Plot

A young woman inherits a ranch just before taking the bar exam to become a lawyer.

Since she doesn’t know anything about running it, she would normally sell it and take the money.

However, before selling it, she has to travel from LA where she lives to the actual location of the ranch, and do the sale in person.

This is what her late father actually wanted her to do.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PnKb\_WhnLgI&pp=ygUXbG92ZSBmaW5kcyBpbiB2YWxlbnRpbmU%3D

As she gets there, she encounters problems that she didn’t expect, and start suspecting that things are not what they look like financial-wise.

In the meantime, and through various events and meetings with different local people, she gradually begins to build a connection with the past.

Her own past is shared between two families, her father’s and her mother’s, and goes back to when a feud between the two families was sparked by two ancestors falling in love for the same woman.

This story of animosity continues, and the young woman finds foes that seem to either dislike her, like her maternal grandfather, or try to financially defraud her, like a cousin from her father’s side.

Hopefully for her, she also meets people who are willing to help and support her, like the local pastor, who is a maternal cousin of hers, or the foster mother of the foreman who now runs the ranch.

After overcoming the initial hostile reception, and going through many ups and downs, her relationship with the latter improves slowly but steadily.

As he also struggles with demons from his past, they realize that they belong to each other and share many things as persons, in spite of coming from very different worlds and backgrounds.

In the end, love triumphs once again, building bridges between people, and helping them develop and improve as individuals.

Hello anime fans

So I recently came across an anime called I Made Friends with the Second Prettiest Girl in My Class, and I won't even lie, the title alone got my attention, I was curious because it sounded like one of those typical school romance stories, but after watching it, I realized there was actually something sweet and relaxing about it.

The story follows a guy called Maki Maehara, Maki is the kind of person who mostly keeps to himself, He doesn't have many friends, he isn't popular, and he is basically expecting to spend another school year minding his business and staying in his little corner, seriously, I think a lot of us can relate to that feeling at some point in life.

Then one day, he unexpectedly meets Umi Asanagi, who happens to be one of the most popular girls in their class, Now if this was another anime, you would expect some dramatic encounter or some over the top romance immediately, but that is not really what happens here.

Instead, they discover that they actually have similar interests, they both enjoy things like movies and other hobbies that most people around them would not expect because of that, they slowly start spending time together and eventually become friends.

And honestly, that is what I liked most about this anime, It doesn't rush, Nowadays a lot of romance anime want to move very fast, before you know it, people are already confessing feelings after three episodes, this one takes its time, you get to watch two people genuinely get to know each other first.

I also liked how Umi wasn't written as just another "perfect popular girl." The more you see her, the more you realize she has her own personality outside of what everybody in school thinks about her, the same goes for Maki, at first he seems like your regular quiet protagonist, but as the story moves on, you start seeing more sides of him.

The conversations between them were actually one of my favorite parts, sometimes nothing major is happening, they are just talking, watching movies, hanging out, and somehow it still manages to be enjoyable, It feels natural.

And maybe that is why the anime works, not every story needs a world ending threat or some crazy tournament arc, sometimes it is just nice watching people connect with each other.

Another thing that I enjoyed in this anime was the atmosphere, the anime feels very calm, it is the kind of anime that you watch after a stressful day ,like when you just want something relaxing, there is no unnecessary drama every five minutes, indeed there are awkward moments, funny moments, and those little interactions that make you smile without you realising you are.

Of course, if you are looking for intense action, supernatural powers, or mind games like Classroom of the Elite,I can assure you that , this probably won't be your thing at all, this anime is more about friendship, relationships, and slowly just stepping outside your comfort zone.

And as someone who enjoys romance anime from time to time sometimes ,I found it refreshing, It just reminded me that some of the best relationships start from very simple conversations and of course shared interests.

So in all, I think that "I Made Friends with the Second Prettiest Girl in My Class" is indeed a really nice watch and if you are looking for something wholesome and easygoing, It won't blow your mind with plot twists, but it has a lot of heart, and sometimes that is exactly what an anime needs.

For me, it is one of those animes that you put on expecting something simple, and before you know it, you are already invested.

_{Images Gotten from My Movie Box Player}

Aikay👾

Images from imdb I used Google Translate.

Rating: 80/100

Time travel remains one of the most perennially fascinating concepts in speculative fiction, and a staple theme within the science‑fiction genre. Its cinematic potential is vast, offering narratives that can thrill, puzzle, and philosophise in equal measure. Yet, for all its popularity, the silver screen has a curious habit of sidestepping one of the concept’s most ‘inconvenient’ implications: the paradox. All too often, films employ time travel as a mere plot device, glossing over the logical snarls and causal loops it inherently creates. It is a rare filmmaker who not only acknowledges these paradoxes but constructs an entire film around their relentless, inescapable mechanics. With his 2007 feature debut Timecrimes, Spanish director Nacho Vigalondo did precisely that, crafting a taut, ingenious thriller that treats the time paradox not as a bug to be solved, but as the very premise of its horror.

