scrobble.life
← Back

Title · no scrobbles indexed yet

Death Note

The first scrobble for this title is still propagating, but a community review is already indexed below.

Reviews

Longform community posts about this title

The Philosophy of Death Note: Justice or Madness?@vickystory321d
Permalink·Open on PeakD ↗·Linked from existing Hive post

Comments

No comments yet — be the first.

6 more reviews

  1. 💀 DEATH NOTE 2017 💀 A trash adaptation / Una adaptación basura [ENG|ESP]@leansorribas402d

    Best regards Hive community. 🎬📽️

    Un saludo cordial comunidad de Hive. 🎬📽️


    Miniatura.gif

    Image edited by me, using photoshop / Imagen editada por mí, con photoshop

    Fuente 1

    Fuente 2


    Literally, this movie is the second worst adaptation of an anime to live action. And it's not the first because it's impossible to make something more disastrous than Dragon Ball Evolution.


    Literalmente, esta película es la segunda peor adaptación de un anime al live action. Y no es la primera porque es imposible hacer algo más desastroso que Dragon Ball Evolution.


    In this opportunity I would like to explain why this movie is insulting and disrespectful to Death Note. I hope you enjoy reading me complaining.

    En esta oportunidad me gustaría explicar por qué esta película es un insulto y una falta de respeto hacia Death Note. Espero que disfruten leerme al quejarme.

    dsadasd.png


    1.png

    Fuente


    The main problem with this movie is that it is an adaptation of Death Note. I mean, the movie itself is not bad, the problem is that in some aspects it is very different from the anime they were supposed to adapt.

    El problema principal que tiene esta película es que es una adaptación de Death Note. Me explico, la película en sí misma no es mala, el problema es que en algunos aspectos es muy diferente al anime que se supone que debieron adaptar.


    2.png

    Fuente


    The clearest example of this is the drastic change in the ethnicity of L. I understand that it is not easy to find an actor when you are looking to play an animated character. I fully understand that. That's why I don't expect an actor to be exactly the same as his animated version, pretending that is stupid.

    El ejemplo más claro de esto es el cambio tan drástico en la etnia de L. Entiendo que no es nada fácil encontrar un actor cuando se busca interpretar un personaje animado. Lo comprendo perfectamente. Por eso no espero a un actor que sea exactamente igual a su versión animada, pretender eso es estúpido.


    The issue is that the character that within the anime is someone extremely pale and with very pronounced dark circles under his eyes. He can't be played by someone black. I have absolutely nothing against the actor nor am I racist, but physically he is almost the opposite of what L is in the anime. It even looks like they purposely looked for an actor who is as far away from L's appearance as possible.

    La cuestión es que el personaje que dentro del anime es alguien extremadamente pálido y con ojeras muy marcadas. No puede ser interpretado por alguien negro. No tengo absolutamente nada en contra del actor ni soy racista, pero físicamente es casi opuesto a lo que es L en el anime. Hasta parece que buscaron adrede un actor que se aleje lo más posible de la apariencia de L.


    3.png

    Fuente


    Another example of this is with Light's personality. That at times it seems that they are opposite characters between the version of this movie and the anime. In the anime when he sees Shinigami Ryuk for the first time he practically doesn't react and keeps calm, he was even waiting for him. When he sees him in the movie he starts screaming uncontrollably, calls for help desperately and almost faints. It is too great a contrast.

    Otro ejemplo de esto se da con la personalidad de Light. Que por momentos parece que son personajes opuestos entre la versión de esta película y el anime. En el anime cuando ve al Shinigami Ryuk por primera vez prácticamente no reacciona y mantiene la calma, incluso lo estaba esperando. Cuando lo ve en la película se pone a gritar descontroladamente, pide ayuda desesperadamente y casi se desmaya. Es un contraste demasiado grande.


