scrobble.life
← Back

Title · no scrobbles indexed yet

Gattaca

The first scrobble for this title is still propagating, but a community review is already indexed below.

Reviews

Longform community posts about this title

Gattaca Still Feels Like the Future A Quiet Science Fiction Film That Hits Harder With Time (a warning against genetic determinism and eugenics)@thefed136d
Permalink·Open on PeakD ↗·Linked from existing Hive post

Comments

No comments yet — be the first.

6 more reviews

  1. Gattaca and the Future It Saw Coming. A Nineties Friday Movie Discussion. 🎥@thefed344d

    Gattaca PG-13 1997 ‧ Sci-fi/Thriller ‧ 1h 46m

    Below I continue my dystopian movie series with my third discussion about a nineties dystopian future film.

    Gattaca and the Future It Saw Coming

    The 1997 movie Gattaca imagined a future where your DNA decides everything — your job, your social status, even your chances at love or freedom. At the time, it felt like a cool, stylish sci-fi film. But now, with things like genetic testing kits and gene-editing tools becoming more common, Gattaca feels less like fiction and more like a warning.

    In the movie, people who are born naturally are considered flawed. The world is run by those who were genetically engineered to be stronger, smarter, and healthier. The main character, Vincent, wasn’t engineered, but he has big dreams — like becoming an astronaut. To get there, he has to fake his identity and pretend to be someone with “perfect” genes. It’s a powerful story about how labels and limits can be forced on us, even when we’re capable of so much more.

    What’s creepy is how close some of this feels to real life. Today, companies are collecting genetic data. Insurance providers and employers are already talking about using it to make decisions. Algorithms and risk profiles are starting to shape how people are treated. It’s not exactly like Gattaca, but it’s heading in that direction — and the movie reminds us how dangerous that can be.

    Still, the heart of Gattaca isn’t just about the dangers of technology. It’s about how human determination can beat the odds. Vincent doesn’t let a bad “genetic score” stop him. He pushes forward and proves that who you are isn’t written in your DNA. That message still hits hard today.

    If anything, Gattaca is more important now than ever. It asks us to think about the future we’re building. Just because we can control certain things with science doesn’t mean we should. And maybe the most human parts of us — our flaws, our struggles, our dreams — are the things we need to protect most.

    Permalink·Open on PeakD ↗·Linked from existing Hive post
  2. NOOB FILM REVIEW - THE PHILOSOPHY BEHIND GATTACA (1997) directed by Andrew Niccol@nazirullsafry1190d

    gattaca.png

    (This review was written during the Kuala Lumpur's Philosophy Fest last week. In one session, there was a screening of the film Gattaca and the invited panels were a film director, Al Jafree and a scholar, Dr. Azman Ismail. Here are my thoughts after the session, and after watching the film again after more than 20 years)

    What is immediately clear to me (philosophically) is that this film is of Retrofuturism, which is defined as, "how predictions of the future were depicted in an earlier era. It's a combination of modern-day aesthetics, futuristic technology, and old-fashioned design."

    I am with one of the panel, a film director, Al Jafree when he said this is a telling of a dystopia. While Dr. Azman Ismail touches on the social setup of being industrial and hypermodern in need of a 'new myth'.

    It is quite the same thing that Joseph Campbell said about Star Wars being the new myth needed to feed on the expansion of the modern human mind and imagination. It started ever since mankind got out of the cave and the dense forest. They eventually discovered the horizon, looked up to the sky, and wonder. The myths of heavenly abodes were eventually born.

    But regardless of the setup, Star Wars, at its root talks about a protagonist Luke Skywalker in a quest for knowing who he really is. A self-discovery. And in Gattaca, it is about Vincent Freeman (Ethan Hawke. his last name is a strong hint) in a quest to be free to achieve his ambition, which is going to space. Both protagonists, in a way, like Al Jafree has also mentioned, are on their own 'Hero's Journey'.

    Also brought forward by one of the attendees, Rozan Mat Rasip was the symbolism of the scenes involving the ocean where in one scene Vincent Freeman was naked. Apart from Al Jafree's take of it being spiritual, to me, particularly along the film's narrative, is of its cleansing properties (hence Vincent being naked). The ocean (or mother earth) shows that in both swimming contests, Vincent is the stronger one compared to the so-called 'genetically perfect' brother. Yes. It is also subliminally about brothers' rivalry. Hence why there is the crime thriller where his brother is the investigator subplot to make Vincent who he is in the end. 336796013_530067429210150_3547108433385874725_n.jpg But what interested me the most is the character Jerome Eugene (Jude Law. Also note the last name) who despite being genetically perfect and the best man for the space mission, sees no meaning to it all and decided to help Vincent to go instead of him. After accomplishing that, he cremated himself. That is a strong Albert Camus Absurdism statement where the "contradiction between humanity's desire to find meaning in the Universe, and the Universe itself which is completely meaningless." And both the character Vincent and Jerome has been juxtaposed just to show that. Vincent instead goes to the other extreme end of Absurdism (Nihilism?), which is to find meaning, which is what he said at the end.