Vigalondo, who also wrote the script, sets his deceptively simple tale in the anonymous Spanish countryside. The protagonist, Héctor (Karra Elejalde), is a middle‑aged man enjoying a quiet afternoon at his newly purchased vacation home with his wife, Clara (Candela Fernández). The pastoral calm is broken when, idly surveying the surrounding woods with binoculars, he spies a young woman (Bárbara Goenaga) undressing. Later, spotting her discarded clothing, his curiosity gets the better of him and he ventures into the forest to investigate. This mundane act of voyeuristic impulse triggers the film’s inexorable nightmare. Héctor is suddenly attacked by a mysterious, frightening figure with a heavily bandaged face. Wounded and fleeing in panic, he stumbles upon an isolated building which turns out to be a research laboratory. There, a cryptic scientist (played by Vigalondo) offers him sanctuary inside a strange, tank‑like apparatus. Desperate, Héctor enters.

When he emerges, he discovers the scientist’s machine was not a refuge but a time‑travel device. He has been thrown back several hours. The scientist coolly explains the new reality: there are now two Héctors coexisting, and a paradox must be avoided at all costs. This Héctor—dubbed ‘Héctor 2’—leaves the lab, but his every subsequent action, intended to merely observe and stay out of sight, inadvertently sets in motion the very chain of violence he experienced. After suffering an injury, he bandages his own head, and in a moment of horrifying clarity, realises he has become the grotesque attacker he originally fled from. The film’s central, brilliant conceit locks into place: Héctor 2 is now forced to meticulously re‑enact the terrifying events he witnessed from the other side, becoming the author of his own trauma. A further tragedy unfolds, propelling a desperate Héctor 2 back to the lab to demand another jump, creating a ‘Héctor 3’ in a final, doomed attempt to untangle the knot.

Timecrimes is a science‑fiction film that epitomises the principle ‘less is more’ with remarkable success. Its premise—a man trapped in a short, tight causal loop—is incredibly simple, almost elegant in its purity. It is the kind of high‑concept idea that could have sustained a Twilight Zone episode, but Vigalondo stretches it to feature length with clinical, clockwork precision. This simplicity is its greatest asset, allowing a very limited budget to become a virtue rather than a constraint. The story unfolds over a handful of hours, involves only four key characters, and is largely confined to a few wooded locations and the starkly utilitarian lab. There are no grand special effects or sprawling vistas; the tension derives entirely from the relentless, unfolding logic of the paradox.

While the concept of a man meeting his future self is not particularly original, the execution here is masterful. This is due in large part to the cast. Karra Elejalde delivers a superb performance as the everyman protagonist. He perfectly captures the gradual transformation from bored, slightly peevish husband to a man first bewildered, then horrified, and finally grimly determined as he is forced to commit increasingly extreme acts in a futile bid to restore a normalcy that is forever lost. His portrayal grounds the outlandish premise in a relatable, sweating panic.

Vigalondo’s directorial skill is equally evident. He deftly dresses the film in the trappings of a slasher horror for its first act, complete with a mysterious, stalking antagonist. The revelation that this monster is, in fact, the protagonist himself is a profoundly effective twist. For audiences well‑versed in time‑travel tropes, this reveal may come early, and the ultimate resolution might feel somewhat predictable. Yet Timecrimes succeeds through grim inevitability. The pleasure lies in watching the gears of the plot click perfectly into place, in seeing each piece of the puzzle—the binoculars, the scissors, the phone call—assume its dreadful, pre‑ordained role. It is a very good science‑fiction thriller precisely because it respects its own internal logic so completely.

Some critics have attempted to paint the film with deeper allegorical strokes, interpreting it as a commentary on mid‑life crisis or the consequences of the wandering male gaze. While these readings are not invalid, Timecrimes’ power arguably stems from its lack of overt psychological or thematic depth. It is a clean, mean narrative machine. Its refusal to moralise or philosophise beyond the immediate cause‑and‑effect of its plot makes it easily digestible and, ironically, more memorable. It is a perfect puzzle box of a film.

The success of Timecrimes inevitably led to whispers of a Hollywood remake, a fate that befalls many stylish European genre films. In this case, perhaps it is for the best that nothing materialised. Knowing Hollywood’s tendency to over‑explain, to add unnecessary backstory, romantic sub‑plots, and bombastic set‑pieces, the best an audience could have hoped for would have been a dispiriting sense of déjà vu—a pale imitation of a film whose brilliance lies in its stark, unforgiving originality.