    4.png

    Fuente


    There is also a great disparity in his treatment of women. The anime's Light is practically uninterested in them and only manipulates them for his own benefit. Light in the movie is head over heels in love with Mia. The worst thing is that at times this girl is smarter than him. And at times she manipulates him. At a certain point it seems that Mia is more Light than Light himself.

    También se da una gran disparidad en cuanto al trato con las mujeres. Al Light del anime prácticamente no le interesan y solo las manipula para su propio beneficio. Light de la película está perdidamente enamorado y se arrastra por Mia. Lo peor es que por momentos está chica es más inteligente que él. Y ocasiones ella lo manipula a él. En cierto punto parece que Mia es más Light que el propio Light.


    5.png

    Fuente


    One of the few things that can be salvaged from this movie is Ryuk. I have absolutely no complaints about this character. Without a doubt, the best of the movie. Both his performance and his animation were very good. And I think this is because he is one of the few that are faithful to the anime version.

    Una de las pocas cosas que se puede rescatar de esta película es Ryuk. No tengo absolutamente ninguna queja con respecto a este personaje. Sin dudas, lo mejor de la película. Tanto su interpretación, como su animación fueron muy buenas. Y creo que esto se da porque es de lo pocos que son fieles a su versión del anime.


    6.png

    Fuente


    The ending wasn't bad, it's even good. I don't want to spoil, but let's just say that during the last 10 minutes it does feel like Death Note. The problem is that 10 minutes doesn't cover the remaining hour of movie.

    El final no estuvo mal, incluso es bueno. No quiero spoilear, pero digamos que durante los últimos 10 minutos si parece Death Note. El problema es que 10 minutos no tapa la hora de película restante.


    In short, if you liked the Death Note anime, don't watch this movie. To avoid a bad taste. Overall, I consider this movie to be bad and an insult to the original work. If I had to give it a rating, it would be a 4/10.

    En resumen, si te gustó el anime de Death Note, no te veas esta película. Para evitar un mal gusto. En general, considero que esta película es mala y es un insulto a la obra original. Si le tuviera que dar una calificación, sería un 4/10.


    7.png

    Fuente

    dsadasd.png

    Thank you very much for reading my review. It is a pleasure to share with you. I look forward to posting in this community in the future. I send you all a big hug and hope you are having a good day.🎞️🎬

    Muchas gracias por leer mi reseña. Es un placer compartir con ustedes. Espero poder publicar en esta comunidad en un futuro. Les mando un fuerte abrazo a todos y espero que estén teniendo un buen día. 🎞️🎬

    Translator Deepl.com All images edited by me using Photoshop

    Traductor Deepl.com Todas las imágenes editadas por mí usando Photoshop


    fghfhg.png

    Todos mis links aquí 👇 / All my links here 👇

    **Linktree**
    Permalink·Open on PeakD ↗·Linked from existing Hive post
  2. Death Note - Live Action (2006) review: An accurate mess.@richardalexis1439d

    001.jpg Source

    Separador.png

    While I've had a lot of love for the Death Note anime (and as a consequence, the manga from which it's derived), I've never been particularly jealous when it comes to adaptations. Of course, I grew up around the animated series and always saw it as an ideal way to tell that story, however this never limited my ability to understand that its premise had so much potential and could be relatively easily adapted to other mediums.

    When I bitterly recall how abysmal the 2017 Netflix-exclusive adaptation turned out (which is often put on par with Dragon Ball Evolution in terms of quality, which is unfortunate) I was never bothered by the sheer amount of creative liberties that were taken, in fact, I found certain decisions as charismatic and interesting... My real problem with the film did not radiate in its lack of ability to understand the original work, but in the little sense that the decisions made within its internal logic had.

    still_1_3_1360x765.png Source

    It seems incredible, but Death Note is not an easy story to tell, beyond the aesthetic and superficial elements that flood each of its frames or pages, there is a lot of thematic density that is difficult to transfer, and many times, in an effort to bring freshness At the table, a slight change in the structure ends up bringing down the entire tower.