    "For someone who was never meant for this world, I must confess I'm suddenly having a hard time leaving it. Of course, they say every atom in our bodies was once part of a star. Maybe I'm not leaving... maybe I'm going home."

    This instantly reminded me of what Neil deGrasse Tyson said in his Cosmos series "Human is the Universe looking back at itself" because we are made of it. Apart from the title Gattaca is actually the genetic code (which is comprised of the letters G,A,T and C. Also the many uses of the spiral staircase which is the shape of the DNA), it is like Al Jafree said has been used in this dystopian tale of genetic engineering to divide the human into classes.

    It is ultimately about humans trying to play god and quoting the verse from the Koran which says "God created us differently for us to know each other." And what will we discover when we finally know each other? That we are all the same.

    And the never-ending discussion about the finality of fate which is determined by the divine and the free will of man in choosing his own path. Would Vincent ever get to the mission to outer space if he just accepted his fate as an 'in-valid' cleaner? Or is it his free will that paved his way toward his goal and the master of his own destiny?

    Also note the test doctor wearing white before Vincent gets into the rocket, acting like an angel approving his heavenly ascension. There are many rocket launches seen from the beginning of the film. Is it a symbol of enlightenment for those who are worthy? The camera pans from one face to another inside the rocket and stopped at Vincent's. Maybe the rest of them are 'in-valid's too with their own story on getting there.

    The most powerful motivation is indeed rejection. Maybe that is why the Chinese in this country (Malaysia) still end up being in front despite the Malays being given the advantage since the New Economic Policy (NEP) in 1970. One does need to be philosophical in explaining that.

    This session is more of a philosophy in the film. What it could have been being a session about film philosophy.

    Thank you for making all the way to the end :)

    Permalink·Open on PeakD ↗·Linked from existing Hive post
  3. Film Review: Gattaca (1997)@drax1237d

    (source: tmdb.org)

    The Golden Age of Science Fiction was a long time ago. The period with the largest number of genre classics was roughly between mid 1960s and mid 1970s, and in that time many grand film makers approached science fiction not as an excuse for bug eyed monster, special effects or cute toy-selling aliens but actually as a genre of ideas. There were many attempts to restore that state of affairs to Hollywood and other parts of world cinema and the most persistent person in that effort was New Zealand film maker Andrew Niccol, best known as the screenwriter for The Truman Show. His directorial debut, 1997 film Gattaca for which also wrote screenplay, can be viewed as his most successful work.

    The plot is set in not so distant future, when biotechnology advanced enough to make eugenics not only widely accepted as practical. With genetic screening parents can not only prevent their children from having any physical or mental impairments, but also enjoy benefits of genetic engineering and have perfect babies. The protagonist is Vincent Freeman (played by Ethan Hawke), young man who had misfortune of having parents who preferred conceiving child the old-fashioned way. Vincent grew up to be shortsighted, left-handed and having heart-condition that would make him “in-valid”, and as such considered burden or unacceptable risk compared with “valids”. Vincent, whose parents later decided to have another “valid” child, was confronted with the world of de facto segregation based on quality genome and his dream of flying to space was unfulfilled, with him forced to work as janitor in Gattaca Corporation. His luck changes thanks to Jerome Morrow (played by Jude Law), “valid” who became cripple due to traffic accident and who desperately wants to hide his imperfect condition from the rest of society. Vincent volunteers to take his identity, using his blood and urine samples to get a proper job in Gattaca Corporation and quickly advance in its ranks. He catches attention of Irene Cassini (played by Uma Thurman), beautiful co-worker who, despite “valid”, isn’t perfect enough for highest of corporate position. Situation gets complicated when one of corporation’s directors gets murdered and police investigation threatens to reveal his charade.

    Despite being well-received by critics and its subject matter becoming relevant and much talked about after news about cloning of Dolly the Sheep, Gattaca failed at the both office. The reason for that failure is very simple – it had very little things to attract the average audience or viewers accustomed to science fiction as something closer to action or horror genres. The only thing that might have brought people to theatres was the characters that looked more physically attractive than usual (and, unlike most Hollywood films, here it had justification in the plot dealing with world obsessed with physical perfection). Gattaca was film destined to attract minority audience, those who liked to engage their brain while watching the film. Niccol delivered the goods by allowing debate between fate and free will and also by displaying world both very different and disturbingly close to our own, in which seemingly small technological advance could have far-reaching consequences and create another form of dystopia. Niccol tries to portray this future by sharp visual contrasts – protagonists are beautiful, but forced to conform to single ideal and wear almost identical clothes and have almost identical hairstyles. Sharp contrast is also achieved by cinematography by Slawomir Idziak which insists on cold interiors and warm sepia-toned exteriors. Niccol creates another contrast by having the future world look both futuristic (through brutalist architecture) and “retro” (in the form of electric cars in 1950s and 1960s styles). Effect is even better due to very good soundtrack by Michael Nyman.