RATING: 7/10 (+++)

==

Blog in Croatian https://draxblog.com Blog in English https://draxreview.wordpress.com/ InLeo blog https://inleo.io/@drax.leo Substack https://draxster.substack.com/

InLeo: https://inleo.io/signup?referral=drax.leo Leodex: https://leodex.io/?ref=drax Hiveonboard: https://hiveonboard.com?ref=drax Rising Star game: https://www.risingstargame.com?referrer=drax 1Inch: https://1inch.exchange/#/r/0x83823d8CCB74F828148258BB4457642124b1328e

BTC donations: 1EWxiMiP6iiG9rger3NuUSd6HByaxQWafG ETH donations: 0xB305F144323b99e6f8b1d66f5D7DE78B498C32A7 BCH donations: qpvxw0jax79lhmvlgcldkzpqanf03r9cjv8y6gtmk9

Source

For tonight I was planing on putting out my Hokum (2026) review but decided to instead talk about a movie I recently rewatch, Sunshine from 2007, back in the day I use to watch movies just because friends who told me they were a good watch and not as a hobby like now days and I keep coming back to every few years and it never stops hitting the same way, which is kind of remarkable when you think about what it is actually asking you to sit with for an hour and forty minutes. Danny Boyle made something pretty strange here, a hard science fiction movie about eight people hauling a stellar bomb toward a dying sun with the weight of every living thing on Earth sitting on top of them, and the movie earns that weight almost immediately. The story is very simple and not complex at all with the sun slowly dying, the Earth is locked in a savage solar winter and the crew of the Icarus II is the last real shot anyone has at keep the show going, meaning the sun burning, before everything freezes to death permanently. What makes it work right out of the gate is how the movie traps you inside that ship without over explaining it. You feel the claustrophobia and the pressure from minute one without anyone needing to spell it out. Earth stays completely out of frame for most of the movie, kept distant through pre recorded video messages the crew sends back home right before they pass into the communication dead zone beyond Mercury, and that choice is devastating because it makes the isolation feel absolute. The tension starts cooking from the very first scene where the crew psychologist Searle stands alone in the observation room staring at a filtered image of the sun at two percent brightness and the ship computer warns him that bumping it to four percent will cause permanent eye damage, so he pushes it to three point one anyway, because he is already becoming obsessed with the light and Danny Boyle uses that one image to tell you everything you need to know about the psychological pressure building up inside everyone on this ship.

• IMDB: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0448134/
• Platform: DISNEY PLUS

The best part of this whole movie is the first two thirds and that is because the characters make some of the hardest desicions but completely logical under impossible pressure and watching that unfold is some of the best science fiction you are going to find on this movie and probably overall because you can feel the exploration, the distant, the empty space on this movie and thats what makes out of space movies so good. Chris Evans plays Mace, the ship engineer and he is absolutely on fire in this role, playing someone who is all mission all the time, no exceptions, no emotional arguments, just cold logic and it works every single time he shuts somebody down. There is this sequence that you will probably never forget where the navigator Trey screws up the shield calculations by just over one degree after they divert course to investigate the lost Icarus I ship, and that tiny math error starts this chain reaction of damage that threatens everything. Mace does not even hesitate, he volunteers the physicist Capa to go outside with captain Kaneda to repair the broken panels and watching those two climb out in these enormous gold reflective spacesuits with their claustrophobic little visor slits while the edge of the sun creeps closer is equal parts visually stunning and completely terrifying. Things go completely to hell when a fire breaks out and destroys the oxygen garden that Michelle Yeoh was running as Corazon, the ship autopilot corrects the rotation to compensate and suddenly the men outside are being exposed to direct sunlight with zero warning. Kaneda makes the call, he stays to finish the repair and orders Capa back inside and watching him turn around to face this advancing wall of fire coming to incinerate him is one of the most upsetting deaths I have seen in any science fiction movie, it hits you harder than it should because the movie made you care about everyone on this ship without you even noticing it was doing that.

There is a sequence later that does a better job of showing the indifference of space than honeslty most theatrical movies could do and it is the part where the airlock connecting both ships decouples and destroys itself, stranding Searle, Capa, Mace and Harvey on the dead ship with only one working spacesuit between them. The solution they come up with is to wrap their bodies in ripped out wall insulation and launch themselves through open vacuum at around minus two hundred and seventy degrees or something like that, it was insane temperature and the movie treats it like math, like the only answer available. Searle stays behind to manually operate the airlock so the others can be propelled across and watching Harvey miss the airlock and drift away, snap freezing instantly with tiny ice crystals forming on his last exhaled breath and his eyes glazing over in seconds, is one of the coldest both literal and zero feelings moment and most matter of fact deaths I have ever seen put on screen. That whole section is what the movie is flat out best at, this grounded terror just from been in space and a out of luck, where one small mistake creates a domino chain that the crew has to think and sacrifice their way through without any villain needing to show up and make things worse, all this feels completely fair because there is nothing artificial to it, treating the physics and consequences of space travel with real respect and letting the reality of the situation generate all the dread without manufacturing any of it artificially.