    As many of you may know, there are live-action movies that pre-release the Netflix version by Natt Wolf and Willem Dafoe, created in the land of the rising sun and regularly regarded as "the best of the bunch." My adoration for Light Yagami and Detective L's intellectual battle used to not be enough to compel me to watch them, but things changed today after a couple of ridiculously long Youtube videos analyzing their changes from the original manga.

    Unlike Netflix's vision, Death Note (2006) is an almost literal translation, which changes a couple of elements to fit in a duration limited to less than two hours, it only shows us a reduced portion of the story and although It has a couple of quite curious sequels (The Last Name, L Change The World and Light Up The New World) today I would like to focus only on this first part.

    In an obsessive effort to respect the essence of the manga, Death Note absolutely fails to understand the spirit of its own story, replicating several of its essential notes (By example it shows a cold and inteligente Light Yagami: the ideal representative of Japanese youth, a faithful Ryuk both visual as substantially and an atmosphere very reminiscent of what we've seen before), but it also feels cheap, shallow, like it's a fan project that didn't make the amount of money it needed on gofoundme and decided to go ahead anyway.b

    The dialogues are lousy, the direction lacks personality and is unable to give weight to the most dramatic scenes that need it, the cgi is embarrassing and the intellectual struggle between the protagonists is practically nil.

    AAAABVu_1bsMUoZpbfWbwsivsP3xhSOUYIY9AafYYOJNj20i0RSz7SeK1wnvJmWXLoj7NAacJFB3TLjk9GJeDOqTXVC1xmz9z3i5SEIP.jpg Source

    Death Note is what would happen if we could create a Death Note movie for someone who never saw the anime or read the manga, someone who read the premise and watched a couple of videos on YouTube to get a general idea of ​​what it was supposed to feel like, without the resources to make it look good, other than a couple of spot-on costumes and decent actors with dialogue that they could never have made it sound good.

    Not everything is lousy, I must admit, there are a couple of curious decisions that deserve our recognition, beyond its ability to cut a good portion of the content that the work had in the first place, it could serve as a messy "what if" for those who love everything that has to do with Death Note.

    Separador.png

    001.jpg Source

    Separador.png

    Aunque he sentido muchísimo amor por el anime de Death Note (Y cómo consecuencia, por el manga de dónde deriva), nunca he Sido particularmente celoso cuando se trata de adaptaciones. Por supuesto, crecí al lado de la serie animada y siempre la percibí como una forma ideal de contar esa historia, no obstante, esto nunca limitó mi capacidad para entender que su premisa tenía muchísimo potencial y podría adaptarse con relativa facilidad a otros medios.

    Cuando recuerdo con amargura lo pésima que resultó la adaptación exclusiva para Netflix en 2017 (Que suele ponerse en par con Dragon Ball Evolution en términos de calidad, algo lamentable) nunca me molestaron la gran cantidad de libertades creativas que se tomaron, de hecho, encontraba ciertas decisiones como carismáticas e interesantes... Mi verdadero problema con el filme no irradiaba en su falta de capacidad para entender la obra original, sino en el poco sentido que tenían las decisiones que se tomaron dentro de su lógica interna.

    still_1_3_1360x765.png Source

    Parece mentira, pero Death Note no es una historia fácil de contar, más allá de los elementos estéticos y superficiales que inhundan cada uno de sus frames o páginas, existe muchísima densidad temática difícil de trasladar, y muchas veces, en un afán por traer frescura a la mesa, un ligero cambio en la estructura termina derribando toda la torre.

    Cómo muchos de ustedes sabrán existen unas adaptaciones live action previas a la versión de Natt Wolf y Willem Dafoe, creadas en la tierra del sol naciente y regularmente consideradas cómo "las mejores del monton". Mi adoración por la batalla intelectual de Light Yagami y el detective L solía no ser suficiente para impulsarme a verlas, las cosas cambiaron hoy luego de un par de videos ridículamente extensos en Youtube analizando sus cambios con el manga original.