    The cast is also very good. Ethan Hawke handles his complicated role very well and has very good chemistry with Uma Thurman, with whom he began dating on the set before two of them becoming married couple. Jude Law is also good in one of his first major Hollywood roles. Supporting players are good, especially famed writer Gore Vidal in the role of corporate director. Gattaca is very good, but, like the protagonist, imperfect. The main flaw is the murder subplot getting in the way of the story and somewhat too convenient and too “soapy” motive of sibling rivalry which is resolved near the end in overmelodramatic way. Gattaca nevertheless deserves recommendation as piece of science fiction cinema that looks like it belonged to its Golden Age.

    RATING: 8/10 (+++)

    Blog in Croatian https://draxblog.com Blog in English https://draxreview.wordpress.com/ Leofinance blog https://leofinance.io/@drax.leo Cent profile https://beta.cent.co/@drax Minds profile https://www.minds.com/drax_rp_nc Uptrennd profile https://www.uptrennd.com/user/MTYzNA

    Unstoppable Domains: https://unstoppabledomains.com/?ref=3fc23fc42c1b417 Hiveonboard: https://hiveonboard.com?ref=drax Bitcoin Lightning HIVE donations: https://v4v.app/v1/lnurlp/qrcode/drax Rising Star game: https://www.risingstargame.com?referrer=drax 1Inch: https://1inch.exchange/#/r/0x83823d8CCB74F828148258BB4457642124b1328e

    BTC donations: 1EWxiMiP6iiG9rger3NuUSd6HByaxQWafG ETH donations: 0xB305F144323b99e6f8b1d66f5D7DE78B498C32A7

    Simple Posted with Ecency footer

    Permalink·Open on PeakD ↗·Linked from existing Hive post
  4. A review of "Gattaca": can humanity be upgraded? and is it right to do it?@aurzeq1357d

    Source

    Plot

    In the near future, where the story is set, it is possible to conceive human beings with a certain genetic makeup. The traits of the unborn child can be anticipated through this method, allowing it to enter the world without any flaws. In this situation, society is split into Valids—beings with a perfect genetic make-up—and Non-Valids—people born with imperfect genomes who are doomed to live on the periphery of society. The protagonist, Vincent Freeman, aspires to be an astronaut but is unable to do so because he was born a "disabled" person. He is predicted to pass away before the age of thirty because he was born with the same cardiac condition as his father, according to calculations made using his genetic makeup. Vincent is categorized as invalid as a result, whereas Anthony's parents ask for genetic changes so that Anthony can be categorized as valid upon birth. But Vincent aspires to be an astronaut and will do anything to pursue that goal despite all difficulties. Vincent resolves to assume the identity of Jerome, a real paraplegic as a result of an accident, in order to fulfill his ambition. But it won't be simple to keep his identity a secret.

    Source

    Why you should watch it?

    Modified DNA is now employed in the fields of bioinformatics, genetic engineering, and nanotechnology. For example, genetic screening to lower the risk of disease. Niccol, the director of Gattaca, however, inquires as to what the upper bound of science is. Is it right or bad to choose the physical characteristics and behavioral traits of children who will grow up to be perfect adults? Is it legitimate to split society into two classes, that are genetically unable to communicate, through the analysis of saliva after a kiss to determine if the partner meets the necessary requirements?

    Source

    Human imperfection against genetic perfection. Thanks to Ethan Hawke's ability to portray two characters at once, switching between the calm and assurance of faultless men and the emotions that bring him closer to human nature, these words are bound to be reversed. Jude Law's character is one of the most popular. After switching to the the status of "no longer valid," he also encounters discrimination, and it is only after witnessing his friend's tenacity that he understands that "there is no gene for the human spirit," as one of the slogans promoting the movie claims. It's a realization that Uma Thurman, who is at comfortable playing the part of the protagonist's love interest Irene Cassini, also has.

    Source

    Thui is a movie that exploits the enduring dualism of identity. The hazy line between fact and fiction thus gives way to a perilous game of intrigue and lies masterfully orchestrated by the New Zealand director, who is capable of leaving a silent unease, born of a world split in half where racism has transcended skin color or religious belief in favor of simple DNA diversity in every shot. With the protagonist's voice-over introducing us into the background of this future where dreams seem unattainable for the less fortunate, Gattaca: The Gateway to the Universe hides philosophical and reflective cues well put into action by a metaphorical narration from the very first moments. Thus, the pioneering courage of our hero, ready to do anything to reach the desired goal, assumes crucial importance. The movie maintains its precise balance, allowing suspense to peek out on several occasions (the "spiral staircase" sequence is memorable), and then leads to a perfect closing of the circle with a sweetly poetic taste.