Not everything on this movie is perfect but its very close, reason why I gave it a 8/10 because the movie was headed for a perfect score right up until the third part and thats when it takes a sharp left turn into territory that really pissed me off. After the oxygen garden burns and the mission is in serious trouble, the detour to dock with the abandoned Icarus I ship becomes their only shot at salvaging resources, and that part still fits the tone. What does not fit is what they find on that derelict ship, which is the original captain Pinbacker, who has been surviving alone out there for close to seven years, completely destroyed by solar exposure and who has turned into this religious fanatic convinced that God wants humanity to die in the cold. He sneaks aboard the Icarus II and starts hunting the crew down on a space station and it completely wrecks the tone of everything that came before it, like the part of not needing a villain. What makes it worse is that Danny Boyle shoots every scene with Pinbacker using this distorted blurry camera effect that makes it impossible to even focus on the screen, it looks cheap, it looks like a bad music video effect from 2003 and it pulls you right out of the atmosphere they spent an entire hour building with so much care. The movie already had Searle, a character clearly becoming dangerously obsessed with the sun right from that opening scene, so it would have made so much more sense to let him be the one who snaps and starts threatening the mission from inside, but instead they drop this random burnt ghost into the last twenty minutes and just let him trash everything the smart writing built up. It is the kind of ending that makes you want to go back and have a stern conversation with whoever approved that third act script.

#sunshine, #dannyboyle, #cillianmurphy, #chrisevans, #sciencefiction, #space, #icarustwo, #michelleyeoh, #markstrong, #solarwinter, #stellarbomb, #sun, #isolation, #thriller, #horrormovie, #slasher, #vacuumofspace, #spaceship, #moviereview, #filmcritique, #cinema, #movieblog, #filmblog, #suspense, #survival

Posted Using INLEO

Hello, fellow cinephiles! I'm glad to be writing for this community once again. Not long ago, as a university assignment, we were asked to watch the movie Sound Of Metal. I had previously seen the movie's poster on the internet and it had caught my attention, but I never actually looked it up to watch it. My sister had seen it, though, and she told me it was a pretty good film. The important thing about the assignment was that it was related to my communication course, so the movie features many interesting points regarding both language barriers and psychological aspects.

Ruben (Riz Ahmed), a man dedicated to music—specifically playing the drums in a band—suddenly finds himself struggling to hear one day. This causes him a great deal of stress, along with questions and doubts about what is happening to him. He leads a rockstar life with his girlfriend Lou (Olivia Cooke), who is the lead singer of the duo they both form. However, after some time, Ruben begins to have hearing problems for no apparent reason, which prompts him to seek medical help to find out what is going on. It turns out to be much more serious than he ever imagined, and he begins a journey between accepting that there is massive auditory damage and searching for a solution to his problem, as he needs to get back to his normal life and keep playing because that is his passion.

The movie, directed by Darius Marder and released in 2019, surprised me a lot because I didn't think I would like it so much. It is worth noting that this film is Marder's directorial debut. It also features a performance by Riz Ahmed, who plays the main and fundamental role in this story. What's incredible is that I was reading about how the actor prepared by learning to play the drums, and what you can see at the beginning of the movie is that he does it like a professional. That speaks very well of his responsibility when stepping into a character with major problems and many things to fix.

The film focuses mostly on Ruben; he starts having hearing problems, which leads him to specialists who tell him that he has lost almost all of his hearing. This is extremely sad and a devastating answer for him, as he thinks about how he needs to keep doing concerts with Lou and continue with the life he has always led. Lou doesn't know about the problem at first, but later she finds out and suggests that Ruben look for help. They head to a rural area and there they find a religious community of deaf people, where their main mission is to teach others sign language and how to learn to live in silence.

Ruben goes through several stages: first, he has a lot of anger, not understanding why something like this happened to him; then he remains in denial about his situation, which puts him in an aggressive state, losing the ability to find any calm in such a complicated predicament. But somehow, he begins to interact within the community of people with hearing disabilities, and although he doesn't like the idea at first, he stays there because he has no other choice. It is difficult because he must learn to understand others and himself. I think the first part of the movie is mostly him in his state of denial, refusing to accept that he will no longer be able to do the things he used to do in the same way as someone who can hear.

I really liked this movie, perhaps because these types of reflective films that leave you analyzing the ending allow your thoughts to expand regarding what was seen in the story. I think the actor did an incredible job; he behaved so naturally in the face of an event that could have destroyed him, making every scene you watch feel completely believable. Furthermore, I feel that for the assignment it was necessary to understand how the topic of communication and the story of the film intertwine. Something I learned is that sign language is not a non-verbal language, because even though it has certain differences from the language we humans normally use, other ways of communicating among people with hearing loss truly do exist.