    A diferencia de la visión de Netflix, Death Note (2006) es una traslación casi literal, que cambia un par de elementos para encajar en una duración limitada a menos de dos horas y que no solo nos muestra una porción reducida de la historia, aunque cuenta con un par de secuelas bastante curiosas (The Last Name, L Change The World y Light Up The New World) hoy quisiera enfocarme únicamente en esta primera parte.

    En un afán obsesivo por respetar la esencia del manga, Death Note fracasa absolutamente en entender el espíritu de su propia historia, replicando varias de sus notas escenciales (La muestra de un Light Yagami frío y representante ideal de la juventud japonesa, un Ryuk fiel tanto visual como sustancialmente y una atmósfera muy reminiscente a lo que hemos visto antes), también se siente barata, superficial, como si se tratara de un proyecto de fans que no logró la cantidad de dinero que necesitaba en gofoundme y de igual forma decidió seguir adelante.

    Los diálogos son pésimos, la dirección carece de personalidad y es incapaz de brindarle peso a las escenas más dramáticas que lo necesitan, el cgi es vergonzoso y la lucha intelectual entre los protagonistas es prácticamente nula.

    AAAABVu_1bsMUoZpbfWbwsivsP3xhSOUYIY9AafYYOJNj20i0RSz7SeK1wnvJmWXLoj7NAacJFB3TLjk9GJeDOqTXVC1xmz9z3i5SEIP.jpg Source

    Death Note es lo que sucedería si le podieramos a alguien crear una película de Death Note que nunca vio el anime ni leyó el manga, alguien que leyó la premisa y Vió un par de videos en YouTube para hacerse una idea general de como se debía sentir, sin los medios para hacer que se vea bien, más allá de un par de vestuarios acertados y actores decentes con diálogos que nunca podrían haber hecho que se escucharan bien.

    No todo es pésimo, debo admitirlo, hay un par decisiones curiosas que merecen nuestro reconocimiento, más allá de su habilidad para recortar una buena porción del contenido con el que la obra contaba en primer lugar, podría servir como un "what if" desprolijo para aquellos que adoran todo lo que tenga que ver con Death Note.

    Separador.png

    Twitter/Instagram/Letterbox: Alxxssss

    AA4FE540-E68C-4DFF-90B3-32A2B0222C22.png

    Permalink·Open on PeakD ↗·Linked from existing Hive post
  3. La historia que nunca se completa - Death Note One Shot@takeru2552333d

    [](http://www.anmtvla.com/2020/02/el-nuevo-one-shot-de-death-note-ya-esta.html)
    [](https://www.tierragamer.com/death-note-donde-leer-gratis-one-shot/)
    Es muy común que en alguna parte de tu vida te hayan mandado a hacer un ensayo sobre ética, y debería resultar fácil por la cantidad de información y lo fácil que es debatir acerca de un tema tan ambiguo como lo es la ética, pero termina siendo más difícil de lo pensado por las limitaciones que te imponen al ser un trabajo para alguna universidad o empresa. Ahora sin esas limitaciones en mi espalda y con el éxito que está teniendo el oneshot de Death Note, quiero sacar mi lado más otaku para poder hablar de una mejor forma sobre lo que es la ética, y como un anime que tiene más de diez años y además es ficción, sigue dando de qué hablar en debates sobre lo que está bien y está mal en el mundo.

    Antes que nada, quiero decir: el nuevo oneshot de Death Note es increíble. A pesar de que me he leído algunos mangas, nunca había leído un oneshot pero tengo entendido que casi siempre son hechos por fans y por eso no tienen la publicidad que tuvo este, además de que es escrito y dibujado por los creadores originales de Death Note, así que tienen un poco de ventaja al ya ser unos veteranos en el medio. Pero más allá de lo técnico, la historia auto conclusiva termina con un final (que aunque no me gustó) no estuvo mal, y en poco más de ochenta paginas logra una buena historia con crítica social, un plan bien elaborado, un buen final y un flashback. Material suficiente para hacer un OVA.

