of Baby Driver and True Romance (two of my favorite movies of all times). But it also throws in a little Natural Born Killers. For me, the mix worked very well. But keep in mind how serious natural Born Killers was and it may help set your expectations for this film.
In addition, there were some cool action scenes. I especially enjoyed Weaving getting to show off her physical abilities. If Margot Robbie decides she can't play Harley Quinn anymore, I think Samara Weaving could step in nicely.
I'm not going to lie. The fact that Samara Weaving would fit in perfectly in Banshee Pennsylvania definitely enhanced my enjoyment of Eenie Meanie.
But the best part of the movie are the interesting characters from the criminal world. Andy Garcia does an amazing job as always playing a crime boss. Steven Zahn does a fine job as a petty criminal trying to go straight. Weaving and Karl Glusman have some great chemistry as the couple stuck in the ultimate toxic relationship. For the first half of the movie, I wanted to scream at Edie (played by Weaving) to get the hell away from that dipshit John who was destroying her life. And then the writers did what does not happen enough. They actually explained why Edie would be with this douchebag. It made tragic sense.
The two most surprisingly things about the movie were the fact that I actually loved the car chase scenes... and there are many. Edie is a getaway driver. Apparently she's the best and the stunt crew worked overtime getting that point across. I normally am bored to tears by chase scenes. That is why these were so surprising. The second surprise is that ex-NFL player Marshawn Lynch continues to steal every scene he is in. He is starting to garner a reputation with me that if he is in a movie, I will be entertained.
I am actually very surprised that so many critics are panning this movie. As I write this Eenie Meanie only has a 39% with critics. I honestly don't think they get why the movie is not just a simple formulaic lovers running from the law story.