Quite simply, I think that if I had been in the protagonist's shoes, I would have reacted the exact same way. It is not the same to be born with a condition as it is for it to happen to you when you are already an adult and used to your normalcy. And something I really liked about the movie is that the gentleman who welcomes Ruben into the center for people with hearing disabilities tells him that nobody there sees the lack of hearing as a disability, but rather as a condition, and as such, they choose to see the positive side of things. Just because you lose a sense doesn't mean you have to stop doing the things you love, and that is something incredibly valuable. Faced with a difficulty like this, some people may choose to stay in denial, while others start living from a new reality. If you have the chance to watch it or if you like these kinds of movies, I assure you that you might really enjoy it.

Trailer Oficial

_{Todo el texto de esta publicación es de mi autoría - All the text in this publication is my own. Los banners y el separador de texto fueron editados con la versión gratuita de Canva y PicsArt - The banners and the text separator were edited with the free version of Canva and PicsArt. La traducción del texto fue realizada con la versión gratuita de Deepl - The translation of the text was made with the free version of Deepl}

Spanish

¡Hola, querida comunidad de Hive! Hoy quiero abrir una ventana al reino de la imaginación y llevarlos de viaje hacia una noche iluminada por la tenue luz de la luna llena. Quiero hablarles de una obra que, a mi juicio personal, merece un absoluto 100/100: la hermosa Novela Venezolana Cumboto (1947), escrita por Ramón Díaz Sánchez. Si aún no la han leído, hoy les cuento por qué es una joya imprescindible.

La Estructura: Un Rompecabezas Perfecto

Para mí, esta novela no es una simple narración lineal; es un fascinante rompecabezas de recuerdos aglomerados que retumba solo, esperando esa pieza exacta que viene desde lejos para dar el ensamble perfecto. La historia se nos presenta de forma circular y episódica. El tiempo de la novela está detenido en los recuerdos de una noche tormentosa, una mala noche que «remueve el pantano dormido bajo la costra de los últimos 25 años».

A través de la voz evocadora de Natividad, nuestro narrador principal, la acción se frena en el primer capítulo para desplegar el pasado secuencialmente y se retoma con maestría a la mañana siguiente. Como bien exponía E.M. Forster, el gran mérito de una historia es conseguir que el público quiera saber qué ocurre después, y les aseguro que el misterio envuelto en la biblioteca, el baúl y los secretos familiares los atrapará de principio a fin.

Las Dudas Espirituales y su Gente

El núcleo más potente de la obra radica en lo que el propio Natividad llama sus "dudas espirituales". Me conmueve profundamente su conflicto de identidad al verse atrapado entre dos realidades: «¿A cuál de los dos mundos pertenecía yo? ¿Al del alegre sol que dora los mangos y ennegrece la pulpa del coco haciéndole brotar el aceite, o al de la blanca penumbra que resbala sobre los pisos brillantes y fríos?». Este dilema se entrelaza con personajes ficticios pero profundamente reales. Desde el viejo Cervelión —un negro largo y flauto que conecta al protagonista con sus raíces ancestrales— hasta la silenciosa Eduvige, la enigmática abuela Anita con su baúl profético, y la taciturna institutriz blanca Frau Berza, quien guardaba un secreto mientras golpeaba las teclas del piano en la Casa Blanca.

Un Cuadro de Ritmo, Magia y Poesía

Lo que termina por consagrar mi nota máxima para esta obra es la fuerza lírica de su atmósfera. Díaz Sánchez escribe con la maestría de un paisajista: el retumbar salvaje de los tambores, las noches de burros azules, el olor a leña y el canto de los negros en plena faena se conjugan con ritos fantásticos y misticismo puro. Es un manejo impecable de la luz y la oscuridad.

Mi veredicto:

El mayor valor de Cumboto es la sencillez inteligente con la que está escrita. El autor logra meternos en un estado de ensoñación paradisiaca sin caer jamás en historias empalagosas. ¡Es poética, es inteligente y se las recomiendo con el corazón!

Imágenes tomadas con el celular Redmi Note 13 He utilizado https://www.deepl.com/es/translator

Rating: 100/100

Originally posted through scrobble.life/books.

Posted Using INLEO

This movie is just as people described it.
Before I watched it, I read a review that really made me interested in watching it. The review boldly said that if one wants to see disturbing and disgusting scenes, then this is the movie to watch.