    Todos conocen la historia de Death Note, la libreta la cual mata personas al escribir su nombre en ellas. Kira (Light) usa la libreta para eso mismo, matar personas y así crear un nuevo mundo, mientras que aKira (Minoru) la vende y así se vuelve rico. El primer Kira, Light, en su momento hizo algo muy parecido a lo que hizo Thanos en Infinity War, creando un debate en si estaba bien o estaba mal matar criminales solo por ser criminales. Se puede comparar a Thanos y a Light al pensar quien hizo más mal, o depende de cómo lo veas, quien hizo más mal, porque uno lo hizo para desaparecer a la “escoria” del mundo desde su perspectiva, y otro lo hizo de forma equitativa para que así el mundo estuviese en equilibrio por la sobrepoblación.

    Minoru, por su lado, hizo algo que a primera vista parece más altruista, usando la Death Note sin matar a alguien y repartiendo el dinero que ganó entre toda Tokio. Cómo dije, a primera instancia parece bueno, pero a él no le importa quien tenga la death note, así que pudo habérsela dado a otro Kira mucho más despiadado, incluso (aunque ya la historia explotó en internet, trataré de no dar grandes spoiler con la trama) con el comprador final, de haber tenido otro final, pudo haberse creado otra guerra o alguna dictadura, y lo del dinero no fue más que parte de su plan para que así no conocieran su identidad.

    Mucha gente está a favor de Light porque a diferencia de Thanos, él no mató a personas inocentes (o por lo menos al principio no quería hacerlo) sino solo a criminales que eran un peligro para la sociedad. Entiendo que esto sería bueno de alguna forma, pero tengo dos problemas con eso: el primero es el hambre de poder hace que este objetivo “altruista” que tiene se vea en segundo plano siendo más importante para Light el ser una especie de Dios. El segundo problema es que él no estaba al tanto de lo que la policía pudiese hacer con la información que tenía la gente que mataba: “matar desesperadamente a una cucaracha ¿no es mejor planear cuidadosamente como matar a toda una epidemia?”.

    Particularmente, aunque me gusta la idea original de Light, no tendría la mente fría para poder matar a alguien con algo tan simple como escribir su nombre y pensar en su cara, por eso siento que hubiese hecho lo que hizo Minoru. A pesar de ser un concepto completamente ficticio, tener una Death Note es tan increíble como tentador, y tener dos perspectivas diferentes a cómo se podría usar es algo muy bueno para que así, después de diez años, vuelva el debate de lo que está bien y está mal en cuanto al homicidio y jugar con la vida de las personas.

    Consider to follow our curation trail on steemauto We thanks all the support.

    Sin título-2.png

    To all of you artists out here at Steemit! If you ever are lost please join Bokura No Digital World at our discord chat

    Good-Karma

    Qurator

    All Rights Reserved - @Takeru255

    Permalink·Open on PeakD ↗·Linked from existing Hive post
  4. Death Note (2017 film) : It was entertaining but upsetting for fans@gooddream2741d

    This was always going to get attacked by fans of the manga and anime. It should come as no surprise that Hollywood would take a beloved story (although beloved by a relatively small segments of society) and then change it up. It was always going to induce groans from long-time fans the same way that anytime a Korean thriller is remade in the USA they manage to screw that up for fans also. It is unavoidable . Anyway, despite that, the movie is entertaining for people that are not super dedicated to the real story.

    maxresdefault.jpg source

    Let's just get this straight: I am not a Death Note expert. I have only seen this 2017 film and one other one, both of which I enjoyed. I do not like it when Hollywood changes movies to appeal to their audience, but from a financial point of view I completely understand why they do it. Unfortunately for a lot of these things the bottom line is all about money.

    death-note-1017440.png source

    For those of you unfamiliar with the story, a high-school "loner" has a book drop out of the sky near him and contained inside are a group of rules dictating how the book can be used. Any name that is written in the book will result in that person's death. There are a bunch of other rules and some of them are explained as the film proceeds.