    Source

    Apart from the ideas it explores, Gattaca is a film full of vivid visuals, with a specific outer yellowish photography evoking a sense of apathy in a society that has lost its humanity.

    Source

    Conclusion

    Is it feasible to advanceupgrade humanity? and if the answer is yes, then should scientific advancement be used to do it? The purpose of this movie is not to answer to these questions, but to raise concerns about the challenging balance between human evolution and scientific advancement. And this is why Gattaca, in my opinion, is a good movie, because it makes you reflect and think, and this is something that nowadays is not so common.

    Rating

    My personal vote is:

    8.0/10


    If you enjoyed the post, please leave an upvote and/or a comment, and feel free to follow me (at the link below) if you want to see my next movie review.

    ➡️ hive.blog/@aurzeq ⬅️

    fIRMA_hIVE.png

    Permalink·Open on PeakD ↗·Linked from existing Hive post
  5. Gattaca (1997) Movie Review - A Dramatic Look Into The Future Of Racism With Gene Editing@cyberdemon5311532d
    Permalink·Open on PeakD ↗·Linked from existing Hive post
  6. GATTACA [Andrew Niccol, USA 1997] - movie review by Mandibil@mandibil3583d

    Eugenics can be seen as a state-enforced genetic selection at birth and has naturally raised a growing concern, as the technology of genetic manipulation has become more and more developed and economically feasible. It is not cloning, like with Dolly the sheep from the year before the premiere of this movie, but seeking out the best combination of egg and sperm for at particular heterosexual couple to ensure their dream of the perfect, but also state-approved, child. This movie is about a world, where eugenics has become the norm ... but where there is a natrural disgust from those, who were not so fortunate to have been born this way.

    Gattaca is an academy for those who are getting educated and tested to get to travel in spaceships into the solar system. Vincent (Ethan Hawke) is born the "normal" way but he has some physical and mental shortcomings the parents want to avoid with their next child. Anton, his younger brother, is born as a "valid", referring to his genetics, while Vincent seen as an "in-valid". When he has grown up and work in the "in-valid" workforce, he dreams of being as perfect as his brother so that he can fulfill his dream of going out into space every time he sees one of the regular launches of a spaceship. He finds someone who can help him with his dream, but it will take some extreme measures. He has to get the genes from valid individual, and is hooked up with Jerome Morrow (Jude Law), who has lost mobility in his legs. He exchanges blood and gets all possible genetic samples from Jerome and has to become his identity. He is enrolled in Gattaca and starts the strict and education under heavy biometric surveillance. When the leader of the academy is found murdered one of his "in-valid" eyebrow hairs is found nearby. It is considered evidence and now his scam is in danger of exposure, even if he is not the murderer. The police detectives are getting closer and closer to his true identity, while he at the same time, falls in love with one of the female "valids" (Uma Thurman).

    The obvious theme is the feeling of being outside. Outside the "good" company or being unwanted and looked down upon for not being perfect. The perfection ideal is a sick and destructive illusion, that keeps driving you away from staying human and become who you really are. Genetic selection i see as a metaphor for female hypergamy. There has been a genetic selection going on since the dawn of life and females are the gatekeepers of whether a mans genes gets to an egg or not. State "sponsored" genetic selection is not better in any way, but it is wise to realize that it is already a reality, albeit a more hidden one. This is a very stylish, clean and pure movie artistically. In some ways i like the use of colored light and larger open spaces around unrecognizable large buildings as the backdrop. It gives it a futuristic look that is not too over the top. On the other hand, everything is so clean and symmetric and it is a cliche that works two ways. It is also an illustration of the "valids" superior biology, shown as these unemotional, machine like robots (which is actually odd for a very intelligent person), that has references back to Metropolis for sure. They are made too machine like and reminds me a lot of Christian Bale in "American Psycho". Being a sci-fi drama, there is actually very little science fiction to it at all. It is mostly based on the murder-case and Vincent´s or rather Jerome´s efforts not to be revealed. I found that disappointing. The movie poster even has a planet on it, that is clearly not earth, and i find that odd.

    Anyway the genetic theme is an interesting one and you do get a good sense of how i feels to be lying and betraying and constantly having to avoid recognition for who you truly are. maybe that is a small theme too, but on the overall this is sort of an average movie. It is professionally executed and have fine actors, but it lacks some in the sci-fi and the emotional department. It is too focused on the murder case to drive the plot forward, while the story of Vincent and Jerome becomes a side dish. A bad decision in my view.

    Rating: 5/10

    Permalink·Open on PeakD ↗·Linked from existing Hive post