Dr Heiter, a retired surgeon, wants to fulfil his fantasy of creating a human centipede, as he commonly calls it. He's out looking for humans with matching tissues to use. Luckily for him, two ladies on tour walked to his house on the outskirts of town when they were seeking help to repair their faulty car on the lonely and bushy road.
Dr Heiter laced their drink with pills, and that's how they fell. He does a blood test on them, and the result comes out matching that of another Japanese guy who was chained to the bird already.
The surgeon did the surgery on them, connected the three of them from anus to mouth, in a way that they can't pull out. The Japanese guy was the only guy with a usable mouth; he's the only one who eats food while he passes feces to others through the anus that is connected to their mouth. Isn't that disgusting?

The graphics are so real. The cuts on the faces of the ladies are so real to the extent that pus is being pressed out. The scenes of the mouth of the ladies plugged to the anus are so disgusting, but I love them too because that's really a great act.

This movie has just a few characters; there was no confusion at all, and all the characters nailed their roles except the two guys that appeared towards the end. They communicated in German, and the subtitles didn't show and that made me struggle to know what they really came for.
Dr Heiter, his face is scary, and that's a great act by him.

This movie has subsequent parts, and I only watched the first one, and I'm wowed. I will rate it 8/10.

Thanks for reading.

Photo

With a woman standing in a Warsaw flower shop, looking at someone she used to love, and saying almost nothing — and you feel everything. That is Erupcja, seventy-one minutes. Polish word for eruption and it will sit with you for days longer than films twice its length. That's the kind of movie quietly breaks you.

Set against the subdued, quietly restless backdrop of Warsaw, Erupcja follows Nel, a florist drifting through routine, and Bethany, a British visitor whose arrival disrupts everything. Nel is grounded, present, rooted in the city like the flowers she arranges every day. Bethany played by Charli XCX in a performance I genuinely did not expect to affect me — is the opposite. She is untethered, restless in the particular way of someone who knows exactly what's coming and has chosen not to look at it directly.

Bethany arrives with her boyfriend Rob, who is planning a proposal but it quickly becomes clear that her intentions are elsewhere. Their trip is framed as romantic yet oddly hollow. Rob represents stability, predictability, a life mapped out in advance. Bethany, however, appears disconnected from that version of herself and Will Madden plays Rob with this earnest, painful obliviousness that I found genuinely heartbreaking. He has planned everything. The city, the itinerary, the ring probably and she is already somewhere else entirely, has been for a while, and he just hasn't seen it yet. I know that feeling from both sides and neither is comfortable.

Bethany arrives in Warsaw only to rekindle a relationship with her former flame, Nel. Bethany and Nel's reunion, in their mind, is a cosmic one — every time they see each other, a volcano somewhere in the world erupts and the movie plays this with a completely straight face, which I love. It doesn't wink at you, it doesn't explain or justify the mythology, it just presents it as fact — the way people in the grip of an overwhelming feeling will convince themselves the universe is participating. We've all done it, we've all looked for signs that the thing we desperately want to do is somehow cosmically endorsed.

Nel lives in Warsaw where she works at a flower shop. When her childhood friend Bethany comes to visit with a new boyfriend, a volcano erupts. Just like that, just like it always does and something in Nel's face — Lena Góra is extraordinary in this role, all restrained longing tells you she knew. She expected it, she has been half-waiting.

Fearing the impending proposal and unsure how she'll even answer it, Bethany heads off, driven by an impulsive urge to stoke an old flame. She ditches Rob's carefully curated romantic itinerary and follows Nel instead — through Warsaw's grungy lofts, clubs, back alleys, art spaces. During lunch, Bethany becomes more interested in an American painter they come across, played by Jeremy O. Harris, and is blisteringly quick to accept a party invitation, where Nel coincidentally also joins as another acquaintance of his. That scene at the party is where the film gets genuinely strange and gorgeous — everyone orbiting each other in the particular way of people who know something important is happening and are choosing to circle it rather than name it.

The film's collaborativeness can be felt in the unvarnished approach to the contemplative dialogue, which includes a couple of recitations of Lord Byron's apocalyptic poem "Darkness" and honestly that choice wrecked me. Byron writing about the world going cold and dark, recited in a film about a woman standing at the edge of a decision that will either illuminate or extinguish something. It's not subtle but it's sincere, and sincerity earns a lot.

The film's strength lies in its refusal to judge. It does not frame Bethany's actions as right or wrong — only as human. Rob is not a villain, Nel is not a temptress, Bethany is not reckless for its own sake. She is just a person who cannot make herself want something she doesn't want, no matter how reasonable and kind and planned that something is and the film holds that truth without punishing her for it.

In the end, Erupcja is less a story than a mood — fleeting, bruised, and quietly devastating. Charli XCX gives a performance that is both natural and quietly layered, embodying a character who is constantly slipping between identities. Lena Góra matches her with a grounded presence that prevents the film from floating away entirely. Together they create something that feels less like watching a movie and more like overhearing a conversation you were never meant to hear — intimate, unresolved, and completely alive.