    Given the setting in a high-school. It should come as no surprise that a teenage romance gets kind of forced into the story. I mean, that kind of has to happen in these USA films right?

    the-forced-romance-between-light-and-mia-1535720850.jpg source

    This is one thing that angered fanbois because this forced romance isn't necessary to the story and well, for me anyway, it just made the film seem "typical." The movie was too gory to be aimed at the lucrative pre-teen audience but the teenage romance needs to be in here? Why?

    Now I am not going to jump on the bandwagon and say that "this movie was crap because it didn't follow the manga / anime/ japanese story! etc. For one thing I am not familiar enough with any of that to have an opinion. This movie is getting ripped to shreds in popular online rating sites and it isn't very difficult to understand why. If you step on the toes of something really popular with people who also tend to be more online oriented (like Anime) you invite their wrath in the online arena. Netflix was never going to be able to make this in a way that would satisfy long-time fans of Death Note but for me, who bases his opinions almost entirely upon raw entertainment value I say this film is MUCH better than what the Tomatoes and IMDB scores indicate (which are between 20 and 40 percent.)

    For a "novice" like me, i found the story compelling, most of the characters interesting and the acting to be quite well done. This movie is being called a "failure" by fans but these people are basing this on the RT scores as a metric of success, which it is not. Netflix has already announced a part 2 of the series and that isn't normally something that gets done with "failures."

    I agree and disagree with the fanbois on this one and it is reflected in my overall score. The movie isn't perfect, but I really enjoyed it. I think that if someone is being honest and not being so dedicated to the specifics of the original story (and let's be honest, not many people are familiar with it in the grand scheme of things) they can say that this film is pretty good.

    7.5 / 10

    Permalink·Open on PeakD ↗·Linked from existing Hive post
  5. Review Film: DEATH NOTE (2017)@film-trail2996d


    Adaptation is not obliged to be completely faithful to the source material. Changes as a personal interpretation or adjustment regarding legitimate cultural differences, even need to be done. It produces uniqueness in adaptation, may also lead to a new point of view. The condition, change must be reasonable and does not betray the essence of the original version. Because it is a fan of the Death Note manga (at least the first half), I do not mind when this live-action adaptation promises a difference, such as the transfer of settings from Japan to America so that the ranks of the cast changed the race (I do not believe in any race-washing). The problem is, director Adam Wingard (Blair Witch, You 're Next, The Guest) and the team refuse to honour Tsugumi Ohba and Takeshi Obata' s phenomenal work.

    The manuscripts by Charles Parlapanides, Vlas Parlapanides, and Jeremy Slater try to bring his story closer to the American share by emphasizing the moral ambiguity of the teen angst theme rather than the two-sided tactics that represent the good. Light Action (Turner, not Yagami, played by Nat Wolff) writes the name of the criminal in the Death Note giving Ryuk shinigami (Jason Liles behind the costume, Willem Dafoe fills the voice and mo-cap for expression) though underlying beliefs will improve the world, tend to be driven by teenage anger rather than a deep calculation. Light is like many teenagers, wanting to burst into the midst of incompetence. In short, the film wants to make its character more relatable, Wingard's unfolded Death Note comes as a product of a powerless state struck by a variety of unfairness issues, where dreams and hopes get blurred. It is natural that Light Yagami's superiority is seen less closely. Light Turner characterization whose actions are triggered human desire, including the steal of the heart of a popular girl named Mia Sutton (Margaret Qualley) can be accepted. The journey at the beginning was also promising, when Wingard refused to exchange small talk, immediately brought Light to a series of murders that in addition to moving fast, packed brutal-style Final Destination series. This is an acceptable new interpretation and entertaining teen gory horror ..... until it's not.