#animation #movie #cinetv #animerealm #moviereview #disney #hiveposh #hiveengine #reviews #dailyblog #otaku #magic #waves #entertainment #moana #season2 #whattowatch #movierecommendation #film #cinema

#movie #cinetv #animerealm #moviereview #disney #hiveposh #hiveengine #reviews #dailyblog #otaku #magic #action #entertainment #nakedgun #season2 #whattowatch #movierecommendation #film #cinema #netflix #crunchroll #primevideo #niche #tylerperry

The Grown-Ups (S3x12)

Airdate: 1 November 2009

Written by: Brett Johnson & Matthew Weiner Directed by: Barbet Schroeder

Running Time: 48 minutes

No event depicted or referenced in Mad Men was less anticipated by its audience than the assassination of President John F. Kennedy. For many Americans of that era, and particularly for the Baby Boomers who would come to dominate the cultural narrative, 22 November 1963 stands as the grand, irrevocable dividing line between ‘What Used To Be’ and ‘What Is Now’. By the end of its third season, set in that otherwise relatively uneventful year of 1963, it was a foregone conclusion that the series would eventually confront how its protagonists—people whose profession is the shaping of images and perceptions—would react to the momentous events in Dallas. The only remaining question was one of narrative placement: would this national catastrophe be reserved for the season finale, or, in keeping with the emerging practice of high-quality serialised television, would it occur in the penultimate episode, allowing the aftermath to resonate into the season’s close? The Grown-Ups, the twelfth episode of the third season, decisively answered that question, and in doing so delivered one of the series’ most masterful and devastating instalments.

Co-written by Brett Johnson and Matthew Weiner and directed with remarkable restraint by the Swiss-French filmmaker Barbet Schroeder, the episode begins in deceptively banal fashion on Thursday, 21 November. The genius of this opening lies in its focus on the petty, everyday grievances that consume the Sterling Cooper office. Pete Campbell complains bitterly about a heating failure that has left him freezing; his physical discomfort is neatly paralleled by the professional chill of learning that Ken Cosgrove has been promoted over him, despite both men bringing in comparable accounts. Across the office, other trivial dramas unfold: Roger Sterling’s daughter, Margaret, frets about her Saturday wedding and the inevitable presence of Jane, Roger’s young wife, whom she cannot abide. Meanwhile, Peggy Olson discusses her ongoing liaison with the louche Duck Phillips with her roommate Karen Ericson, treating it as a mundane secret rather than a life-altering affair. This meticulous establishment of routine is crucial, for it constructs the placid surface that is about to be shattered.

Friday, 22 November dawns like any other day. The heating has been repaired, but now the office is oppressively hot—a minor irony that underscores the characters’ inability to achieve equilibrium. Peggy accepts a call from Duck, arranging a midday tryst. Don Draper argues with Lane Pryce over replacing the art director after the unjust firing of Sal Romano. Pete, seeking solace, discusses his stagnant future with Harry Crane in his office. As head of the television department, Harry has a set tuned to CBS to monitor advertisements; the soap opera As The World Turns plays in the background, ignored. This detail is a stroke of brilliant dramatic irony. The characters are so engrossed in their myopic personal and professional concerns that they literally ignore the world turning on its axis, as a special news bulletin interrupts the broadcast with the first fragments of news from Dallas.

The episode then meticulously dissects the varied, often self-absorbed, reactions of its ensemble. Duck Phillips, waiting for Peggy in his hotel suite, sees the bulletin but chooses to switch off the television, prioritising a sexual escapade over a national tragedy—a chillingly apt character note for a man defined by opportunism and escape. Back at Sterling Cooper, Don Draper’s world is invaded by the news more subtly; he notices the phones falling silent and the staff gathering anxiously around radios and television sets. It is only when colleagues burst into Harry Crane’s office that both Harry and Pete are ripped from their insular conversation and forced to comprehend the reality of the situation.

The collective shock and grief that permeate the office are portrayed with a realism that avoids melodrama. However, the episode’s sharpest critique is levelled at the characters’ capacity to refract even this seismic event through the prism of their own immediate desires. None is more blatantly affected in this regard than Margaret Sterling, who upon hearing the news declares her wedding to be “ruined.” Her petulance is not presented as mere villainy but as a tragic failure of perspective, emblematic of a privileged generation suddenly confronted with a history that refuses to accommodate their personal timelines. The following day, the invited executives grapple with the etiquette of the situation. Pete and Trudy Campbell, representing a newer, perhaps more morally cautious sensibility, decide not to attend. Don and Betty Draper, ever performing the role of the perfect couple, go. The wedding itself is a profoundly unhappy affair, a forced and brittle pantomime of celebration. Some guests, including Jane, retreat to the kitchen to watch the relentless television coverage, unable to maintain the façade. Don and Betty take to the dance floor in a grim imitation of marital bliss, but Betty’s attention is fractured by the arrival of Henry Francis, who, under the thin pretext of accompanying his daughter and Margaret’s friend Eleanor (Veronica Taylor), has come solely to see her. Here, the episode brilliantly juxtaposes the collapse of a national myth with the unravelling of a domestic one.

The aftermath of the wedding offers further poignant vignettes. Roger, tending to his drunken wife Jane, uses the opportunity to call Joan Holloway (now Harris). Their conversation is one of the episode’s quieter, more profound moments. Joan speaks of her husband, a doctor working in the Emergency Room, trying to process the day’s events, thereby grounding the national tragedy in tangible, human-scale suffering. It is a rare instance of a character attempting to contextualise the horror, rather than being overwhelmed by it.

The episode’s final act moves the focus decisively to the disintegration of the Draper marriage. On Sunday, 24 November, Betty leaves her home for a drive “to clear her head”—a transparent euphemism for a rendezvous with Henry Francis. Their meeting in a parked car is charged with a desperate intimacy. Henry declares his intention to marry her, and they share a kiss that seals the fate of Betty’s current life. Upon returning home, Betty initiates the conversation she has avoided for years, telling Don with devastating simplicity, “I don’t love you anymore.” Parallel to this, in the Campbell household, Trudy attempts to galvanise a despondent Pete, urging him to gather his clients and strike out to form his own agency—a suggestion that plants the seed for the season’s finale. These parallel scenes underscore the episode’s central thesis: just as the nation is forced to confront a terrifying new future, so too are these individuals.

Monday morning presents a haunting tableau of aftermath. Betty and Don share a silent, icy breakfast before Don leaves, ostensibly for work but in reality to confront the desolate truth that his marriage is over. The world outside is in official mourning; bars are closed. The Sterling Cooper office, that temple of capitalist distraction, is one of the few places open. There, Don finds Peggy already at work, diligently altering a television advertisement because its visual composition now bears an unwelcome and traumatic resemblance to the Zapruder film’s imagery. This moment is a perfect, succinct metaphor for the show’s entire project: the advertising industry, tasked with crafting palatable fictions, must now hastily edit reality itself.

The Grown-Ups is arguably one of Mad Men’s finest achievements. Its genius lies in the deft juxtaposition of a national catastrophe with the personal cataclysms of its protagonists. Just as America—and the world—would never be the same after Dallas, neither would Don Draper, who is finally forced to contend with an unimaginable loss that no amount of professional ingenuity or personal reinvention can mitigate. The episode operates on multiple levels, weaving threads of dark humour and profound irony into its fabric. The irony of Margaret’s “ruined” wedding and the bleak comedy of Duck turning off the news for a tryst—all serve to highlight the fragile vanity of the characters’ pre-assassination concerns.

Schroeder’s direction is notably economical and realistic, refusing to sensationalise events that were already seared into the cultural memory of much of the audience. The episode trusts viewers to connect the dots, relying on the power of implication and reaction rather than graphic recreation. This restraint makes the emotional impact all the more potent. Furthermore, the cultural resonance is cemented by the impeccable choice of Skeeter Davis’s ‘The End of the World’ over the closing credits. The song’s plaintive, heartbroken refrain (“Why does the sun go on shining?”) perfectly captures the episode’s essence: the bewildering persistence of daily life in the face of world-shattering events, and the private apocalypses that unfold in quiet living rooms and empty marriages.

The Grown-Ups transcends being merely an ‘assassination episode’. It is a masterful study in contrast, a meticulous deconstruction of American self-absorption on the brink of historical upheaval, and the point at which Mad Men fully matured into the tragic, clear-eyed masterpiece of television history it is recognised as today. It demonstrates that sometimes, growing up is forced upon you by a single, terrible Friday in November.

RATING: 9/10 (++++)

==

Blog in Croatian https://draxblog.com Blog in English https://draxreview.wordpress.com/ InLeo blog https://inleo.io/@drax.leo Substack https://draxster.substack.com/

LeoDex: https://leodex.io/?ref=drax InLeo: https://inleo.io/signup?referral=drax.leo Hiveonboard: https://hiveonboard.com?ref=drax 1Inch: https://1inch.exchange/#/r/0x83823d8CCB74F828148258BB4457642124b1328e

BTC donations: 1EWxiMiP6iiG9rger3NuUSd6HByaxQWafG ETH donations: 0xB305F144323b99e6f8b1d66f5D7DE78B498C32A7 BCH donations: qpvxw0jax79lhmvlgcldkzpqanf03r9cjv8y6gtmk9