    Just make Light a normal teenager. But instead of balancing the intelligence with the randomness of teenagers to impress humanists, Light is totally stupid, with no less stupid plan. If Light wants to act without thinking, what is the need to inculcate the fact that he is smart? Beyond the third act, signs of cleverness are found. A similar case struck L (Lakeith Stanfield), the number one (but allegedly) detective but it was difficult to control his emotions when he was defeated. Inconsistent. And Teen angst turmoil does not mean always controlled emotions and then eliminate intelligence. In addition, the characterization of both does not just change but tarnished the essence of the source material. Whatever the modifications, Light is a representation of truth enforcement on the extreme path, while L is on a straight path. That is the trigger of both friction, and for the conflict to be convincing, they must be smart.

    It gets worse when the Death Note fails to summarize its intense source of intrigue. Seen from the impression of hastily rolling the story, especially the birth process of a revered figure Kira. The manuscript gets stuck in a dilemma, between releasing or following the source. Ryuk for example. Eliminating it would provoke controversy, but the writers also did not know what to do, ending up eliminating the Light-Ryuk dynamics that also wasted Dafoe's gripping voice. Light and L interactions are also cleared out, raising questions about the need for their battle set-ups if the ends are not exactly an interesting one. Without the exciting dynamics, in addition to the gore and Wingard styles that rely on the stylish visual as well as electronic music, Death Note leaves a tedious void.

    The cries of laugh Nat Wolff when Light first met Ryuk difficult to like his character. It was not Wolff's fault at all, because of Wingard's decision to insert a black comedy creator of atmosphere inconsistency. While Stanfield's performance reflects the acute confusion of this film about addressing the original material. Stanfield demonstrates the eccentric gesture characteristic of L, but its overall characterization is not as unique as the outer cover. Besides Dafoe, fortunately, Margaret Qualley is interesting to be listened to. Thanks to her, the figure of Mia keeps a veil of mystery, one thing that the film failed to give. Borrowing a statement that our society is fond of wearing, this film is a blasphemy for the legacy of the Death Note. 


    RATING (4/10)


    Don't forget, give your feedback in the comment section



    Image Source


    Adaptation is not obliged to be completely faithful to the source material. Changes as a personal interpretation or adjustment regarding legitimate cultural differences, even need to be done. It produces uniqueness in adaptation, may also lead to a new point of view. The condition, change must be reasonable and does not betray the essence of the original version. Because it is a fan of the Death Note manga (at least the first half), I do not mind when this live-action adaptation promises a difference, such as the transfer of settings from Japan to America so that the ranks of the cast changed the race (I do not believe in any race-washing). The problem is, director Adam Wingard (Blair Witch, You 're Next, The Guest) and the team refuse to honour Tsugumi Ohba and Takeshi Obata' s phenomenal work.

    The manuscripts by Charles Parlapanides, Vlas Parlapanides, and Jeremy Slater try to bring his story closer to the American share by emphasizing the moral ambiguity of the teen angst theme rather than the two-sided tactics that represent the good. Light Action (Turner, not Yagami, played by Nat Wolff) writes the name of the criminal in the Death Note giving Ryuk shinigami (Jason Liles behind the costume, Willem Dafoe fills the voice and mo-cap for expression) though underlying beliefs will improve the world, tend to be driven by teenage anger rather than a deep calculation. Light is like many teenagers, wanting to burst into the midst of incompetence. In short, the film wants to make its character more relatable, Wingard's unfolded Death Note comes as a product of a powerless state struck by a variety of unfairness issues, where dreams and hopes get blurred. It is natural that Light Yagami's superiority is seen less closely. Light Turner characterization whose actions are triggered human desire, including the steal of the heart of a popular girl named Mia Sutton (Margaret Qualley) can be accepted. The journey at the beginning was also promising, when Wingard refused to exchange small talk, immediately brought Light to a series of murders that in addition to moving fast, packed brutal-style Final Destination series. This is an acceptable new interpretation and entertaining teen gory horror ..... until it's not.

    Just make Light a normal teenager. But instead of balancing the intelligence with the randomness of teenagers to impress humanists, Light is totally stupid, with no less stupid plan. If Light wants to act without thinking, what is the need to inculcate the fact that he is smart? Beyond the third act, signs of cleverness are found. A similar case struck L (Lakeith Stanfield), the number one (but allegedly) detective but it was difficult to control his emotions when he was defeated. Inconsistent. And Teen angst turmoil does not mean always controlled emotions and then eliminate intelligence. In addition, the characterization of both does not just change but tarnished the essence of the source material. Whatever the modifications, Light is a representation of truth enforcement on the extreme path, while L is on a straight path. That is the trigger of both friction, and for the conflict to be convincing, they must be smart.

    It gets worse when the Death Note fails to summarize its intense source of intrigue. Seen from the impression of hastily rolling the story, especially the birth process of a revered figure Kira. The manuscript gets stuck in a dilemma, between releasing or following the source. Ryuk for example. Eliminating it would provoke controversy, but the writers also did not know what to do, ending up eliminating the Light-Ryuk dynamics that also wasted Dafoe's gripping voice. Light and L interactions are also cleared out, raising questions about the need for their battle set-ups if the ends are not exactly an interesting one. Without the exciting dynamics, in addition to the gore and Wingard styles that rely on the stylish visual as well as electronic music, Death Note leaves a tedious void.

    The cries of laugh Nat Wolff when Light first met Ryuk difficult to like his character. It was not Wolff's fault at all, because of Wingard's decision to insert a black comedy creator of atmosphere inconsistency. While Stanfield's performance reflects the acute confusion of this film about addressing the original material. Stanfield demonstrates the eccentric gesture characteristic of L, but its overall characterization is not as unique as the outer cover. Besides Dafoe, fortunately, Margaret Qualley is interesting to be listened to. Thanks to her, the figure of Mia keeps a veil of mystery, one thing that the film failed to give. Borrowing a statement that our society is fond of wearing, this film is a blasphemy for the legacy of the Death Note. 


    RATING (4/10)


    Don't forget, give your feedback in the comment section



    Image Source

    Permalink·Open on PeakD ↗·Linked from existing Hive post
  6. Netflix's 'Death Note' Review: A film that ends before it really begins@namiks3229d

    Death Note.jpg

    I loosely followed the controversy that followed the announcement of Netflix's film adaptation of Tsugumi Ohba and Takeshi Obata's 'Death Note' manga. Calls of whitewashing, as well as general negativity surrounding its very existence were the most people had to say.

    These days, I'm forever sceptical of film adaptations that come from either videogame or anime/manga source material. I don't think every film will be terrible, I believe that eventually someone will come along and fully understand the best ways to combine the source material in a way that fits a one hour and forty minute-long production.

    Netflix's Death Note successfully distances itself from the plethora of other failed live-action attempts, and I'd be lying if I said there were tons of things wrong with the film that made me enjoy it less than I could have. Primarily, everything wrong with Death Note can be summed up in the following: Netflix's Death Note feels like two hours of various live-action events within in the source material, but condensed in such a way that it feels like a trailer for an upcoming show. And honestly, a show would have been a much, much stronger approach to bringing Death Note to the west in a live-action form.

    I believe director Adam Wingard did his absolute best, and his vision of Death Note being in a slightly cyberpunk world certainly fits, it's just a shame that its story feels so rushed with poor use of exposition to explain particular things that needed far more explaining. Performances are another positive of the film: I can't say any performance was done poorly given the little screen time everyone actually had; generally, it was too hard to really understand character intentions and there was no real cat-and-mouse investigative approach following character L and protagonist Light. But once again, the performances weren't awful.

    If you're a fan of the anime/manga, I think you will be quite disappointed in the lack of depth in Netflix's Death Note, but it's still very much worthy of watching. Overall, it isn't a bad film, it just doesn't fully grasp what made its source material so popular in the first place.

    Permalink·Open on PeakD ↗·Linked from existing Hive post